Multitasking Across Generations Lyzette Blanco & Dr. Larry Rosen California State University, Dominguez Hills.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Numbers Treasure Hunt Following each question, click on the answer. If correct, the next page will load with a graphic first – these can be used to check.
Advertisements

EcoTherm Plus WGB-K 20 E 4,5 – 20 kW.
Números.
1 A B C
Trend for Precision Soil Testing % Zone or Grid Samples Tested compared to Total Samples.
Trend for Precision Soil Testing % Zone or Grid Samples Tested compared to Total Samples.
AGVISE Laboratories %Zone or Grid Samples – Northwood laboratory
Trend for Precision Soil Testing % Zone or Grid Samples Tested compared to Total Samples.
PDAs Accept Context-Free Languages
In-Home Pantry Inventory Updated: November Background and Methodology Background In 1996 a National Eating Trends (NET) pantry survey found that.
1
EuroCondens SGB E.
Worksheets.
Slide 1Fig 26-CO, p.795. Slide 2Fig 26-1, p.796 Slide 3Fig 26-2, p.797.
Slide 1Fig 25-CO, p.762. Slide 2Fig 25-1, p.765 Slide 3Fig 25-2, p.765.
Sequential Logic Design
Addition and Subtraction Equations
David Burdett May 11, 2004 Package Binding for WS CDL.
Create an Application Title 1Y - Youth Chapter 5.
Add Governors Discretionary (1G) Grants Chapter 6.
CALENDAR.
CHAPTER 18 The Ankle and Lower Leg
The 5S numbers game..
突破信息检索壁垒 -SciFinder Scholar 介绍
A Fractional Order (Proportional and Derivative) Motion Controller Design for A Class of Second-order Systems Center for Self-Organizing Intelligent.
Numerical Analysis 1 EE, NCKU Tien-Hao Chang (Darby Chang)
Media-Monitoring Final Report April - May 2010 News.
Break Time Remaining 10:00.
The basics for simulations
PP Test Review Sections 6-1 to 6-6
MM4A6c: Apply the law of sines and the law of cosines.
2013 Fox Park Adopt-A-Hydrant Fund Raising & Beautification Campaign Now is your chance to take part in an effort to beautify our neighborhood by painting.
Regression with Panel Data
TCCI Barometer March “Establishing a reliable tool for monitoring the financial, business and social activity in the Prefecture of Thessaloniki”
1 Prediction of electrical energy by photovoltaic devices in urban situations By. R.C. Ott July 2011.
Dynamic Access Control the file server, reimagined Presented by Mark on twitter 1 contents copyright 2013 Mark Minasi.
Copyright © 2012, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved. 1 Chapter 7 Modeling Structure with Blocks.
Progressive Aerobic Cardiovascular Endurance Run
Biology 2 Plant Kingdom Identification Test Review.
Name of presenter(s) or subtitle Canadian Netizens February 2004.
Adding Up In Chunks.
MaK_Full ahead loaded 1 Alarm Page Directory (F11)
Facebook Pages 101: Your Organization’s Foothold on the Social Web A Volunteer Leader Webinar Sponsored by CACO December 1, 2010 Andrew Gossen, Senior.
TCCI Barometer September “Establishing a reliable tool for monitoring the financial, business and social activity in the Prefecture of Thessaloniki”
When you see… Find the zeros You think….
2011 WINNISQUAM COMMUNITY SURVEY YOUTH RISK BEHAVIOR GRADES 9-12 STUDENTS=1021.
Before Between After.
2011 FRANKLIN COMMUNITY SURVEY YOUTH RISK BEHAVIOR GRADES 9-12 STUDENTS=332.
2.10% more children born Die 0.2 years sooner Spend 95.53% less money on health care No class divide 60.84% less electricity 84.40% less oil.
Subtraction: Adding UP
5 minutes.
Numeracy Resources for KS2
1 Non Deterministic Automata. 2 Alphabet = Nondeterministic Finite Accepter (NFA)
Static Equilibrium; Elasticity and Fracture
Converting a Fraction to %
Resistência dos Materiais, 5ª ed.
Clock will move after 1 minute
famous photographer Ara Guler famous photographer ARA GULER.
PSSA Preparation.
Select a time to count down from the clock above
Copyright Tim Morris/St Stephen's School
1.step PMIT start + initial project data input Concept Concept.
A Data Warehouse Mining Tool Stephen Turner Chris Frala
1 Dr. Scott Schaefer Least Squares Curves, Rational Representations, Splines and Continuity.
1 Non Deterministic Automata. 2 Alphabet = Nondeterministic Finite Accepter (NFA)
Introduction Embedded Universal Tools and Online Features 2.
Schutzvermerk nach DIN 34 beachten 05/04/15 Seite 1 Training EPAM and CANopen Basic Solution: Password * * Level 1 Level 2 * Level 3 Password2 IP-Adr.
Presentation transcript:

