Volume 19, Issue 3, Pages (March 2017)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 16, Issue 3, Pages e4 (March 2014)
Advertisements

Detecting new microRNAs in human osteoarthritic chondrocytes identifies miR-3085 as a human, chondrocyte-selective, microRNA  N. Crowe, T.E. Swingler,
Volume 131, Issue 1, Pages (July 2006)
A Novel Cofactor for p300 that Regulates the p53 Response
Takashi Tanaka, Michelle A. Soriano, Michael J. Grusby  Immunity 
Development of Cell-Penetrating Asymmetric Interfering RNA Targeting Connective Tissue Growth Factor  Jihye Hwang, Chanil Chang, Ji Hyun Kim, Chang Taek.
Volume 138, Issue 3, Pages e2 (March 2010)
Hirotaka Matsui, Hiroya Asou, Toshiya Inaba  Molecular Cell 
Volume 19, Issue 2, Pages (February 2017)
Volume 129, Issue 1, Pages (July 2005)
Volume 76, Issue 1, Pages (July 2009)
Volume 138, Issue 2, Pages (February 2010)
David X Liu, Lloyd A Greene  Neuron 
Volume 19, Issue 3, Pages (March 2017)
IFN-γ Upregulates Expression of the Mouse Complement C1rA Gene in Keratinocytes via IFN-Regulatory Factor-1  Sung June Byun, Ik-Soo Jeon, Hyangkyu Lee,
Volume 136, Issue 2, Pages (February 2009)
Volume 11, Issue 6, Pages (June 2012)
Volume 44, Issue 3, Pages (November 2011)
Arginine Methylation of STAT1 Modulates IFNα/β-Induced Transcription
Activation of the Innate Signaling Molecule MAVS by Bunyavirus Infection Upregulates the Adaptor Protein SARM1, Leading to Neuronal Death  Piyali Mukherjee,
Eun-Joo Kim, Jeong-Hoon Kho, Moo-Rim Kang, Soo-Jong Um  Molecular Cell 
Akio Horiguchi, Mototsugu Oya, Ken Marumo, Masaru Murai 
Volume 130, Issue 4, Pages (August 2007)
Volume 25, Issue 9, Pages (September 2017)
Inhibition of KLF4 by Statins Reverses Adriamycin-Induced Metastasis and Cancer Stemness in Osteosarcoma Cells  Yangling Li, Miao Xian, Bo Yang, Meidan.
MUC1 Oncoprotein Stabilizes and Activates Estrogen Receptor α
Volume 135, Issue 3, Pages e3 (September 2008)
Volume 145, Issue 3, Pages e11 (September 2013)
Jungmook Lyu, Vicky Yamamoto, Wange Lu  Developmental Cell 
Volume 18, Issue 5, Pages (January 2017)
MUC1 Oncoprotein Stabilizes and Activates Estrogen Receptor α
Molecular Therapy - Nucleic Acids
Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages (January 2008)
Volume 26, Issue 6, Pages (September 2013)
HDAC5, a Key Component in Temporal Regulation of p53-Mediated Transactivation in Response to Genotoxic Stress  Nirmalya Sen, Rajni Kumari, Manika Indrajit.
p53DINP1, a p53-Inducible Gene, Regulates p53-Dependent Apoptosis
Volume 45, Issue 6, Pages (March 2012)
Halofuginone, an Inhibitor of Type-I Collagen Synthesis and Skin Sclerosis, Blocks Transforming-Growth-Factor-β-Mediated Smad3 Activation in Fibroblasts 
Volume 38, Issue 1, Pages (April 2010)
Volume 13, Issue 3, Pages (March 2006)
Volume 16, Issue 24, Pages (December 2006)
Volume 19, Issue 5, Pages (November 2003)
The Actin-Bundling Protein Palladin Is an Akt1-Specific Substrate that Regulates Breast Cancer Cell Migration  Y. Rebecca Chin, Alex Toker  Molecular.
