Introduction to Hierarchical Models. Lluís Coromina (Universitat de Girona) Barcelona, 06/06/2005.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Radio Maria World. 2 Postazioni Transmitter locations.
Advertisements

Questions From Yesterday
TWO STEP EQUATIONS 1. SOLVE FOR X 2. DO THE ADDITION STEP FIRST
The t Test for Two Independent Samples
Trend for Precision Soil Testing % Zone or Grid Samples Tested compared to Total Samples.
Trend for Precision Soil Testing % Zone or Grid Samples Tested compared to Total Samples.
AGVISE Laboratories %Zone or Grid Samples – Northwood laboratory
PCC-SU-010 Identify some key business issues you need to consider before setting up Product Change Control in MFG/PRO PCC Set up Product Change Control.
/ /17 32/ / /
Advanced Piloting Cruise Plot.
Reflection nurulquran.com.
Worksheets.
© 2008 Pearson Addison Wesley. All rights reserved Chapter Seven Costs.
STATISTICS Linear Statistical Models
STATISTICS Sampling and Sampling Distributions
1 ESTIMATION IN THE PRESENCE OF TAX DATA IN BUSINESS SURVEYS David Haziza, Gordon Kuromi and Joana Bérubé Université de Montréal & Statistics Canada ICESIII.
AIDS epidemic update Figure AIDS epidemic update Figure 2007 Estimated adult (15–49 years) HIV prevalence rate (%) globally and in Sub-Saharan Africa,
Describing Data: Measures of Dispersion
Demonstration of capabilities of a bi- regional CGE model to assess impacts of rural development policies (RURMOD-E) Demonstration Workshop Brussels,
AIDS epidemic update Figure AIDS epidemic update Figure 2007 Estimated adult (15–49 years) HIV prevalence rate (%) globally and in Sub-Saharan Africa,
0 - 0.
DIVIDING INTEGERS 1. IF THE SIGNS ARE THE SAME THE ANSWER IS POSITIVE 2. IF THE SIGNS ARE DIFFERENT THE ANSWER IS NEGATIVE.
Addition Facts
Summative Math Test Algebra (28%) Geometry (29%)
Year 6 mental test 5 second questions
Year 6 mental test 15 second questions Numbers and number system Numbers and the number system, Measures and Shape.
Edmund Cannon Electronic and traditional learning on an econometrics unit September 2009.
1 Contact details Colin Gray Room S16 (occasionally) address: Telephone: (27) 2233 Dont hesitate to get in touch.
I can count in decimal steps from 0.01 to
1 What is? Structural Equation Modeling (A Very Brief Introduction) Patrick Sturgis University of Surrey.
ZMQS ZMQS
Fig. 1. Ms.: Stratified prokaryote network …… by Daffonchio et al., 2004 b a Conductivity [mS cm -1 ] Water depth (m) 40.
R + Hadoop = big data analytics Antonio Piccolboni Revolution Analytics.
HB 1358 Oil & Gas Production Tax Distribution Office of State Treasurer.
Tables, Figures, and Equations
Time-varying and time-invariant covariates in a latent growth model of negative interactions and depression in widowhood Jason T. Newsom & David L. Morgan.
The basics for simulations
Chapter 4: Basic Estimation Techniques
Moving Average, MAD, Tracking Signal Problems
1 Heating and Cooling of Structure Observations by Thermo Imaging Camera during the Cardington Fire Test, January 16, 2003 Pašek J., Svoboda J., Wald.
1 STA 536 – Experiments with More Than One Factor Experiments with More Than One Factor (Chapter 3) 3.1 Paired comparison design. 3.2 Randomized block.
2014 Level I Prep Class Determining a Neighborhood Factor 1.
7 - 1 ©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster Flexible Budgets, Variances, and Management Control: I Chapter.
On the Bias in Estimating Program Effects Using Clinic Based Data Ashu Handa University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Mari-Carmen Huerta London School.
TCCI Barometer March “Establishing a reliable tool for monitoring the financial, business and social activity in the Prefecture of Thessaloniki”
2009 Foster School of Business Cost Accounting L.DuCharme 1 Determining How Costs Behave Chapter 10.
TCCI Barometer March “Establishing a reliable tool for monitoring the financial, business and social activity in the Prefecture of Thessaloniki”
Statistics Review – Part I
Healthcare Sector Projections Michael Wolf Employment Projection Program PMP Summit June 3, 2014.
Correlation and Regression
Unit 2 Lesson 7 Part 2: Rounding to the Nearest Hundred Copyright © 2009 Kelly Mott.
Introduction to Feedback Systems / Önder YÜKSEL Bode plots 1 Frequency response:
Comparing Two Population Parameters
Introduction The fit of a linear function to a set of data can be assessed by analyzing residuals. A residual is the vertical distance between an observed.
Before Between After.
Addition 1’s to 20.
25 seconds left…...
Equal or Not. Equal or Not
Slippery Slope
Test B, 100 Subtraction Facts
Week 1.
$100,000 Pyramid A Fun Vocabulary Game! CAN YOU GUESS ALL SIX WORDS IN 1 MINUTE? Player 1: Sees the word and defines/describes it without saying the word.
Age Biased Technical and Organisational Change, Training and Employment Prospects of Older Workers Luc Behaghel, Eve Caroli and Muriel Roger Paris School.
Resistência dos Materiais, 5ª ed.
Experimental Design and Analysis of Variance
Heibatollah Baghi, and Mastee Badii
A Measurement Study of Available Bandwidth Estimation Tools MIT - CSAIL with Jacob Strauss & Frans Kaashoek Dina Katabi.
Lecture 5 1 Continuous distributions Five important continuous distributions: 1.uniform distribution (contiuous) 2.Normal distribution  2 –distribution[“ki-square”]
Spearman’s Rank For relationship data. Non-parametric i.e. no assumptions are made about data fitting a normal distribution You must have more than 5.
Multilevel Multitrait Multimethod model. Lluís Coromina (Universitat de Girona) Barcelona, 06/06/2005.
Presentation transcript:

Introduction to Hierarchical Models. Lluís Coromina (Universitat de Girona) Barcelona, 06/06/2005

N=1371. Introduction

Observed Variables M1T1M1T1 Frequency of contact / face-to-face M1T2M1T2 Feeling of closeness / face-to-face M1T3M1T3 Feeling of importance / face-to-face M1T4M1T4 Frequency of the alter upsetting to ego / face-to-face M2T1M2T1 Frequency of contact / telephone M2T2M2T2 Feeling of closeness / telephone M2T3M2T3 Feeling of importance / telephone M2T4M2T4 Frequency of the alter upsetting to ego / telephone Introduction

1. How frequently are you in contact with this person (personally, by mail, telephone or Internet)? 1 Less than once a year. 2 Several times a year. 3 About once a month. 4 Several times a month. 5 Several times a week. 6 Every day. 2. How close do you feel to this person? Please describe how close you feel on a scale from1 to 5, where 1 means not close and 5 means very close Not Close Very Close 3. How important is this person in your life? Please describe how close you feel on a scale from 1 to 5, where 1 means not important and 5 means very important Not importantVery important 4. How often does this person upset you? 1 Never. 2 Rarely. 3 Sometimes. 4 Often. Introduction

Model Y ij = t ij T i + e ij (1)) where: Y ij : response or measured variable i measured by method j. T i : unobserved variable of interest (trait). Related to validity. e ij : random error, which is related to lack of reliability. Model

