Lecture 5 Fault Modeling

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chapter 3 Fault Modeling
Advertisements

Testing of PLA and PAL V y1y1 y2y2 y m x 1 x 2 x n + V Buffer ANDOR x 1 x 2 x n y1y1 y2y2 y m PAL/PLA structure.
Based on text by S. Mourad "Priciples of Electronic Systems" Digital Testing: Design Representation and Fault Detection
Apr. 20, 2001VLSI Test: Bushnell-Agrawal/Lecture 311 Lecture 31 System Test n Definition n Functional test n Diagnostic test  Fault dictionary  Diagnostic.
Fault Equivalence Number of fault sites in a Boolean gate circuit is = #PI + #gates + # (fanout branches) Fault equivalence: Two faults f1.
VLSI TESTING 2011 Chapter 2-1 VLSI T ESTING 積體電路測試 1 期中考範圍 PING-LIANG LAI 賴秉樑.
CMP238: Projeto e Teste de Sistemas VLSI Marcelo Lubaszewski Aula 2 - Teste PPGC - UFRGS 2005/I.
March 23, 2001VLSI Test: Bushnell-Agrawal/Lecture 211 Lecture 21 I DDQ Current Testing n Definition n Faults detected by I DDQ tests n Vector generation.
Copyright 2001, Agrawal & BushnellDay-1 AM-3 Lecture 31 Testing Analog & Digital Products Lecture 3: Fault Modeling n Why model faults? n Some real defects.
Modern VLSI Design 2e: Chapter 4 Copyright  1998 Prentice Hall PTR Topics n Switch networks. n Combinational testing.
Test de Circuitos Integrados
Spring 08, Mar 13 ELEC 7770: Advanced VLSI Design (Agrawal) 1 ELEC 7770 Advanced VLSI Design Spring 2008 VLSI Test Principles Vishwani D. Agrawal James.
Lecture 5 Fault Modeling
Copyright 2001, Agrawal & BushnellVLSI Test: Lecture 51 Lecture 5 Fault Modeling n Why model faults? n Some real defects in VLSI and PCB n Common fault.
1 Introduction VLSI Testing. 2 Overview First digital products (mid 1940's) Complexity:low MTTF:hours Cost:high Present day products (mid 1980's) Complexity:high.
Dominance Fault Collapsing of Combinational Circuits By Kalpesh Shetye & Kapil Gore ELEC 7250, Spring 2004.
ELEN 468 Lecture 231 ELEN 468 Advanced Logic Design Lecture 23 Testing.
5/24/2016 Based on text by S. Mourad "Priciples of Electronic Systems" Digital Testing: Defects, Failures and Faults.
ECE 553: TESTING AND TESTABLE DESIGN OF DIGITAL SYSTES Fault Modeling.
Modern VLSI Design 4e: Chapter 4 Copyright  2008 Wayne Wolf Topics n Switch networks. n Combinational testing.
Unit I Testing and Fault Modelling
Chapter 7. Testing of a digital circuit
1 EE 587 SoC Design & Test Partha Pande School of EECS Washington State University
Fault Models, Fault Simulation and Test Generation Vishwani D. Agrawal Department of ECE, Auburn University Auburn, AL 36849, USA
TOPIC : Different levels of Fault model UNIT 2 : Fault Modeling Module 2.1 Modeling Physical fault to logical fault.
EE434 ASIC & Digital Systems Partha Pande School of EECS Washington State University
Fault modeling is the translation of physical defects into a mathematical construct that can be operated upon algorithmically and.
An introduction to Fault Detection in Logic Circuits By Dr. Amin Danial Asham.
Jan. 26, 2001VLSI Test: Bushnell-Agrawal/Lecture 51 Lecture 5 Fault Modeling n Why model faults? n Some real defects in VLSI and PCB n Common fault models.
TOPIC : Introduction to Faults UNIT 2: Modeling and Simulation Module 1 : Logical faults due to physical faults.
TOPIC : Introduction to Faults UNIT 2: Modeling and Simulation Module 1 : Logical faults due to physical faults.
VLSI Testing Class Fault Modeling 李昆忠 Kuen-Jong Lee Dept. of Electrical Engineering National Cheng-Kung University Tainan, Taiwan.
Copyright 2001, Agrawal & BushnellVLSI Test: Lecture 51 Lecture 5 Fault Modeling n Why model faults? n Some real defects in VLSI and PCB n Common fault.
Copyright 2001, Agrawal & BushnellVLSI Test: Lecture 61 Lecture 6 Logic Simulation n What is simulation? n Design verification n Circuit modeling n True-value.
THE CMOS INVERTER.
VLSI Testing Lecture 5: Logic Simulation
VLSI Testing Lecture 14: System Diagnosis
VLSI Testing Lecture 5: Logic Simulation
Vishwani D. Agrawal Department of ECE, Auburn University
VLSI Testing Lecture 6: Fault Simulation
Algorithms and representations Structural vs. functional test
Lecture 7 Fault Simulation
ECE 553: TESTING AND TESTABLE DESIGN OF DIGITAL SYSTES
Definitions D-Algorithm (Roth) D-cubes Bridging faults
ENG2410 Digital Design “CMOS Technology”
VLSI Testing engr. uconn. edu/~tehrani/teaching/test/index
Lecture 13 Sequential Circuit ATPG Time-Frame Expansion
Definitions D-Algorithm (Roth) D-cubes Bridging faults
VLSI Testing Lecture 6: Fault Simulation
VLSI Testing Lecture 7: Combinational ATPG
ELEC Digital Logic Circuits Fall 2014 Logic Testing (Chapter 12)
Fundamentals of Computer Science Part i2
Bushnell: Digital Systems Design Lecture 4
Pattern Compression for Multiple Fault Models
ELEC 7770 Advanced VLSI Design Spring 2012 Introduction
Design Technologies Custom Std Cell Performance Gate Array FPGA Cost.
ECE434a Advanced Digital Systems L02
ELEC 7770 Advanced VLSI Design Spring 2010 Introduction
Automatic Test Generation for Combinational Circuits
VLSI Testing Lecture 8: Sequential ATPG
ELEC 7770 Advanced VLSI Design Spring 2016 Technology Mapping
Fault Models, Fault Simulation and Test Generation
VLSI Testing Lecture 7: Combinational ATPG
EENG447 Digital IC Design Dr. Gürtaç Yemişcioğlu.
Topics Switch networks. Combinational testing..
VLSI Testing Lecture 9: Delay Test
VLSI Testing Lecture 7: Delay Test
VLSI Testing Lecture 3: Fault Modeling
ELEC Digital Logic Circuits Fall 2015 Logic Testing (Chapter 12)
Manufacturing Testing
Presentation transcript:

Lecture 5 Fault Modeling Why model faults? Some real defects in VLSI and PCB Common fault models Stuck-at faults Single stuck-at faults Fault equivalence Fault dominance and checkpoint theorem Classes of stuck-at faults and multiple faults Transistor faults Summary Copyright 2001, Agrawal & Bushnell VLSI Test: Lecture 5

Why Model Faults? I/O function tests inadequate for manufacturing (functionality versus component and interconnect testing) Real defects (often mechanical) too numerous and often not analyzable A fault model identifies targets for testing A fault model makes analysis possible Effectiveness measurable by experiments Copyright 2001, Agrawal & Bushnell VLSI Test: Lecture 5

Some Real Defects in Chips Processing defects Missing contact windows Parasitic transistors Oxide breakdown . . . Material defects Bulk defects (cracks, crystal imperfections) Surface impurities (ion migration) Time-dependent failures Dielectric breakdown Electromigration Packaging failures Contact degradation Seal leaks Ref.: M. J. Howes and D. V. Morgan, Reliability and Degradation - Semiconductor Devices and Circuits, Wiley, 1981. Copyright 2001, Agrawal & Bushnell VLSI Test: Lecture 5

Occurrence frequency (%) Observed PCB Defects Defect classes Shorts Opens Missing components Wrong components Reversed components Bent leads Analog specifications Digital logic Performance (timing) Occurrence frequency (%) 51 1 6 13 8 5 Ref.: J. Bateson, In-Circuit Testing, Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1985. Copyright 2001, Agrawal & Bushnell VLSI Test: Lecture 5

Common Fault Models Single stuck-at faults Transistor open and short faults Memory faults PLA faults (stuck-at, cross-point, bridging) Functional faults (processors) Delay faults (transition, path) Analog faults For more examples, see Section 4.4 (p. 60-70) of the book. Copyright 2001, Agrawal & Bushnell VLSI Test: Lecture 5

