Transmit processing: a viable scheme for MIMO-OFDM in n

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
GSC: Standardization Advancing Global Communications Evolution of TD-SCDMA China Communications Standards Association (CCSA) Chicago, May 29th to 2nd June,
Advertisements

DESIGN OF A SPECIFIC CDMA SYSTEM FOR AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL APPLICATIONS UNIVERSIDAD DE LAS PALMAS DE GRAN CANARIA UNIVERSIDAD POLITÉCNICA DE MADRID.
ECSE 6592 Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Networks Spatial Diversity in Wireless Networks Hsin-Yi Shen Nov 3, 2005.
Multi-carrier CDMA. Outline Introduction System Model Types Applications References.
Doc.: IEEE /792r1 Submission Slide 1 André Bourdoux (IMEC) July 2004 Transmit processing: a viable scheme for MIMO-OFDM in n André Bourdoux.
A Framework for MIMO Operation over mmWave Links
1 PIANO+ OTONES WP3 SIGNAL PROCESSING ALGORITHMS.
VSMC MIMO: A Spectral Efficient Scheme for Cooperative Relay in Cognitive Radio Networks 1.
MIMO Communication Systems
Doc.: IEEE /794r1 Submission Slide 1 André Bourdoux (IMEC) July 2004 Preambles for MIMO channel estimation André Bourdoux Bart Van Poucke Liesbet.
Comparison of different MIMO-OFDM signal detectors for LTE
EE359 – Lecture 16 Outline MIMO Beamforming MIMO Diversity/Multiplexing Tradeoffs MIMO Receiver Design Maximum-Likelihood, Decision Feedback, Sphere Decoder.
10 th MCM - Novi Sad, March 2006 Joaquim Bastos ( ) 1 The information in this document is provided as is and no guarantee or warranty.
APPLICATION OF SPACE-TIME CODING TECHNIQUES IN THIRD GENERATION SYSTEMS - A. G. BURR ADAPTIVE SPACE-TIME SIGNAL PROCESSING AND CODING – A. G. BURR.
12- OFDM with Multiple Antennas. Multiple Antenna Systems (MIMO) TX RX Transmit Antennas Receive Antennas Different paths Two cases: 1.Array Gain: if.
February 26, 2004Slide 1 Little Wireless and Smart Antennas Little Wireless and Smart Antennas Jack H. Winters 2/26/04.
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/0844r0 Slide 1 Non-linear Multiuser MIMO for next generation WLAN Date: Authors: Shoichi Kitazawa, ATR.
MIMO Multiple Input Multiple Output Communications © Omar Ahmad
MULTIPLE INPUT MULTIPLE OUTPUT SYSTEMS (MIMO)
Improvements in throughput in n The design goal of the n is “HT” for High Throughput. The throughput is high indeed: up to 600 Mbps in raw.
1 PROPAGATION ASPECTS FOR SMART ANTENNAS IN WIRELESS SYSTEMS JACK H. WINTERS AT&T Labs - Research Red Bank, NJ July 17,
8: MIMO II: Capacity and Multiplexing Architectures Fundamentals of Wireless Communication, Tse&Viswanath 1 8. MIMO II: Capacity and Multiplexing Architectures.
Ali Al-Saihati ID# Ghassan Linjawi
1 SMART ANTENNAS FOR TDMA Jack H. Winters AT&T Labs - Research Red Bank, NJ September 7, 2000.
Space Time Codes. 2 Attenuation in Wireless Channels Path loss: Signals attenuate due to distance Shadowing loss : absorption of radio waves by scattering.
1 SMART ANTENNAS FOR THIRD GENERATION TDMA (EDGE) Jack H. Winters AT&T Labs - Research Red Bank, NJ July 17, 2000.
EE359 – Lecture 15 Outline Announcements: HW posted, due Friday MT exam grading done; l Can pick up from Julia or during TA discussion section tomorrow.
1 SMART ANTENNAS FOR THIRD GENERATION TDMA (EDGE) Jack H. Winters AT&T Labs - Research Red Bank, NJ March 22, 2000.
MIMO: Challenges and Opportunities Lili Qiu UT Austin New Directions for Mobile System Design Mini-Workshop.
Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles Second level Third level Fourth level Fifth level Wednesday, December 3, 2003Slide 1.
Data and Computer Communications Tenth Edition by William Stallings Data and Computer Communications, Tenth Edition by William Stallings, (c) Pearson Education.
Doc.: IEEE /229r1 Submission March 2004 Alexandre Ribeiro Dias - Motorola LabsSlide 1 Multiple Antenna OFDM solutions for enhanced PHY Presented.
Multiple Antennas.
 First generation systems utilized frequency axis to separate users into different channels  Second generation systems added time axis to increase number.
Doc.: IEEE /0632r1 Submission May 2016 Intel CorporationSlide 1 Performance Analysis of Robust Transmission Modes for MIMO in 11ay Date:
A REVIEW: PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF MIMO-WiMAX AKANKSHA SHARMA, LAVISH KANSAL PRESENTED BY:- AKANKSHA SHARMA Lovely Professional University.
Technology training (Session 6)
EE359 – Lecture 16 Outline ISI Countermeasures Multicarrier Modulation
EE359 – Lecture 14 Outline Practical Issues in Adaptive Modulation
244-6: Higher Generation Wireless Techniques and Networks
Multiple Antennas: Performance Gains with Channel Measurements
WiMAX 1EEE Protocol Stack
DESIGN OF A SPECIFIC CDMA SYSTEM FOR AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL APPLICATIONS
Full-duplex Technology for HEW
September 2004 doc.: IEEE n September 2004
Antennas Topologies Directly connecting two duplexers together can affect each other’s filter characteristic, thereby losing the isolation that is needed.
An Overview of ax Greg Kamer – Consulting Systems Engineer.
MIMO III: Channel Capacity, Interference Alignment
Distributed MIMO Patrick Maechler April 2, 2008.
Wednesday, November 07, 2018 Little Wireless and Smart Antennas Jack H. Winters 2/26/04.
MIMO II: Physical Channel Modeling, Spatial Multiplexing
Wireless Communication Co-operative Communications
Wednesday, November 21, 2018 Little Wireless and Smart Antennas Jack H. Winters 2/26/04.
Towards IEEE HDR in the Enterprise
6-10GHz Rate-Range and Link Budget
Wireless Communication Co-operative Communications
MIMO-OFDM for High-Speed WLANs
ETRI Proposal to IEEE TGn
Multi-band Modulation, Coding, and Medium Access Control
Multiple Antennas: Performance Gains with Channel Measurements
Optimal Combining of STBC and Spatial Multiplexing for MIMO-OFDM
Preambles for MIMO channel estimation
MIMO (Multiple Input Multiple Output)
Joint Coding and Modulation Diversity for ac
Multiple Antenna OFDM solutions for enhanced PHY
Strawmodel ac Specification Framework
Turbo-equalization for n/ac
MIMO I: Spatial Diversity
MIMO II: Physical Channel Modeling, Spatial Multiplexing
Implicit Channel Sounding in IEEE (Feasibility Study)
Presentation transcript:

Transmit processing: a viable scheme for MIMO-OFDM in 802.11n André Bourdoux Bart Van Poucke Liesbet Van der Perre IMEC, Wireless Research bourdoux@imec.be

Need for 4G High-Speed WLANs 5 m 1 Mbps 10 Mbps 100 Mbps 1 Gbps Maximum Data rate 100 kbps 50 m 500 m Range 1G WLAN 802.11 1-2 Mbps 3G WLAN 802.11a/g 6-54 Mbps 4G WLAN 802.11n > 100 Mbps 2G WLAN 802.11b 5.5-11 Mbps IEEE802.11n calls for 100 Mbps at the MAC SAP in a 20 MHz band MIMO is seen as a ley technology to meet this requirement MIMO techniques can result in rate increase and/or range increase Higher data rates Larger range More users

MIMO-OFDM boosts performances in frequency selective environments Higher capacity SDM, SDMA MIMO offers: Higher robustness Diversity (MRC, STBC) Frequency Magnitude The MIMO advantages: - Multiplexing (either SDM or SDMA) allows dramatic increase in capacity. Multiple antennas are needed at both ends of the link. Theoretical capacity improvement is approximately equal to min(NT,NR), hence linear in the number of antennas. - Diversity (Combining diversity such as Maximum Ratio Combining or transmit diversity such as Space-time Block Coding) allows to improve the link budget by combining signals travelling over independently fading paths. Multiple antennas are needed at one side of the link only. A single stream is transmitted. There is still some capacity gain as the SNR improves, but the gain is only a logarithmic in the number of antennas.

