Energy Management Annual Report

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 1 BASICS OF ENERGY MANAGEMENT Section A - Energy Basics.
Advertisements

Let’s Get Energized Saving Energy At School Sites.
Energy Savings Opportunities in Controls, Lighting, Air Conditioning, Water Heating and Refrigeration Chuck Thomas, P.E. CEM Lead Engineer.
© B. Alan Whitson 1 It’s the Money! Corporate Realty, Design & Management Institute 319 SW Washington, Suite 602 Portland, OR
Co-generation Cogeneration is an attractive option for facilities with high electric rates and buildings that consume large amounts of hot water and electricity.
Mitigation Strategies Review LP Mitigation Strategy #1: Transportation Efficiency A car that gets 30 mpg releases 1 ton of carbon into the air.
SAU Energy Talking Points SAU per square foot energy cost of $1.20 is among the most efficient in the state. District Heating and Cooling Systems save.
Worcester Regional Transit Authority Key Performance Indicators Electric Bus Deployment Project December 18, 2013.
Solar Energy Eco Friendly Construction Energy conservation is now a way of life for many in this region. At Eco Friendly Construction, we have embraced.
Transportation choices and CO 2 emissions By: Dayanara Veliz & Abel Adam.
So much more than a lamp and ballast change out ENERGY SERVICES PEOPLE.PLANET.PROFIT.
MSJC 4/10s Cost Analysis Aug. ’08 - Rev. Feb. ‘09 Compiled by MSJC R&P Dept. – XCJH Rev
DES Energy Program Energy Performance Contracting: Using future Energy Savings to help finance the cost of construction.
Energy Management 101 Lance Stewart Facilities Maintenance Manager/Energy Manager City of Charlottesville, Virginia.
GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS INVENTORY REPORT 2009 Antioch University Seattle.
Northeast and Mid-Atlantic States Regional Low Carbon Fuel Standard Stakeholder Meeting
Energy Conservation Program Board Update Capital Region BOCES Consortium Galway Board Presentation Tom Schweizer -Energy Education Specialists BOCES Adam.
Super Power Yunsi Liang Xueshan Ni Emma Witt Gabriela Baeza Carlos Gonzalez May 25, 2011.
Northwest Power and Conservation Council The Northwest Energy Efficiency Market 2007 NAESCO Northwest Regional Meeting June 15, 2007 Tom Eckman Northwest.
STATE WATER EFFICIENCY AND ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM Jenny Lester Moffitt Deputy Secretary.
MADISON COMMUNITY OPERATIONS CARBON INVENTORY 2012 Adam Anderson Tyler Brandt Iseul Choi Bridget Holcomb Kendi Larrabee Leona Yi-Fan Su.
Prepared By: Stephanie Hunt Presented By: Larry Freeman October 2014.
1 Analysis of Cost and Savings Values for Revised Energy Star Dishwasher Specifications June 6, 2006 Revised August 8, 2006.
1 Limestone County School District Energy Update Year Eleven Report September 2008 – August 2009.
Initial Goal 58 KBTU/Ft 2 Graph includes main building and all mobile units Baseline =
1 Oconomowoc Area School District Energy Update 6-Month Status Report December 2005 – May 2006.
1 Energy Efficiency Programs For Local Governments & Community Partners Christina Prestella Program Manager, Government & Community Partnerships PG&E September.
Not a slide, just intro. BHS Carbon Footprint Baseline Assessment FY08: BHS responsible for at least 3758 metric tons of CO 2 emissions.
Carbon Footprint Dem Two: Enlly Bugarin Narciso Arevalo December 14, 2015.
Session 2 Buildings and Measurements. Buildings Sector Accounts for About 40% of U.S. Energy, 72% of Electricity, 34% of Natural Gas, 38% of Carbon, 18%
 Transportation choices and CO 2 emissions By: Dayanara Veliz & Abel Adam.
An Alternate to Alternative Energy microE 3,LLC Copyrighted, 2013, microE3,LLC Robert S Donaldson.
SAUSALITO COMMUNITY GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS INVENTORY Years 2005 and 2010.
Energy Update March 8, 2016 Year 3 Results. SEE Program Goals  Reduce annual energy use by at least 10%.  Achieve external recognition through programs.
Revisions to the Rhode Island GHG Emissions Draft Baseline Charles Heaps Stockholm Environment Institute - U.S. Center 11 Curtis Avenue Somerville, MA.
ENERGY UPDATE April 14, 2015 Year 2. Year 2 Energy Review December 2013 – November 2014 Q1 (Dec ‘13-Feb ‘14) Q2 (Mar ‘14-May ‘14) Q3 (Jun ‘14-Aug ‘14)
Performance Margins for Snowmaking
Union Church Path to Net Zero Energy (10 Years of Progress)
ZNE Definitions.
Harley-Davidson Museum
2013/2014 Energy Report January 5, 2015
Why lighting and hot water?
August 2013 – July 2014 Jill Parisella, Energy Specialist
Single Family Cost of Living Comparison
SGUSD Transformational Energy Management… Making SGUSD GREENER!
Hyde Park Central School District
CHE 670 Sustainability Seminar
Killeen Independent School District Energy Efficiency Report
SUMMIT COUNTY Solar Photovoltaic Feasibility Study
City-wide LED Street Light Conversion Program
Energy Efficiency Of Cars
Ski Area Footprints What Size Are Those Boots?
Woodford County Schools Energy Management Package
Three times more energy reaches the customer with natural gas
Conserving for a Better Future Personal Ecological Impact
Cabarrus County Schools Annual Energy Management Report
The Ecological Footprint
Ecological Impact Super Power Yunsi Liang Xueshan Ni
The Ecological Footprint
Energy Conservation Program Update
FACILITY OPERATIONS ENERGY MANAGEMENT DIVISION
At Philip Rosenau, sustainable practices make good business sense.
The Ecological Footprint
FACILITY OPERATIONS ENERGY MANAGEMENT DIVISION
Carbon Foot Print Personal Ecological Impact / Carbon Footprint……..
What is global warming?. What is global warming?
Oconomowoc Area School District December 2005 – July 2011
CHE 670 Sustainability Seminar
Municipal and Community Greenhouse Gas Inventory
Municipal Greenhouse Gas Inventory Lebanon, NH
Presentation transcript:

