Alaska Citizen Review Panel

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CITIZEN REVIEW PANEL Theresa Costello, MA Director National Resource Center for Child Protective Services.
Advertisements

Developing the Learning Contract
EDUCATIONAL POLICIES Alyssa Martin, NDSBA Director of Policy Services Annette Bendish, NDSBA Legal Counsel.
The Continuous Quality Improvement Process Empowering staff to develop local level solutions.
A Place to Call Home 10 Year Plan to End Homelessness November 2006.
1 North Dakota Children and Family Services Review Paul Ronningen, Division Director Don Snyder, Permanency Unit Manager.
1 Strengthening Child Welfare Supervision as a Key Practice Change Strategy Unit I: Helping Child Welfare Leaders Re-conceptualize Supervision.
Citizens Review Panels Blake Jones Program Coordinator.
1 EEC Board Policy and Research Committee October 2, 2013 State Advisory Council (SAC) Sustainability for Early Childhood Systems Building.
State Agency and Association Partnership The example from Oklahoma.
Human Resources Federal Regulations and Review Findings.
ALASKA CITIZEN REVIEW PANEL BIA Providers’ Conference Anchorage, AK December 2, 2014 CRP’s work and how you can help.
Guide to Membership Recruitment, Retention, Diversity and Inclusion.
Welcome! Please join us via teleconference: Phone: Code:
Katie A. Learning Collaborative For Audio, please call: Participant code: Please mute your phone Building Child Welfare and Mental.
Recruiting and Retaining Good Citizen Review Panel members The South Dakota Perspective.
Care Network of the Treasure Coast.  The mission of the Care Network of the Treasure Coast (CNTC) is to serve as the advisory body for the Ryan White.
Crosswalk of Public Health Accreditation and the Public Health Code of Ethics Highlighted items relate to the Water Supply case studied discussed in the.
Department of Human Services
Alaska’s Citizen Review Panel. Presentation Outline Citizen Review Panel - Brief overview Panel’s activities since 2002 This year’s goals Your participation.
Effective Collaboration Between Migrant and Homeless State Education Programs Presented By Lisa Phillips, State Coordinator for NC 2012.
Alaska’s Citizen Review Panel. Citizen Review Panel: Who The CRP is composed of volunteer members who are broadly representative of the state, including.
RESPONSIBILITIES & PROCEDURES
Care Coordination for Children, Young Adults, and Their Families
RCHC Developmental Screening and Referral project for Children 0-5 served by Sonoma County Community Health Centers.
Welcome to the Annual Meeting of Title I Parents
Welcome to the Annual Meeting of Title I Parents
University Career Services Committee
District Commander 10 Point Success Guide
Welcome to the Annual Meeting of Title I Parents
Butte Falls Charter School Open House & Annual Title I Meeting
Office of Children's Services
Alaska Citizen Review Panel
National Health Corps: A Case Study for Training as a Driver for Member Engagement Sara Wein, MSS, MLSP, LSW Caitlin Hoge, MPS Jennifer Larramore, MPH.
Add your school name and the date and time of the meeting
Aspirations 2022 Strategic Planning Process focus group meetings
Overview – Guide to Developing Safety Improvement Plan
Welcome to the Annual Meeting of Title I Parents
Overview – Guide to Developing Safety Improvement Plan
Organizing Your District Leadership Team
Continuum of care for the homeless
Welcome to the Annual Meeting of Title I Parents
Welcome to the Annual Meeting of Title I Parents
Welcome to the Annual Meeting of Title I Parents
Using the EFQM Excellence Model to support the role of a trustee
Alaska’s Citizen Review Panel
DISTRICT COMMANDER 10 POINT PLAN FOR SUCCESS
Ethics as Culture key elements
Responsibilities and Duties of Members and Staff
Texas Department of Family and Protective Services December 19, 2014
Using Data for Program Improvement
Model T(eamwork) in The Aid Office
Presentation to - Management Team Javier Garza, HRM B-02
Environmental Protection Agency
Alaska’s Citizen Review Panel
Welcome to the CIS Annual Meeting of Title I Parents
Using Data for Program Improvement
Family Engagement Policy
Alaska Citizen Review Panel
Welcome to the Annual Meeting of Title I Parents
Welcome to the Annual Meeting of Title I Parents
Welcome to the Annual Meeting of Title I Parents
Refresher: Background on Federal and State Requirements
Welcome to the Annual Meeting of Title I Parents
Creating Permanency Through Family
Annual Meeting of Title I Parents
Ethics as Culture key elements
Welcome to the Annual Meeting of Title I Parents
Shasta CCD Board Retreat CEO Search, Accreditation & Student Success
Central New York HEALTH EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS COALITION
Presentation transcript:

Alaska Citizen Review Panel CRP’s work House Health and Social Services Committee Juneau, AK February 12, 2015

Presentation Outline What is the CRP, and what does it do? Panel’s activities since 2002 This year’s goals

What does CRP do? Federal Mandate: State Mandate: Review and evaluate practice as well as policy and procedure Collect public comment and prepare and present an annual report which details their activities and recommendations (CRP Annual Report) State Mandate: “The CRP shall examine the policies, procedures, and practices of State and local agencies and where appropriate, specific cases, to evaluate the extent to which State and local child protection system agencies are effectively discharging their protection responsibilities.”

