Pems route and parameters

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Comparison of WLTP unified database distributions and WLTC rev2 distributions Heinz Steven WLTP WLTP-DHC
Advertisements

Working paper number WLTP-DHC Application of the development approach described in WLTP-DHC on ACEA’s EU database By H. Steven
Instrumented Vehicle BAQ Instrumented In-Use-Vehicles, a Versatile Tool to Measure Emissions BAQ 2004 Agra, India Dec 2004 Instrumented In-Use-Vehicles,
Igor Trpevski University of St. Cyril and Methodius Skopje,
1 Proposal for a downscaling procedure for the extra high speed phases of the WLTC for low powered vehicles within a vehicle class Technical justification.
1 Comments on the Ste 3 gearshift calculation tool from validation 2 participants Heinz Steven WLTP WLTP-DHC
1 Analysis of in-use driving behaviour data delivered by vehicle manufacturers By Heinz Steven
Application of a software tool for routing optimisation in the Azemmour area D. Malamis, M. Loizidou, M. Mountadar, M. Rihani et O. Assobhei International.
Deliverable 10 Contents  Vehicles/engines  Diesel passenger cars  Gasoline (PFI-DISI) passenger cars  Diesel heavy duty vehicles  Diesel heavy duty.
Proposed by Japan GRPE/WLTP-IG/ DHC subgroup
RDE testing: how to define NTE emission limits?
WLTP-DHC Analysis of in-use driving behaviour data, influence of different parameters By Heinz Steven
Task 3 results and Conclusions 15/10/2014
4. Activity Data – Beginner’s Guide
Study on Drive Trace Index of Electrified Vehicles
N. Ligterink, R. Cuelenaere
WLTP Modelling of fuel consumption and detection of driveability problems for “borderline” cars with different maximum speed caps. Heinz Steven
Institute for Internal Combustion Engines and Thermodynamics
Evaluation of PEMS tests Veh 01 & Veh 02 with the CLEAR Method
Institute for Internal Combustion Engines and Thermodynamics
RDE Regulation Commission Meeting
Status Januar Verification of test normality
RDE Task Force Meeting, 7th January 2014
Development of the Japan’s RDE (Real Driving Emission) procedure
Questions on cycle representativeness
CLEAR Graz Stefan Hausberger, Nikolaus Furian
RDE Task Force Meeting, 28th November 2013, Brussels
28th of November 2013, Brussels
Comparison of different gearshift prescriptions
Input on wind tunnel criteria discussions
BRAKE PARTICLE EMISSIONS
Weighting Factors impact on WLTP CO2 emissions
Institute for Internal Combustion Engines and Thermodynamics
WLTP-DTP-LabProcICE-229
Warm Up If there are 2000 students total in the school, what percentage of the students are in each section?
JAMA position on RDE Boundary Condition
NO2 Measurement Method proposed by Japan 9 ~ 10 December 2010.
Lemnos 11/9/03 Comparison of PM exhaust emissions measured at a chassis dynamometer and on-road chasing on a test track.
Input ACEA Boundary Conditions.
DATA EVALUATION VEHICLE #5 Diesel EU6
Additional RDE trip indicator(s)
Institute for Internal Combustion Engines and Thermodynamics
Submitted by the experts of OICA
WLTP Validation2 for RLD ~ Validation test plan by Japan ~
Overview of in-use driving behaviour data from different regions
Emissions testing in the laboratory and on the road: Preliminary results for one Euro 6 diesel vehicle Pierre Bonnel Martin Weiss Joint Research Centre.
Rolling resistance and CO2
PN-PEMS Progress update
RDE testing of hybrid vehicles Contribution to the RDE working group
16th of November 2013, Brussels
Real Driving Emissions IWG Recommendations for Data Collection & EU Dataset
WLTP Correlation measurement
HDV CO2 Regulation in REPUBLIC OF KOREA
Indicator Variables Response: Highway MPG
WLTP Comparison of WLTP unified database distributions and WLTC rev2 distributions Heinz Steven
LDV Real Driving Emissions: - Assessment criteria and work plan -
Emissions testing with PEMS versus random laboratory driving cycles
Comparing EMROAD and the ACEA RDE Evaluation Tool
RDE-LDV working group 13 April 2012 Pierre Bonnel Martin Weiss
WLTP Validation3 test result ~ Road load determination ~
WLTP Modelling of fuel consumption and detection of driveability problems for “borderline” cars with different maximum speed caps. Heinz Steven
Informal document GRPE-77-30
RDE-LDV working group 20 November 2012, Brussels, EU Pierre Bonnel
Comparison NEDC/WLTC Comparison of the influence of weighting factors as proposed by France on the validation 2 CO2 emission results for the WLTC By H.
RDE Task Force Meeting, 16th December 2013, Brussels
Analysis for WLTP UF development
Proposal for aerodynamic options
Working Group “Real-Driving Emissions of Light-Duty Vehicles” Work Progress – December
Informal document GRPE Rev.1
China Automotive Technology and Research Center Co., Ltd.
Presentation transcript:

Pems route and parameters Circular tour with total test duration of ~100 – 110 min, equal distribution of rural, urban, and highway. Euro-5 DI Gasoline vehicle used for 4 test drives on different days (vehicle available for lab testing). 3 different T-curves for Emroad tool, 1st version with NEDC weight (1700 kg) and road load setting during WLTC testing on chassis dynamometer: average 201.9 g/km CO2 (only possible until Emroad 5.60B2). 28/11/2018

Wltc reference 2nd version of T-curve with higher vehicle weight of 1875 kg (WLTC TMH): average 212.3 g/km CO2 (only possible until Emroad 5.60B2). 3rd version of T-curve with simulated real road load (average CO2 unknown, only possible with Emroad 5.70, default +/-25% for normal, 100% for extreme). 28/11/2018

Method comparison For most of the 4 tests increasing share of “normal” from NEDC weight to TMH to Emroad version 5.70 with simulated real road load. Decreased share of severe and extreme driving. 1700 kg 1875 kg 1700 kg 1875 kg v 5.70 v 5.70 Standard Trip 1 Standard Trip 2 Standard Trip 3 Sporty Trip 4 28/11/2018

Resulting emissions All driving emissions identical for the 3 methods (consistency check). Normal driving emissions constant or slightly increasing from 1700 kg to 1875 kg to v5.70, severe driving often significantly higher, but not always. Test to test variability larger than any difference of methods. Standard Trip 2 Standard Trip 1 Sporty Trip 4 Standard Trip 3 No clear reduction of test difference for normal windows All 3 methods behave similarly, >80% normal 28/11/2018

Summary Use of 3 different T-curves for the Emroad tool: NEDC weight (1700 kg) and road load setting during WLTC testing on chassis dynamometer: average 201.9 g/km CO2 (only possible until Emroad 5.60B2), vehicle weight of 1875 kg (WLTC TMH): average 212.3 g/km CO2 (only possible until Emroad 5.60B2), simulated real road load (average CO2 unknown, estimated from graph ~220 g/km, only possible with Emroad 5.70). Normal driving emissions constant or slightly increasing from 1700 kg vehicle weight to 1875 kg to Emroad v5.70, severe driving for standard trip significantly higher, but not for sporty trip. Test to test variability not reduced for normal driving as compared to all driving or total trip average. Similar behavior for the 3 different T- curves, normal driving share >80%. Possibility to „fine-tune“ simulated real road load should be added, method should be well documented. 28/11/2018