A Critical Role for Noncoding 5S rRNA in Regulating Mdmx Stability
Volume 10, Issue 3, Pages (September 2006)
Phosphorylation on Thr-55 by TAF1 Mediates Degradation of p53
Volume 9, Issue 3, Pages (March 2009)
Resistance of Human Melanoma Cells Against the Death Ligand TRAIL Is Reversed by Ultraviolet-B Radiation via Downregulation of FLIP  Elke Zeise, Michael.
Volume 22, Issue 6, Pages (February 2018)
Volume 25, Issue 8, Pages (August 2017)
Yi Tang, Jianyuan Luo, Wenzhu Zhang, Wei Gu  Molecular Cell 
Inhibition of PAX3 by TGF-β Modulates Melanocyte Viability
Shrimp miR-34 from Shrimp Stress Response to Virus Infection Suppresses Tumorigenesis of Breast Cancer  Yalei Cui, Xiaoyuan Yang, Xiaobo Zhang  Molecular.
Overexpression of HGF decreases MET protein levels.
Volume 25, Issue 4, Pages (April 2014)
Mitochondrial p32 Is a Critical Mediator of ARF-Induced Apoptosis
Volume 25, Issue 5, Pages (March 2007)
Volume 67, Issue 6, Pages (June 2005)
Dan Yu, Rongdiao Liu, Geng Yang, Qiang Zhou  Cell Reports 
Volume 24, Issue 6, Pages (December 2006)
Volume 57, Issue 2, Pages (October 2000)
Volume 70, Issue 5, Pages (September 2006)
Volume 5, Issue 6, Pages (December 2013)
USP15 Negatively Regulates Nrf2 through Deubiquitination of Keap1
Dong Zhang, Kathrin Zaugg, Tak W. Mak, Stephen J. Elledge  Cell 
Volume 72, Issue 2, Pages (July 2007)
Bcl-2 and bcl-xL Antisense Oligonucleotides Induce Apoptosis in Melanoma Cells of Different Clinical Stages  Robert A. Olie, Christoph Hafner, Renzo Küttel,
Paracrine Apoptotic Effect of p53 Mediated by Tumor Suppressor Par-4
Jörg Hartkamp, Brian Carpenter, Stefan G.E. Roberts  Molecular Cell 
The interaction between PARsylated BRCA1 and RAP80 is required for maintaining BRCA1–RAP80–PARP1 complex integrity after DNA damage and normal HRR regulation.
Presentation transcript:

Volume 19, Issue 3, Pages 185-195 (March 2017) EPSIN 3, A Novel p53 Target, Regulates the Apoptotic Pathway and Gastric Carcinogenesis  Jinichi Mori, Chizu Tanikawa, Naomi Ohnishi, Yuki Funauchi, Osamu Toyoshima, Koji Ueda, Koichi Matsuda  Neoplasia  Volume 19, Issue 3, Pages 185-195 (March 2017) DOI: 10.1016/j.neo.2016.12.010 Copyright © 2016 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 (A) qRT-PCR analysis of EPSIN 3 in HCT116 p53−/− and p53+/+ cells. After incubation with medium containing 2 μg/ml of ADR for 2 h, HCT116 p53−/− and p53+/+ cells were incubated with culture medium that did not contain ADR for the indicated hours. (B - D) A549, U2OS and HepG2 cells were transfected with sip53 24 h before treatment with ADR. siEGFP and no transfection (noTF) were used as controls. At 48 h after treatment with 2 μg/ml of ADR, total RNA was subjected to qRT-PCR. (E, F) qRT-PCR analysis of EPSIN 3 in U373 MG (p53 mutant) and H1299 (p53 null) cells infected with adenovirus expressing either p53 (Ad-p53) or LacZ (Ad-LacZ) at a multipli2city of infection (MOI) of 10 or 20. (F) qRT-PCR analysis of Epsin 3 expression in MEF cells obtained from p53−/− and p53+/+ mice. The cells were harvested at the indicated times after 2 μg/ml ADR treatment for 2 h. Error bars represent the S.D. (n=3). Gapdh was used to normalize the expression levels. (H) qRT-PCR analysis of Epsin 3 expression in the thymus of X-ray-irradiated p53−/− and p53+/+ mice (10 Gy) (n=3 per group). Mice were sacrificed 24 h after irradiation with 10 Gy of X-rays. β-actin was used to normalize the expression levels in all qRT-PCR analyses unless otherwise noted. Neoplasia 2017 19, 185-195DOI: (10.1016/j.neo.2016.12.010) Copyright © 2016 