Software & Hardware for Wavefront Estimation Pipeline Development Te-Wei Tsai Software Engineer Joint Technical Meeting March 6, 2017.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

© 2006 MVTec Software GmbH Press Colloquium Part II Building Technology for the Customer’s Advantage.

Advertisements

Plans for LSE-130 through CD-2 Gregory Dubois-Felsmann SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory.

Systems Engineering Breakouts George Angeli. Tuesday 11am Current Commissioning Plans – Chuck Claver Revised commissioning timeline Development plans.

Protocol & Test Review Spaceport America Student Launch University/Institution Team Members Date.

Proposal Analysis Review NMSGC Student Launch University/Institution Team Members Date.

Data Test Review Spaceport America Student Launch University/Institution Team Members Date.

1 LEHIGH MODEL ATLSS Engineering Research Center Lehigh University Version 1.2.

WBS & AO Controls Jason Chin, Don Gavel, Erik Johansson, Mark Reinig Design Meeting (Team meeting #10) Sept 17 th, 2007.

PALM-3000 High-order Wavefront Sensor Update Christoph Baranec Team Meeting #9 10/22/2008.

NGAO Status R. Dekany January 31, Next Generation AO at Keck Nearing completion of 18 months System Design phase –Science requirements and initial.

Natasha Benko, Kevin Jacobsen, Marcus LaRose, Scott Timme October 14, 2009 Our design will automatically calibrate your speedometer according to tire size.

Trigger and online software Simon George & Reiner Hauser T/DAQ Phase 1 IDR.

1 m – APOGEE Feed Jon Holtzman Diane Feuillet (NMSU)

Team Phoenix March 15, Project Goal Our team will develop an air vehicle that will not only navigate a course autonomously while providing real.

Control Software Integration German Schumacher T&S Software Lead.

LSST Scheduler status Francisco Delgado Sr. Software Engineer Telescope & Site.

Common PDR Problems ACES Presentation T. Gregory Guzik March 6, 2003.

LSST Scheduler requirements

Microscope Control Configuration This section of the QED manual will describe how to configure you Configure and Control your automated microscope. Mac.

NSF Engineering Research Center for Reconfigurable Manufacturing Systems University of Michigan College of Engineering Reconfigurable System for Turbine.

1 System wide optimization for dark energy science: DESC-LSST collaborations Tony Tyson LSST Dark Energy Science Collaboration meeting June 12-13, 2012.

Test and Integration Robyn Allsman LSST Corp DC3 Applications Design Workshop IPAC August , 2008.

LSST Scheduler construction plan Francisco Delgado Sr. Software Engineer Telescope & Site.

GAYA Analyzer SDD Presentation. GAYA Analyzer Introduction OMS40G256 is a hardware device used for detection of radioactive radiation for medical imaging.

The Active Optics System S. Thomas and the AO team.

Autonomous Soil Investigator. What Is the ASI? Designed to complete the 2013 IEEE student robotics challenge Collects "soil" samples from a simulated.

Realtime Robotic Radiation Oncology Brian Murphy 4 th Electronic & Computer Engineering.

COS PIPELINE CDR Jim Rose July 23, 2001OPUS Science Data Processing Space Telescope Science Institute 1 of 12 Science Data Processing

Mapping of FM and HD Radio Coverage Brian Casey, Leandro Franca, and Thomas Shanks March 9, 2009.

Anritsu Automation Platform (AAP) AAP PC Connects to the system via IP connection (system switch) AAP was developed to add features that were requested.

Mountaintop Software for the Dark Energy Camera Jon Thaler 1, T. Abbott 2, I. Karliner 1, T. Qian 1, K. Honscheid 3, W. Merritt 4, L. Buckley-Geer 4 1.

Tracing the JWST Proposal from User Interface to Commanding of an Instrument Margaret Meixner & WIT Balzano, Robinson & CMD.

Oct 17, 2001SALT PFIS Preliminary Design Review Control System 1 Southern African Large Telescope Prime Focus Imaging Spectrograph Preliminary Control.

Anomaly Detection and Damage Mitigation in Complex Systems by Amol M Khatkhate Pennsylvania State University.

GLAST LAT ProjectSLAC Internal Review, April 16-18, 2002 LAT-PR Electronics and Flight Software WBS GLAST Large Area Telescope: Electronics,

Commissioning Alistair Walker NOAO/CTIO 9/30/ DES Collaboration Meeting October

1 Board Telescope & Site Tucson, Arizona July 18-20, 2011 LLST Control Software Review Resources Tucson, January

1 OBSERVATORY CONTROL SYSTEM (OCS) FRANCISCO DELGADO OCS CAM.

Commissioning Planning

LSST Commissioning Overview and Data Plan Charles (Chuck) Claver Beth Willman LSST System Scientist LSST Deputy Director SAC Meeting.

