Participatory methods overview

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Active Social Welfare (ASW): Improvement of collective welfare in Umbria Region Mariella Ursini Ph.D. Consorzio ABN – Perugia ITALY.
Advertisements

Migration and Remittances in ECA: Challenges and Opportunites A Knowledge Sharing Series Sudharshan Canagarajah World Bank February 5, 2009.
RD4S Exercise Pillar C: How can the contribution of research to SD be measured ? By L. Esterle, Cermes and Ifris, France.
Interactive Technology Assessment (ITA) Definition Interactive TA aims at influencing the innovation process through early interactions between suppliers,
Concluding Remarks from a Non-PTA Country: Insights and Future Directions Dr Paidi O’Reilly, University College Cork Château de Colonster - University.
Psychological Aspects of Risk Management and Technology – G. Grote ETHZ, Fall09 Psychological Aspects of Risk Management and Technology – Overview.
DEMOCRATIC CULTURAL POLICY: WHICH DEMOCRACY? WHICH CULTURE? WHICH POLICY? Clive Gray De Montfort University.
Beirut – 20 April 2011 Citizens as partners: current issues and challenges Charles-Henri Montin Senior Regulatory Adviser Ministère de l’économie et des.
Future Search Definition The Future Search method is an interactive planning process that focuses on breaking down borders and creating understanding about.
How to design and organize a public deliberation project Gy Larsen Ida-Elisabeth Andersen The Danish Board of Technology.
Participatory methodoogies: comparing Metaplan and Open Space Technology Adriana Valente Irpps-Cnr, Rome, Italy Biohead-Health Citizen Meeting Marrakech,
INTRODUCTION TO LAND-USE ISSUES. Land-use planning Seveso II provisions (Art. 12) in case of: New establishments Modifications to existing ones Developments.
Proposal under Science With and For the Society Sofoklis A. Sotiriou.
March 2015 Inter-American Network for the Prevention of Violence and Crime.
How to design and organize a public deliberation project Gy Larsen Ida-Elisabeth Larsen The Danish Board of Technology.
Implementing national EHR strategies in Europe: organisational, social and political issues Laurence ESTERLE, MD,PhD INSERM U 750 ‘Medicine, Sciences,
Planning citizen participation Procida workshop 2007 Ida-Elisabeth Andersen Gy Larsen The Danish Board of Technology.
Community Planning Training 5- Community Planning Training 5-1.
Consensus Conference Definition The Consensus Conference is a method for lay people assessment, where a panel of ordinary citizens (around 14) meets an.
Citizens Jury Definition A Citizens Jury is a method of obtaining informed citizen input into policy decisions. 12 to 24 randomly selected citizens make.
SERSCIDA WP2 and WP3 Marijana Glavica SEEDS kick-off meeting, 4th May 2015.
Module 3 Engagement techniques 3a Introduction. What’s in Module 3a  Range of techniques  Different techniques for different levels of engagement 
+ Welcome to PAHO/WHO Sustainable Development and Health Toolkit for the UN Global Conference RIO + 20 Welcome to PAHO/WHO Sustainable Development and.
Marília Maciel. Why ICANN? Why a comparative approach? ICANN Global Regional org. org.
Extension Roles in Complex Issues (Patton and Blaine, 2001) Content expert roles (focus on research & teaching) – Issue monitor – Issue researcher – Information.
Elizabeth Evans Getzel Virginia Commonwealth University
” “People are the reason for and the means of polycentric development”
PARTICIPATORY METHODS IN IA
1 2 3 background objectives methods expected results research team
MOST SIGNIFICANT CHANGE PROCESS
Connecting People for Better Coastal Water Management in Europe
Sample Fit-Gap Kick-off
ESSA Accountability April 5, 2017.
Brian Irwin Atlantic Herring MSE Workshop 2 Portsmouth, NH 7 Dec. 2016
The most represented stakeholders within the NAPA process were governments, followed by research institutions, UN Agencies and local communities. Private.
Participatory Action-research and the use of citizen science in promoting effective climate adaptation actions Filipe Moreira Alves Centre for Climate.
Information Sharing for Integrated care A 5 Step Blueprint
Science for the Carpathians
DARM 2013: Assessment and decision making
Overview of the work of the Expert Group on Technology Transfer
Lars Klüver, Director of Danish Board of Technology Foundation
HSCB Focus 2010 Overview August 5-7, 2009 Chantilly, Virginia
AWARE Evaluation Results and Conclusions
Konstantinos Karachalios Managing Director, IEEE Standards Association
Speeches to Inform Lesson 4.
Perspective Interview: Sofia Perez
A Training Design Tool for Stakeholders Tasked with Evaluating New and Innovative Treatment Technologies for Small Drinking Water Systems Be sure to type.
Nick Bonvoisin Secretary to the Convention on the
The Case for Participation
Communicating about Risks
What is a Logic Model? A depiction of a program showing what the program will do and what it is to accomplish. A series of “if-then” relationships that.
2 From Alpha to Ω IEEE offers much more than a globally open, rules-based standardization ecosystem. For over 130 years, IEEE has been the place where.
14 June 2018 Matthieu Branlat (SINTEF)
Managing a PSIA process
Decision-making Matrix Template
CitizenScience.org/CitSci2017
Family Engagement Policy
UNITED STATE AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT (USAID)
Bachelor's degree computer science (21) Programming Exercises Part 3
Division for Social Impact
Building Leadership Capacity Maximizing Performance Case Studies
The Use and Impact of FTA
What to expect in the next 4 months
Fred Ford Matt Klauza Phillip C. Mancusi Helena Zacharis
Local Initiative Facility for Urban Environment (LIFE Programme)
THE ENVIRONMENT THAT INFLUENCES NURSING CARE
Presentation title (including which technology you address)
Date and venue: 23 September, MSFD PCG, DG Environment, Brussels
What is a Logic Model? A depiction of a program showing what the program will do and what it is to accomplish. A series of “if-then” relationships that.
Global Fund Civil Society Implementers Forum
Presentation transcript:

Participatory methods overview Objectives Topic1 Participants Time €   (K) (M) (CX) (CV) Event Total 1-4 Citizens Jury Obtaining informed citizen input into policy decisions +/- + 12-24 randomly selected citizens. Experts, stakeholders & politicians give input 3 days 4-5 months 4 Consensus Conference Establish a dialogue between lay people and experts on a controversial topic 10-30 randomly Others give input 3 Week ends 7-8 Scenario workshop Develop common visions and proposals for future developments at a local level - 25-30 people with different roles in the local community (politicians, experts, business actors, citizens…) 2 days 2 Focus Group Understanding of group’s norms meanings and values m 8-12 participants: Stakeholders and/or citizens 2 hours – 1 day 1 month 1 ITA Collective assessment on technological development 15 people 6-10 days 6 Future search Interactive planning process to create understanding about common desires for the future 60-80 participants: experts, politicians, stakeholders, citizens 1 Legend: Explanation of chart symbols: Topic + - (K) Knowledge A lot of common knowledge exists There is little common knowledge (M) Maturity Most people have already formed opinions an the subject The subject is new; people are still forming their opinions. (CX) Complexity Highly complex or technical Not very complex or technical (CV) Controversial Highly controversial Not very controversial Note: +/‑ means that the method can address subjects with either + or -; m = medium € : 1 = inexpensive; 2 = moderate; 3 = expensive; 4 = very expensive Delphine Ducoulombier, Cité des sciences et de l’industrie Poster edited by Luis Aparicio and Delphine Ducoulombier