Vision and Mission Vision: Mission: To enable the Office of Children’s Services to implement its policies and procedures in a culturally sensitive and consistent manner across the state. Mission: Review and evaluate the practices and procedures of OCS Recommend changes and improvements

What CRP does not do It does not get involved in individual cases. The Ombudsman’s Office exists to hear concerns about state government from citizens. OCS also has a recently revamped grievance process to assist citizens and clients with concerns. CRP appreciates hearing from citizens because this will alert us if there is a pattern of problems in an area or with a policy or its implementation.

CRPs can review, evaluate, or examine Intake and screening Investigation or assessment Family Services (in-home or out-of-home) Practice behaviors Coordination of services Staff qualifications, training, and workload Utilization of technology Review of individual cases

CRP recommendations Can address… Should be… Policy-practice gaps Focused and specific Inadequate policy Should deal with issues within OCS control Issues not addressed in policy Based on meaningful and real information Systemic issues Be based on the work done through the year

Broadly representative of the state Panel Membership Volunteers Broadly representative of the state Diverse personal and professional background All parts of the state Some experience and familiarity with child protection The Panel’s members are chosen through a formal interview process

Needs of children and families This is how it works… Alaska’s Child Protection CRP’s job is to check if these wheels are turning as we expect them to – smoothly. Needs of children and families Practice Policy

CRP tries to know the answers to these questions. This is how it works… Alaska’s Child Protection Needs of children and families Practice Policy What is supposed to be done? What is needed? What is actually done? CRP tries to know the answers to these questions.

Every year the Panel starts with a WORK PLAN This is how it works… Every year the Panel starts with a WORK PLAN Sample thing 1 for this year….. Goal 1 Tasks…. Sample thing 2 for this year ….. Goal 2 Tasks… Sample thing 3 for this year ….. Goal 3

CRP pursues these goals through: Monthly meetings This is how it works… CRP pursues these goals through: Monthly meetings Panel meetings Meetings with OCS senior leadership Site visits Meet with OCS staff Meet with local partner agencies including tribal leaders and ICWA workers Present to the legislature every February Release an annual report

In the past year CRP conducted site visits in Anchorage, Bethel, Kodiak and Southeast (Juneau, Sitka and Ketchikan). Held a first ever retreat. Presented to the BIA ICWA Providers’ Conference and surveyed attendees. Met twice a month (once with senior OCS staff) Revised and updated nearly all processes and procedures. Recruited new members.

Covered almost all of the state…

Recommendations from 2013-2014 Recommendation 1: OCS make several changes to its intake policy Create and support several methods for people to make a report Change the intake procedures so reporters have to opt-out of receiving follow up on the case Uniformly implement the current pilot project of having a supervisor reviewing cases after 10 screened-out PSRs Periodically send a list of screened out PSRs to the local field office

Screened out because…

Recommendations from 2013-2014 OCS develop a model for serving in-home cases in rural Alaska and improve its data collection on in-home cases

Recommendations from 2013-2014 Recommendation 3: OCS address the root of Initial Assessment (IA) backlog problem

Recommendations from 2013-2014 Recommendation 4: OCS make improved relationships with community partners a priority Focus on relationships has been part of CRPs work for several years There is no consistent practice in building and sustaining good relationships No institutional structure guiding relationships

Past recommendations 2008 & 2009 - That OCS continue to work toward having a fifth service region headquartered in Bethel 2009 - Supporting and developing the relationship between OCS & ICWA (Indian Child Welfare Act) workers

Past recommendations 2011 - Work to improve the culture within the agency (Wasilla site visit) 2012 - Establish deadlines that require non‐emergency petitions to be filed allowing for supervision of the family by the continuum of legal parties without necessitating the removal of the child.

Goals for 2014-2015 Retained all four goals from last year And added: Learn more about ORCA and its capabilities Understand and assess OCS’ foster care recruitment efforts

OCS cannot resolve all the issues alone Come join hands… OCS cannot resolve all the issues alone CRPs are set up for us to participate

We just need to find a common language Child protection is very complex OCS is a complex system $ 300 million annual budget 500 workers 5 regional offices 21 field offices Governed by Federal laws, state laws, codes of ethics, professional values, rules and regulations, legal cases and opinions, etc.

We just need to find common language OCS says… Citizens say… Not enough money Needs are important Not enough people I know things are not right… Higher ups will not let us do that… Why don’t you do something now… We have to do things one at a time… You don’t understand my community… We are following a set process We have no idea what you do…everything is a secret!

We just need to find a common language CRP is trying to translate between these parties Alaska’s Child Protection Needs of children and families Practice Policy What is supposed to be done? What is needed? What is actually done?

THANK YOU! For more information www.crpalaska.org Contact Sylvan Robb 907-450-2456 sylvan@iialaska.com Leave this slide on the screen while people are leaving or if they come up to ask you questions as people are leaving.