Critical Review: Chun, C. W. (2006). An Analysis of a Language Test for Employment: The Authenticity of the PhonePass Test Tianfei (Faye) Jiang & Peipei.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chapter 9 - Fluency Assessment
Advertisements

Nükte Durhan METU, Northern Cyprus Campus, School of Foreign Languages (Ankara, 30 May 2012)
Session 4: ASSESSING SPEAKING
Second Language Acquisition
TESTING SPEAKING AND LISTENING
Formative and Summative Assessment
Test of English as a Foreign Language - Measures English language proficiency and aptitude - College or university admissions requirement - World’s accessible.
The New Japanese-Language Proficiency Test (JLPT)
Chapter 1 What is listening?
Natalie Fong English Centre, The University of Hong Kong Good Practices in a Second Language Classroom: An Alternating Use of ICT in Independent Learning.
Common Core Math: 2 > 4 Super Week Norms Silence your technology Limit sidebar conversations.
Four Skills for Learning a Language
Designing and Developing Useful Language Tests Lyle F. Bachman Department of Applied Linguistics & TESL University of California, Los Angeles.
TESTING ORAL PRODUCTION Presented by: Negin Maddah.
5 Pillars of Mathematics Training #1: Mathematical Discourse Dawn Perks Grayling B. Williams.
LANGUAGE TESTING: Approaches & Techniques
Multicultural Health Communication. Learning Objectives Enhanced ability to communicate with people from culturally diverse backgrounds Practical knowledge.
Testing 05 Test Methods. Considerations in Test Methods Like traits tested, test methods also affect test performance. Test methods: features of the test.
Unit II Four Language Skills: Aural and Oral Reading and Writing.
Presented by: Mohsen Saberi and Sadiq Omarmeli  Language testing has improved parallel to advances in technology.  Two basic questions in testing;
EUROPEAN SCALES OF LANGUAGE PROFICIENCY BASIC CONCEPTS IN ASSESSMENT ASSESSING ORAL PERFORMANCE Language Assessment.
Linguistics and Language Teaching Lecture 9. Approaches to Language Teaching In order to improve the efficiency of language teaching, many approaches.
Teaching Oral Communication Skills
Communicative Language Teaching
Stages of Second Language Acquisition
National Curriculum Key Stage 2
Lecture 8 Assessing Listening Chapter Six Pages: Brown, 2004.
Theme 2: Expanding Assessment and Evaluation for FNMI Students Goal #1: First Nations, Métis and Inuit student achievement is increased as measured by.
Performance-based Assessment The types of work we choose to evaluate and the methods we use to evaluate that work deliver powerful messages to students.
Language Assessment 4 Listening Comprehension Testing Language Assessment Lecture 4 Listening Comprehension Testing Instructor Tung-hsien He, Ph.D. 何東憲老師.
1 DEVELOPING ASSESSMENT TOOLS FOR ESL Liz Davidson & Nadia Casarotto CMM General Studies and Further Education.
ENGLISH PRIMARY BENCHMARK COMPONENTS AND WEIGHTINGS SPEAKING – carrying 20% of the global mark (prepared by the Benchmark board and administered.
WELCOME Presentation slides can be downloaded from:
Professional Development by Johns Hopkins School of Education, Center for Technology in Education Supporting Individual Children Administering the Kindergarten.
1546 J. HEYWOOD Prov. II. iv. (1867) 51 . —Oxford English Dictionary
1 U.S. PIAAC National Supplement: Prison Study Overview Association of State Correctional Administrators Research and Best Practices Committee Gaylord.
ELD Transition Sessions
Four Basic Principles to Follow: Test what was taught. Test what was taught. Test in a way that reflects way in which it was taught. Test in a way that.
ASSESSING LANGUAGE SKILLS
UKNARIC conference Understanding IELTS scores explanation and practical exercise.
Developing Communicative Dr. Michael Rost Language Teaching.
Principles in language testing What is a good test?
The second part of Second Language Assessment 김자연 정샘 위지영.
The new languages GCSE: STRATEGIES FOR SUCCESSFUL IMPLEMENTATION.
Special Education Software and Programs Demetrios Houmas
Chap. 2 Principles of Language Assessment
Developing the language skills: reading Dr. Abdelrahim Hamid Mugaddam.
Are you ready to play…. Deal or No Deal? Deal or No Deal?
FCE First Certificate in English. What is it ? FCE is for learners who have an upper- intermediate level of English, at Level B2 of the Common European.
RESEARCH 1.Systematic 2.Logical 3.Tangible 4.Replicable 5.Reductive.
Communicative Language Teaching
Chapter 6 Acquiring knowledge for L2 use
Benjamin Rifkin The College of New Jersey.  Background  Development  ACTFL and ILR  Modalities  Levels and sublevels.
COURSE AND SYLLABUS DESIGN
MICHIGAN EXAMS Presentado por: Kelly Roa Roa
Objectives of session By the end of today’s session you should be able to: Define and explain pragmatics and prosody Draw links between teaching strategies.
Key Stage 2 Portfolio. Llafaredd / Oracy Darllen / Reading Ysgrifennu / Writing Welsh Second Language.
Teaching Language Skills. Listening used most frequently receiving aural information interpreting aural information bringing own background and linguistic.
HIGH SCHOOL TEACHER TRAINING WORKSHOP
AAPPL Assessment Follow Up June What is AAPPL Measure? The ACTFL Assessment of Performance toward Proficiency in Languages (AAPPL) is a performance-
Copyright © 2009 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Chapter 47 Critiquing Assessments.
Dr Anie Attan 26 April 2017 Language Academy UTMJB
IB Assessments CRITERION!!!.
Learning About Language Assessment. Albany: Heinle & Heinle
THE TEACHING/LEARNING CYCLE
SPEAKING ASSESSMENT Joko Nurkamto UNS Solo 11/8/2018.
Communicative Language Teaching
COMMUNICATIVE LANGUAGE TEACHING
SPEAKING ASSESSMENT Joko Nurkamto UNS Solo 12/3/2018.
Presentation transcript:

Critical Review: Chun, C. W. (2006). An Analysis of a Language Test for Employment: The Authenticity of the PhonePass Test Tianfei (Faye) Jiang & Peipei (Christina) Dong CTL 3799 Communication and L2 Learning in Workplace Prof. Julie Kerekes February 11, 2014

OUTLINE Background & Context Characteristics of the PhonePass test – Procedure – Setting Frameworks Analysis of the PhonePass test Conclusion Critique & Implications Questions & Comments

BACKGROUND Global technology has quickly progressed to provide more accessible business modes of telecommunication, like telephone, video phone, s and other internet/computer- mediated system in workplace. Tests over telecommunication networks are usually highly commercialized..

CONTEXT PhonePass Spoken English Test-10 (SET-10) WHAT IS IT? An expedient assessment tool for screening job candidates ability in spoken English WHAT IS IT FOR? Evaluating employees for promotions and measuring service employees with an accurate and objective test of their spoken English spoken capabilities. HOW DOES IT WORK? This test is a 10 minutes spoken English test for non- native English speakers, which is administered over a language-line telephone and immediately scored by computer. It consists of 5 sections, based on four diagnostic subscores which includes sentence mastery, vocabulary, fluency, and pronunciation. The cost ranges from $25 to $40. WHEN & WHERE IS IT? Anytime and Anywhere with a land-line phone system available. HOW IS IT SCORED? The first four sections are recorded and scored by computers, while the last section is not scored, which is open for review.