Fault Tolerant Digital System Desgin 5 week Fault Tolerant Digital System Desgin

Fault Tolerant Digital System Desgin x 5 week Fault Tolerant Digital System Desgin

Fault Tolerant Digital System Desgin 5 week Fault Tolerant Digital System Desgin

1 0/ 1 1 1 Copyright 2001, Agrawal & Bushnell VLSI Test: Lecture 5

Fault Tolerant Digital System Desgin 5 week Fault Tolerant Digital System Desgin

Fault Tolerant Digital System Desgin Z(0 1) = Z(1 0) =0 AND OR Z(0 1) = Z(1 0) =1 5 week Fault Tolerant Digital System Desgin

Fault Tolerant Digital System Desgin x x ( NFBF) x x ( FBF) 5 week Fault Tolerant Digital System Desgin

Copyright 2001, Agrawal & Bushnell VLSI Test: Lecture 5

Fault Tolerant Digital System Desgin 5 week Fault Tolerant Digital System Desgin

Fault Tolerant Digital System Desgin 1 1 5 week Fault Tolerant Digital System Desgin

Single Stuck-at Fault Three properties define a single stuck-at fault Only one line is faulty The faulty line is permanently set to 0 or 1 The fault can be at an input or output of a gate Example: XOR circuit has 12 fault sites ( ) and 24 single stuck-at faults Faulty circuit value Good circuit value s-a-0 c j 0(1) a d 1(0) g 1 h z i 1 b e 1 k f Test vector for h s-a-0 fault Copyright 2001, Agrawal & Bushnell VLSI Test: Lecture 5

001,011,100,110 Copyright 2001, Agrawal & Bushnell   001,011,100,110 Copyright 2001, Agrawal & Bushnell VLSI Test: Lecture 5

Fault Equivalence Number of fault sites in a Boolean gate circuit = #PI + #gates + # (fanout branches). Fault equivalence: Two faults f1 and f2 are equivalent if all tests that detect f1 also detect f2. If faults f1 and f2 are equivalent then the corresponding faulty functions are identical. Fault collapsing: All single faults of a logic circuit can be divided into disjoint equivalence subsets, where all faults in a subset are mutually equivalent. A collapsed fault set contains one fault from each equivalence subset. Copyright 2001, Agrawal & Bushnell VLSI Test: Lecture 5

Copyright 2001, Agrawal & Bushnell VLSI Test: Lecture 5

Fault Tolerant Digital System Desgin 5 week Fault Tolerant Digital System Desgin

Equivalence Rules sa0 sa0 sa0 sa1 sa0 sa1 sa1 sa1 WIRE AND OR sa0 sa1 NOT sa1 sa0 sa0 sa1 sa0 sa1 sa0 sa1 sa0 NAND NOR sa1 sa0 sa0 sa1 sa1 sa0 sa1 FANOUT Copyright 2001, Agrawal & Bushnell VLSI Test: Lecture 5

Fault Tolerant Digital System Desgin 5 week Fault Tolerant Digital System Desgin

Equivalence Example sa0 sa1 Faults in red removed by equivalence collapsing sa0 sa1 sa0 sa1 sa0 sa1 sa0 sa1 sa0 sa1 sa0 sa1 sa0 sa1 sa0 sa1 sa0 sa1 sa0 sa1 sa0 sa1 sa0 sa1 sa0 sa1 sa0 sa1 sa0 sa1 20 Collapse ratio = ----- = 0.625 32 Copyright 2001, Agrawal & Bushnell VLSI Test: Lecture 5

Copyright 2001, Agrawal & Bushnell VLSI Test: Lecture 5

Fault Tolerant Digital System Desgin 5 week Fault Tolerant Digital System Desgin

Copyright 2001, Agrawal & Bushnell VLSI Test: Lecture 5

Copyright 2001, Agrawal & Bushnell VLSI Test: Lecture 5

Fault Tolerant Digital System Desgin β α 5 week Fault Tolerant Digital System Desgin

Fault Tolerant Digital System Desgin { 00, 01, 10} 01, 10 { 11, 01, 10} 01, 10 5 week Fault Tolerant Digital System Desgin

