Lorraine Hartles West Midlands Regional Genetics Laboratory

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Implications of Consanguinity for Routine Diagnostic Testing and Development of Specialist Services Teresa Lamb Clinical Scientist Leeds DNA Laboratory.
Advertisements

The Diagnostic Laboratory ……the ideal system……. Molecular Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory Exciting area of medical pathology Need to continually up-date.
What Do We Do? Cancer Genetics Service for Wales.
Clinical background: Patient RM, YoB 1966 Her family were originally referred because of a history of breast and ovarian cancer. BRCA testing found a missense.
Medical Genomics Promise, Peril and Price. Alison J Whelan M.D., FACP Professor of Medicine and Pediatrics Director of the Hereditary Cancer Clinic Washington.
Breast MR Imaging Workshop th September 2014 High-Risk Screening Evidence-based Clinical Indications for Breast MRI Dr. Muhamad Zabidi Ahmad, AMDI.
Patient Decisions for Disclosure of Secondary Findings Identified from Clinical Diagnostic Exome Sequencing Gonzalez K 1, Shahmirzadi L 1, Palmaer E 1,
Hereditary Factors in Breast Cancer
The Genetics of Breast and Ovarian Cancer Susceptibility Patricia Tonin, PhD Associate Professor Depts. Medicine, Human Genetics & Oncology McGill University.
The genetic epidemiology of common hormonal cancers Deborah Thompson Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology.
© Dr Whitcomb Familial Pancreatic Cancer Families (and other high-risk people) David C Whitcomb MD PhD Giant Eagle Foundation Professor of Cancer Genetics.
Genetics and Ovarian Cancer June 16, 2015 Ovarian Cancer Alliance of Oregon and SW Washington Becky Clark, MS, CGC Genetic Counselor.
Ovarian Cancer Risk Reduction Taking oral contraceptives for 5 years can reduce your risk of ovarian cancer by up to 50% Hankinson SE, Colditz GA, Hunter.
Shiva Sharma SHO to Professor Redmond.  Introduction  Increased risk groups  Consideration of genetic testing  Management of patients with mutation.
Genetics: For this Generation and the Next
The BOADICEA Project – translational research in practice
Rachel Liao, PhD Coordinator of the Clinical Working Group and the BRCA Challenge demonstration project for the Global Alliance for Genomics and Health.
Genetic predisposition to
Clinical Evaluation of a Multiple-Gene Sequencing Panel for Hereditary Cancer Risk Assessment Volume 32, Number 19, July. 1, 2014, from J Clin Oncol Chen.
Private pay, physician ordered genetic testing Developed by Dr. Judith Allanson, Ms. Shawna Morrison and Dr. June Carroll Last updated November 2015.
Pancreatic Cancer In 2012 there were 43,920 cases of pancreatic cancer. 10% of these cases have a family clustering of pancreatic cancers and associated.
BRCA testing in women with ovarian cancer Dr Carole Brewer Peninsula Clinical Genetics Service 15 January 2016.
Breast Cancer Ten percent of breast cancer is hereditary. Or 23,000 women a year with a genetic basis for their cancer. The most common mutations in this.
Towards Global Eminence K Y U N G H E E U N I V E R S I T Y Prevalence of Germline Mutations in Cancer Predisposition Genes in Patients With Pancreatic.
What Percentage of Cancer is Considered to be Hereditary?
Genetic Counseling Yahwardiah Siregar Sry Suryani W Mutiara Indah Sari.
