Faculty of Engineering and Physical Sciences

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Material Performance Centre University of Manchester UNTF 2010 Andrew Wasylyk UNTF 2010 Assessment of Ductile Tearing and Plastic collapse in 304 SS Andrew.
Advertisements

Theoretical solutions for NATM excavation in soft rock with non-hydrostatic in-situ stresses Nagasaki University Z. Guan Y. Jiang Y.Tanabasi 1. Philosophy.
LECTURER5 Fracture Brittle Fracture Ductile Fracture Fatigue Fracture
3 – Fracture of Materials
Workshop at Indian Institute of Science 9-13 August, 2010 Bangalore India Fire Safety Engineering & Structures in Fire Organisers:CS Manohar and Ananth.
FINITE ELEMENTS SOFTWARE FOR ELECTROMAGNETICS APPLIED TO ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING TRAINING. J. Mur, J.S. Artal, J. Letosa, A. Usón and M. Samplón Electrical.
Fracture Specimen To Visualize whether a crack of given length in a material of known fracture toughness is dangerous, because it will propagate to given.
MODELLING OF DEFORMATION AND DAMAGE OF SPECIMENS UNDER STATIC AND DYNAMIC LOADING Kondryakov E.A., Lenzion S.V., and Kharchenko V.V.
Elektronový mikroskop SEM In our miniproject “Fracture: Initiation, Propagation, Consequences and Modeling” the tensile test, computer simulations, observation.
An Experimental Study and Fatigue Damage Model for Fretting Fatigue
Sensitivity Analysis In deterministic analysis, single fixed values (typically, mean values) of representative samples or strength parameters or slope.
NOTCH EFFECTS INTRODUCTION OF A NOTCH AFFECTS THE FRACTURE PROCESS Eg: INCREASES THE DUCTILE-BRITTLE TRANSITION TEMPERATURE OF STEEL NOTCH CREATES A LOCAL.
Presented by Robert Hurlston UNTF Conference 2011 Characterisation of the Effect of Residual Stress on Brittle Fracture in Pressure Vessel Steel.
Engineering materials lecture #14
Influence of filler properties on the mechanical failure of a polymer nanocomposite A. Kutvonen, G. Rossi, T. Ala-Nissilä Multiscale Statistical Physics.
The various engineering and true stress-strain properties obtainable from a tension test are summarized by the categorized listing of Table 1.1. Note that.
Stress Corrosion Cracking of Sensitized Type 316 Stainless Steel In High Temperature Selenate Contaminated Water Stuart Palmer School Of Chemical Engineering.
Materials Performance Centre Modeling Directions.
Stainless Steels Stainless steels are iron base alloys that contain a minimum of approximately 12% Cr, the amount needed to prevent the formation of rust.
Lab 6: Torsion test (AISI 1018 Steel, cold drawn )
Mechanics of Elastic Materials
Miguel Patrício CMUC Polytechnic Institute of Leiria School of Technology and Management.
Engineering Doctorate – Nuclear Materials Development of Advanced Defect Assessment Methods Involving Weld Residual Stresses If using an image in the.
Objectives Students will be able to label a stress-strain diagram correctly indicating. Ultimate stress, yield stress and proportional limit. Students.
Application of the Direct Optimized Probabilistic Calculation Martin Krejsa Department of Structural Mechanics Faculty of Civil Engineering VSB - Technical.
MODELLING THE PULLOUT OF HOOKED STEEL FIBERS FROM CEMENTITIOUS MATRIX Edmunds Zīle, Olga Zīle Institute of Polymer Mechanics Riga, Latvia.
November 14, 2013 Mechanical Engineering Tribology Laboratory (METL) Arnab Ghosh Ph.D. Research Assistant Analytical Modeling of Surface and Subsurface.
Evaluation of the Susceptibility of Simulated Welds In HSLA-100 and HY-100 Steels to Hydrogen Induced Cracking R. E. Ricker, M. R. Stoudt, and D. J. Pitchure.
AMML Effect of rise, peak and fall characteristics of CZM in predicting fracture processes.
Mechanical Properties of Materials
Materials Process Design and Control Laboratory Finite Element Modeling of the Deformation of 3D Polycrystals Including the Effect of Grain Size Wei Li.
Fracture Overview Fall Figure 6.1 Rectangular plate with hole subjected to axial load. (a) Plate with cross-sectional plane;
Evaluation of Residual Stresses due to Spherical Impact using LS – DYNA Jason Fayer MANE-6980 ENGINEERING PROJECT Spring 2010.
