An Overview of the North Carolina Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) Presentation to the State Health Director's Conference January 23,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Burden of Obesity in North Carolina
Advertisements

Cell Phones for Data Collection: Costs and Challenges Michael Link 1, Michael Battaglia 2, Martin Frankel 3, Larry Osborn 4, and Ali Mokdad 5 1 Nielsen.
Address Frames and Mail Surveys as Complements (or Alternatives) to RDD Surveys Michael W. Link, Michael P. Battaglia, Martin R. Frankel, Larry Osborn,
The Burden of Obesity in North Carolina
The Burden of Obesity in North Carolina Obesity in Adults.
State Center for Health Statistics Division of Public Health NC Dept. of Health and Human Services.
2004 Fannin County Health Survey Texas Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS)
Employee Wellness & Physical Activity in Texas: Results from the 2003 BRFSS.
Texas Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) Turning Information Into Health.
Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
Diabetes in Idaho BRFSS 2009 Data collected from Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Idaho Department of Health and Welfare, Division of.
Strategies for Increasing Efficiency of Cellular Telephone Samples Kurt Peters 1, William Robb 1, Cristine Delnevo 2, Daniel A. Gundersen 2 March 2014.
Coverage Bias in Traditional Telephone Surveys of Low-Income and Young Adults Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Center for Health Statistics.
Costs Per Survey Response
Online Privacy Survey Results Conducted: December 2011.
Recent Improvements for Dual-Frame RDD Sampling Methodology 29 th Annual Meeting March 26, 2012.
1 FY10 ACS Methods Panel Update Jennifer Guarino Tancreto Chief, ACS Data Collection Methods Staff Decennial Statistical Studies Division Presentation.
Connect Nevada Residential Technology Assessment Results.
1.3 Data Collection and Experimental Design
Copyright © 2005 Brooks/Cole, a division of Thomson Learning, Inc. 1.1 Chapter Five Data Collection and Sampling.
Instructions and Reporting Requirements Appendix A Electronic Reporting For Dermatology Physician Practices March 2014 North Carolina Central Cancer Registry.
Burton Reist Chief, 2020 Research and Planning Office U.S. Census Bureau 2014 SDC and CIC Steering Committee Meeting March 5, Census Updates.
POPULATION RESEARCH SEMINAR SERIES Sponsored by the Statistics and Survey Methods Core of the U54 Partnership Post Survey Adjustments Lee Hargraves, Ph.D.
Women’s Health and BRFSS Presented By: Neha Thakkar Arkansas BRFSS Coordinator With the help of: Dr. John Senner Project Officer Arkansas Center for Health.
Sampling A population is the total collection of units or elements you want to analyze. Whether the units you are talking about are residents of Nebraska,
Preliminary Results from the 2008 Oklahoma Health Care Insurance and Access Survey Presentation to the Oklahoma Health Care Authority Board November 13,
The Early Release Program of the National Health Interview Survey Jeannine Schiller, M.P.H., Jane F. Gentleman, Ph.D., Eve Powell-Griner, Ph.D. National.
STATISTICS FOR MANAGERS LECTURE 2: SURVEY DESIGN.
Asthma Prevalence in the United States
Kentucky Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Monitoring the health of Kentuckians: “A look at Mental Health Data” February 8, 2007.
Investigations of Cell Phone Use While Driving in NC Jane Stutts William Hunter Herman Huang University of North Carolina Highway Safety Research Center.
CE Overview Jay T. Ryan Chief, Division of Consumer Expenditure Survey December 8, 2010.
The Effort to Develop Disability Questions for the Current Population Survey Terence M. McMenamin U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics October 5, 2006.
Chapter 12 Sample Surveys
