SVT detector electronics

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
LHCb Upgrade Overview ALICE, ATLAS, CMS & LHCb joint workshop on DAQ Château de Bossey 13 March 2013 Beat Jost / Cern.
Advertisements

The LHCb Inner Tracker LHCb: is a single-arm forward spectrometer dedicated to B-physics acceptance: (250)mrad: The Outer Tracker: covers the large.
1 Conceptual design adopts state-of-the-art silicon sensor techniques (compare ATLAS/CMS/ALICE inner tracker layers, BaBar tracking of B mesons). Design.
Tobias Haas DESY 7 November 2006 A Pixel Telescope for Detector R&D for an ILC Introduction: EUDET Introduction: EUDET Pixel Telescope Pixel Telescope.
U N C L A S S I F I E D FVTX Detector Readout Concept S. Butsyk For LANL P-25 group.
Pixel hybrid status & issues Outline Pixel hybrid overview ALICE1 readout chip Readout options at PHENIX Other issues Plans and activities K. Tanida (RIKEN)
Frontend of PHENIX Si pixel K. Tanida (RIKEN) FEM/DAQ meeting for PHENIX upgrade (10/24/02) Outline Overview of PHENIX Si pixel detector ALICE1 chip readout.
LHCb VErtex LOcator & Displaced Vertex Trigger
NUMI Off Axis NUMI Off Axis Workshop Workshop Argonne Meeting Electronics for RPCs Gary Drake, Charlie Nelson Apr. 25, 2003 p. 1.
Joel Goldstein, RAL 4th ECFA/DESY LC Workshop, 1/4/ Vertex Readout Joel Goldstein PPd, RAL 4 th ECFA/DESY LC Workshop DAQ Session 1 st April 2003.
11 June 2015 Thomas Bergauer (HEPHY Vienna) Belle II SVD beam Test SPS 2015 SPS users meeting.
CLAS12 Central Detector Meeting, Saclay, 3 Dec MVT Read-Out Architecture & MVT / SVT Integration Issues Irakli MANDJAVIDZE.
SVT detector Electronics Status Overview: - SVT design status - F.E. chips - Electronic design - Hit rates and data volumes - Required ETD inputs Mauro.
27/01/2012Mauro Citterio - SVT TDR Meeting - Pisa1 Pheripheral Electronics Mauro Citterio INFN Milano.
Status of SVT front-end electronics M. Citterio on behalf of INFN and University of Milan XVII SuperB Workshop and Kick Off Meeting: ETD3 Parallel Session.
G. RizzoSVT Meeting – April, SVT Update SVT bi-weekly Meeting - April, Giuliana Rizzo Universita’ & INFN Pisa Group Organization & WBS.
Mu3e Data Acquisition Ideas Dirk Wiedner July /5/20121Dirk Wiedner Mu3e meeting Zurich.
Pixel detector/Readout for SuperB T.Kawasaki Niigata-U.
2 March 2012Mauro Citterio - SVT Phone meeting1 Peripheral Electronics Some updates Mauro Citterio INFN Milano.
The LHCb Calorimeter Triggers LAL Orsay and INFN Bologna.
GGT-Electronics System design Alexander Kluge CERN-PH/ED April 3, 2006.
SVT detector Electronics Status Overview: - SVT design status - F.E. chips - Electronic design - Hit rates and data volumes - TDR Mauro Villa INFN & Università.
The SuperB Silicon Vertex Tracker Abstract : The SuperB project aims to build an asymmetric e+ - e- collider capable of reaching.
G. RizzoSVT - SuperB Workshop – Paris 16 Feb SVT Plans for TDR Activities since Elba Meeting Plans for TDR preparation Giuliana Rizzo Universita’
Update on & SVT readout chip requirements
SVD Electronics Constraints
DAQ Requirements M. Villa 21/02/2011.
SVT – SuperB Workshop – Annecy March 2010
Plans for pixel module integration electronics
Valerio Re INFN Pavia and University of Bergamo
ETD meeting Architecture and costing On behalf of PID group
SVT Parallel-SuperB Workshop Perugia, June
Update on SVT electronics
SVT subchapters & editors
PID meeting SNATS to SCATS New front end design
Preliminary thoughts on SVT services
Milano Activities: an update Mauro Citterio On behalf of INFN Milano
APSEL6D Architecture, simulations and results
Electronics Trigger and DAQ CERN meeting summary.
ETD summary D. Breton, S.Luitz, U.Marconi
INFN Pavia and University of Bergamo
Preliminary considerations on the strip readout chip for SVT
From SNATS to SCATS C. Beigbeder1, D. Breton1,F.Dulucq1, L. Leterrier2, J. Maalmi1, V. Tocut1, Ph. Vallerand3 1 : LAL Orsay, France (IN2P3 – CNRS) 2 :
SVT front-end electronics
ETD/Online Report D. Breton, U. Marconi, S. Luitz
SVT Mechanics Baseline SuperB SVT configuration
TELL1 A common data acquisition board for LHCb
Electronics, Trigger and DAQ for SuperB
Silicon Pixel Detector for the PHENIX experiment at the BNL RHIC
Pixel Module Interfaces Mauro Citterio On behalf of INFN Milano
& pixel module interfaces On behalf of INFN Milano
Update on SVT activities
The SuperB Silicon Vertex Tracker
SVT Issues for the TDR What decisions must be taken before the TDR can be written? What is the mechanism for reaching those decisions How can missing information.
Vertex 2005 November 7-11, 2005 Chuzenji Lake, Nikko, Japan
VELO readout On detector electronics Off detector electronics to DAQ
Example of DAQ Trigger issues for the SoLID experiment
SVT detector electronics
Overview: - Front-end activities - DAQ activities - Test beam analysis
SVT- Status Update on R&D activities for TDR
The LHCb Level 1 trigger LHC Symposium, October 27, 2001
The CMS Tracking Readout and Front End Driver Testing
PID meeting Mechanical implementation Electronics architecture
SVT detector electronics
SVT – SuperB Workshop – Frascati Sept. 2010
PHENIX forward trigger review
The LHCb Front-end Electronics System Status and Future Development
TELL1 A common data acquisition board for LHCb
Perugia SuperB Workshop June 16-19, 2009
U. Marconi, D. Breton, S. Luitz
Presentation transcript:

