Individual Education Plans

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Special Education Referral and Evaluation Process Presented by Lexington Special Education Staff February 1, 2013.
Advertisements

1 Ministry of Education, 2009 Individual Education Plans (IEPs) 101 Slide Deck No. 2.
Enforcing and Maintaining the IEP
IEP DEVELOPMENT STAFF DEVELOPMENT OCTOBER 14, 2008 PATRICIA GRIFFIN ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT FOR SPECIAL EDUCATION/PPS.
Understanding the IEP Process
Individual Education Plan Overview Presented By: Pamela Cameron Winter 2013.
Amy A. Peterman ADMS 625 Summer days notice to parents prior to meeting School and parents must agree on time and place of meeting. School can.
Adapted Physical Education (APE)  Ann Hughes, New Hanover Schools  Barbara Meleney, Durham Public Schools.
Defensible IEPs Douglas County School District 1 Module V: Documentation and Timelines.
1 Referrals, Evaluations and Eligibility Determinations Office of Vocational and Educational Services for Individuals with Disabilities Special Education.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
ASSESSMENT& EVALUATION Assessment is an integral part of teaching. Observation is your key assessment tool in the primary and junior grades.
American Diploma Project Network A coalition of states committed to aligning high school standards, assessments, graduation requirements and accountability.
Question on Background Reading. How does the M.E.L.S Special Education Policy tie in with the Q.E.P.? Do you see a practical link between a competency-
 Describes the special education program and services that are provided within a school district and those special education programs and services which.
I nitial E valuation and R eevaluation in IDEA Produced by NICHCY, 2007.
Skills and Achievement Commencement Credential
 Special Education is mandated by federal law and we have to do what they say.
Special Education in the United States Susie Fahey and Mario Martinez.
“Count Us In” 2007 Provincial Itinerant Conference Friday, April 20, 2007 Mary Ann Bibby with thanks to Perry Leslie for his valuable input.
Let’s Get S.T.A.R.T.ed Standards Transformation and Realignment in Thompson.
Individual Education Plan Overview Presented By: Pamela Cameron Fall 2014.
JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction 1 Program Guidelines for Students who are Visually Impaired PRESENTATION TO: California Transcribers.
1. 2 Roots of Ontario Legislation and Policy Bill 82 (1980), An Amendment to the Education Act: –Universal access: right of all children, condition notwithstanding,
Structure of Special Education A Quick Guide By: Edward Desanti.
Welcome to the “Special Education Tour”.  Specifically designed instruction  At no cost to parents  To meet the unique needs of a child with disabilities.
Individualized Education Plan (IEP) GOALS: Provide an understanding of your role as well as other professionals involved. Demystify the basic workings.
The IEP: Drafting the IEP (Steps 1, 2, 3, and 4) Southwest Ohio Special Education Regional Resource Center Tuesday, November 7, 2006.
Students with Exceptionalities
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
Special Education Module #1 : Legislative Overview.
SACS/CASI District Accreditation  January 2007  April 2007  May 2007  January – April 2008  Board Approval for Pursuit of District Accreditation.
 ask in writing for evaluation; keep a copy of the request  explain child’s problems and why evaluation is needed  share important information with.
The School Effectiveness Framework
Individual Education Plans.
Steps to Creating Standards-Based Individualized Education Programs The following highlights the major steps Committees on Special Education (CSEs) can.
Overview of the IEP as a tool in order to access, participate, and make progress in the general curriculum 1.
The Standards-based IEP Process: What You Need to Know Standards-Based IEP State-Directed Project - January 2011.
ASSESSMENT OF STUDENTS WITH MULTIPLE LEARNING DIFFICULTIES AND THE IMPACT UPON TEACHER TRAINING Ulla Alexandersson Lena Thorsson Sweden.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
“ IT IS PROOF NOT TRUTH” THE IEP IS THE PROOF Dr. Jodi Roseman Director of Special Education School District of Springfield Township.
Learning today. Transforming tomorrow. REED: Review Existing Evaluation Data 55 slides.
IEP Participation Special Education Paraprofessional Workbook Module 3.
IEP Participation Special Education Paraprofessional Workbook Module 3.
Expert Topic Presentation By Chris Coombe March 9, 2009.
Teacher Roles and Responsibilities in the IEP Process Amanda Strong Hilsmier EDUC 559.
And Amendments to the Regulations of the Commissioner of Education Effective December 8, 2010.
Section 504 training.
The Individual Education Plan (IEP)
Adapted Physical Education (APE)
NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION INSTRUMENT and PROCESS
Child Outcomes Summary Process April 26, 2017
Introduction to Evaluation IDEA 2004.
Introduction to Evaluation in IDEA Produced by NICHCY, 2007.
Special Education Ministry of Education
Title III of the No Child Left Behind Act
Test Accommodations.
The Michigan Merit Curriculum (MMC), Personal Curriculums (PC) and Certificates of Completion (COC): Addressing the Needs of Students with ASD.
FEAPs (Florida Educator Accomplished Practices)
Related Services: The What, The How, The Why
IEP Workshop Kathryn Everest YRDSB SEAC Representative – AO – YRC
Governance and leadership roles for equality and diversity in Colleges
The Speech Language Pathologist’s Role in Schools
Student Assessment and Evaluation
Evaluation in IDEA 2004.
THE INSPECTION SYSTEM AND THE SCHOOL EXTERNAL EVALUATION
The Transition Planning Process
Student Assessment and Evaluation
Introduction to Evaluation IDEA 2004.
Assistive Technology Devices & Assistive Technology Services
Presentation transcript:

Individual Education Plans SEAC - April 2018

Reference: Education Act (sections 96.14 and 235) In the case of a handicapped student or a student with a social maladjustment or a learning disability, the principal, with the assistance of the student’s parents, of the staff providing services to the student, and of the student himself, unless the student is unable to do so, shall establish an individualized education plan adapted to the needs of the student. The plan must be consistent with the school board’s policy concerning the organization of services for handicapped students and students with social maladjustments or learning disabilities and in keeping with the ability and needs of the student as evaluated by the school board before the student’s placement and enrollment at the school. In addition, the plan must state that recourse to the school board’s complaint examination procedure provided for in section 220.2 is an option if the parent or student is not satisfied. The principal shall see to the implementation and periodical evaluation of the education plan and inform the student’s parents on a regular basis.  

Orientations Seeing success in a differentiated way Placing students at the centre of their own success Adopting a systemic view of the student’s situation Focusing on the student’s strengths and the school's resources Strengthening school-family-community cooperation

IEP to meet the needs and pathway Regular pathway Modified pathway Lifeskills pathway: Moderate to severe intellectual disability: CASP – Competency Based Approach to Social Participation – 6-15 years old Challenges – 16-21 years old Profound Intellectual Impairment PII

Student Information and Profile Academic, Behaviour, Social/Emotional, Ministry Exceptionality describes the student in general terms Includes any specific diagnostic information (as per documentation in file and anything new that is pertinent) Career interests/goals are included for WOTP students

Assistive Technology Includes such things as assistive tools for visual impairments, hearing impairments (magnifier, FM system, etc.), hardware, software specific to student’s needs (as identified in reports on file)

Special Exam conditions NOTE: ONLY students with a diagnosed Learning Disorder/Disability qualify for BOARD/MEES SEC (special exam conditions) School approved conditions are determined internally but the student will need an IEP Students with special exam conditions must be using this condition throughout the year

Adaptations vs Modifications ADAPTATIONS: Changes to the format, instructional strategies and/or assessment procedures that do not alter the regular expectations of the curriculum. Students follow a regular academic pathway leading to an academic diploma. MODIFICATIONS: Substantial changes to the complexity of the expectations of the curriculum. Students follow a modified academic pathway leading to a work- oriented pathway and a work training certificate.

Lifeskills IEPs The competencies for each program are included in the IEP and provide the framework for the program. Goals will support the development of competencies

Current Skills and Abilities Students following a modified pathway will have an instructional level for literacy and numeracy – this relates to the level at which the student is evaluated on their report card, which differs from the cycle level that they are in currently. Students who require SUPPORT are following the regular academic program, so “regular with support” is indicated Students on a lifeskills pathway will have a focus for the knowledge and skills The skills and abilities listed are those that the student demonstrates independently

SMART Goals IEPs are unique and goals should reflect the student’s need, should move from the present skills and abilities to the next attainable goal S: Strategic and Specific – academic achievement, functional or behavioural – what is key to success? What will have impact… M: Measurable –You can count or observe it, how much progress is seen? A: Attainable - goal is developmentally appropriate and not too frustrating, what is next? R: Realistic, Relevant, and Results based – Is it important to the student and their success? What does it look like in practice? T: Time Bound – Can it be achieved within the year? Is it short term? Lifeskills IEPs have more goals possible to allow for more developmental short term goals

Other Recommendations and Communication General/Other Recommendations Personalized recommendations Signatures Checkbox to allow for sharing of document to new year’s staff Monthly Communications Regular communication is tracked – can be done in a variety of ways

Additional SMART Goal In rare cases where one or both goals have been met, and a new priority or goal becomes relevant to the student’s success, there is an optional third goal at the end of the form.