Dominance Example All tests of F2 F1 s-a-1 001 F2 110 010 000 s-a-1 110 010 000 101 100 s-a-1 F2 011 Only test of F1 s-a-1 s-a-1 s-a-1 s-a-0 A dominance collapsed fault set Copyright 2001, Agrawal & Bushnell VLSI Test: Lecture 5

Checkpoints Primary inputs and fanout branches of a combinational circuit are called checkpoints. Checkpoint theorem: A test set that detects all single (multiple) stuck-at faults on all checkpoints of a combinational circuit, also detects all single (multiple) stuck-at faults in that circuit. Total fault sites = 16 Checkpoints ( ) = 10 Copyright 2001, Agrawal & Bushnell VLSI Test: Lecture 5

Classes of Stuck-at Faults Following classes of single stuck-at faults are identified by fault simulators: Potentially-detectable fault -- Test produces an unknown (X) state at primary output (PO); detection is probabilistic, usually with 50% probability. Initialization fault -- Fault prevents initialization of the faulty circuit; can be detected as a potentially-detectable fault. Hyperactive fault -- Fault induces much internal signal activity without reaching PO. Redundant fault -- No test exists for the fault. Untestable fault -- Test generator is unable to find a test. Copyright 2001, Agrawal & Bushnell VLSI Test: Lecture 5

Example: Initialization fault Copyright 2001, Agrawal & Bushnell VLSI Test: Lecture 5

Multiple Stuck-at Faults A multiple stuck-at fault means that any set of lines is stuck-at some combination of (0,1) values. The total number of single and multiple stuck-at faults in a circuit with k single fault sites is 3k-1. A single fault test can fail to detect the target fault if another fault is also present, however, such masking of one fault by another is rare. Statistically, single fault tests cover a very large number of multiple faults. Copyright 2001, Agrawal & Bushnell VLSI Test: Lecture 5

Models of fault in PLA-s and PAL-s Permanent constant faults; Short-circuits; Crosspoint Faults ; appearance of CP-s in the AND array;; disappearance of CP-s from the AND array; appearence of CP-s in the OR array; disappearance of CP-s from the OR array. Classical model of fault: constant 1 and 0 (Stuck-at-0, Stuck-at-1, s-a-0, s-a-1) s-a-0 s-a-1 X f X f Short X X f1 f1 X X f2

Example. y1 = x1 x2 x3 + x1 x2 x3 + x1 x2 y2 = x1 x2 x3 + x1 x2 x 1 x 2 x 3 1 1 1 +V y 1 y 2

Permanent constant faults in PLA/PAL-s y1 = x1 x2 x3 + x1 x2 x3 + x1 x2 y1 = x1 x2 + x1 x2 + x1 x2 X3 s-a-1fault y2 = x1 x2 x3 + x1 x2 y2 = x1 x2 + x1 x2 x 1 x 2 x 3 1 1 1 +V s-a-1 y 1 y 2

Crosspoint Faults Appearance of CP-s to in the AND array Unnecessary variable Shrinkage fault y1 = x1 x2 x3 + x1 x2 x3 + x1 x2 Unnecessary CP y1 = x1 x2 x3 + x1 x2 x3 + x1 x2 x3 y2 = x1 x2 x3 + x1 x2 y2 = x1 x2 x3 + x1 x2 x3 x 1 x 2 x 3 1 1 1 +V Carnaugh Map y 1 y 2 Faultless Faulty x2x3 x2x3 y2 y2 00 01 11 10 00 01 11 10 1 1 x1 x1 1 1 1 1 1

Disappearance of CP-s from the AND array Growth fault y1 = x1 x2 x3 + x1 x2 x3 + x1 x2 CP does not exist y1 = x1 x2 x3 + x1 x2 x3 + x1 x2 y2 = x1 x2 x3 + x1 x2 y2 = x1 x2 x3 + x1 CP does not exist x 1 x 2 x 3 1 1 1 +V Carnaugh Map y 1 y 2 Faultless Faulty x2x3 x2x3 y2 y2 00 01 11 10 00 01 11 10 x1 1 1 x1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