SVT detector electronics Mauro Villa - INFN & Università di Bologna Overview: - SuperB SVT - Layer 0 peculiarities - SVT channels and reading chains - Rate, links and event size - SVT in trigger schema

SuperB SVT 40 cm 30 cm 20 cm Layer0 Layer Radius 0 1.5 cm 1 3.3 cm 2 4.0 cm 3 5.9 cm 4 9.1 to 12.7 cm 5 11.4 to 14.6 cm Baseline: use an SVT similar to the BaBar one adding a Layer 0 Layer 0 options: double layer thin MAPS pixels, striplets (double sided), single layer hybrid pixel. Load to DAQ calculated for MAPS double layer. Each layer has several modules, mechanically independent units (52+8) Each module has 2 half-modules, electrically independent units: Sensor, front-end chips, HDI with power/signal input and data output link Pixel half-module Strip(lets) half-module Data Pixel sensor + front-end chips HDI Power/Signal HDI Si Wafers Data Power/Signal Front-end chips Frascati, 2/12/09

Layer0 peculiarities MAPS Pixel sensors (40 um pitch) Rad hard environment Large machine background ( 15 mm from beam line) Fundamental the first point of a track for vertexing MAPS Pixel sensors (40 um pitch) Apsel6D – or similar 320x216 pixels a 40 um pitch. Active Area = 110 mm2 Completely data driven architecture Space time coordinates Time granularity down to 100 ns from 0.2-2.0 us Time ordered hits External Time stamp clock. Hit rate expected: 110 Mhit/s/chip (with a safety factor>5). Frascati, 2/12/09

