Hardware Injections in S4

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
S3/S4 BBH report Thomas Cokelaer LSC Meeting, Boston, 3-4 June 2006.
Advertisements

For the Collaboration GWDAW 2005 Status of inspiral search in C6 and C7 Virgo data Frédérique MARION.
Calibration of the gravitational wave signal in the LIGO detectors Gabriela Gonzalez (LSU), Mike Landry (LIGO-LHO), Patrick Sutton (PSU) with the calibration.
G Z 1 Block-Normal, Event Display and Q-scan Based Glitch and Veto Studies Shantanu Desai for Penn. State Burst Group And Glitch Working Group.
LIGO- G Z March 22, 2006March 2006 LSC Meeting - DetChar 1 S5 Spectral Line Catalogue Status Keith Thorne (PSU) for the Spectral Line Catalogue.
G D Interferometer Status LSC Meeting, Ann Arbor, June 4, 2005 Daniel Sigg.
LIGO-G W Summary of S1 at LIGO Hanford Observatory Fred Raab 9 September 02.
LIGO-G L Peter Fritschel & Michael Zucker PAC18 meeting LIGO Livingston Observatory 18 May 2005 S5 Run Performance Goals.
ALLEGRO G Z LSC, Livingston 23 March, Calibration for the ALLEGRO resonant detector -- S2 and S4 Martin McHugh, Loyola University New Orleans.
LSC Meeting, 17 March 2004 Shawhan, Marka, et al.LIGO-G E Summary of E10 / S3 Hardware Signal Injections Peter Shawhan, Szabolcs Márka, Bruce.
G R AJW, Caltech, LSC Meeting, 3/20/02 Discussion of Statistical Methods, Tools, and Simulations  Review of tools and methods  (I am only familiar.
GEO-LIGO data analysis M.Alessandra Papa Max Planck Inst. f. Gravitationsphysik, Potsdam, Germany G Z VESF foundation meeting, Pisa, Dec
S4/S5 Calibration The Calibration team G Z.
LIGO- G Z LSC ASIS Meeting LIGO Scientific Collaboration - University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee 1 S2 Hardware Pulsar Injections Bruce.
LIGO- G Z 03/23/2005LSC Meeting March BlockNormal Near-Online S4 Burst Analysis Keith Thorne Penn State University Relativity Group (Shantanu.
3/19/08G D S5 Calibration Status Brian O’Reilly For the Calibration Committee LSC March 2008 Brian O’Reilly For the Calibration Committee LSC.
1 Data quality and veto studies for the S4 burst search: Where do we stand? Alessandra Di Credico Syracuse University LSC Meeting, Ann Arbor (UM) June.
Searching for Gravitational Waves with LIGO Andrés C. Rodríguez Louisiana State University on behalf of the LIGO Scientific Collaboration SACNAS
LIGO-G Z April 2006 APS meeting Igor Yakushin (LLO, Caltech) Search for Gravitational Wave Bursts in LIGO’s S5 run Igor Yakushin (LLO, Caltech)
LIGO-G D Status of Stochastic Search with LIGO Vuk Mandic on behalf of LIGO Scientific Collaboration Caltech GWDAW-10, 12/15/05.
LIGO- G D Burst Search Report Stan Whitcomb LIGO Caltech LSC Meeting LIGO1 Plenary Session 18 August 2003 Hannover.
LSC Meeting, 19 March 2003 Shawhan, Leonor, MarkaLIGO-G D Introduction to Hardware Signal Injections Peter Shawhan, Isabel Leonor, Szabi Márka.
LIGO-G D LSC Meeting Nov An Early Glimpse at the S3 Run Stan Whitcomb (LIGO–Caltech) LIGO Scientific Collaboration Meeting LIGO Hanford.
Searching for Gravitational Waves from Binary Inspirals with LIGO Duncan Brown University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration.
S5 BNS Inspiral Update Duncan Brown Caltech LIGO-G Z.
1 Status of Search for Compact Binary Coalescences During LIGO’s Fifth Science Run Drew Keppel 1 for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration 1 California Institute.
3/21/06G D S4/S5 Calibration Status Brian O’Reilly For the Calibration Committee LSC March 2006 Brian O’Reilly For the Calibration Committee LSC.
LIGO-G Z S2 and S3 calibration status Michael Landry LIGO Hanford Observatory for the Calibration team Justin Garofoli, Luca Matone, Hugh Radkins.