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 (A, D) White boxes indicate the location of the potential p53 binding sequences (p53BS1, p53BS2, p53BS3 and p53BSm). Comparison of these potential binding sequences to the consensus p53 binding sequence. R, purine; W, A or T; Y, pyrimidine. Nucleotides identical to the consensus sequence are in capital letters. The underlined cytosine and guanine residues were substituted for thymine to examine the specificity of the p53 binding sequence. (B, E) Results of the luciferase assay of the genomic fragments containing p53BSs with or without amino acid substitutions at the p53BSs. The luciferase activity is indicated relative to the activity of the mock vector with S.D. (n=3). Mutant p53 represents the plasmid expressing either human p53 with a missense mutation (R175H) or mouse p53 with a missense mutation (R172H) (C). U373 MG cells were used for these analyses. Neoplasia 2017 19, 185-195DOI: (10.1016/j.neo.2016.12.010) Copyright © 2016 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 (A) HCT116 p53−/− and HCT116 p53+/+ cells were treated with 2 μg/ml ADR for 2 h and then incubated in normal medium. At the indicated times after the treatment, whole cell extracts were subjected to immunoblotting with anti-EPSIN 3, anti-p53, anti-p21, or anti β-actin antibodies. (B) We designed four small interfering RNAs (siRNAs): siEPSIN 3-a-d. HCT116 cells were transfected with each siRNA 24 h before treatment with ADR. siEGFP was used as a control. At 48 h after ADR treatment, whole cell extracts were subjected to western blot analysis. Red arrows indicate the protein bands of EPSIN 3. (C) At 24 h after HEK293T cells were transfected with one of the following expression plasmids: EPSIN 3 tagged with HA at its C-terminus (EPSIN 3C), EPSIN 3 tagged with HA at its N-terminus (EPSIN 3 N), mouse Epsin 3 tagged with HA at its C-terminus (Epsin 3C) or EPSIN 1 tagged with HA at its C-terminus (EPSIN 1), the culture medium was replaced with serum-free medium. After another 24 h, the medium was collected, and acetone-precipitated protein samples were subjected to western blot analysis. (D) HEK293T cells were transfected with either EPSIN 3 N or mock vector. At 36 h after transfection, whole cell lysates were subjected to immunoprecipitation with an anti-HA agarose antibody, and the precipitants were analyzed using SDS-PAGE and subsequent silver staining. The red arrow indicates the N-terminal segment of EPSIN 3. (E) The whole amino acid sequence of EPSIN 3 is shown. Red letters indicate peptide sequences detected by mass spectrometry analysis. (F) After incubation with medium containing 0 or 2 μg/ml of ADR for 2 h, HCT116 p53−/− and p53+/+ cells were incubated for 48 h with medium that did not contain ADR. Adherent cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS and permeabilized with 0.2% Triton X-100 in PBS for 5 min at room temperature. EPSIN 3 (green) and p53 (red) were visualized using specific primary antibodies and fluorescein-conjugated secondary antibodies. Nuclei were stained with DAPI (blue). Neoplasia 2017 19, 185-195DOI: (10.1016/j.neo.2016.12.010) Copyright © 2016 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 (A) H1299, HCT116 and U373 MG cells transfected with either an EPSIN 3-expressing plasmid or mock vector were cultured in medium containing 0.8, 0.5 and 0.5 mg/ml of geneticin, respectively, for 2–3 weeks. Error bars represent the S.D. (n=3). The P value was calculated by using Student's t tests. (B) At 24 h after transfection of each siRNA, HCT116 cells were seeded and cultured on ultra-low-attachment plates. Then, 24 h after plating, HCT116 cells were treated with 1 μg/ml ADR for 48 h and subjected to cell proliferation analysis. Relative cell viability was calculated by dividing the absorbance of ADR-treated cells by that of untreated cells. Error bars represent the S.D. (n=3). (C) Western blot analysis was performed using HCT116 cells treated as described above. siRNA against EGFP was used as a control. Neoplasia 2017 19, 185-195DOI: (10.1016/j.neo.2016.12.010) Copyright © 2016 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 (A) Western blot analysis of Epsin 3 protein expression in the stomachs of X-ray-irradiated Epsin 3−/− and Epsin 3+/+ mice (10 Gy) (n=2–3 per group). The red arrow indicates the Epsin 3 protein band. Gapdh was used as the loading control. (B) Immunohistochemical analysis of Epsin 3 protein expression in the stomachs of X-ray-irradiated Epsin 3−/− and Epsin 3+/+ mice (10 Gy). All mice were sacrificed 24 h after irradiation. (C) qRT-PCR analysis of Epsin 3 in the thymi of X-ray-irradiated Epsin 3−/− and Epsin 3+/+ mice (10 Gy, 24 h) (n=1 per group). β-actin was used to normalize the expression levels. (D) Apoptotic cells in the thymi of Epsin 3−/− and Epsin 3+/+ mice were evaluated using TUNEL assays 48 h after exposure to 3 Gy of X-ray irradiation. Red arrows indicate TUNEL-positive cells. Neoplasia 2017 19, 185-195DOI: (10.1016/j.neo.2016.12.010) Copyright © 2016 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 (A) Using the RNA sequence data of the in human gastric cancer tissues obtained from the database of The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), gene expression analysis was performed. Box-plots indicate EPSIN 3 expression in stomach tissues. The vertical axis indicates the normalized expression level of EPSIN 3, the top bar represents the maximum observed value, the lower bar represents the minimum observed value, the top of the box is the upper or third quartile, the bottom of the box is the lower or first quartile, and the middle bar is the median value. The P value was calculated by using Mann–Whitney U tests. (B) qRT-PCR analysis of EPSIN 3 mRNA levels in biopsy samples from the gastric mucosa in the absence (n=28) or presence (n=214) of H. pylori. The vertical axis indicates the expression level of EPSIN 3 normalized against β-actin expression, the top bar represents 90% of the maximum observed value, the lower bar represents 10% of the maximum observed value, the top of the box is the upper or third quartile, the bottom of the box is the lower or first quartile, and the middle bar is the median value. The P value was calculated by a Mann–Whitney U test. (C) Comparison of the expression levels of EPSIN 3 in each individual patient (n=54) before and after H. pylori eradication. The vertical axis indicates the expression level of EPSIN 3 normalized against β-actin expression. (D) qRT-PCR analysis of Epsin 3 mRNA levels in the stomachs of mice that were sacrificed 24 h after treatment with 40 mg/kg of intraperitoneal indomethacin (n=3). The vertical axis indicates the expression level of EPSIN 3 normalized against β-actin expression. The P value was calculated by using Student's t test. (E) Scheme of EPSIN 3 mediated gastric carcinogenesis. EPSIN 3 is inactivated in the stomach by p53 inactivation and H. pylori infection, and its inactivation causes apoptosis resistance, a hallmark of cancer cells. Neoplasia 2017 19, 185-195DOI: (10.1016/j.neo.2016.12.010) Copyright © 2016 The Authors Terms and Conditions