European Spallation Source

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Summary of Report to IATI Steering Committee, Paris 9 February 2011 Richard Manning.
Advertisements

Professor Dave Delpy Chief Executive of Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council Research Councils UK Impact Champion Competition vs. Collaboration:
The HR Paradigm Shift Discover Stakeholder Value for the Human Resources Function.
Training and Mobility of Managers and Technical staff Carlo Rizzuto Chair Sincrotrone Trieste roma 2010 sept-oct.
Month Year Working together to achieve your desired outcomes, by delivering service excellence. Building Engineering Solutions for the optimisation of.
1 Expectations of Forest Owners for reliable contracting services Ivar Legallais-Korsbakken CEPF Confederation of European Forest Owners.
H. Danared | Sw/Fr Coordination Committee | Page 1 Swedish/French Coordination Committee Håkan Danared Saclay, 13 January 2015.
Euei1. 2 Facilitation Workshop and Policy Dialogue Maputo April 2005 Enrico Strampelli European Commission DG Development.
The “Marie Curie Actions Road Show” is organised as a series of info-days in the premises of the participating research organisations with a set of presentations.
Ensuring Food Safety in Europe through Scientific Cooperation and Networking The Role of EFSA Carola Sondermann EFSA Polish Focal Point – Annual Experts.
DETERMINE Working document # 4 'Economic arguments for addressing social determinants of health inequalities' December 2009 Owen Metcalfe & Teresa Lavin.
H. Danared | Cryomodule Workshop | Page 1 The In-Kind Process at ESS Håkan Danared Lund, 15 October 2014.
European Spallation Source Overview and Status Technical Advisory Committee 1-2 April 2015 James H. Yeck ESS CEO & Director General
H. Danared | TB12, 5 Mar 2015 | Page 1 Håkan Danared Mats Lindroos Lund, 5 March 2015 Status of In-Kind Contributions to Accelerator.
H. Danared | Collaboration Board | Page 1 Status of In-Kind Contributions Håkan Danared Legnaro, 1 December 2014.
H. Danared | Collaboration Board, March 2014 | Page 1 Status of In-Kind Contributions to Accelerator Håkan Danared Kastrup, 14 April 2014.
EU Health Priorities Jurate Svarcaite Secretary General PGEU.
eContentplus 2008 Work Programme
Voluntary Sector Care Partnerships
Dorota Kilańska RN, PhD European Nursing Research Foundation (ENRF)
Name Job title Research Councils UK
Infrastructure Canada
for the EURISOL Steering Committee
ICT PSP 2011, 5th call, Pilot Type B, Objective: 2.4 eLearning
EU Funding Seminar, UWE, April 2009
Hampshire County Council Adult Social Care
INAC Water and Wastewater: Discussion on Current Policies and Processes Presented at: Circuit Rider Trainer Professional Association’s Annual General Meeting.
KEYNOTE STAGE SPONSOR.
The French National Agency on Water and Aquatic Environments
Standards for success in city IT and construction projects
EU Reference Centres for Animal Welfare
Support for the AASHTO Committee on Planning (COP) and its Subcommittees in Responding to the AASHTO Strategic Plan Prepared for NCHRP 8-36, TASK 138.
European Synchronisation of Research Infrastructure Policies
April 2011.
Jakob Wested and Helen Yu and Timo Minssen
Setting up an ERIC 11 May 2012 Richard Derksen
Species at Risk (SAR) Legislation & Program Renewal Project
Barbara Hendrickson BAX SECURITIES LAW June 1st, 2018
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
Evaluation of impact Understanding impact first, deciding on indicators last The case of largescale research infrastructures Eu-SPRI Paris – 6 June 2018.
CRUE – The Way Forward Vicki Jackson
Knowledge Exchange – European Open Science Cloud
RMAPI Town Hall Meeting
4th BrightnESS Best Practice Workshop VAT exposure related to ESS Installations in Sweden Carlo J. Bocchetta.
The European Spallation Source
The European Spallation Source
Draft Methodology for impact analysis of ESS.VIP Projects
DRIVER+ Overview EXTERNAL COOPERATION IN DRIVER+
Building Statistical Capacity UNSD perspective
Juan Gonzalez eGovernment & CIP operations
WFD, Common Implementation Strategy  Water Scarcity and Droughts Expert Group Madrid, February 17, 2010.
Perspective of an International Research Center
8-c) Expert Group & River Basin Network on WFD & Agriculture
Safety Culture Peter Jacobsson Environment, Safety & Health
ESH&Q General Information
Assembly of Members – 12 March 2019
Assembly of Members – 12 March 2019
Finalisation of study report
Main recommendations & conclusions (1)
7th Environment Action Programme to 2020 Living well, within the limits of our planet Evaluation - COM (2019) May 2019.
ICSTI International conference “Scientific and Tecnological Innovations: National Experience and International Collaboration” Collaboration for the Development.
League of Advanced European Neutron Sources
Introduction of “Sustainable and Liveable Cities and Urban Areas” Programs Co-Sponsored by NSFC and JPI UE Yang Liexun Management Sciences Department(DMS)
Being a Local University: Towards New Assessment Tools and Indicators Dr John H Smith Senior Adviser, European University Association (EUA) Brussels Member,
Experience of the implementation of FP6; preparations towards FP7
Finalisation of study report
CEng progression through the IOM3
Socio-Economic Impact of ESS
Capacity development and Financing data for development
IKC in operations and potentials for co-creation
Presentation transcript:

European Spallation Source Building European Spallation Source – a multi-disciplinary research centre and the world’s most powerful neutron source! Agneta Nestenborg Director of Project Support & Administration European Spallation Source ERIC 2018-07-05

Vision and mission statement Core values Excellence Openness Collaboration Sustainability   Vision Our vision is to build and operate the world’s most powerful neutron source, enabling scientific breakthroughs in research related to materials, energy, health, and the environment, and addressing some of the most important societal challenges of our time Mission To do this, we commit to deliver ESS as a facility that: Is built safely, on time and on budget Produces research outputs that are best-in-class both in terms of scientific quality and in terms of socioeconomic impact Supports and develops its user community, fosters a scientific culture of excellence and acts as an international scientific hub Operates safely, efficiently, and economically and responds to the needs of its stakeholders, its host states and member states Develops innovative ways of working, new technologies, and upgrades to capabilities needed to remain at the cutting edge

A true green field project – Project Funding Total project cost 1.843 B€2013 Host Countries Sweden and Denmark Construction 47.5% Cash Investment ~ 97% Operations 15% Non Host Member Countries Construction 52.5% In-kind Deliverables ~ 70% Operations 85% Hur möjliggör man finansiering från Europa? Members’ initial aspiration for In-kind: 670 M€ !

Partners Aarhus University Atomki - Institute for Nuclear Research Bergen University CEA Saclay, Paris Centre for Energy Research, Budapest Centre for Nuclear Research, Poland, (NCBJ) CNR, Rome CNRS Orsay, Paris Cockcroft Institute, Daresbury Elettra – Sincrotrone Trieste ESS Bilbao Forschungszentrum Jülich Helmholtz-Zentrum Geesthacht Huddersfield University IFJ PAN, Krakow INFN, Catania INFN, Legnaro INFN, Milan Institute for Energy Research (IFE) Rutherford-Appleton Laboratory, Oxford(ISIS) Kopenhagen University Laboratoire Léon Brilouin (CEA – CNRS – LLB) Lund University Nuclear Physics Institute of the ASCR Oslo University Paul Scherrer Institute (PSI) Polska Grupa Energetyczna - PGE Roskilde University Tallinn Technical University Technical University of Denmark Technical University Munich Science and Technology Facilities Council UKAEA Culham University of Tartu Uppsala University WIGNER Research Centre for Physics Wroclaw University of Technology Warsaw University of Technology Zurich University of Applied Sciences (ZHAW)

Previous VAT workshop Previous VAT workshop held 14-15 June 2016 Objective to understand the status of VAT treatment for a) ERIC b) the Representing Entities and c) the In-Kind partners. Exchange experiences in respective Member countries. Identify key common issues relative to VAT treatment and Partners.

How Does the VAT Work with the ERIC?