A smart MIMO system adapts to scene and actual user needs SDMA multiplies cell capacity SDM brings higher throughput in DL/UL MIMO-TX ! MRC brings robustness STBC brings robustness MIMO transmission can be used in an intelligent (adaptive) manner: different user scenarios exist: single user, multi-user, file transfer, multimedia, upstream, downstream, etc.. Different environment: corporate, home, malls, … Different user termanals classes and needs: single antennna, multi-antenna, power- or not power-limited, legacy terminals, etc… MIMO-TX can play a significant role for SDMA downlink and TX-MRC for legacy terminals SDM downlink for multi-antenna terminals

A wide variety of MIMO schemes are available “MIMO-TX” schemes, focus of this presentation SDM s1 s2 TX-SDM SDMA TX-SDMA MRC TX-MRC STBC stbc Downlink H SDMA s1 s2 RX-SDMA SDM RX-SDM MRC RX-MRC STBC Uplink MIMO-TX schemes are not the only MIMO mode. A variety of MIMO modes is possible and should be included in 11n. The rest of this presentation focuses on specific topics for MIMO-TX NB: RX-SDMA is not recommended because it requires a complicated pre-synchronization of the transmitters so that the OFDM symbols from different transmitters arrive with good time alignment at the AP antennas. This is especially acute in environments with large delay spreads.

MIMO-TX requires “TX-CSI” … H S1 MIMO TX SDM(A) MIMO with TX pre-processing SN h S1 H MIMO TX MRC … MIMO with TX pre-processing Simpler receiver (no MIMO processing needed, SISO equalizer needed) Transmitter processing: low complexity (Zero-forcing, MMSE, MRC) Channel H needed at TX ( “TX-CSI” ) Option 1: by feedback Option 2: from channel estimation in reverse link, reciprocity needed only works for TDD set-ups Reciprocity: Propagation channel: OK if delay kept short Front-ends: not OK, calibration needed to measure transfer function of the front-ends MIMO-TX simplifies the receiver processing. The SISO equalizer is still needed to compensate for scaling and rotation of the constellation at the receiver. For SDM, suitable schemes are zero-forcing or MMSE. This is just a linear processing (matrix multiplication). Non-linear schemes, dual of the successsive interference cancellation for MIMO-RX schemes, also exist but require cooperation of the receiver. Hence, they are not suitable for SDMA with legacy terminals The rest of the slide is self-explanetory or detailed in the next slides

Example of Channel estimation and TX processing DL 2 s2 AP s1 UT1 UT2 DL 1 UL1 AP UT1 UL2 AP UT2 Spatial dimension Channel estimation, AGC couples H Time Spatial pre-filter Example of Channel estimation procedure for MIMO-TX processing: The intended receivers are the UTs in this example Short uplink bursts from the UTs are used to estimate the channel at the AP side. IF the UTs are single antenna UTs (SDMA) then each UT transmits a burst in turn. If the UT is multi-antenna (SDM), a single burst is transmitted. The AGC coefficients used during the channel estimation must be known (4 coefficients for SDMA, 2 coefficients for SDM). The estimated channel and the front-end calibration values (including AGC) are then used to compute the TX pre-filter, MMSE in this example Parallel SDM or SDMA transmission can then take place. H with FE. C.

Front-end non-reciprocity can be solved by calibration The channel includes: the propagation channel ( H ) front-end circuits (filters, etc..) linear and non linear ( Dxx,yy ) Base Station Receiver Front-end From modulator To demodulator Terminal Transmitter Front-end Terminal Receiver Front-end Base Station Transmitter Front-end H DTX,AP DTX,MT DRX,AP DRX,MT Propagation Channel Downlink: Uplink: Beause the estimated channel includes the RF, IF and baseband circuits that have an impact on the frequency response, the uplink and downlink channel are not reciprocal, even in a TDD set-up. uplink and downlink channel matrices are just the transpose of each other for perfectly reciprocal channels. It can be shown that the TX processing is only affected by the non-reciprocity at the side where MIMO-TX is applied, usually at the AP side. To solve the problem, the front-end frequecy responses must be known at this side. Hence, front-end calibration is required at this side only. HDL  (HUL)T

Non-perfect reciprocity  MUI Downlink model (for Inversion) : Not diagonal anymore  Multi-user interference

The Base Station Transceiver alone is responsible for the MUI Only the base station creates MUI (DTX,BS & DRX,BS) The terminal effects (DTX,MT & DRX,MT) only create scalar complex multiplication, can be equalized H includes all common (reciprocal) terms, including antenna coupling Common LO is mandatory Valid for all pre-filtering technique, including MIMO-TX, beamforming, SVD

OFDM-MIMO Demo Set-up 2 Terminals with 1 antenna each Access Point with 2 antennas

Our advise for 802.11n MIMO-TX and MIMO-RX schemes are both interesting for 802.11n MIMO-TX needs channel knowledge at TX side Estimation in reverse link has lower latency Delay between reverse link estimation and MIMO-TX transmission must be minimized must be supported by MAC Protocol MIMO-TX has been demonstrated Real-time (VHDL, 5GHz band) Wireless, 2x2 antennas MIMO-OFDM-SDM (108 Mbps) and MIMO-OFDM-MRC (8 dB SNR improvement)