Multitasking Across Generations Lyzette Blanco & Dr. Larry Rosen California State University, Dominguez Hills

Generations Net Generation (ages 11-28) Born after 1980 Generation X (ages 29-43) Born between 1965 and 1979 Baby Boomers (ages 44-62) Born between1946 and1964

Introduction Kaiser Family Foundation National Study (2006) of children and teens 8 to 18-years-old Children/Teens spend 6 hours and 21 minutes per day or 44 hours a week using digital media. When multitasking is taken into consideration the time increases to 8 hours 33 minutes a day or 60 hours per week using digital media.

Multitasking Websters Dictionary: The concurrent performance of several jobs by a computer.

STUDY 1 DEMOGRAPHICS GROUP SAMPLE SIZE MALES FEMALES AsianBlackWhite Latino/ a Net Generation (1980 +) Under %-58%22%17%27%35% Generation X ( ) %-57%17%22%33%28% Baby Boomers ( ) %-61%7%21%52%21%

DAILY TECHNOLOGY AND MEDIA USAGE TECHNOLOGY HOURS/DAY NET GENERATION GENERATION XBABY BOOMERS Online2:311:581:14 On Computer2:082:321:41 1:261:371:14 IM/Chat1:450:360:14 Telephone2:021:471:38 Texting2:201:070:28 Video Games1:080:310:13 Music3:332:351:44 Television2:372:122:25 TOTAL DAILY TECHNOLOGY USE 20:3814:557:51

TOTAL NUMBER OF TASKS DONE DURING FREE TIME

Multitasking With Free Time Top 5 Activities for Each Generation NET GENERATIONGENERATION XBABY BOOMERS Music (79%)Eating (78%)Eating (80%) Online (75%)Music (72%) TV (67%) Eating (74%)Online (68%)Music (64%) Texting (60%)TV (62%)Telephone (52%) (60%) (59%) Online (50%)

STUDY 1 RESULTS SUMMARY There is a difference in how much members of the three generations multitask during free time. During free time generation members multitask using different media devices. The tasks chosen require minimal amounts of working memory (e.g., eating, listening to music, etc.)

STUDY 2: PURPOSE To assess how much time members of each generation use a variety of technology and media. To assess how individuals within each generation multitask under three conditions: During Free Time While Studying for a Final Exam the Next Day While Preparing an Important Business Report that is Due the Next Day To assess whether the multiple tasks that are performed by the generations are similar or different in these three conditions.

