Module V.2 NAP as a living document Trainer: [Name]

Overview of this module Adaptation is a long-time process covering many decades Various changes will take place over such long time periods which will have to be reflected in the NAP process NAP documents have to be flexible and open for adjustments (NAP as living process) Provide an overview of the content of the presentation, starting with “Objectives of the module” (see next slide). If you find it useful, you may use this field to insert notes – but only sparingly, please!!

What can you expect to learn from this session? Understand the iterative character of NAP planning and implementation Get sensitized for the need for regular revision Reflect reasons and frequency of revision List two to four learning objectives of the module. What would you like each participant to know and be able to do when he/she has completed the module? Make the participants clearly understand the intended learning outcome and the relevance of the topic.

Need for regular adjustments NAP process has long-term character. Framework conditions such as CC impacts and vulnerabilities will evolve over time. Experiences from NAP implementation will gradually evolve. Knowledge and state of science will improve over time. Relevant development and sector plans will change to which the NAP process is aligned: Strong link to national planning cycles Mainstreaming is a continuous process. The trainer might highlight in this context the key questions for updated as mentioned in the technical guidelines: What are the frequency and/or triggers for an update of the NAPs and related outputs? • Which of the previous steps of the NAP process would be repeated in order to produce an update of the NAPs? • How can the updating of the NAPs be aligned with other development planning processes to ensure harmonization and the identification of co-benefits?

Time-scale of adaptation 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Annual crops Election cycles/ profit & loss Whole farm planning Tourism developments Tree crops New irrigation project Transport infrastructure Major urban infrastructure Protected areas Large dams Landscape architecture Forest succession Bridge design life Suburb locations Adaptation processes and measures have to reflect the time-scale of how certain systems might respond to climate changes: Crop cycles might be changed annually if needed. Therefore, comparably quick reactions to climate changes are possible. Quite in contrast: New infrastructure developments (transport, urban infrastructure such as sanitation) will last for decades. Adapation measures at a later point might require much time and resources. Planning horizons Source: Adapted from Staffort Smith 2009

Particular areas of change influencing NAP New directions in the national development planning New policy directions Socio-economic changes Increasing knowledge on CC change and vulnerability Experiences within the NAP implementation process (what works, what doesn’t work) Feed-back from M&E system New impetus from international climate negotiations

How can a NAP be adjusted ? Adjusted goals New sectors to be covered Adjusted measures New stakeholders to be involved New plans / policies to be aligned with Adjusted timeframes Changed resource conditions (funds, personnel …) Real case: New political situations might require comprehensive adjustments in the NAP process. The National Climate Change Strategy of Tunisia was not implemented after the Arab spring any more. A new process had to be started to win a mandate for adaptation.

Initiatives and triggers for revision Revisions might be launched by adaptation steering bodies if new knowledge emerges or relevant framework conditions change. New development or sector plans might need reflection in the adaptation process (Example: A new River Basin Management Plan might be very relevant for climate sensitive irrigation projects). Some counties initiated their NAP process through an act of parliament, an executive order by the President or the like. This might include provisions for up-dating (Example: US Executive Order 13514 on Climate Change Adaptation). The time-frames for revision might be also stipulated in the Adaptation Plan itself. 29/11/2018

Exercise: Revision process for NAP Please reflect possible changes and options for adjustment in Matrix V.2.1 for the concrete situation of your country. Note down your finding on cards Present your findings in plenary

Imprint Published by Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH Climate Policy Support Project Dag-Hammarskjöld-Weg 1-5 65760 Eschborn, Germany T +49 61 96 79-0 F +49 61 96 79-1115 Contact E climate@giz.de I www.giz.de/climate Responsible Nele Bünner, GIZ Author Alfred Eberhardt Contributions by Nele Bünner This presentation is part of a NAP country-level training that has been developed by GIZ on behalf of BMZ and in cooperation with the NAP Global Support Programme (NAP-GSP), in particular UNDP and UNITAR. The training is designed to support countries in setting up a National Adaptation Plan (NAP) process. It builds on the NAP Technical Guidelines developed by the Least- Developed Countries Expert Group (LEG). You are welcome to use the slides, as long as you do not alter its content or design (including the logos), nor this imprint. If you have any questions regarding the training, please contact Till Below or Nele Bünner at GIZ. For questions related to the Technical Guidelines, please refer to the UNFCCC’s NAP Support Portal. As a federally owned enterprise, the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH supports the German Government in achieving its objectives in the field of international cooperation for sustainable development. GIZ also engages in human resource development, advanced training and dialogue.