Relationship between MRLs and AS6500

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 PROJECT MANAGEMENT ROLE OF KEY PERSONNEL Bernd Madauss International Space University Strasbourg February, 2011
Advertisements

Transition from Q1- 8th to Q1- 9th edition
PROJECT TITLE Project Leader: Team: Executive Project Sponsor (As Required): Date: Month/Day/Year 110/17/2014 V1.
 Contracts  Subcontracting  Suppliers  Complaints  Corrective and preventive actions (CAPA)  Internal audits  Management reviews Management requirements.
Using UML, Patterns, and Java Object-Oriented Software Engineering Royce’s Methodology Chapter 16, Royce’ Methodology.
SAE AS9100 Quality Systems - Aerospace Model for Quality Assurance
Systems Engineering Management
Pertemuan 15 Matakuliah: A0214/Audit Sistem Informasi Tahun: 2007.
Roadmap Name Strategic Roadmap #n Interim Report April 15, 2005.
What are MRLs ? Alfred W. Clark Dawnbreaker, Inc.
SE513 Software Quality Assurance Lecture04: Contract Review Galin, SQA from Theory to Education Limited 2004.
New Advanced Higher Subject Implementation Events
Pre-Project Activities Text Chapters 5 and 6. Pre-Project Activities 1.Contract Review 2.Development Plan 3.Quality Plan.
Introduction to Software Quality Assurance (SQA)
Proposed Updates to Deskbook Gary Stanley 22 July 14.
Software Quality Assurance Activities
1 Process Engineering A Systems Approach to Process Improvement Jeffrey L. Dutton Jacobs Sverdrup Advanced Systems Group Engineering Performance Improvement.
SE Team Agenda Review work being done by Dwayne –Review Sect 4.4.X for DAG – being processed –SEP Guide – being processed; seen as OK –Technical Reviews.
The MIT/QA Plan Issue W. Reiersen. Terminology 1 Product specification: A document generated by the customer identifying requirements and the inspections.
1 MRL Assist Tool Website Access the MRL Assist Tool at
Solar Probe Plus A NASA Mission to Touch the Sun March 2015 Instrument Suite Name Presenter's Name.
The Project Plan Plan Your Work, then Work Your Plan
Date: 25 Sep 12 Presented by: Steve Watts Team Leader Aviation and Missile Research, Development and Engineering Center Presented to: MRL Government /
Group Three Outbrief Team Members Michael BakerEglin 328 ARSG Tony BumbaloughAFRL/RXMT Scott FrostANSER Michael GanowskyBoeing- Mark GordonNCAT Jim LorenzeRockwell.
1 Overview of SAE’s AS6500 “Manufacturing Management Program” David Karr Technical Advisor for Mfg/QA AFLCMC/EZSM
Copyright 2002 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chapter 3 Managing the Information Systems Project Modern Systems Analysis and Design Third Edition Jeffrey A. Hoffer.
Table 2: HSI Discretionary Practices Issuance Number Title
Principal Investigator ESTCP Selection Meeting
Software Quality Assurance
[Team Name] (e.g. ESH) Team Lead.
Supportability Design Considerations
[Team Name] (e.g. ESH) Team Lead.
Team #1 Gary Stanley.
Software and Systems Integration
Lessons Learned MRL Date: 23 Oct 12 MRL Working Group Steve Watts
Principal Investigator ESTCP Selection Meeting
Milestone A to Milestone B Requirements Management Activities
DAG CH 3 Figure 11: Weapon System Development Life Cycle
Overview of SAE’s AS6500 “Manufacturing Management Program”
DAG CH 3 Figure 17: Weapon System Development Life Cycle
DAG CH 3 Figure 23: Weapon System Development Life Cycle
Training Course on Integrated Management System for Regulatory Body
TSMO Program Plan Development
Defining the Activities
DAG CH 3 Figure 13: Weapon System Development Life Cycle
MRL 6 Artifacts (at End of TMRR) Page 1 of 6
Defense Acquisition University
DAG CH 3 Figure 19: Weapon System Development Life Cycle
Presented By: Daniel J. Brown, CQA
DAG CH 3 Figure 18: Weapon System Development Life Cycle
DRAFT Implementation Guide
Software Quality Assurance Plans
DAG CH 3 Figure 28: Weapon System Development Life Cycle
How to properly use the primary MRL Body Of Knowledge References
Lockheed Martin Canada’s SMB Mentoring Program
DAG CH 3 Figure 15: Weapon System Development Life Cycle
The Dream Team Jack Galuardi.
Project Management Process Groups
Instrument PDR Summary of Objectives
Counterfeit Parts Committee
Principal Investigator ESTCP Selection Meeting
CS/EE/ME 75(a) Nov. 19, 2018 Today: Prelimnary Design Review Homework.
PSS verification and validation
[Team Name] (e.g. ESH) Team Lead.
DAG CH 3 Figure 21: Weapon System Development Life Cycle
IEEE RS Standards Status and Descriptions
Principal Investigator ESTCP Selection Meeting
DAG CH 3 Figure 27: Weapon System Development Life Cycle
DAG CH 3 Figure 22: Weapon System Development Life Cycle
DAG CH 3 Figure 25: Weapon System Development Life Cycle
Presentation transcript:

Relationship between MRLs and AS6500 AF Life Cycle Management Center Relationship between MRLs and AS6500 Providing the Warfighter’s Edge

Relationships Between MRLs and AS6500 Elements of synergy: Compatibility of MRL criteria and AS6500 requirements Conduct of MRL assessments Manufacturing Plan Cross-references

Nearly 100% coverage of MRL topics in AS6500 requirements AS6500 requires many of the activities being assessed by MRL criteria Table excerpted from MIL-HDBK-896A

AS6500 Requirements 6.3 Manufacturing Risk Identification 6.3.1 Manufacturing Feasibility Assessments Conduct assessment for each design alternative Use MRL matrix as a guide Identify immature production processes and manufacturing technologies 6.3.2 Manufacturing Readiness Level Assessments Identify MRL Targets Document manufacturing risks Conduct MRL assessments prior to PDR, CDR, PRR, Milestones Include critical suppliers Implement maturation plans for threads not at target MRL Reference: DoD MRL Deskbook and MIL-HDBK-896 6.3.3 Production Readiness Reviews Prior to production decision MRL assessments should support manufacturing elements More details on PRR in IEEE 15288.2 Similar to SOW checklist in Deskbook section 6.5 AS6500 requires the conduct of MRL Assessments

AS6500 Requirements 6.4 Manufacturing Planning Manufacturing Plan shall include: Manufacturing methods and processes Personnel with appropriate technical skills and training Manufacturing technology investments Customer furnished hardware, software, and other items Production control Customer inspections Producibility Capacity analysis reflecting effects of other business on resources Material management Manufacturing system verification Manufacturing capability for critical manufacturing processes Minimization of scrap, rework and repair Facilities Tooling Test equipment Capital commitments MRL approach not required to be included in Mfg Plan, but AS6500 requires the documentation of most MRL topics

Relationships Among Documents Cross-References SAE AS6500 Commercial Mfg Management Standard MRL Matrix MIL-HDBK-896A Companion Guide for AS6500 OSD M/Q Body of Knowledge (In development) Close alignment of related documents

Summary MRL subjects, criteria, and assessments are thoroughly integrated into AS6500 If the requirements of AS6500 are implemented effectively, then there is a high probability that program/product/process will be at the target MRL

Proposed MRL Deskbook Addition Drafted several paragraphs addressing material on previous charts to explain relationship between MRLS and AS6500 Suggest new words be inserted in section 6, “Applying MRLS in Contract Language” Is this addition value-added? Are the proposed words acceptable?