Study 2 Demographics GROUP SAMPLE SIZE MALES FEMALES AsianBlackWhiteLatino/a Net Generation (1980 +) Under % - 56%11%17%30%41% Generation X ( ) 29 to % - 56%7%21%34%38% Baby Boomers ( ) 44 to % - 59%9%23%36%32%

Daily Technology Use Among Generations TECHNOLOGY HOURS/DAY NET GENERATION GENERATION X BABY BOOMERS F-Score Online2:372:041: *** On Computer2:372:251: *** 1:411:561:284.84*** IM/Chat1:510:390: *** Telephone1:561:531:334.17* Texting2:491:230: *** Video Games1:010:330: *** Music3:562:281: *** Television2:322:202: TOTAL DAILY TECHNOLOGY USE 21:0115:4111: ***

MULTITASKING UNDER THREE CONDITIONS

TOP 5 TASKS MULTITASKING WITH FREE TIME NET GENERATIONGENERATION XBABY BOOMERS Music (79%) Eating (78%) Eating (80%) Online (75%) Music (72%)TV (67%) Eating (74%)Online (68%) Music (64%) Texting (60%)TV (62%)Telephone (52%) (60%) (59%) Online (50%) MANOVA RESULTS: Generation F(2, 1195) = 20.89, p<.001 Task x Generation F(22, 13145) = 12.97, p<.001

MULTITAKSING WHILE STUDYING FOR A FINAL EXAM NET GENERATION (N=392) GENERATION X (N=80) BABY BOOMERS (N=28) Music (57%) Eating (78%)Music (43%) Eating (52%) Music (36%) Computer (32%) Texting (38%) Computer(29%)Eating(29%) Computer (35%) Texting (16%)Online(18%) Online (30%) (15%) (18%) MANOVA RESULTS: Generation F(2, 494) = 7.57, p<.001 Task x Generation F(22, 5434) = 1.54, p=.054

MULTITASKING BY AN EMPLOYEE WRITING AN IMPORTANT REPORT NET GENERATION (N=345) GENERATION X (N=284) BABY BOOMERS (N=254) Music (52%)Music (42%)Music (34%) Eating (40%)Eating (33%)Eating (26%) Online (35%)Online (25%)Computer (21%) Texting (32%) Computer (25%) (21%) Computer (28%) (23%)Telephone (19%) MANOVA RESULTS: Generation F(2, 877) = 9.85, p<.001 Task x Generation F(22,9647) = 5.23, p<.001 [Pillais Trace]

SUMMARY & IMPLICATIONS Clearly, tasks that require more working memory allow less multitasking. This supports research by Konig et al. (2005) and Buhner et al. (2006) who found that working memory is the best predictor of multitasking performance Even with tasks that require more working memory, however, all groups multitask, just with a reduced number of tasks.

SUMMARY & IMPLICATIONS Multitasking with free time was directly related to generation with the Net Generation multitasking more than Gen X who in turn multitasked more than Baby Boomers. This replicates and validates work done by the Kaiser Family Foundation and Jeong & Fishbein (2007) that multitasking is directly related to age.

MORE IMPLICATIONS Each generation had similar and different tasks chosen for multitasking which are most likely related to their differential use of media (e.g., Net Generation kids use text messaging more than any other generation so that is one of their top 5 choices for multitasking). This validates earlier research (Carrier et al.; 2008) who found generational differences in ease or difficulty of multitasking

A DEVELOPMENTAL ISSUE According to research by Luciana et al. (2005), the maturation of the prefrontal cortex -- the part of the brain that controls executive control including multitasking – is not complete until 18 years of age.

DEVELOPMENT OF THE PREFRONTAL CORTEX AND MULTITASKING A separate analysis of 62 subjects under 18 showed that they claimed to do an average of 6.47 tasks during free time compared to 6.23 for those Net Generation teens and young adults (18-29). Although this difference is not significant, it is of interest that the youngest subjects multitask the most in spite of an under- developed prefrontal cortex.

LIMITATIONS These studies did not measure multitasking performance, only self-reported multitasking under different conditions. Another study should be done to measure multitasking performance. A pilot study, replicating the dichotic listening studies by Cherry (1953) showed small, but consistent evidence of multitasking performance among year olds and is being replicated and expanded to include subjects younger than 18.

Thanks to the following people who have been involved in this research: Dr. L. Mark Carrier, Associate Professor of Psychology Nancy Cheever, M.A., Assistant Professor of Communications Sandra Benitez, B.A. Heather Ruoti, B.A. Abraham Guttierez, B.A.