1 Planning notes from August 2005 Burst Group Face-to-Face Meeting LHO, August 18, 2005 Peter Shawhan, scribe LIGO-G Z.
S.Klimenko, G Z, March 20, 2006, LSC meeting First results from the likelihood pipeline S.Klimenko (UF), I.Yakushin (LLO), A.Mercer (UF),G.Mitselmakher.
LIGO-G Z Confidence Test for Waveform Consistency of LIGO Burst Candidate Events Laura Cadonati LIGO Laboratory Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
LIGO-G Z GWDAW9 December 17, Search for Gravitational Wave Bursts in LIGO Science Run 2 Data John G. Zweizig LIGO / Caltech for the LIGO.
LSC - 03/23/05SB/SWG1 Stochastic HW Injections in S4 Sukanta Bose Washington State University, Pullman For the Stochastic Working Group / Inject. Team.
First Year S5 Low Mass Compact Binary Coalescences Drew Keppel 1 representing the LIGO/VIRGO Compact Binary Coalescence Group 1 California Institute of.
S3 and S4 pulsars injections Graham Woan, University of Glasgow, For Matt Pitkin Réjean Dupuis PULG … LIGO-G Z.
Peter Shawhan The University of Maryland & The LIGO Scientific Collaboration Penn State CGWP Seminar March 27, 2007 LIGO-G Z Reaching for Gravitational.
LIGO- G Z AJW, Caltech, LIGO Project1 First look at Injection of Burst Waveforms prior to S1 Alan Weinstein Caltech Burst UL WG LSC meeting, 8/21/02.
LIGO-G Z r statistics for time-domain cross correlation on burst candidate events Laura Cadonati LIGO-MIT LSC collaboration meeting, LLO march.
S5 First Epoch BNS Inspiral Results Drew Keppel 1 representing the Inspiral Group 1 California Institute of Technology Nov LSC Meeting MIT, 4 November.
Igor Yakushin, December 2004, GWDAW-9 LIGO-G Z Status of the untriggered burst search in S3 LIGO data Igor Yakushin (LIGO Livingston Observatory)
LIGO-G Z Report on the S2 RunK. Riles / S. Whitcomb 1 Report on the S2 Run Keith Riles (University of Michigan) Stan Whitcomb (LIGO–Caltech)
LIGO-G Z Introduction to QScan Shourov K. Chatterji SciMon Camp LIGO Livingston Observatory 2006 August 18.
LSC Meeting, June 3, 2006 LIGO-G Z 1 Status of inspiral search reviews Alan Weinstein (LIGO Laboratory / Caltech) For the LSC Internal review.
GEO600 Data Analysis Status
Discussion of Statistical Methods, Tools, and Simulations
S4 Pulsar Search Results from PowerFlux
S4 Pulsar Search Results from PowerFlux
S5 First Epoch BNS & BBH Inspiral Update
Searching for Gravitational-Wave Bursts (GWBs) associated with Gamma-Ray Bursts (GRBs) during the LIGO S5 run Isabel Leonor University of Oregon (for the.
Overview of E10 / S3 Hardware Injections
S2/S3 calibration Gabriela González, Louisiana State University Plus
WaveMon and Burst FOMs WaveMon WaveMon FOMs Summary & plans
Report on the S2 Run Keith Riles (University of Michigan)
Stochastic background search using LIGO Livingston and ALLEGRO
Background estimation in searches for binary inspiral
Status of the LIGO Detectors
University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
LISA Data Analysis & Sources
Towards the first coherent multi-ifo search for NS binaries in LIGO
First look at Injection of Burst Waveforms prior to S1
Update on LLO-ALLEGRO stochastic analysis
Searches for gravitational waves by the LIGO Scientific Collaboration
Burst Figure of Merit Julien Sylvestre LSC Meeting, March 2004
ALLEGRO calibration for the LLO-ALLEGRO stochastic analysis
John Zweizig LIGO/Caltech
Status and Plans for the LIGO-TAMA Joint Data Analysis
Calibration: S2 update, S3 preliminaries
Performance of the WaveBurst algorithm on LIGO S2 playground data
Hardware Injection Status Update
Presentation transcript:

Hardware Injections in S4 V. Mandic, CIT (for P. Shawhan, S. Marka, S. Bose, M. Landry, S. Fairhurst, R. Prix …) LSC Meeting, LLO March 23, 2005 DetChar Session – S3/S4 Investigations

Novelties Daily inspiral and burst injections Each 5min/day, at various times, various sensitivities, various IFOs New software mostly automates the procedure Coordinate the operators at both sites to enter/exit injection state Modified code for “on-the-fly” stochastic injection Should resolve the synchronization problem from S3 New pulsar code and configurations Actuation function read from a file

Overview of Injections Single (•) Double () Triple (*) A1-L1 (□) Total triple-coincidence: About 5-6 hours 1-2% of total triple-coincident time

Bursts Waveforms calculated by Peter Shawhan 3 configurations, 20 waveforms each Sine-gaussian waveforms at 235 Hz and 914 Hz One Gaussian waveform One Zwerger-Muller SN waveform Various amplitudes and delays between LLO and LHO One configuration per day Set of 16 loud Sine-gaussian waveforms once per week Injection Stats: Triple-coincident: 272 waveforms Double-coincident: 112 waveforms

Inspirals Waveforms calculated by Stephen Fairhurst 3 configurations, 3 waveforms each One configuration per day Includes 1.4+1.4, 3+3, and 10+10 M waveforms for several different distances 40 minutes of low-background running surrounds each injection (usually prior to injection) Injection Stats: Triple-coincident: 42 waveforms Double-coincident: 27 waveforms

Pulsar Parameters calculated by Mike Laundry makefakedata updated by Reinhard Prix, compiled by Peter Shawhan Same 10 pulsars as in S3, but with smaller amplitudes. Pulsars started on March 8, and remained running for the rest of the run, in the science mode. Last day of S4: added 2 binary pulsars

Stochastic New code and all waveforms provided by Sukanta Bose IFO injections: Pre-calculated 17 min waveform into H2-L1 pair, Ω=0.04. Pre-calculated 17 min waveform into H1-H2-L1, Ω=0.01. “On-the-fly” 75 min injection into H1-H2-L1, Ω=0.04. Weaker injections planned for post-run period. ALLEGRO-LLO Three 17 minute pre-calculated injections in the “Minus” and “Plus” orientations of ALLEGRO, Ω=2500. Planned another three 17 minute pre-calculated injections in the “Null” orientation of ALLEGRO for the post-run period.

Problems Glitches when starting/stopping the injection stream Caught by the burst monitors Injections started/stopped in injection mode only Pulsars running? Injection code sometimes does not recognize that pulsars are running Burst/inspiral injected “with” the pulsars Only two such cases in S4 Confusion how to enter/exit the injection state First ~week only

Conclusion A number of successful injections have been performed Of all 4 types Many in triple-coincidence Feedback from the analysis groups looks great! For the future (i.e. S5): Hope to completely automate the process Inject waveforms according to a pre-determined schedule Allow operators to override the injections Avoid the overhead of coordinating the two sites Hope to determine exactly what will be done long before the run starts!