SuperB Layer 0 MAPS Module 6 Chips: 1.1 cm^2 Signal lines: 180 in 1 cm width Hit Rate: 110 MHz/chip (safety>5) Module Rates: 660 MHz Bandwidth: 20 Gbit/s (design parameters) Thin aluminium bus for power and signals Main technological challenge: Line spacing (<100 um) Frequency (> 100 MHz) Frascati, 2/12/09

SuperB SVT in numbers 6 layers: Layer0 + 5 layers like BaBar SVT Layer Modules HDI ReadOut Section (ROS) chips/ROS chips channels 0- Pixels 8 16 32 6 192 13.1E+06 1 12 24 7-8 180 23.0E+03 2 7-10 204 26.1E+03 3 10-14 288 36.9E+03 4 64 4-11 480 61.4E+03 5 18 36 72 4-14 648 82.9E+03 total 60 120 240   2052 13.4E+06 Frascati, 2/12/09

Bkgd Hit Rate (MHz/cm^2) Present values … might change! L0 L1 L2 L3 L4 L5 Frascati, 2/12/09

General DAQ framework Frascati, 2/12/09

DAQ reading chain for L0 HDI with line drivers, copper cables, Rad-hard ram+L1 handling logic, optical links RAM and L1 logic Copper Link Buffers and line drivers Optical 1Gbit/s Optical Link 2.5 Gbit/s FEB ROM Transition card Near detector “soft” rad area Off detector low rad area Counting room Std electronics On detector High rad area Design limited by the large data rate on L0: 16 Gbit/s/ROS and the link bandwidth (1 Gbit/s/link) Simplicity: 1 ROS to 1 FEB 32 x1Gb/s links; Frascati, 2/12/09

DAQ reading chain for L1-L5 Full data shipment to FEBs; 1 FEB serves max 12 ROS; optical 1Gbit/s Links Line drivers Optical Link 2.5 Gbit/s HDI Si Wafers Data Power/Signal Front-end chips FEB ROM Transition card Near detector “soft” rad area On detector High rad area Off detector low rad area Counting room Std electronics Max 3 Gbit/s/ROS on L1, L2; 0.3-1.3 Gbit/s/ROS on L3-L5 Grouping: up to 12 ROS to 1 FEB Resources: 252x 1Gbit/s links, 24 FEBs, 24x2.5Gbit/s links Frascati, 2/12/09

Rates, links & event size Trigger rate: 150 kHz, SVT readout window: 396 ns Layer 1Gbit/s links FE Boards 2 Gbit/s DAQ links To ROM DAQ rate/FEB (Gbit/s) (*) Triggered event size (kB/ev) 0- Pixels 32 (*) 32 1.2 26 1 72 6 0.8 3.2 2 0.6 3.6 3 48 4 1.6 24 0.4 1.0 5 36 0.5 1.3 total 284 56   (*) Triggered data only Frascati, 2/12/09

SVT in trigger schema Purposes/Advantages Thanks to the data-push architecture of FSSR, L1-L5 will be read out continuously L3-L5 could be used for online-track finding Purposes/Advantages Early (<2µs) identification of interesting events L1 triggering Background track identification tracks not coming from primary vertex region Bhabha veto (?) Back to back in r-phi Quick track finding might speed-up downstream processing Seeded track finding; reduction of reconstruction farm Many ideas, many possibilities, but no systematic study yet Frascati, 2/12/09

Conclusions and main numbers Full SVT readout with 56 Front-End Boards 56 DAQ links, 56 ECS, 56 FTCS Large use of 1 Gbit/s Optical links (284 in total) Moderate use of DAQ links (2 Gbit/s) assuming suitable ROS data grouping SVT Time-tagging of events every 132 ns; Events span a time range of 3x132 ns=396 ns. Event size: 36 kB (with a safety factor of 5 on background rate at L0) Possibility for early (<2µs) track finding for L1 applications or seeded reconstruction at HLTs Frascati, 2/12/09