title: CLAS 2X4. TRAIT LOADS EQUAL. 1 nivell. RAW DATA FROM FILE dadesmodel.PSF LATENT VARIABLES T1 T2 T3 T4 RELATIONSHIPS M1T1 = 1*T1 M2T1 = T1 M1T2 = 1*T2 M2T2 = T2 M1T3 = 1*T3 M2T3 = T3 M1T4 = 1*T4 M2T4 = T4 SET THE ERROR VARIANCE OF M1T1 FREE SET THE ERROR VARIANCE OF M2T1 FREE SET THE ERROR VARIANCE OF M1T2 FREE SET THE ERROR VARIANCE OF M2T2 FREE SET THE ERROR VARIANCE OF M1T3 FREE SET THE ERROR VARIANCE OF M2T3 FREE SET THE ERROR VARIANCE OF M1T4 FREE SET THE ERROR VARIANCE OF M2T4 FREE SET THE VARIANCE OF T1 FREE SET THE VARIANCE OF T2 FREE SET THE VARIANCE OF T3 FREE SET THE VARIANCE OF T4 FREE T2 = T1 T4 T3 = T1 T4 LET T1 AND T4 CORRELATE LET T2 AND T3 CORRELATE LET THE PATH T1 -> M2T1 BE EQUAL TO THE PATH T2 -> M2T2 LET THE PATH T1 -> M2T1 BE EQUAL TO THE PATH T3 -> M2T3 LET THE PATH T1 -> M2T1 BE EQUAL TO THE PATH T4 -> M2T4 OPTIONS ND=3 sc RS PATH DIAGRAM END OF PROBLEM

Model Figure I : Path diagram for the MTMM model

Table I: Decomposition variance components T1M1T1M1 T2M1T2M1 T3M1T3M1 T4M1T4M1 T1M2T1M2 T2M2T2M2 T3M2T3M2 T4M2T4M2 trait variance87%79%83%74%87%82%85%78% error variance13%21%17%26%13%18%15%22% Model Structural Equations T2 = 0.376*T *T4, Errorvar.= 0.490, R² = (0.0245) (0.0322) (0.0244) T3 = 0.439*T *T4, Errorvar.= 0.566, R² = (0.0261) (0.0344) (0.0278) Error Covariance for T3 and T2 = (0.0242) Lisrel Output in latent growth curve Var (Y ij ) = t ij 2 Var (T i ) + Var (e ij ) (2)()

The highest level: group level = egos = g The lowest level: individual level = alters = k Multilevel model Multilevel analysis. Two-level model.

The mean centred individual scores for group g and individual k can be decomposed into: Between group component (3) Within group component (4) where: is the total average over all alters and egos. is the average of all alters of the g th ego. Y gk is the score on the name interpreter of the k th alter chosen by the g th ego. G is the total number of egos. n is the number of alters within each ego, constant. N=nG is the total number of alters. Multilevel model

Sample covariance matrices: Multilevel model SW=SW=SB=SB= S T = S B + S W = (5)(6) (7) Population covariance matrices: T = B + W (8) Y ij = t Bij T Bi + e Bij + t wij T wi + e wij (9)() Y Bij Y Wij

Härnqvist Method Separate analysis for S B and S W Group measures S w is the ML estimator of Σ W S B is the ML estimator of Σ W +cΣ B (10) Multilevel model Model estimated by Maximum Likelihood (ML).

title: CLAS 2X4. TRAIT LOADS EQUAL. BETWEEN SIMPLIFICAT GROUP 1: BETWEEN RAW DATA FROM FILE dadesmodel.PSF $CLUSTER EGO LATENT VARIABLES T1 T2 T3 T4 RELATIONSHIPS M1T1 = 1*T1 M2T1 = 1*T1 M1T2 = 1*T2 M2T2 = 1*T2 M1T3 = 1*T3 M2T3 = 1*T3 M1T4 = 1*T4 M2T4 = 1*T4 SET THE ERROR VARIANCE OF M1T1 FREE SET THE ERROR VARIANCE OF M2T1 FREE SET THE ERROR VARIANCE OF M1T2 FREE SET THE ERROR VARIANCE OF M2T2 FREE SET THE ERROR VARIANCE OF M1T3 FREE SET THE ERROR VARIANCE OF M2T3 FREE SET THE ERROR VARIANCE OF M1T4 TO SET THE ERROR VARIANCE OF M2T4 FREE SET THE VARIANCE OF T1 FREE SET THE VARIANCE OF T2 FREE SET THE VARIANCE OF T3 FREE SET THE VARIANCE OF T4 FREE T2 = T1 T4 T3 = T1 T4 LET T1 AND T4 CORRELATE LET T2 AND T3 CORRELATE... Multilevel model