Energy Management Annual Report 2012-2013

The overall average for 2009-2010 was 53 The overall average for 2009-2010 was 53.3 kBTU/Ft2 (1000 British Thermal Units / Square Foot) . The overall average for 2012-2013 is 44.9 kBTU/Ft2

Reduction in electrical usage is 1,037,395 kwh when comparing this year (2012-2013) to the baseline year (2009-2010) Based upon todays rates this provides the district a cost avoidance of $91,248 Graph includes main building and all mobile units Baseline Year = 2009-2010

Reduction in natural gas usage is 52,419 therms when comparing this year (2012-2013) to the baseline year (2009-2010) Based upon todays rates this provides the district a cost avoidance of $44,773.55 Graph includes main building and all mobile units Baseline Year = 2009-2010

Reduction in water/sewer usage is 1,725,645 gallons when comparing this year (2012-2013) to the baseline year (2009-2010) Based upon todays rates this provides the district a cost avoidance of $27,396 Graph includes main building and all mobile units Baseline Year = 2009-2010

Summary 2012-2013 vs. 2009-2010 (baseline) Cost Avoidance Savings $163,761.59 Cost Avoidance Savings is the difference of this year’s utility usage, when compared to the baseline year (2009-2010), times the current average unit cost for that particular utility. Cost avoidance is the amount of money you avoided spending, in this case by taking action to save energy. Total Cost Savings $1,042,663.91 –1,000,747.31= $41,916.60 Cost savings is the actual dollar difference between current year costs and the baseline year’s cost. Red indicates an increase in utility rate

Accomplishments When comparing 2012-2013 (July-June) data to the baseline data. Electricity, natural gas, water and water/sewer usage are down. Producing a cost avoidance savings of $163,716 for the district. Electrical usage has been reduced (2009-2010 vs. 2012-2013) by 1,037,395 kWH. This is equivalent to keeping 715 metric tons of CO2 out of the atmosphere Efficiency (energy usage/sq. ft.) has dropped from (2009-2010) 53.3 kBTU/Ft2 to (2012-2013) 44.9 kBTU/Ft2. Despite rate increases in three out of four utilities, KCS has lowered the utility operating cost by $41,916. In the US, we account for 20% of the man made greenhouse gas emissions, with less than 5% of the world’s population. Conversion factors from Dept. of Energy Web Site. 6.8956 x 10-4 metric tons CO2/kWH 1 metric ton/ 2204.6 lbs

Summary 2012-2013 vs. 2011-2012 Cost Avoidance Savings $70,403.58 Cost Avoidance Savings is the difference of this year’s utility usage, when compared to previous year (2011-2012), times the current average unit cost for that particular utility. Cost avoidance is the amount of money you avoided spending, in this case by taking action to save energy. Total Cost Savings $1,003,137.62 –1,000,747.31= $2,390.31 Cost savings is the actual dollar difference between current year costs and the previous year’s cost. Red indicates an increase in utility rate

Accomplishments When comparing 2012-2013 (July-June) data to the previous year’s data. Electricity, water and water/sewer usage are down. Producing a cost avoidance savings of $70,043 for the district. Electrical usage has been reduced (2011-2012 vs. 2012-2013) by 701,159 kWH. This is equivalent to keeping 483 metric tons of CO2 out of the atmosphere Despite rate increases in all four utilities, KCS has lowered the utility operating cost by $2,390. In the US, we account for 20% of the man made greenhouse gas emissions, with less than 5% of the world’s population. Conversion factors from Dept. of Energy Web Site. 6.8956 x 10-4 metric tons CO2/kWH 1 metric ton/ 2204.6 lbs