P17 SDC* Working Group Meeting 2 *Seismic Design Category

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Western Electricity Coordinating Council Market Interface Committee Report to the WECC Board of Directors December 6-7, 2007 Robert D. Schwermann MIC Chair.
Advertisements

05 July 2007Cologne NPA WG66.009: Type and Group Ratings Juan Anton.
Embrace the Elephant A few provocative questions….
CIPA Update. FOR SCHOOLS – By July 1, 2012, amend your existing Internet safety policy (if you have not already done so) to provide for the education.
Keck Telescope Seismic Upgrade Design Support - Progress Report Frank Kan Andrew Sarawit 4 May 2011 (Revised 5 May 2011)
© Simpson Gumpertz & Heger Inc. 1 Development of Performance-based Seismic Design Standards & Criteria Ronald O. Hamburger, SE, SECB Senior.
3 Dec 2003Market Operations Standing Committee1 Market Rule and Change Management Consultation Process John MacKenzie / Darren Finkbeiner / Ella Kokotsis,
Challenges in Urban Meteorology: A Forum for Users and Providers OFCM Panel Summaries Bob Dumont Senior Staff Meteorologist OFCM.
National Energy Technology Laboratory U. S. Department of Energy Project Kickoff Presentation December 16, 2003 Ken H. Green Principal Investigator Development.
Updating the Guidelines for the Seismic Design of Highway Bridges Status update for the Mid-America Ground Motion Workshop February 2003.
Major Ongoing Ground Motion Research Programs at PEER Yousef Bozorgnia, Ph.D., P.E. PEER, University of California, Berkeley.
Amendments to Orange County Code Chapter 9 (Building & Construction Regulations) Orange County BCC June 16, 2015.
Introducing A New Process For Reporting Financial Data to DPI A Revised Format For The PI-1505 AC.
Ratemaking Research Working Party Stewart Gleason, Ph.D., ACAS, ASA, MAAA CAS Research Initiatives Coordinator Senior Vice President Guy Carpenter & Company,
Planning your Project Managing your 333T project is like managing any professional project.
Amendments to Chapter 9 (Building & Construction Regulations) Orange County Board of County Commissioners Division of Building Safety March 6,2012.
Translating the 2009 Provisions into ASCE 7-10: Ground Motions Maps
EERI Seminar on Next Generation Attenuation Models Development of Corresponding Building Code “Design” Maps Nicolas Luco Research Structural Engineer USGS.
The Role of Building Codes in Delivering Seismic Performance John Hooper Director of Earthquake Engineering Magnusson Klemencic Associates.
NGA Project Review and Status Norm Abrahamson NGA Workshop #5 March, 2004.
ECHO, European Commission, Brussels 20 Jan 2016 KnowRISK project Kick off meeting for the selected projects under the 2015 Call for proposals for prevention.
Airdrie Land Use Bylaw Presentation to City Council May 2, 2016.
Slide 1 Material Handling Equipment Selection  2000 Rahul S. Deshpande Material Handling Equipment Selection.
ПОРТФОЛИО профессиональной деятельности Белово 2015 Таюшовой Натальи Борисовны Преподавателя дисциплин «Химия», «Биология»
EERI Seminar on Next Generation Attenuation Models Updates to Maps for the 2015 NEHRP Recommended Seismic Provisions Building Seismic Safety Council (BSSC)
Bow Basin Watershed Management Plan Revised Terms of Reference
A consolidated review of multiple analyses using JMP Clinical
Peter Varhol Solutions Evangelist
Involvement of industry Philippe GARDERET Chairman of FIIF Management Board FIIF (Fusion Industry Innovation Forum) Garching, april 14th,
Growth Management Amendments Land Use & Transportation
SOLVING PROBLEMS ANALYTICALLY AND CREATIVELY
Webinar on the Exposure Draft of CAS Continuing Education Policy
Mendocino County’s Cannabis Programs
Structure of the Code – Phase 1
Project 17 Report to Provisions Update Committee April 12, 2017
CSC 221: Computer Programming I Spring 2010
Can Statistical monitoring really improve data integrity?
CSC 221: Computer Programming I Fall 2005
NGA-East Tentative Plan
Wrap-up and future activities Roberto Barbera (roberto.
Review of Part C Phase 2 - Applicability
NURSING Informatics for senior nurses
Cost of Service Analysis & Rate Design
Structure of the Code – Phases 1 and 2
Short Term Rentals City Council Briefing February 20, 2018
NFEC Forum Spring 2018 Pearson update
The Q Improvement Lab August 2017.
How do you define a problem so that it can be effectively communicated and yield the best possible solution?
CHAPTER 4 PROPOSAL.
CHAPTER 4 PROPOSAL.
The activity of Art. 29. Working Party György Halmos
PERSONALIZE YOUR CANTOR EXPERIENCE
Presentation on the Mine Health and Safety Amendment Bill
Facilities Planning and Design Course code:
Jim Gaa, Chair, Part C Task Force IESBA Meeting New York July 8, 2014
Topical Paper Presentation #07
European Central Bank – DG Statistics
Nonclinical Topics WG Overview Working Group Co-leads
Fiscal Sustainability Task Force
Notes on the Intensity Measure Breakout Session - PEER Annual Meeting - Jan. 17, 2002   ·   Testbeds will not provide definitive answers as to the best.
PN UNC AMR Topic Workgroup Meeting 14 – Meter Reading
Informal document GRSG Rev.1
National Environmental Management: Air Quality Amendment Bill, 2013
Non-Assurance Services
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
San Francisco Bay Water Board
Shareholders Rights Directive II SMPG Task Force Progress Status
Fundamental Science Practices (FSP) of the U.S. Geological Survey
Presentation transcript:

P17 SDC* Working Group Meeting 2 *Seismic Design Category W.G. P17 SDC* Working Group Meeting 2 *Seismic Design Category Julie C. Furr, PE, SECB Senior Engineer CSA Engineering, Inc. Chair P17 SDC Working Group

Outline Welcome Related Groups – Topic Summary W.G. Outline Welcome Related Groups – Topic Summary P17 SDC Fundamental Task – Review Revise SDC Definition? Redefine SDC Parameters? Open Discussion

Schedule Project 17 to be Complete December 31, 2017 W.G. Next Meeting: November 29, 2016 3 Meetings in 2017 SDC Working Group Initial Meeting: August 10, 2016 Meeting 2: November 4, 2016 Meeting 3: December 2017 (proposed) Does the group prefer multiple short meetings or a face to face meeting before november? Expenses, productivity?

Related Groups – Topic Summary W.G. Related Groups – Topic Summary PUC IT-01 (Pekelnicky) Seismic Performance Structures Non-Structures Map fluctuations Accuracy and Precision Working Group (Dolan) Accuracy of mapped values and fluctuations Precision of reporting Very broadly stated, P17 has discussed the issues… So, we’re looking at the other side of the equation…

P17 SDC Fundamental Task-Review W.G. P17 SDC Fundamental Task-Review P17 Discussions Issues: Mapped ground motions fluctuate too much and reported accuracy on USGS web tool is misleading. Solutions? Can engineering community disregard USGS changes within a predefined margin (stated margin of error)? Can ground motion fluctuations be flattened in some way? Round off reported accelerations to predefined accuracy? Most proposed solutions directed to the science and reporting of mapped values. Working Group Creation Alternate approach: Hold discussions to change how seismic design categories are designated. Proposed approach directed to the engineering application without constraining the science. Very broadly stated, P17 has discussed the issues… So, we’re looking at the other side of the equation…

P17 SDC Fundamental Task-Review W.G. P17 SDC Fundamental Task-Review Initial Task Highlights… Define how Seismic Design Categories are decoupled from ground accelerations. Broadly consider impacts on material standards and practical implementation. What SDC boundary/definition would be most palatable (and therefore sellable) to adopting and enforcing jurisdictions? Currently based on Sds/Sd1 as listed in Tables 11.6-1 and 11.6-2 in ASCE 7 Material standards: if we develop a perfect solution but it upends the ACI provisions, do we really want to go there? Politics: we can develop a perfect solution to address science and engineering, but useless if governing jurisdictions amend standards to change=> latest AR amendment

P17 SDC Fundamental Task-Review Meeting 2 W.G. P17 SDC Fundamental Task-Review Meeting 2 P17 Discussions Issues: Mapped ground motions fluctuate too much and reported accuracy on USGS web tool is misleading. Detailing requirements across the board are based on SDC. Very broadly stated, P17 has discussed the issues… So, we’re looking at the other side of the equation…

P17 SDC Fundamental Task-Review Meeting 2 W.G. P17 SDC Fundamental Task-Review Meeting 2 Revise SDC Definition? Fundamentally based on ground motion intensity correlated to PGA and PGV Alternate means of defining hazard? General Correlation MMI V SDC A - No real damage MMI VI SDC B - Light nonstructural damage MMI VII SDC C - Hazardous nonstructural damage MMI VIII SDC D - Hazardous damage to susceptible structures MMI IX SDC E - Hazardous damage to robust structures Very broadly stated, P17 has discussed the issues… So, we’re looking at the other side of the equation…

P17 SDC Fundamental Task-Review Meeting 2 W.G. P17 SDC Fundamental Task-Review Meeting 2 Redefine SDC Parameters? SDC is currently determined based on site class, building occupancy and importance, and MCE accelerations. Actual ground motion will vary only with site class. Building occupancy and importance has no impact on ground motion. Very broadly stated, P17 has discussed the issues… So, we’re looking at the other side of the equation…

W.G. Open Discussion SDC’s must be defined in a way that will facilitate use and encourage adoption of codes without significantly increasing code complexity or fanning jurisdiction resentment already in existence, while still maintaining life safety. have sugg approaches already emailed in but wanted to get your ideas without influence first. Will send them out with meeting summary