Fernando De Vita Oncologia Medica Seconda Università di Napoli

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab (bev) vs FOLFIRI plus bev
Advertisements

Our bold approach to life-changing medicines
Phase III Study Comparing Gemcitabine plus Cetuximab versus Gemcitabine in Patients with Locally Advanced or Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Southwest.
Phase III study of first-line XELOX plus bevacizumab (BEV) for 6 cycles followed by XELOX plus BEV or single agent (s/a) BEV as maintenance therapy in.
Intergroup trial CALGB 80101
1 Phase II trial of sequential gemcitabine and carboplatin followed by paclitaxel as first-line treatment of advanced urothelial carcinoma Presented by.
Copyright © 2011 Research To Practice. All rights reserved. Case presented by Dr Schwartz 44 yo woman with 4 mo hx of abdominal pain –Imaging = pancreatic.
Pancreatic Cancer Ali Shamseddine MD Proessor of Medicine AUBMC
This house believes that FOLFIRINOX is the best treatment for patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma Pro Marc YCHOU Montpellier.
Phase III trial of chemotherapy with or without irinotecan in the front-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer in elderly patients. FFCD
Randomized Phase III Trial Comparing FOLFIRINOX (F: 5FU/Leucovorin [LV], Irinotecan [I], and Oxaliplatin [O]) versus Gemcitabine (G) as First-Line Treatment.
MABEL – a large multinational study of cetuximab plus irinotecan in metastatic colorectal cancer progressing on irinotecan H Wilke, R Glynne-Jones, J Thaler,
. Background Paclitaxel and Irinotecan in Platinum Refractory or Resistant Small Cell Lung Cancer: a Galician Lung Cancer.
Gemcitabine With or Without Cisplatin in Patients with Advanced or Metastatic Biliary Tract Cancer (ABC): Results of a Multicentre, Randomized Phase III.
A Multi-Center Phase I/II Trial of Carfilzomib and Pomalidomide with Dexamethasone (Car-Pom-d) in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma Shah.
1 A Randomized, Multi-Center Phase III Trial of Irinotecan in Combination with Three Different Methods of Administration of Fluoropyrimidine with Celecoxib.
Brentuximab Vedotin in Combination with RCHOP as Front-Line Therapy in Patients with DLBCL: Interim Results from a Phase 2 Study Yasenchak CA et al. Proc.
Erlotinib plus Gemcitabine Compared with Gemcitabine Alone in Patients with Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: A Phase III Trial of the National Cancer Institute.
Single-agent nab-Paclitaxel Given Weekly (3/4) as First-line Therapy for Metastatic Breast Cancer (An International Oncology Network Study, #I )
New Findings in Hematology: Independent Conference Coverage* of ASH 2015, December 5-8, 2015, Orlando, Florida ARRAY : Phase II Trial of Carfilzomib.
POPLAR: Atezolizumab Improved Survival vs Docetaxel in Patients With Advanced NSCLC and Increasing Levels of PD-L1 Expression CCO Independent Conference.
Weekly Paclitaxel Combined with Monthly Carboplatin versus Single-Agent Therapy in Patients Age 70 to 89: IFCT-0501 Randomized Phase III Study in Advanced.
CCO Independent Conference Coverage* of the 2016 ASCO Annual Meeting, June 3-7, 2016 Phase II MONARCH 1: CDK4/6 Inhibitor Abemaciclib in HR+/HER2- MBC.
RANDOMIZED PHASE II STUDY OF NABPACLITAXEL, IN RECURRENT ADVANCED OR METASTATIC CERVICAL CANCER MITO CER-NAB Enrica Mazzoni, MD Medical Oncology & Breast.
Randomized phase III trial of gemcitabine and cisplatin vs. gemcitabine alone inpatients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer and a performance status.
EFFECT: A randomized phase II study to evaluate the EFficacy and impact on Function of two different doses of nab-paclitaxEl in elderly patients with advanCed.
Phase II HALO-202: nab-Paclitaxel and Gemcitabine ± PEGPH20 in Untreated Metastatic Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma CCO Independent Conference Highlights*