VAT in Partners’ member states PRECONDITION APPROACHES OUTCOMES Local tax authority exemption Representing entity acting in the name of member Representing entity using 15(10) forms IKC Allocation ESS ERIC recognized as an International Organisation yes yes VAT Exemption / Reimbursement no yes no yes no yes no no NO solution (pay VAT)

Ways forward were established VAT status in Member countries: Country VAT Status France 15(10) Certificate Hungary Exempt Italy Trilateral In Kind Contribution Agreement (Elettra, INFN, ESS) Spain Switzerland Non-EU/ Awaiting Confirmation United Kingdom Country level VAT has been discussed for some time, and this purely relates to the VAT that you – the in kind partner – gets charged in your own countries locally. A lot of time and effort has been put to solve some of these cases and some solutions have been found, e.g. 15/10 in France and UK, Hungary and Spain seem to enjoy an exemption; Switzerland is a non EU country, though we await further confirmation about this. Clearly the ESS project is shifting towards goods and services being delivered to the site here in Lund Sweden, and this shift means that we need to start focusing on potential VAT risks in Sweden. ESS estimated a cost exposure of between €25-50 million IF THE ISSUE WAS NOT resolved with all partners; Member country VAT status varies, but solutions have been found. Some solutions require a more active approach by ESS. The VAT question now shifts with the project – towards installations in Sweden

VAT risks in Sweden Topic addressed at AFC in November 2017 AFC requested in April 2018 a dedicated workshop for in kind partners to consider VAT risks in Sweden ESS and legal tax advisors prepared a “Guideline on possible VAT risks in Sweden for in kind partners” Some pointers for the bullets: - You will hear today from KPMG more about what considerations need to be taken into account when we refer to VAT risks in Sweden. As mentioned, country level VAT has been discussed for some time, however due to the ESS project shifting towards e.g. installations taking place here in Sweden, it is understood that there is a VAT risk for in kind partners and/or their suppliers due to this fact. Both the country level VAT as well as VAT risks in Sweden have been highlighted to governance forums for some time now, including AFC where these topics were presented November 2017 and again in April 2018. Which brings us to today – 5th July – and this workshop where ESS aims to: Try to provide guidance for In Kind Partners on the issue of VAT risks in Sweden. I must emphasize that solutions might not be possible to achieve today for all the different transactions you will be involved in, however hopefully you will appreciate the way in which you will need to consider your transactions. ESS worked with KPMG tax advisors on a guideline identifying the most common types of VAT “transactions” that could affect in kind partners and/or their sub-contractors. It must be emphasized that the VAT Directive and VAT law generally is very complex. From a non-exhaustive list of over 70 potential VAT “transactions”, we were able to narrow down this list to approximately 5 which are most likely to affect In Kind Partners and/or their sub-contractors. But this is not to say that these are the only 5 types of VAT “transactions” which will happen, the 5 types of VAT “transactions” act as an indicator for potential transaction scenarios that the In Kind Partners should consider. The guideline is now prepared and we will go through it today with all of you - In Kind Partners – since you are best placed to assess your own tax exposure and seek advice from independent experts since you will be in the best position to assess the types of “transactions” you will perform in Sweden and also because you have the contractual relationship with your suppliers and sub-contractors with whom you might need to discuss these issues directly. Due to the complexities of VAT legislation, combined with the complex deliveries from In Kind Partners to ESS, ESS – at the request of the AFC in April 2018 - is convening this workshop to In Kind Partners to raise awareness of the issues at hand.

Vision and mission statement   Vision Our vision is to build and operate the world’s most powerful neutron source, enabling scientific breakthroughs in research related to materials, energy, health, and the environment, and addressing some of the most important societal challenges of our time Mission To do this, we commit to deliver ESS as a facility that: Is built safely, on time and on budget Produces research outputs that are best-in-class both in terms of scientific quality and in terms of socioeconomic impact Supports and develops its user community, fosters a scientific culture of excellence and acts as an international scientific hub Operates safely, efficiently, and economically and responds to the needs of its stakeholders, its host states and member states Develops innovative ways of working, new technologies, and upgrades to capabilities needed to remain at the cutting edge Core values Excellence Openness Collaboration Sustainability