Finite Element Analysis
Mechanics of Materials II UET, Taxila Lecture No. (4&5)
The influence of the geometry of the San Andreas fault system on earthquakes in California Qingsong Li and Mian Liu Geological Sciences, 101 Geol. Bldg.,
Metallurgy of steel When carbon in small quantities is added to iron, ‘Steel’ is obtained. The influence of carbon on mechanical properties of iron is.
Mechanical Properties of Materials
1 Improving the fatigue life of electro- discharge-machined SDK11 tool steel via the suppression of surface cracks Assistant : Wan-Ching Weng Department.
Namas Chandra and Sirish Namilae
Role of Grain Boundary Character on Dynamic Recrystallization Megan E. Frary, Boise State University, DMR Dynamic recrystallization occurs when.
Failures Resulting from Static Loading
STRUCTURES Young’s Modulus. Tests There are 4 tests that you can do to a material There are 4 tests that you can do to a material 1 tensile This is where.
ISSUES TO ADDRESS... How do flaws in a material initiate failure? How is fracture resistance quantified; how do different material classes compare? How.
Materials Science Chapter 8 Deformation and Fracture.
ENT 487 FRACTURE MECHANISMS IN METALS
1 ROAD & BRIDGE RESEARCH INSTITUTE WARSAW Juliusz Cieśla ASSESSSMENT OF PRESTRESSING FORCE IN PRESTRESSED CONCRETE BRIDGE SPANS.
The various engineering and true stress-strain properties obtainable from a tension test are summarized by the categorized listing of Table 1.1. Note that.
Computational Prediction of Mechanical Performance of Particulate-Reinforced Al Metal-Matrix Composites (MMCs) using a XFEM Approach Emily A. Gerstein.
Date of download: 10/10/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
CHAPTER OBJECTIVES Show relationship of stress and strain using experimental methods to determine stress-strain diagram of a specific material Discuss.
Mechanical Properties
ENT 487 ENVIRONMENTALLY ASSISTED CRACKING IN METALS
Introduction We select materials for many components and applications by matching the properties of the material to the service condition required of the.
Nonlinear Analysis: Riks Analysis.
Methods to Maximize Design Life
Poisons Ratio Poisons ratio = . w0 w Usually poisons ratio ranges from
Fracture Process Zone -1
Determination of Fracture Toughness
Materials: engineering, science, processing and design, 2nd edition Copyright (c)2010 Michael Ashby, Hugh Shercliff, David Cebon.
Mechanical Properties: 2
DOKUZ EYLÜL UNIVERSITY MECHANICAL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Mechanical properties of metals Stress and Strain in metals
PDT 153 Materials Structure And Properties
Naval Research Laboratory, Washington DC, USA
LINEAR ELASTIC FRACTURE MECHANICS
DR. AL EMRAN ISMAIL FRACTURE MECHANISMS.
Mechanical Properties Of Metals - I
Tutorial.
Yielding And Fracture Under Combine Stresses
Presentation transcript:

Faculty of Engineering and Physical Sciences School of Materials, Materials Performance Centre Computational studies of intergranular stress corrosion crack propagation and the role of bridging ligaments AP Jivkov, NPC Stevens and TJ Marrow Introduction Results High resolution X-ray tomographic observations of IGSCC in sensitised austenitic stainless steel provided evidence that non-sensitised special grain boundaries form crack bridging ligaments along the crack surface, Fig. 1. Existing models of intergranular stress corrosion cracking have used percolation-like approach with 2D geometries. These models cannot capture the formation of bridges and do not account for the mechanical crack driving force. The aim with the simulations was to answer the questions: To what extent the bridges formed by RB control crack growth and can cause crack arrest? How does this control vary with the strength and fraction of SB and RB? Experimentally studied microstructures have SB fractions 0.65 ≤ f ≤ 0.75. Results have been obtained for a wider range 0.5 ≤ f ≤ 0.8, and for a series of SB failure strains, esf = 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4 ey, and RB failure strains, erf = 5, 10, 50 ey. For each choice of these parameters, simulations have been performed for 30 random distributions of GB character and results have been averaged. Fig.3 shows a result of one crack propagation simulation. As demonstrated, crack advance is accompanied by formation of branches and bridges. These collectively create a crack shielding effect and their amounts increase with decreasing f. Figure 5. Development of crack driving force (a) and bridges retarding force (b) with crack extension. Figure 6. Shielding effect of microstructure with fraction f. (a) SB failure strain effect; (b) RB failure strain effect. Figure 1. Tomography data from in-situ stress corrosion cracking experiments (pH 2 tetrathionate solution, sensitised 302 stainless steel). B and C designate bridging ligaments. Clearly, the influence of SB failure strain in the range of f considered is negligible, while the effect of RB failure strain is more pronounced. Fig. 7 shows the contribution of all bridges (a) and yielding bridges (b) to the total shielding effect only for the three RB failure strains considered. The plots demonstrate the importance of erf for developing a crack retarding force in the microstructures of interest. 