CCO Independent Conference Highlights
Alessandra Gennari, MD PhD
ABRAMYO Phase I-II study of weekly nab paclitaxel in combination with liposomal encapsulated doxorubicin in patients with HER2 negative MBC Alessandra.
CCO Independent Conference Coverage
Phase II Study of Docetaxel (D) and Oxaliplatin (O) in Recurrent Metastatic Transitional Cell Carcinoma of the Bladder Davar D1, Appleman LA1, Friedland.
ASPEN: Prolonged PFS With Sunitinib vs Everolimus in Nonclear-Cell RCC CCO Independent Conference Highlights of the 2015 ASCO Annual Meeting* May 29 -
Shustov AR et al. Proc ASH 2010;Abstract 961.
Gajria D et al. Proc SABCS 2010;Abstract P
Maintenance Lapatinib After Chemotherapy in HER1/2-Positive Metastatic Bladder Cancer CCO Independent Conference Highlights of the 2015 ASCO Annual Meeting*
CREATE-X: Adjuvant Capecitabine in HER2-Negative Breast Cancer
Phase III Trial (MPACT) of Weekly nab-Paclitaxel Plus Gemcitabine in Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer: Influence of Prognostic Factors of Survival J Tabernero,
NCI/CTEP 7435: Eribulin Active, Tolerable in Urothelial Cancer CCO Independent Conference Highlights of the 2015 ASCO Annual Meeting* May 29 - June 2,
Vahdat L et al. Proc SABCS 2012;Abstract P
ASCO Recap Palak Desai, MD.
What do we do after FOLFIRINOX? Gemcitabine-Based Therapy is Standard
ESPAC-4: Adjuvant Gemcitabine/ Capecitabine Improves 5-Yr Survival vs Gemcitabine Alone in Resected Pancreatic Ductal Carcinoma CCO Independent Conference.
CCO Independent Conference Coverage
Mateos MV et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 403.
KEYNOTE-012: Durable Efficacy With Pembrolizumab in PD-L1–Positive Gastric Cancer CCO Independent Conference Highlights of the 2015 ASCO Annual Meeting*
CCO Independent Conference Coverage
Trifluridine/Tipiracil (TAS-102) Improves Survival in Patients With Metastatic CRC and Mild Renal/Hepatic Impairment: Subgroup Analysis of RECOURSE CCO.
Ruolo di carboplatino + nab-paclitaxel nel trattamento di I linea nel carcinoma polmonare non a piccole cellule         P.Bidoli S.C. Oncologia Medica.
Intervista a Lucio Crinò
The Nurse View.
Lo sviluppo clinico di nab-paclitaxel Discussant: Fabio Puglisi
Bevacizumab in platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer: OCEANS.
BRAF mutant mCRC patients – What would you recommend? FOLFIRINOX/Bev
PRODIGE 24/CCTG PA.6: Phase III Trial of Adjuvant mFOLFIRINOX vs Gemcitabine in Patients With Resected Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma CCO Independent.
Ospedale Misericordia, Grosseto
Nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine in metastatic pancreatic cancer: a clinical experience Silvia Vecchiarelli Istituto di Ematologia e Oncologia “L.& A. Serágnoli”,
Nab-paclitaxel nel NSCLC avanzato
Lo sviluppo clinico di nab-paclitaxel Discussant: Nicola Silvestris
Jordan Berlin Co-Director, GI Oncology Program
Lo sviluppo clinico di nab-paclitaxel Discussant: Nicola Silvestris
Nab-paclitaxel in Ovarian Cancer
LV5FU2-cisplatin followed by gemcitabine or the reverse sequence in metastatic pancreatic cancer: Preliminary results of a randomized phase III trial (FFCD.
Advani RH et al. Proc ASH 2011;Abstract 443.
Adjuvant chemotherapy after potentially curative resection of metastases from colorectal cancer. A meta-analysis of two randomized trials E Mitry, A Fields,
1University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium;
RTOG 9704: A Phase III Study of Adjuvant Pre and Post Chemoradiation 5-FU vs. Gemcitabine for Resected Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma A U.S. GI INTERGROUP.
Lo sviuppo clinico di nab-paclitaxel Lo studio APACT
Nab-paclitaxel: lo stato dell’arte
La nanomedicina in oncologia: presente e futuro
Presentation transcript:

Fernando De Vita Oncologia Medica Seconda Università di Napoli Esperienza real life A multicenter experience of Nab-paclitaxel plus Gemcitabine as first-line therapy in mPC: efficacy and safety results in clinical practice Fernando De Vita Oncologia Medica Seconda Università di Napoli

Esperienza real life – I linea Inclusion criteria 46 pts with mPC who received Nab-paclitaxel and Gemcitabine between January 2012 and December 2014 were selected as the subjects of this study according to the following criteria: histologically or cytologically confirmed metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas ECOG PS ≤ 2 age ≥ 18 adequate major organ functions no previous CT; gemcitabine in the adjuvant setting was allowed if the treatment was completed at least 6 months before written informed consent

Esperienza real life – I linea Treatment schedule Nab-paclitaxel/Gemcitabine Nab-paclitaxel 125 MG/M2 D1,8,15 Gemcitabine 1000 MG/M2 D1,8,15 every 4 weeks

Esperienza real life – I linea Endpoints The purposes of the present study were to evaluate the effectiveness of NAB-P/GEM regimen in an unselected population of patients with metastatic PC and to identify the prognostic factors influencing outcome Endpoints Overall Response Rate (ORR) Progression Free Survival (PFS) Overall Survival (OS) Toxicity Prognostic factors analysis The data on the patient background characteristics, adverse events, treatment compliance, treatment response, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were collected retrospectively from the medical records

Esperienza real life – I linea Pretreatment evaluation *CT scan of the chest and abdomen/pelvis Blood count, serum chemistry and tumor markers (*CA 19-9) ECG and echocardiogram with evaluation of ventricular function *tumor response evaluated every 8 weeks by CT scan and CA 19-9

Patients characteristics (1) Esperienza real life – I linea Baseline characteristichs Patients characteristics (1) PTS 46 AGE (range) >70 63 (41-77) 11 (23.9%) SEX M F 22 (47%) 24 (63%) PS (ECOG) 1 2 21 (45.6%) 15 (32.6%) 10 (21.7%) PANCREATIC PRIMARY LOCATION HEAD BODY/TAIL 28 (61%) 18 (39%)

Patients characteristics (2) Esperienza real life – I linea Baseline characteristichs Patients characteristics (2) SITE OF METASTASIS Lung Liver Peritoneum Bone 9 (19.5%) 32 (69.5%) 6 (13%) 1 (2%) No OF METASTATIC SITES 1 ≥ 2 31 (67%) 15 (33%) BILIARY STENT 11 (24%) MEDIAN CA19.9 U/I (range) 469 (17.4 - 61546) PREVIOUS SURGERY 11 (24%) PREVIOUS ADJUVANT GEMCITABINE 10 (22%)

Esperienza real life – I linea Cross trial comparison comparison between poor PTS characteristics CHARACTERISTIC MPACT Our experience ECOG 2 (%) 8 21.7 AGE >70 (%) 10 23.9 BILIARY STENT (%) 19 24 PREVIOUS ADJUVANT CT (%) 22 HEAD 44 61 PERITONEUM 4 13

Esperienza real life – I linea Overall Response Rate (ORR) RC 2 (4.3%) RP 14 (30.4%) 16 (34.7%) SD 17 (36.9%) DCR 33 (71.7%) PD 13 (28.2%) *CA19.9 ≥ 50% reduction 20 (43.4%) *correlation between CA19.9 decrease ≥ 50% from baseline and tumor response (Pearson correlation 0.581, Sig. 2 tails 0.0001)

Esperienza real life – I linea Progression Free Survival (PFS) PFS, months (update data January 2015) PFS, months Median Range (95% CI) 6.9 (3-14)

