Models, Theories and Frameworks MTF Description Reference KTA . Knowledge to Action model is a process model that defines and describes Knowledge Translation processes and outlines strategies for building Knowledge Translation capacity Graham, D., et al. (2006). Lost in translation: Time for a map?. Journal of continuing education in the health professions, 26 (1): 13-24. COM-B Capability, Opportunity, Motivation – Behaviour is a behavior change theory. Michie, S. et al. (2011). The behaviuor change wheel: A new method for characterizing and designing behaviour change interventions. Implementation Science, 6:42. TDF Theoretical Domains Framework is a framework that was developed to make behavior change theories more accessible in relation to implementation practices. Cane, J., et al. (2012). Validation of the theoretical domains framework for use in behaviour change and implementation research. Implementation Science, 7(1). CFIR Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research is a framework that can be used to understand the implementation context. Damschroder, L., et al. (2009). Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implementation Science, 4:50.

Models, Theories and Frameworks MTF Description Reference QIF . Quality Implementation Framework is a framework that provides a synthesized overview of critical steps of implementation that can be used as a guide for practice and research. Wandersman, et al. (2012). The Quality Implementation Framework: A Synthesis of Critical Steps in the Implementation Process. American Journal of Community Psychology, 50(3-4):462-80. doi: 10.1007/s10464-012-9522-x. ISF Interactive Systems Framework is a framework that outlines the people/organizations/contexts needed to move effective prevention into the field. Wandersman, A., et al. (2008). Bridging the gap between prevention research and practice: The interactive systems framework for dissemination and implementation. American journal of community psychology, 41(3-4): 171-181. RE-AIM A framework for evaluating public health interventions that assesses 5 dimensions: reach, efficacy, adoption, implementation, and maintenance. These dimensions occur at multiple levels (e.g., individual, clinic or organization, community) and interact to determine the public health or population-based impact of a program or policy. Glasgow RE, Vogt TM, Boles SM: Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the RE-AIM framework. Am J Public Health. 1999, 89: 1322-1327. 10.2105/AJPH.89.9.1322.