Foreshock(Mj6.5) Main shock(Mj7.3) 28 hrs later

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Measuring Earthquakes
Advertisements

 Depth Into the earth Surface of the earth Distance along the fault plane 100 km (60 miles) Slip on an earthquake fault START.
EPRI/SOG Mmax –Six earth-science teams, diverse methods largest observed eq (+ increment) catalog statistics – extreme occurrences seismogenic feature:
Ch 6 Review Earthquakes.
WHAT COULD BE THE NEXT EARTHQUAKE DISASTER FOR JAPAN  A difficult question, but ---  It is the one that was being asked long before the March 11, 2011.
GLG 410 FINAL PROJECT: VA EARTHQUAKE ANALYSIS. Introduction:  August 23 rd, 2011 a magnitude 5.8 earthquake struck in Louisa County, 5 miles SSW from.
Yan Y. Kagan Dept. Earth and Space Sciences, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA , Full.
03/09/2007 Earthquake of the Week
Michigan Grade Level Content Expectations 6 – G2.1.2 Account for topographic and human spatial patterns (where people live) associated with tectonic plates.
THE MARCH 11, 2011 EARTHQUAKE- TSUNAMI DISASTER IN JAPAN REMEMBERING: PART 2 Walter Hays, Global Alliance for Disaster Reduction, University of North Carolina,
Earthquake Measurement
Changes that IMPACT peoples lives! Changes to the Earth and Peoples lives in a matter of seconds.
Forecasting Earthquakes ・ Difference between Predictions and Forecasts ・ Earlier Efforts in Earthquake Prediction ・ Long-term Probability Estimates.
Brainstorm: How to assess an Earthquake: Stroked off B.C. coast? Rapid Earthquake Risk Assessment Source Parameters USGS World Shake Maps USGS Shake Aftershocks.
Earthquakes. Given information on Earthquakes, you will be able to describe, in writing: a) what an earthquake is; b) what the elastic rebound theory.
New Madrid Earthquake By: Julie Dillon and Caroline Miller.
Seismic Reflection Image along I-64 Pratt et al., 1988 Coruh et al., 1988.
Seismic Hazard Assessment for the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Do Now – In Notebooks  What are some effects of earthquakes?  Why is intensity not always the same as magnitude for an earthquake?
Lisa Wald USGS Pasadena U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey USGS Earthquake Hazards Program Earthquakes 101 (EQ101)
Inside Earth Chapter 2 Earthquakes 2.2 Earthquakes and Seismic Waves.
A functional form for the spatial distribution of aftershocks Karen Felzer USGS Pasadena.
WHY DO WE LOOK FOR FAULTS?? Geologists of the end of the 19th century (at that time geologists were more like adventurers rather than scientists!) realized.
GNS Science Natural Hazards Research Platform Progress in understanding the Canterbury Earthquakes Kelvin Berryman Manager, Natural Hazards Research Platform.
Natural and Cultural Characteristics of an Environment that make it vulnerable to E.N.E.
9. As hazardous as California? USGS/FEMA: Buildings should be built to same standards How can we evaluate this argument? Frankel et al., 1996.
Forecasting Earthquakes
Earthquake Scales Richter vs. Mercalli. What is an earthquake? Earthquakes are the vibration of the earth as a result of a release of energy – Earthquakes.
Earthquakes 101 (EQ101) Lisa Wald USGS Earthquake Hazards Program
Earthquakes. Sounds of Earthquakes nds.phphttp://earthquake.usgs.gov/learning/listen/allsou nds.php.
EARTHQUAKE REPORT SOUTH AMERICA WEEK OF FEBRUARY 3 RD TO FEBRUARY 9 TH, 2016 OLIVIA HELPRIN.
Objectives Relate earthquake activity to plate tectonics Define earthquake, and identify the focus and epicenter of an earthquake. Describe the types.
Seismic Hazard Analysis for Guam & the Northern Mariana Islands Chuck Mueller U.S. Geological Survey Golden, Colorado, USA.
Earthquakes.
Introduction to Japan.
Earthquakes and Volcanoes
European Geosciences Union, General Assembly Vienna | Austria | 23–28 April 2017 Seismic zoning (first approximation) using data of the main geomagnetic.
Earthquakes.
Images courtesy of Google Earth (top), and USGS (bottom).
TWO DAYS--TWO DAMAGING EARTHQUAKES IN JAPAN
Learning Goals Describe the plate interactions that causes earthquakes. Discuss the types of information scientists learn from seismograms. Compare.
Why aren't earthquake hazard maps better. Seth Stein1, M
What are earthquakes? Stresses in the crust cause rock to move suddenly The sudden movement causes vibrations that travel as waves inside the Earth and.
Geographic Distribution of Earthquakes
Destructive Forces: EARTHQUAKES.
Jordan seismological Observatory (JSO) Engineer Ahmad Algazo
1958 Lituya Bay, Alaska Earthquake Magnitude 7.9
Ch.5, Sec.2 - Earthquake Measurement
EARTHQUAKE EFFECTS, PATTERNS, AND RISK
8.2 – Measuring Earthquakes – Part II
Warm up 9/27/2016 ( 10 min) Label the diagram A-G Volcano B. trench
European Geosciences Union, General Assembly Vienna | Austria | 23–28 April 2017 Seismic zoning (first approximation) using data of the main geomagnetic.
S52C-01 Outline of the 2016 Kumamoto, Japan, earthquakes and lessons learned for a large urban earthquake in Tokyo metropolitan area Naoshi Hirata1, Aitaro.
S52C-01 Outline of the 2016 Kumamoto, Japan, Earthquakes and lessons for a large urban earthquake in Tokyo Metropolitan area Naoshi Hirata1, Aitaro Kato1,
Principal Stress rotates to EW direction
Japanese Government…..
Earthquakes and Volcanoes
Foreshock(Mj6.5) Main shock(Mj7.3) 28 hrs later
Faults, Earthquakes, and Simulations
SICHUAN EARTHQUAKE May 12, 2008
Engineering Geology and Seismology
Key Terms 5.2.
K. Z. Nanjo (ERI, Univ. Tokyo)
Michigan Grade Level Content Expectations
Earthquake Epicenters
Plate Tectonics Tectonic plates are blocks of lithosphere that consist of the crust and the rigid, outermost part of the mantle and glide across the.
Earthquake Measurement
by Naoki Uchida, Takeshi Iinuma, Robert M
Presentation transcript:

Foreshock(Mj6.5) Main shock(Mj7.3) 28 hrs later Figure 1. Seismic intensity distribution of the 2016 Kumamoto earthquakes

Figure 2. Surface faulting of the 2016 Kumamoto earthquakes on known active faults. Along the Futagawa fault zone, about 30 km long, a series of surface faults are found. The maximum faulting is 2.2 m right-lateral slip at Mashiki town, Dozon area. Photo taken on 2016, May 14th by Naoshi Hirata.

Figure 3.Kumamoto earthquakes on mapped active faults, the Futagawa and Hinagu faults, which are two of 98 major active fault among 2000 mapped active faults in Japan.

Central Kyushu North Central Whole Kyushu: 30-42% South Cumulative distribution South Probability (%) Figure 4. Profanities of earthquake M6.8+ occurrence in 30 years. © Earthquake Research Committee, Headquarters for Earthquake Research Promotion (HERP)

28% Kumamoto City 14% Mashiki Town Probability Figure 5. Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Assessment. A chance for Japanese Seismic Intensity 6- or larger in 30 years: as of Jan. 1, 2016

4 5- 5+ 6- 6+ 7 ≦3 4 5- 5+ 6- 6+ 7 Figure 6. Estimated (a) [7] and observed seismic intensities at the 2016-April-16 Kumamoto earthquake (b)[14].

Figure 7(a). Labeling of active faults Rank S (High) : >3% in 30 yrs Rank A (Fairly high) : 0.1 – 3 % in 30 yrs Rank Z: :<0.1 % in 30 yrs Rank X: unknown (not reject soon to occur) Name Rank Magnitude Figure 7(a). Labeling of active faults

Figure 7 (b)