Esperienza real life – I linea PFS: univariate analysis VARIABLE P ECOG (PS 0-1 vs 2) 0.043 AGE (<70 vs > 70) 0.989 SEX (M vs F) 0.126 Tumor Site (Head vs Other) 0.116 Bilirubin (> ULN vs < ULN) 0.05 Byliary Stent (No vs Yes) 0.365 Liver Metastasis (No vs Yes) 0.119 Multiple Metastasis (No vs Yes) 0.794 Basal Ca 19.9 (> 59ULN vs ≤ 59ULN) 0.741 Ca 19.9 Response (<50% vs >50%) 0.006 NLR ( <5 vs >5) 0.011

Esperienza real life – I linea PFS according NLR Median (95% CI) Range <5 8.0 6.9-9.0 >5 3.0 0.8-5.1 Log Rank test: P: 0.005

Esperienza real life – I linea PFS according CA 19.9 response Median (95% CI) Range Response <50% 4.0 0.7-7.2 >50% 9.0 6.5-11.5

MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS Esperienza real life – I linea PFS: multivariate analysis MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS VARIABLE P ECOG 0.125 CA 19.9 response 0.006 NLR 0.002 Bilirubin 0.444

Esperienza real life – I linea Overall survival OS, months Median Range (95% CI) 10.5 7.8-13 OS, months (update data January 2015) 3 (7.3 %) 13 (31.7%) 3 (7.3%)

Esperienza real life – I linea OS: univariate analysis VARIABLE P ECOG (PS 0-1 vs 2) 0.02 AGE (<70 vs > 70) 0.56 SEX (M vs F) 0.23 Tumor Site (Head vs Other) 0.22 Bilirubin (> ULN vs < ULN) 0.12 Byliary Stent (No vs Yes) 0.77 Liver Metastasis (No vs Yes) 0.24 Multiple Metastasis (No vs Yes) 0.82 Basal Ca 19.9 (> 59ULN vs ≤ 59ULN) 0.25 Ca 19.9 Response (<50% vs >50%) 0.04 NLR ( <5 vs >5) 0.001

Esperienza real life – I linea OS according NLR Median (95% CI) Range <5 12.0 9.3-14.6 >5 7.0 3.8-10.1 Log Rank test, P: 0.0001

MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS Esperienza real life – I linea OS: multivariate analysis MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS VARIABLE P ECOG 0.03 CA 19.9 response 0.15 NLR 0.002

Esperienza real life – I linea Second-line CT

Esperienza real life – I linea Treatment exposure Total number of cycles: 273 Median number of cycles: 6 (range 1 – 14)

Esperienza real life – I linea Toxicity AE nab-P + Gem (n = 46) Grade 3 hematologic AE, no (%) Anemia 7 (15.2%) Neutropenia 12 (26%) Thrombocytopenia 8 (17.3%) Grade 3 non hematologic AE, no (%) Fatigue Peripheral neuropathy 6 (13%) Diarrhea 7 (15%) Nausea 6 (13%)

Esperienza real life – I linea Conclusions Our results indicate that Nab-P + Gem is an effective treatment with the potential for long-term survivors also in the clinical practice including elderly and poor PS pts Availability of Nab-P + Gem as an effective first-line may conceivably allow maintenance of a better PS, thus increasing the chance of exposing pts to subsequent treatment lines, with consequent benefit in terms of OS This study provides safety data similar to those of the pivotal MPACT phase III trial Exploratory analyses suggest that PS and NLR are independent predictor of OS  

Esperienza real life – I linea Oncologia Medica Seconda Università di Napoli Jole Ventriglia Angelica Petrillo Alessio Fabozzi Ospedale Sacro Cuore di Gesù - Benevento Antonio Febbraro Guido Giordano La realta' e' determinata non da quello che gli scienziati o chiunque altro dice o crede ma da quello che le prove ci rivelano. Alan Hale 

Esperienza real life – I linea Background “In the era of biologic and molecularly targeted agents, the success of nab-paclitaxel in recalcitrant pancreatic cancer is a timely reminder of the importance and relevance of pharmacology and novel drug delivery technology in the development of anticancer drugs.”