Examining Best Practices for Sampling and Weighting Dual Frame Surveys Liz Kantor Advised by Dr. David Redlawsk Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey.
Enhancing Surveillance with the Colorado Child Health Survey Jodi Drisko, MSPH Jason Gannon Alyson Shupe, MSW, PhD Colorado Department of Public Health.
Copyright ©2005 Brooks/Cole, a division of Thomson Learning, Inc. How to Get a Good Sample Chapter 4.
Internet Access, Past Year Health-Related Use of the Internet, and Interest in Selected IT Modalities for Health Education Estimates from the 2005 Kaiser.
How America Shops & Spends 2014
Introducing HealthStats Eleanor Howell, MS Manager, Data Dissemination Unit State Center for Health Statistics February 2, 2012.
A Profile of Health among Massachusetts Adults: Highlights from the Massachusetts Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) Health Survey.
Liesl Eathington Iowa Community Indicators Program Iowa State University October 2014.
2004 Falls County Health Survey Texas Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS)
Deanna E. White, Adam Stevens, John Barbaro, Kristy McGill and Lynne Russell.
Protestant Churches’ Use of Social Media Sponsored by Fellowship Technologies, a partner in LifeWay’s Digital Church initiative.
Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance Survey BRFSS 2013 Tuesday, August 14, Room - 540A (10:30 A.M. – 11:30 A.M.) Presented by: Judy Bass Arizona.
BPS - 5th Ed. Chapter 81 Producing Data: Sampling.
BreastCare in Arkansas: Results from the Arkansas BRFSS Presented By: LaTonya Steward, B.S. Arkansas BRFSS Coordinator.
Testing for Coverage Bias when Combining Directory-Listed And Cellphone Samples T. M. Guterbock, A. Diop, J. M. Ellis, J. L. P. Holmes and K. T. Le, Center.
Finding low-income telephone households and people who do not have health insurance using auxiliary sample frame information for a random digit dial survey.
The Use of Random Digit Dialing in Household Surveys: Challenges and Changes Chris Chapman 2008 IES Research Conference Washington, DC June 11, 2008
Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance Survey BRFSS 2014.
2015 MASSACHUSETTS HEALTH INSURANCE SURVEY KEY FINDINGS Prepared by: Laura Skopec, Sharon K. Long, and Emily Hayes, Urban Institute Susan Sherr, David.
Center for Children with Special Needs 1 What can the Behavior Risk Factor Surveillance System do for Children with Special Health Care Needs? Jacquie.
FDA/FSIS Food Safety Survey Methods Amy Lando, MPP Consumer Studies Team Office of Scientific Analysis and Support Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition.
1 Using Household Surveys to Collect Data on Remittances: Lessons Learned from the CPS Migration Supplement Elizabeth M. Grieco Chief, Immigration Statistics.
Presented by: Khaleel S. Hussaini PhD Bureau Chief, Public Health Statistics Division of Public Health Preparedness Judy Bass Arizona’s BRFSS Coordinator.
E-Reading Rises as Device Ownership Jumps BY: KATHERINE ZICKUHR AND LEE RAINIE.
Section 1.3 Objectives Discuss how to design a statistical study Discuss data collection techniques Discuss how to design an experiment Discuss sampling.
Weighting and imputation PHC 6716 July 13, 2011 Chris McCarty.
Chapter 12 Sample Surveys
Division of Surveillance: Available Data Sources
Winnipeg Regional Health Authority Tissue Bank – April 2016
Rapid Risk Factor Surveillance System Conference
Lecture 2: Data Collecting and Sampling
SCHS and Health Statistics
National needs for AES Purpose - describe participation in learning during a 12 months period. The main parameters are; Participation rates in different.
How the Affordable Care Act Has Improved Americans’ Ability to Buy Health Insurance on Their Own Findings from the Commonwealth Fund Biennial Health Insurance.
Did not have a usual source of care Went without care because of cost
Presentation transcript:

An Overview of the North Carolina Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) Presentation to the State Health Director's Conference January 23, 2014 State Center for Health Statistics Division of Pubic Health NC Dept. of Health & Human Services

Presentation Outline How the survey is done Questionnaire development Sampling Data Collection Weighting Future developments Demonstrate how to access results Q&A State Center for Health Statistics Division of Pubic Health NC Dept. of Health & Human Services

Timeline for 2014 BRFSS External review of proposed new/revised questions State Coordinators vote on proposed questions CDC field tests questionnaire CDC Core & Optional Modules checked and finalized State-added questions reviewed and finalized CATI coding developed and checked Interviewers trained 2014Conduct interviews January through December CDC sends final weighted data to NC SCHS reviews data and produce web tables 2015

BRFSS QUESTIONNAIRE

Questionnaire Organization Each years survey is divided into three main parts CDC Core Questions CDC Optional Modules State- Added Questions Mandated by CDC; must ask all questions exactly as written States choose which modules they will administer; must ask all questions exactly as written Developed by each states coordinator

The Core The CDC Division of Behavioral Surveillance (DBS) works with other CDC programs to develop questions for the core & optional modules Proposed questions undergo two rounds of cognitive testing State Coordinators have input via Participation in State Working Group Participation as external reviewer for proposed questions Vote on proposed questions taken at Annual Conference Questions rotate in & out of core on a fixed schedule Just adopted a new 5-year plan for the core

CDC Optional Modules Process for developing optional modules is similar to the core CDC programs pay DSB for space on the BRFSS So the selection of optional modules available varies each year

State-Added Questions May include Questions from other surveys, including questions on CDC Optional Modules Questions written by state staff Each state has a process for soliciting proposed questions

Survey time is a very scarce resource When telephone interviews run past 15 to 20 minutes, Break-offs increase Data quality suffers as people say whatever comes to mind so youll leave them alone! Some cell phone respondents are more sensitive to length because they pay by the minute Pew Research Center successfully does 20 minute cell phone interviews

The 2013 NC BRFSS interview averaged 29 minutes 17 minutes of that is take up by Core questions and an expanded Optional Module on Health Care Access Core creep – expansion of the length of the core – is a major issue with state coordinators We have been trying to cut down on state-added and CDC Optional Modules to shorten the interview

SAMPLING

Random Digit Dialing (RDD) Surveys 4 digit numbers are generated at random within each combination of area code and phone exchange within a geographic area Resulting numbers are screened to identify non-working numbers Results in a random sample of telephone numbers for a given geographic region

BRFSS uses a Dual-Frame RDD Sample Landline Frame Numbers generated within area code/exchange combinations for landline telephones Telco companies share more information regarding these numbers Most importantly where the phone is located

Cell Phone Frame Numbers generated within area code/phone exchange combinations for cell phones Cell phone companies share little information about these numbers Little information on where owner of phone lives until they are interviewed

Increase in Cell Phone Only (Wireless) Households Roughly 38% of adults as of the end of These folks are: Younger More are minorities Less affluent Have some significantly different health conditions & behaviors Must sample this population to avoid biased estimates

DATA COLLECTION

BRFSS is a process, not a project Survey runs throughout calendar year Each month we receive separate landline and cell phone samples (~8,000 phone numbers total) To complete each months study Each landline number is called up to 15 times Each cell phone number is called up to 8 times We call seven days a week around 330 days every year

More difficult to reach cell phone respondents In the landline sample Get one completed interview every 1.4 hours of interview time Perform 38 dialings per completed interview 4,600 sample records yield ~900 completed interviews Cell Get one completed interview for every 1.7 hours Perform 97 dialings per completed interview 3,200 sample records yield ~100 completed interviews Bottom Line: We have to call many, many more cell phone numbers before finding someone who will complete the interview

WEIGHTING

Why Weight? We weight survey data to make our sample better match the population Some observations get counted more than others

BRFSS Weighting Systems The old BRFSS system used gender, age, race/ethnicity, & region within state to adjust the final results. The new rake weights adds adjustment by education level, marital status, renter/owner status & phone source (landline vs. cell phone) The new raked weights should improve the representativeness of the sample, particularly regarding socioeconomic status The new weights, together with adding cell-phone interviews, produces different estimates for some health indicators

Some estimates change a lot: Estimate increases by ~ 5.5 percent

Estimate increases by ~ 3.3 percent

Some estimates change very little: Estimate increases by ~ 1.0 percent

Estimate increases by ~ 0.9 percent

FUTURE DEVELOPMENTS

Change to Geographic Strata Beginning in 2014, geographic strata will be based on Area Health Education Center regions Able to stratify both landline and cell phone samples for these area

We will produce estimates for State as a whole Eastern, Piedmont & Western Carolina AHECS Counties when possible At least 500 completed interviews in the sample

HOW TO ACCESS RESULTS

Data for a calendar year are combined and analyzed Results for state and sub-regions are posted to SCHS Web page Main SCHS Web Page NC BRFSS Web Page

Contact Information: James Cassell Head of Survey Operations & BRFSS Coordinator State Center for Health Statistics North Carolina Division of Public Health 2422 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC Voice: Fax: NC BRFSS Web Page State Center for Health Statistics Division of Pubic Health NC Dept. of Health & Human Services