GROUP 2: WITHIN RAW DATA FROM FILE dadesmodel.PSF LATENT VARIABLES T1 T2 T3 T4 RELATIONSHIPS M1T1 = 1*T1 M2T1 = T1 M1T2 = 1*T2 M2T2 = T2 M1T3 = 1*T3 M2T3 = T3 M1T4 = 1*T4 M2T4 = T4... END OF PROBLEM Multilevel model

CLAS 2X4. TRAIT LOADS EQUAL. BETWEEN SIMPLIFICAT GROUP 1: BETWEEN LISREL Estimates (Maximum Likelihood) Measurement Equations M1T2 = 1.000*T2, Errorvar.= , R² = M1T3 = 1.000*T3, Errorvar.= , R² = M2T2 = 1.000*T2, Errorvar.= , R² = M2T3 = 1.000*T3, Errorvar.= , R² = M1T1 = 1.000*T1, Errorvar.= , R² = M1T4 = 1.000*T4, Errorvar.= 0.000, R² = 1.00 M2T1 = 1.000*T1, Errorvar.= , R² = M2T4 = 1.000*T4, Errorvar.= , R² = Structural Equations T2 = *T *T4, Errorvar.= , R² = T3 = 0.152*T *T4, Errorvar.= 0.103, R² = Error Covariance for T3 and T2 = (0.0) Multilevel model Lisrel Output in latent growth curve

GROUP 2: WITHIN LISREL Estimates (Maximum Likelihood) Measurement Equations M1T2 = 1.000*T2, Errorvar.= 0.184, R² = M1T3 = 1.000*T3, Errorvar.= 0.193, R² = M2T2 = 0.950*T2, Errorvar.= 0.151, R² = M2T3 = 0.950*T3, Errorvar.= 0.151, R² = M1T1 = 1.000*T1, Errorvar.= 0.154, R² = M1T4 = 1.000*T4, Errorvar.= 0.225, R² = M2T1 = 0.950*T1, Errorvar.= 0.167, R² = M2T4 = 0.950*T4, Errorvar.= 0.181, R² = Structural Equations T2 = 0.474*T *T4, Errorvar.= 0.386, R² = T3 = 0.502*T *T4, Errorvar.= 0.448, R² = Error Covariance for T3 and T2 = (0.0) Multilevel model

Interpretation: To analyse each component separately: Y ij = t Bij T Bi + e Bij + t wij T wi + e wij (11) () Y Bij Y Wij Decompose the variance: Var (Y ij ) =t ij 2 w Var (T iW ) + t ij 2 B Var (T iB ) + (12)() Var (e ijw ) + Var (e ijB ) Multilevel model

Table II: Decomposition into 4 variance components. T1M1T1M1 T2M1T2M1 T3M1T3M1 T4M1T4M1 T1M2T1M2 T2M2T2M2 T3M2T3M2 T4M2T4M2 trait variance within error variance within trait variance between error variance between* * Boldfaced for small non-significant variances constrained to zero. Results and interpretation

Table III: Percentages of decomposition into 4 variance components* T1M1T1M1 T2M1T2M1 T3M1T3M1 T4M1T4M1 T1M2T1M2 T2M2T2M2 T3M2T3M2 T4M2T4M2 trait variance within error variance within trait variance between error variance between* * Boldfaced for small non-significant variances constrained to zero. Results and interpretation

t ij 2 w Var(T iw )/ [t ij 2 w Var(T iw ) + t ij 2 B Var(T iB )] T1M1T1M1 T2M1T2M1 T3M1T3M1 T4M1T4M1 T1M2T1M2 T2M2T2M2 T3M2T3M2 T4M2T4M Table IVTable IV: Percentages of variance at within level form M1 and M2 Results and interpretation T1M1T1M1 T2M1T2M1 T3M1T3M1 T4M1T4M1 T1M2T1M2 T2M2T2M2 T3M2T3M2 T4M2T4M2 Var(eijw)/ Var(Yij)

For further information and contact: