Writing about Structural Equation Models

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Writing up results from Structural Equation Models
Advertisements

Chapter 18: The Chi-Square Statistic
Multilevel analysis with EQS. Castello2004 Data is datamlevel.xls, datamlevel.sav, datamlevel.ess.
1 Regression as Moment Structure. 2 Regression Equation Y =  X + v Observable Variables Y z = X Moment matrix  YY  YX  =  YX  XX Moment structure.
Structural Equation Modeling. What is SEM Swiss Army Knife of Statistics Can replicate virtually any model from “canned” stats packages (some limitations.
StatisticalDesign&ModelsValidation. Introduction.
Structural Equation Modeling Using Mplus Chongming Yang Research Support Center FHSS College.
Structural Equation Modeling
Structural Equation Modeling
Structural Equation Modeling: An Overview P. Paxton.
SOC 681 James G. Anderson, PhD
Multivariate Data Analysis Chapter 11 - Structural Equation Modeling.
Regression and Correlation
“Ghost Chasing”: Demystifying Latent Variables and SEM
G Lecture 51 Estimation details Testing Fit Fit indices Arguing for models.
LECTURE 16 STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING.
Factor Analysis Ulf H. Olsson Professor of Statistics.
The General (LISREL) SEM model Ulf H. Olsson Professor of statistics.
G Lect 31 G Lecture 3 SEM Model notation Review of mediation Estimating SEM models Moderation.
Multiple Sample Models James G. Anderson, Ph.D. Purdue University.
Confirmatory factor analysis
This Week: Testing relationships between two metric variables: Correlation Testing relationships between two nominal variables: Chi-Squared.
Structural Equation Modeling 3 Psy 524 Andrew Ainsworth.
Moderation in Structural Equation Modeling: Specification, Estimation, and Interpretation Using Quadratic Structural Equations Jeffrey R. Edwards University.
Issues in structural equation modeling Hans Baumgartner Penn State University.
Confirmatory Factor Analysis Psych 818 DeShon. Purpose ● Takes factor analysis a few steps further. ● Impose theoretically interesting constraints on.
CJT 765: Structural Equation Modeling Class 7: fitting a model, fit indices, comparingmodels, statistical power.
Educational Research: Competencies for Analysis and Application, 9 th edition. Gay, Mills, & Airasian © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
CJT 765: Structural Equation Modeling Class 8: Confirmatory Factory Analysis.
Measurement Models: Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis James G. Anderson, Ph.D. Purdue University.
Chapter 9 Introduction to the t Statistic. 9.1 Review Hypothesis Testing with z-Scores Sample mean (M) estimates (& approximates) population mean (μ)
Assessing Hypothesis Testing Fit Indices
ANOVA: Analysis of Variance.
CHI SQUARE TESTS.
Advanced Statistics Factor Analysis, II. Last lecture 1. What causes what, ξ → Xs, Xs→ ξ ? 2. Do we explore the relation of Xs to ξs, or do we test (try.
Latent Growth Modeling Byrne Chapter 11. Latent Growth Modeling Measuring change over repeated time measurements – Gives you more information than a repeated.
Measurement Models: Identification and Estimation James G. Anderson, Ph.D. Purdue University.
CFA: Basics Beaujean Chapter 3. Other readings Kline 9 – a good reference, but lumps this entire section into one chapter.
Examining Relationships in Quantitative Research
G Lecture 3 Review of mediation Moderation SEM Model notation
Chapter 13 Repeated-Measures and Two-Factor Analysis of Variance
Assessing Hypothesis Testing Fit Indices Kline Chapter 8 (Stop at 210) Byrne page
Correlation & Regression Analysis
CJT 765: Structural Equation Modeling Class 8: Confirmatory Factory Analysis.
SEM Model Fit: Introduction David A. Kenny January 12, 2014.
Structural Equation Modeling Mgmt 291 Lecture 3 – CFA and Hybrid Models Oct. 12, 2009.
Examples. Path Model 1 Simple mediation model. Much of the influence of Family Background (SES) is indirect.
ALISON BOWLING CONFIRMATORY FACTOR ANALYSIS. REVIEW OF EFA Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) Explores the data All measured variables are related to every.
The general structural equation model with latent variates Hans Baumgartner Penn State University.
Chapter 17 STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING. Structural Equation Modeling (SEM)  Relatively new statistical technique used to test theoretical or causal.
NURS 306, Nursing Research Lisa Broughton, MSN, RN, CCRN RESEARCH STATISTICS.
The SweSAT Vocabulary (word): understanding of words and concepts. Data Sufficiency (ds): numerical reasoning ability. Reading Comprehension (read): Swedish.
Methods of Presenting and Interpreting Information Class 9.
I. ANOVA revisited & reviewed
Advanced Statistical Methods: Continuous Variables
Structural Equation Modeling using MPlus
Chapter 15 Confirmatory Factor Analysis
Basic Estimation Techniques
CJT 765: Structural Equation Modeling
Basic Estimation Techniques
LEARNING OUTCOMES After studying this chapter, you should be able to
Structural Equation Modeling
Product moment correlation
Confirmatory Factor Analysis
Advisor: Ming-Puu Chen
Chapter 18: The Chi-Square Statistic
James G. Anderson, Ph.D. Purdue University
Causal Relationships with measurement error in the data
3 basic analytical tasks in bivariate (or multivariate) analyses:
Testing Causal Hypotheses
Presentation transcript:

Writing about Structural Equation Models R.H. Hoyle Abigail T. Panter

The Conceptual Model Introduce model with a diagram. Provide a written explanation in the text for each relation or path.

The Statistical Model Include a path diagram. Describe the statistical model in the Methods section.

Details about the Data Include a correlation matrix with standard deviations of the variables. Explain any assumptions about measurement levels of the raw data. Provide information about the distributions of the individual variables and the multivariate distribution. Include statistics on univariate kurtosis and multivariate normality.

Describing the Results Report results from ML estimation. If necessary report results of alternative estimation procedures. Include the Indicators of Fit recommended in Table 9.1.

Recommended Indexes of Overall Model Fit Stand-Alone/Absolute Indexes Reference Description Chi-Square Scaled Chi-square Bollen (1989b) Sattora & Bentler (1994) Statistical test of the lack of fit resulting from overidentifying restrictions placed on a model Goodness-of-fit index Joreskog & Sorbom (1981) Indexes the relative amount of the observed variances and covariances accounted for by a model Analogous to R2

Recommended Indexes of Overall Model Fit Type-2 Indexes Reference Description Tucker-Lewis Index (TLI)/Nonnormed Fit Index (NNFI) Bentler & Bonett (1980) Tucker & Lewis (1973) Compares the lack of fit of a target model to the lack of fit of a baseline model, usually the independence model. Value estimates the relative improvement per df of the target model over a baseline model. Not recommended for very small samples (<150) or with GLS estimation.

Recommended Indexes of Overall Model Fit Type 2 Indexes Reference Description Incremental fit index (IFI) Bollen (1989a) Same interpretation as TLI/NNFI. Less variable than TLI/NNFI in small samples and more consistent across estimators than TLI/NNFI.

Recommended Indexes of Overall Model Fit Type-3 Indexes Reference Description Comparative fit index (CFI) Bentler (1989, 1990) Indexes the relative reduction in lack of fit as estimated by the noncentral chi square of a target model versus a baseline model. Varies between 0 and 1. Fit index (FI)/Relative noncentrality index (RNI) McDonald & Marsh (1990) Equivalent to CFI but can exceed 1 and 1 because of sampling error or over-fitting.

Parameter Estimates Provide all parameter estimates, error variances, and variances of latent variables. Include standard error of estimates, critical ratios and p-values. Indicate parameters fixed at specific values.

Alternative Models The strongest SEM analysis compares competing theoretical models. Include substantive reasons for post-hoc modifications. Report any equivalent models. If possible, cross-validate the final model.

Interpretation Directionality is established by logic, manipulation, or strong theoretical arguments. Associations in SEMs are necessary but not sufficient evidence of causal relations. Include additional limitations regarding the interpretation of the SEM results in the discussion.

Reference R.H. Hoyle and A. T. Panter, “Writing about Structural Equation models,” In: R. H. Hoyle (ed.), Structural Equation Modeling; Concepts, Issues and Applications. Sage Publications, 1995, pp. 158-176.