CONTEXT Purpose: to see if the characteristics of the domain of the test tasks found in the PhonePass SET 10 test correspond to real life domains of nontest tasks. Key Words: telecommunication; spoken language test; authenticity;

CHARATERISTICS IN PHONEPASS TEST Access to an Internet- connected Computer Download and Print out a Test Paper Access to a Land-line Telephone Follow Further Instruction in the Phone Testing PROCEDURE (requires employees computer technology & telephone technology capabilities)

CHARATERISTICS OF PHONEPASS TEST SETTING Please read No. 3. The winter in Toronto is freezing. A: Reading Aloud War broke out. There are three basic ways in which a story might be told to someone. B: Repeating Sentence What season comes before spring? Does a blanket go on the bed or the wall? C: Giving Short Answers to Question in/ bed/ stay we wondered/ would fit in here/ whether the new piano D: Building Sentences Which would you prefer to live, in the big city or a small town? And why? E: Responding to Open Questions

CHARATERISTICS OF PHONEPASS TEST Grammatical knowledge Textual cohesion Sentence mastery Vocabulary Fluency Pronunciation No reciprocal tasks visual and aural channels Any location & time High degree of speed 10 minutes Flexibility & Short Length Input Expectations Tasks

FRAMEWORK Authenticity the degree of correspondence of the characteristics of a given language test task to the features of a target language use task. (Bachman & Palmer, 1996, p.23) the developers need to show that the content of the test tasks is representative of the demands of the corresponding task outside the test situation, and that the scoring reflects this. (Luoma, 2004) authenticity of input, purpose, and outcome (Lewkowicz, 2000) Test Fairness Framework access, administration, validity, absence of bias, and social consequence. (Kunnan, 2004)

ANALYSIS: Authenticity RationalePhonePass Test (PART A) Created real-life discourseStructured speaking task Grammatical KnowledgeWithout correct sentence production and comprehension Textual KnowledgeRead in random order of items Functional and Sociolinguistic Knowledge Standard pronunciation

ANALYSIS: Authenticity RationalePhonePass Test (PART B) Proof of comprehensionSounds reorganization and repetition & Memory Speech productionWithout discourse creation and interpretation

ANALYSIS: Authenticity RationalePhonePass Test (PART C) Vocabulary of professional employment level low level of lexical knowledge Extended production responsesLimited production responses Sociolinguistic knowledgeN/A

ANALYSIS: Authenticity RationalePhonePass Test (PART D) Fluency (constructing, reading and repeating the sentences) Inadequate constructing Pragmatic knowledgeN/A Sentence masteryOne in six chance of guessing word groups

ANALYSIS: Authenticity RationalePhonePass Test (PART E) AuthenticityExtended production responses Not scored

ANALYSIS : Fairness RationalePhonePass Test (PART A) Minimal biasNo biased content or language Educational access (speaking & listening) Advantages for test takers who have had more opportunities to learn and become familiar with the tasks on the test Telecommunication access (land-line telephone, printer & internet connected computer) The absence of supporting telecommunication in underdeveloped countries Appropriate accommodationsUncertain physical (e.g. sight and hearing) impairment Rescoring and reevaluationN/A

CONCLUSIONS The performance on these tasks does not necessarily predict or reflect the speaking ability of the test taker to function in real-life domain of workplace. PhonePass SET 10 is considered relatively less authentic. The test tasks are relatively less specific to a particular domain and are not interesting and engaging.

CRITIQUE Strengths: The author used strong theoretical basis to support his analysis. It provides a valuable evaluation as a reference, emphasizing the importance of authenticity, to language assessment in workplace. Weakness: This article does not offer further practical implication in telecommunication in workplace. It would be better if the author provides more constructive suggestions to the phone language test.

IMPLICATIONS Since telecommunication lacks non-verbal compensation, such as body languages and facial gestures, the requirement of language is much higher than daily face-to-face communication. This analysis brings readers to have more deep provoking thoughts about telecommunication networks, for example, how can we communicate effectively without these compensation, and how can we minimize the misunderstandings in telecommunication. For employers, phone interview or language assessment via telephone should focus more on the authentic communicative competence than on linguistic performance. Communication effectiveness is a critically important criteria in assessing individual's language ability in workplace. Standards for communicative language capability in workplace is needed to be further explored.

Questions AND/OR Comments?

----- Tianfei Jiang & Peipei Dong February 11, 2014