Appearance of a new CP to the OR-array Appearance fault y1 = x1 x2 x3 + x1 x2 x3 + x1 x2 y1 = x1 x2 x3 + x1 x2 x3 + x1 x2 Unnecessary CP y2 = x1 x2 x3 + x1 x2 y2 = x1 x2 x3 + x1 x2 + x1 x2 x3 x 1 x 2 x 3 1 1 1 +V Carnaugh Map y 1 y 2 Faultless Faulty x2x3 x2x3 y2 y2 00 01 11 10 00 01 11 10 x1 1 1 x1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

Disapperance of the CP from the OR-array Disappearance fault y1 = x1 x2 x3 + x1 x2 x3 + x1 x2 CP does not exist y1 = x1 x2 x3 + x1 x2 x3 + x1 x2 y2 = x1 x2 x3 + x1 x2 y2 = x1 x2 x3 x 1 x 2 x 3 CP does not exist 1 1 1 +V Carnaugh Map y 1 y 2 Faultless Faulty x2x3 x2x3 y2 y2 00 01 11 10 00 01 11 10 1 1 x1 x1 1 1 1 1

Transistor (Switch) Faults MOS transistor is considered an ideal switch and two types of faults are modeled: Stuck-open -- a single transistor is permanently stuck in the open state. Stuck-short -- a single transistor is permanently shorted irrespective of its gate voltage. Detection of a stuck-open fault requires two vectors. Detection of a stuck-short fault requires the measurement of quiescent current (IDDQ). Copyright 2001, Agrawal & Bushnell VLSI Test: Lecture 5

Stuck-Open Example VDD A B C Vector 1: test for A s-a-0 (Initialization vector) Vector 2 (test for A s-a-1) pMOS FETs VDD Two-vector s-op test can be constructed by ordering two s-at tests A 1 Stuck- open B C 1(Z) Good circuit states nMOS FETs Faulty circuit states Copyright 2001, Agrawal & Bushnell VLSI Test: Lecture 5

Stuck-Short Example VDD A B C Test vector for A s-a-0 pMOS FETs IDDQ path in faulty circuit A 1 Stuck- short B Good circuit state C 0 (X) nMOS FETs Faulty circuit state Copyright 2001, Agrawal & Bushnell VLSI Test: Lecture 5

Truth table for fault-free circuit and all possible transistor faults VDD VSS B P1 P2 N2 N1 A Z 2-input CMOS NOR gate Any transistor can be Stuck-short Also known as stuck-on Stuck-open Also known as stuck-off # fault types: k=2 Example circuit # fault sites: n=4 # single faults =2×4=8 Open Truth table for fault-free circuit and all possible transistor faults AB 00 01 10 11 Z 1 N1 stuck-open last Z N1 stuck-short IDDQ N2 stuck-open N2 stuck-short P1 stuck-open P1 stuck-short P2 stuck-open P2 stuck-short

Truth table for fault-free circuit and all possible transistor faults VDD VSS B P1 P2 N2 N1 A Z Stuck-short faults cause conducting path from VDD to VSS Can be detect by monitoring steady-state power supply current IDDQ Stuck-open faults cause output node to store last voltage level Requires sequence of 2 vectors for detection 0010 detects N1 stuck-open 2-input CMOS NOR gate Truth table for fault-free circuit and all possible transistor faults AB 00 01 10 11 Z 1 N1 stuck-open last Z N1 stuck-short IDDQ N2 stuck-open N2 stuck-short P1 stuck-open P1 stuck-short P2 stuck-open P2 stuck-short

Transistor Faults # collapsed faults = 2×T -TS+GS -TP+GP T = number of transistors TS= number of series transistors GS= number of groups of series transistors TP= number of parallel transistors GP= number of groups of parallel transistors For example circuit, # collapsed faults = 6 T=4, TS= 2, GS= 1, TP= 2, & GP= 1 Fault collapsing typically reduces number of transistor faults by 25% to 35%

Summary Fault models are analyzable approximations of defects and are essential for a test methodology. For digital logic single stuck-at fault model offers best advantage of tools and experience. Many other faults (bridging, stuck-open and multiple stuck-at) are largely covered by stuck-at fault tests. Stuck-short and delay faults and technology-dependent faults require special tests. Memory and analog circuits need other specialized fault models and tests. Copyright 2001, Agrawal & Bushnell VLSI Test: Lecture 5