The Elliott Breast Center * Baton Rouge, LA *
Date of download: 7/7/2016 From: Genetic Risk Assessment and BRCA Mutation Testing for Breast and Ovarian Cancer Susceptibility: Systematic Evidence Review.
Research Brief: Genetic Testing for Hereditary Cancers Craig Morse BIO 101 SNHU.
Update on genetic testing for hereditary breast cancer syndromes Kristin DePrince Mattie, M.S. Licensed / Certified Genetic Counselor William G. Rohrer.
Hereditary Cancer Predisposition: Updates in Genetic Testing
Pathways involved in hereditary breast cancer
Kristen Zarfos, MD Linda Steinmark, MS, LCGC
Trends in Genetic Testing
Navigating from Somatic Tumor Testing to Germline Genetic Testing
Annabelle’s Challenge is a UK registered charity with a brave little girl at its heart; eight-year-old Annabelle Griffin. Annabelle was diagnosed with.
Olga Jarinova, PhD, FCCMG
Kyle Salsbery Genetic Counselor
Breast Cancer Screening/Imaging
Susan Domchek, MD University of Pennsylvania
Demystifying Cancer Genetics
Development of a next-generation sequencing gene panel for neurogenetic disorders J E Martindale, R Crookes, L Crooks, N J Beauchamp, A Dalton Sheffield.
Frances Bond West Midlands Regional Genetics Laboratory 12/04/10
CUP SSG May 2016 Dr Matt sephton
Brady A. F. 1, Taylor A2, Lachlan K. L. 3 1
‘ACHIEVING WORLD CLASS CANCER OUTCOMES’
Figure 1. (A) Cumulative risk of breast (diamonds) and ovarian (squares) cancer in BRCA1 mutation carriers. (B) Cumulative risk of breast (diamonds) and.
GYN CANCER RISK AND GENETICS
New Approaches to Cancer Susceptibility Testing
Overview of Cancer Genetics
Clinical Cancer Genetics in Breast and Ovarian Cancers The Role of Cancer Genetics in Precision Medicine April 17, 2018 & May 1, 2018 Kamel Abou Hussein,
Who in the room would offer BRCA1/2 testing to this patient Who in the room would offer BRCA1/2 testing to this patient? How might the medical management.
Genetics and Breast Cancer Adelphi 2018 Educational Forum Sharona Cohen, MS, CGC Certified Genetic Counselor Northwell Health.
Figure 1 The genomic nephrology workflow: genetic diagnosis and clinical application Figure 1 |The genomic nephrology workflow: genetic diagnosis and clinical.
Genomic Medicine Centre Overview
Introduction and Survey Results
Counseling Patients About Germline BRCA Mutations
Genetic Counseling & Testing for Cancer Risk
100,000 Genomes Project & Mainstreaming Genomic Medicine
Clinical Next-Generation Sequencing Pipeline Outperforms a Combined Approach Using Sanger Sequencing and Multiplex Ligation-Dependent Probe Amplification.
Genomic Medicine Centre Overview
Biology of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC)
HBOC Genetic counseling: major concerns and communication skills
Multi-Gene Panel Testing of 23,179 Individuals for Hereditary Cancer Risk Identifies Pathogenic Variant Carriers Missed by Current Genetic Testing Guidelines 
Diagnosis of breast cancer in women age 40 and younger: Delays in diagnosis result from underuse of genetic testing and breast imaging 95% of patients.
Breast cancer treatment according to pathogenic variants in cancer susceptibility genes in a population-based cohort Steven J. Katz MD MPH Professor of.
Breast Cancer BRCA testing protocol
Breast cancer BRCA testing protocol
Somatic-to-germline testing pathways
Urological cancer genomics
Presentation transcript:

Lorraine Hartles West Midlands Regional Genetics Laboratory Implementation of the extended panel analysis for improved cancer diagnosis (EXPAND) study Lorraine Hartles West Midlands Regional Genetics Laboratory

Hereditary breast and ovarian cancer More than 58,000 new cases of breast and ovarian cancer in the UK per year 5-10% are caused by hereditary factors 20% of these caused by BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations Current testing strategy Sequencing and MLPA analysis of BRCA1 and BRCA2 PALB2 sequencing for most breast cancer referrals

Current detection rates (2015-2017)

International breast and ovarian cancer genetic testing There is a global effort to identify the elements causing this missing heritability in breast and ovarian cancer Country Gene panel size (excluding BRCA1/BRCA2) Cohort size Detection rate (excluding BRCA1/BRCA2) USA (2017) 17 300 8% China (2018) 38 937 6.8% Italy (2017) 92 255 6.6% Germany (2018) 8 5589 6.1%

Aims of EXPAND Increase the diagnostic yield for patients with hereditary breast/ovarian cancer Increase understanding of the genetic contribution to these cancers Expand the understanding of the phenotypic spectrum associated with known cancer predisposition genes Support the development of clinical management decisions for patients with variants in moderate risk genes

Genes on the EXPAND panel Gene panel is based upon recommendations following the UK CGG workshop in May 2017 BRCA1 MLH1 ATM PTEN RAD51D BRCA2 MSH2 CHEK2 STK11 BRIP1 PALB2 MSH6 TP53 RAD51C NBN * * NBN is for research only and results in these genes should not influence clinical management Consensus for genes to be included on cancer panel tests offered by UK genetics services: guidelines of the UK Cancer Genetics Group. Taylor, A., Brady, A., Frayling, I., et al. J Med Genet 2018;55:372–377.

Genes on the EXPAND panel Ovarian cancer risk Breast cancer risk ATM OR 1.69 (1.19-2.4) OR 2.78 (2.22-3.62) c.7271T>G OR 11.0 (1.42-85.7) BRIP1 OR 2.62 (1.72-3.98) No association found CHEK2 OR 2.26 (1.89-2.72) c.1100delC OR 2.31 (1.88-2.85) MLH1 20% by age 70   19% by age 70 MSH2 24% by age 70 11% by age 70 MSH6 1% by age 70 OR 1.93 (1.16-3.27) Gene Ovarian cancer risk Breast cancer risk NBN OR 1.85 (1.05-3.24) OR 3.0   PTEN No association found OR 5.83 (2.43-10.4) RAD51C 9% by age 80 RAD51D 12% by age 80 OR 3.07 (1.21-7.88) STK11 13% by age 60 32% by age 60 TP53 OR 5.00(1.07-46.9)

EXPAND pathways – retrospective patient cohort Identified 1200 patients No BRCA1/BRCA2/PALB2 pathogenic variants Re-analysis of data from previous TSCP testing 55% uptake rate with 414 patients reported to date Aim to re-analyse ~700 patients in total

EXPAND pathways – prospective patient cohort Clinical Genetics referrals only Opt-in test ~50% uptake rate with 113 patients reported Aim to screen ~300 patients in total

EXPAND pathways – reporting strategy All likely pathogenic and pathogenic variants are reported Variants of uncertain significance are not routinely reported unless In standard of care genes Further studies of benefit 2 MDT meetings 10 patients discussed Considered whole family history Considered further tests to offer

Variant detection rate Data for all patients, excluding standard of care genes (BRCA1, BRCA2 and PALB2)

Variant detection rate by gene

Retrospective vs Prospective detection rate Patient Cohort Pathogenic Variants (LP/P) Diagnostic Yield (excl. SoC) (incl. SoC) Retrospective (n=414) 24 6% n/a Prospective (n=113) 22 5% 19%

CHEK2: a moderate risk gene Pathogenic CHEK2 variants detected in 3.6% patients across both cohorts 62% all reportable variants c.1100delC frameshift variant detected in 14/527 patients across both cohorts (2.7%) 1 patient found to be homozygous for CHEK2 c.1100delC Management of these patients can be a challenge, wider family may benefit from testing

Incidental findings? c.955G>A, p.(Arg319*) in RAD51C Personal and family history of breast cancer No reported ovarian cancer c.1263delT, p(Ser422Valfs*15) in CHEK2 Ovarian cancer family No reported breast cancer

Conclusions An additional 6% of patients have a diagnosis of hereditary breast and/or ovarian cancer Overall improved hereditary breast/ovarian cancer diagnostic rate ~19% Project is supporting the development of protocols for managing moderate risk in these patients Learning outcomes will help to embed this panel into routine clinical service

Thanks to… Beth Young Yvonne Wallis Kai Ren Ong Rachel Hart Jonathon Hoffman Camilla Huber Oliver Ridgway Sarah Burns