16th TRB Planning Applications Conference

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Citizenship Acquisition in the United States of America Ather H. Akbari (Saint Marys University & Atlantic Metropolis Centre)
Advertisements

Discrete Choice Modeling William Greene Stern School of Business IFS at UCL February 11-13, 2004
1 Inter-Temporal and Inter-Regional Analysis of Household Car and Motorcycle Ownership Behaviours in Asian Big Cities Nobuhiro Sanko, Hiroaki Maesoba,
Norman Washington Garrick CE 2710 Spring 2014 Lecture 07
Presented to presented by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. Transportation leadership you can trust. Comparison of Activity-Based Model Parameters Between Two.
FOCUS MODEL OVERVIEW CLASS THREE Denver Regional Council of Governments July 7, 2011.
How Busy is Too Busy? Investigating the Participation of “Busy” Households in Metro Area Household Travel Surveys 14th TRB Planning Applications Conference.
Log-linear modeling and missing data A short course Frans Willekens Boulder, July
Empirical methods take real-world data estimate size of relationship between variables two types  regression analysis  natural experiments take real-world.
Chapter 2 – Tools of Positive Analysis
Domestic Tourism Destination Choices- A Choice Modelling Analysis Assignment 3 Group 3 Hari Hara Sharan Nagalur Subraveti Kasun Dilhara Wimalasena Kento.
Topic Presented By Interpretation Parsons Brickerhoff Rajesh Paleti.
Simple Bayesian Supervised Models Saskia Klein & Steffen Bollmann 1.
InMoSion: Science Shop for Innovative Mobility Solutions for Mobility Challenged Europeans 3rd INTERNATIONAL MEETING ANKARA, TURKEY Partnering: Civil Engineering.
Multivariate Probability Distributions. Multivariate Random Variables In many settings, we are interested in 2 or more characteristics observed in experiments.
18 May 2015 Kelly J. Clifton, PhD * Patrick A. Singleton * Christopher D. Muhs * Robert J. Schneider, PhD † * Portland State Univ. † Univ. Wisconsin–Milwaukee.
Making advanced travel forecasting models affordable through model transferability 14th TRB Conference on Transportation Planning Applications May 5-9,
Conceptualization and Operationalization
11 May, 2011 Discrete Choice Models and Behavioral Response to Congestion Pricing Strategies Prepared for: The TRB National Transportation Planning Applications.
1 Dynamic Female Labor Supply Zvi Eckstein and Osnat Lifshitz December 27, 2010 Based on the Walras-Bowley Lecture to the American Econometric Society.
CSWE Child Welfare Symposium Child Welfare Workforce Retention Research in New York State New York State Social Work Education Consortium.
1 The relative role of spatial, temporal and interpersonal flexibility on the activity scheduling process Sean T. Doherty Wilfrid Laurier University Kouros.
Off-farm labour participation of farmers and spouses Alessandro Corsi University of Turin.
For Model Users Group June 10, 2011 Kyeil Kim, Ph.D., PTP Atlanta Regional Commission.
Measurement and analysis of household welfare: possible approaches using GGS data L. Ovcharova, A. Pishniak, D. Popova Independent Institute.
May 20, 2015 Estimation of Destination Choice Models using Small Sample Sizes and Cellular Phone Data Roberto O. Miquel Chaitanya Paleti Tae-Gyu Kim, Ph.D.
Arterial Lane Selection Model Moshe Ben-Akiva, Charisma Choudhury, Varun Ramanujam, Tomer Toledo ITS Program January 21, 2007.
Bayesian Analysis and Applications of A Cure Rate Model.
Investigating Household Bicycle Ownership Levels: A Tale of Two Market Segments Roger B. Chen, PhD, Yunemi Jang This study investigates two market segments.
Evaluating Transportation Impacts of Forecast Demographic Scenarios Using Population Synthesis and Data Simulation Joshua Auld Kouros Mohammadian Taha.
Modeling and Forecasting Household and Person Level Control Input Data for Advance Travel Demand Modeling Presentation at 14 th TRB Planning Applications.
Generalized Linear Models (GLMs) & Categorical Data Analysis (CDA) in R Hong Tran, April 21, 2015.
INTRODUCTION TO Machine Learning 3rd Edition
Multi-Speaker Modeling with Shared Prior Distributions and Model Structures for Bayesian Speech Synthesis Kei Hashimoto, Yoshihiko Nankaku, and Keiichi.
Meeghat Habibian Analysis of Travel Choice Transportation Demand Analysis Lecture note.
Presented to Time of Day Panel presented by Krishnan Viswanathan, Cambridge Systematics, Inc. Jason Lemp, Cambridge Systematics, Inc. Thomas Rossi, Cambridge.
Systems Analysis Group One ABM for Four Cities: Experience of ABM Estimation on a Pooled Dataset of Multiple Surveys Surabhi Gupta, Peter Vovsha, Gaurav.
Student Travel: Evidence from 13 Diverse Metro Regions of the United States Guang Tian and Reid Ewing Department of City & Metropolitan.
13 th TRB National Planning Applications Conference May 8-12, Reno, Nevada Rosella Picado Parsons Brinckerhoff.
ILUTE Event-Driven Time-Series Based Dynamic Model of Decision Making Processes Conceptual Framework Agenda Formation M. Litwin and E. Miller.
Statistical NLP: Lecture 4 Mathematical Foundations I: Probability Theory (Ch2)
Urban Planning Group Implementation of a Model of Dynamic Activity- Travel Rescheduling Decisions: An Agent-Based Micro-Simulation Framework Theo Arentze,
Hua Yang Arash Mirzaei Zhen Ding North Central Texas Council of Governments Travel Model Development and Data Management.
Responses to Gas Prices in Knoxville, TN Vince Bernardin, Jr., Ph.D. Vince Bernardin, Jr., Ph.D. Bernardin, Lochmueller & Associates Mike Conger, P.E.
Presented to Toll Modeling Panel presented by Krishnan Viswanathan, Cambridge Systematics, Inc.. September 16, 2010 Time of Day in FSUTMS.
Systems Analysis Group TPAC, 2015 Application Experience of Multiple Discrete Continuous Extreme Value (MDCEV) Model for Activity Duration and Trip Departure.
Intimate Partner Violence in Peru: An assessment of competing models Corey S. Sparks Alelhie Valencia Department of Demography Institute for Demographic.
Kotchikpa Gabriel Lawin Lota Dabio Tamini
Development and Validation of Firm Demography Model Case Study Analysis in Phoenix and Tucson Megaregion 16th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications.
Aktivitetsbaseret modellering af transportefterspørgsel
Continuous Regional Travel Behaviour Survey
Robust Estimation Techniques for Trip Generation in Tennessee
FUSING LONG AND SHORT DISTANCE TRAVEL IN THE COLORADO STATEWIDE MODEL
Microeconometric Modeling
Willingness to Pay for Reliability in Road Freight Transportation:
Monitoring international migration flows in Europe Frans Willekens
Eastern Michigan University
Mortality Trends The Good, the Bad and the Future
EVALUATING THE TRANSPORTATION IMPACTS OF MULTIFAMILY HOUSING
Generalized Linear Models
Maximum Likelihood Find the parameters of a model that best fit the data… Forms the foundation of Bayesian inference Slide 1.
Steps Closer to ABM: Example from Jerusalem
Analysis of Travel Choice
Tabulations and Statistics
Statistical NLP: Lecture 4
Travel Demand and Traffic Forecasting
Basics of the semiparametric frailty model
Categorical Data Analysis
Norman Washington Garrick CE 2710 Spring 2016 Lecture 07
Passenger Mobility Statistics 21 May 2015
Presentation transcript:

16th TRB Planning Applications Conference - 2017 A Utility-Theory Consistent Model of Activity Frequency, Purpose, and, Duration Choices Rajesh Paleti Chaitanya Paleti 16th TRB Planning Applications Conference - 2017 11/28/2018

Activity Based Modeling (ABM) ABM Models – Two major components Planning Stage – frequency, purpose, duration Scheduling Stage – Mode, destination, departure time Work Shopping Discretionary T1 Mins T2 Mins Tn Mins Activity 1 Activity n Activity 2 Three dimensions to the activity-travel choices that people make at the planning stage out-of-home activity participation frequency, activity purpose of the activity episodes, and duration associated with each episode 11/28/2018 2017 TRB Planning Applications Conference

Past ABM Research & Applications Work Shopping Discretionary t1 Mins t2 Mins tn Mins Activity 1 Activity n Activity 2 Frequency Activity Purpose Duration Count Data Models Choice Models Duration Models Poisson’s Models; Negative Binomial Models Multinomial Logistic (MNL) Models Regression/ Hazard Duration Models Consistent with Utility Theory 11/28/2018 2017 TRB Planning Applications Conference

2017 TRB Planning Applications Conference Limitations Activity Frequency, Purpose, and, Duration choices are inter-related in nature Models used to predict frequency and duration are not consistent with Random Utility Theory 11/28/2018 2017 TRB Planning Applications Conference

Current Study Objectives Propose a new modeling framework - a single utility theory consistent model for all the dimensions of activity-time use decisions Demonstrate that the joint model offers superior data fit and prediction accuracy than standard models 11/28/2018 2017 TRB Planning Applications Conference

2017 TRB Planning Applications Conference Virginia NHTS Data 11/28/2018 2017 TRB Planning Applications Conference

2017 TRB Planning Applications Conference Key Empirical Results Higher auto ownership levels, higher income levels, regular internet use lead to more OH activity episodes Presence of children 0 to 5 years, bachelor and higher educational attainment, older age (> 65 years) decrease # of OH activity episodes Several socio-demographics including age, gender, household composition, income, educational attainment, presence of children, auto ownership impact activity purpose and duration Higher expected utility from activity participation will result in more OH activity episodes Statistical Fit Comparison Log-likelihood ratio test and Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC) statistics demonstrate superior data fit in the joint model compared to independent count and MNL models 11/28/2018 2017 TRB Planning Applications Conference

2017 TRB Planning Applications Conference Next Steps Validate the estimated models on 50% data retained for data validation Predict using the models and compare with observed frequency, purpose, and duration choices Compare the model performance with standard models Test for traveler-specific unobserved factors that impact all activity purpose and duration choices  “unobserved heterogeneity” 11/28/2018 2017 TRB Planning Applications Conference

2017 TRB Planning Applications Conference Thank You! For more information: Rajesh Paleti rpaleti@odu.edu Chaitanya Paleti, P.E. Chaitanya.Paleti@ch2m.com 11/28/2018 2017 TRB Planning Applications Conference