ComCam Hardware and Interfaces James Howard ComCam CAM LSST 2017 Project & Community Workshop 2017 Aug 15.

Agenda ComCam planning and scheduling (James & Jacques) CCS & CCS-TCS Interface (Tony) Software to use ComCam Software to get data out of ComCam (Mike)

Telescope Assembly, Integration and Verification (AIV) WBS 04C. 14 J

Education and Public Outreach goals and priorities

From LSE-30: Observatory System Spec.

Systems Engineering, Verification, and Commissioning for LSST George Z

ComCam Hardware and Interfaces James Howard ComCam CAM LSST 2017 Project & Community Workshop 2017 Aug 15.

LSST Commissioning Overview and Data Plan Charles (Chuck) Claver Beth Willman LSST System Scientist LSST Deputy Director SAC Meeting.

LSST Commissioning: FY18 Planning

Single Object & Time Series Spectroscopy with JWST NIRCam

OpSim4 vs OpSim3 Francisco Delgado

Chuck F Claver LSST System Scientist & Commissioning Lead

Write less; please more pictures!

OCS Scheduler Status Francisco Delgado T&S Software Manager

Measurement & Automation Explorer

DOE: Transition from MIE to Early Operations Kevin Reil LSST Camera Commissioning Lead LSST Commissioning Plan Review January 24-26, 2017.

Management Breakout: MREFC Budget Summary Victor L

LSST Control Software Integration Francisco Delgado OCS Software Manager LSST Commissioning Plan Review January 24-26, 2017.

OCS Scheduler Status Francisco Delgado T&S Software Manager

Joe Trefilek Jeff Kubascik Paul Scheffler Matt Rockey

Software Engineering Lecture #14.

Characteristics of Reconfigurable Hardware

Click to add title Planning for LSST Verification George Angeli LSST All Hands Meeting Tucson August 15, 2016.

He Sun Advisor: N. Jeremy Kasdin Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering

Engine Part ID Part 1.

Engine Part ID Part 2.

Engine Part ID Part 2.

Question 1: Contingency for “extra” year

Team RAPTORS Joe Trefilek Jeff Kubascik Paul Scheffler Matt Rockey

On to Object Design c. 14.

Presentation transcript:

Software & Hardware for Wavefront Estimation Pipeline Development Te-Wei Tsai Software Engineer Joint Technical Meeting March 6, 2017

Software Development Plan of ComCam The draft of wavefront estimation pipeline (WEP) development plan is done. The correct dates of milestones are TBD. TSS-1221: Change Sensor IDs TSS-1229: Change Active Filter TSS-1232: Get Real-Time Image by DAQ TSS-1329: WEP Integration with ComCam

Required Software and Hardware Required for WEP development: Initial development Camera image simulator Algorithms of instrument signature removal, source selector, source processor, etc. Integration DAQ teststand Camera teststand OCS simulator Required for CamCam development: Camera image simulator customized for ComCam DAQ teststand updated support for ComCam Camera teststand updated support for ComCam

Interface and Collaboration Diagram ICDs between components are listed: LSE-67: ICD between TCS and CCS LSE-68: Camera Data Acquisition Interface LSE-69: ICD between CCS and DM LSE-71: ICD between OCS and CCS LSE-72: ICD between OCS and DM LSE-73: ICD between TCS and OCS LSE-75: ICD between TCS and DM LSE-73 LSE-71 LSE-75 LSE-72 LSE-67 LSE-75 LSE-68 LSE-69

Difference in Interfaces LSE-67: ICD between TCS and CCS Difference: Image geometry (size, location) Behavior to take defocal images (serial vs. parallel)  Same potential issue for LSE-68 and LSE-69

Difference in Interfaces LSE-73: ICD between TCS and OCS In 3.2, TCS Functional Command Set, it contains the following commands: - target - calibration - offset - boresight No significant difference among WFSs.

Difference in Interfaces LSE-75: ICD between TCS and DM Difference: Image geometry (size, location) Behavior to take defocal images (serial vs. parallel)  Same potential issue for LSE-68 and LSE-69

Difference in Interfaces Internal interface between WEP Controller and Bright Star Catalog. Difference: The selection/restriction for Bright Star might be different. For example, Shack-Hartmann WFS should have more serious restriction compared with ComCam and LSST camera.