2D mechanical model A model is developed, based on the following assumptions: The microstructure is represented by a regular tessellation of space into identical hexagonal cells of diameter D. Grain boundaries (GB) belong to either of two classes – resistant (RB) and susceptible (SB) to corrosion. Material is allowed to fail via crack propagation along grain boundaries only. If ey and eu are the yield and ultimate tensile strains, SB fail at strain esf < ey and RB fail at strain ey < erf < eu. Assembly of grains filling the region {-50D ≤ X1 ≤ 50D and 0 ≤ X2 ≤ 50D} is considered (7740 grains and 22850 GB). The assembly is loaded via prescribed displacements parallel to X1 that introduce a homogeneous strain of e∞ = 0.5ey. An initial crack, extending along three grain boundaries, is introduced from the origin of the coordinate system. Figure 3. Crack propagated in a microstructure with f = 0.7. Susceptible boundaries in red, resistant boundaries in blue. Fig. 4 shows the projected length of all bridges (a) and only of yielding bridges (b) as function of crack extension for selected f. Crack extension is plotted in terms of number of grains, while bridges lengths are given as fractions of crack length. The expected upper limit for these fractions in Fig. 4(a) is f, so values above f indicate bridges formed along branches. The results show that the share of yielding bridges in the total length of bridges increases dramatically with f. Figure 7. Contribution of all bridges (a) and yielding bridges (b) in the microstructure shielding effect. Conclusions Numerical implementation The proposed model has the potential to simulate intergranular crack propagation in a realistic manner by including the phenomenon of crack bridging by ductile ligaments. External load magnitude and failure properties of susceptible and resistant boundaries are accounted for. Crack arrest was not observed but a significant degree of crack tip shielding was developed, which would be expected to reduce the crack propagation rate. Shielding is created by crack branches and bridges and increases with increasing fraction of resistant boundaries. The failure properties of susceptible boundaries are found to have negligible effect on crack shielding in the region of f considered. The bridges’ contribution to shielding is strongly dependent on the resistant boundaries’ failure properties. Comparing experimental data on bridges area (size and location of bridging zone behind the crack tip) with simulation results will help identifying the model parameter resistant boundaries failure strain. Crack growth is simulated as a sequence of equilibrium calculations and single-failure events. Fig. 2 illustrates the strategy for crack advance. For each surface boundary the difference, d, between its calculated strain and its failure strain is formed. If there are surface boundaries with d > 0 the one with largest d is failed. If there are no such boundaries, the procedure is repeated for the subsurface boundaries to account for the possibility that the crack bypasses a surface boundary (e.g. from A to B) in the real 3D set. Figure 4. Length of bridges with crack extension, all bridges (a) and yielding bridges only (b). The stress intensity factor, KI, calculated with respect to the tip of the main crack is used for crack driving force (CDF). Stress intensity factor Kbr, due to the bridge stresses measures the bridged crack retarding force (CRF). Fig. 5 shows the development of CDF (a) and CRF (b) as functions of crack extension. In Fig. 5(a) the theoretical CDF for a straight crack without branches and bridges is also plotted. The difference between the theoretical and calculated in the model driving forces represents the total shielding effect of the microstructure, Ksh. The dependence of Ksh on the three model parameters, f, esf and erf is demonstrated in Fig. 6, where the values are taken at selected crack extension a = 15 D. Figure 2. Search for failing boundaries. Crack surface in white, surface GB in red, sub-surface GB in yellow. Acknowledgments: The authors gratefully acknowledge the support of this work by Rolls Royce plc. Contact details: Dr A P Jivkov Tel: +44 (0) 161 306 3556 Fax: +44 (0) 161 306 4865 Email: andrey.jivkov@manchester.ac.uk