WP5.2 Report & outlook Jan Bot, SURF

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
HORIZON 2020: FINANCIAL ISSUES
Advertisements

The FI-WARE Project – Base Platform for Future Service Infrastructures OCTOBER 2011 Presentation at proposers day.
Thee-Framework for Education & Research The e-Framework for Education & Research an Overview TEN Competence, Jan 2007 Bill Olivier,
Updated e-IRG recommendations Motivation and status.
-Nikhil Bhatia 28 th October What is RUP? Central Elements of RUP Project Lifecycle Phases Six Engineering Disciplines Three Supporting Disciplines.
EGI-Engage EGI-Engage Engaging the EGI Community towards an Open Science Commons Project Overview 9/14/2015 EGI-Engage: a project.
Service Transition & Planning Service Validation & Testing
CLARIN work packages. Conference Place yyyy-mm-dd
Realising the European Union Lisbon Goal The Copenhagen process and the Maaastricht Communiqué: Martina Ní Cheallaigh DG Education and Culture.
The FI-WARE Project – Base Platform for Future Service Infrastructures FI-WARE OCTOBER 2011 Presentation at proposers day.
EGI-InSPIRE RI EGI-InSPIRE EGI-InSPIRE RI EGI Business Engagement Program for SMEs Javier Jiménez Business Development.
United Nations Economic Commission for Europe Statistical Division CSPA: The Future of Statistical Production Steven Vale UNECE
Project: EaP countries cooperation for promoting quality assurance in higher education Maria Stratan European Institute for Political Studies of Moldova.
EGI-InSPIRE RI An Introduction to European Grid Infrastructure (EGI) March An Introduction to the European Grid Infrastructure.
Eric Peirano, Ph.D., TECHNOFI, COO
EGI Foundation (Session Chair)
EGI towards H2020 Feedback (from survey)
Bob Jones EGEE Technical Director
Towards a European Open Science Cloud for research
EOSC Governance Development Forum EOSC Governance Framework
Eric Peirano, Ph.D., TECHNOFI, COO
EOSC Services for Scientists
A product is useless without a platform, or more precisely and accurately, a platform-less product will always be replaced by an equivalent platform-ized.
Services for EOSC management
EOSC MODEL Pasquale Pagano CNR - ISTI
WP5.1 Ground Segment Description with contributions from all partners
EOSCpilot Service Pilots Face to Face with SDs and RPs
Defining EOSC Rules of Engagement Damien Lecarpentier (CSC)
eInfraCentral Portal User requirements and features
Integrated Management System and Certification
Exploitation and Sustainability updates
Ian Bird GDB Meeting CERN 9 September 2003
The ESS vision, ESSnets and SDMX
Donatella Castelli CNR-ISTI
Steven Newhouse EGI-InSPIRE Project Director, EGI.eu
Presented by Munezero Immaculee Joselyne PhD in Software Engineering
Summit 2017 Breakout Group 2: Data Management (DM)
The e-Infrastructure Commons
Discussion.
Wrap-up & discussion EOSC Governance Development Forum workshop:
EGI-Engage Engaging the EGI Community towards an Open Science Commons
2017 WPS Break-Out Session: Addressing Gaps
Application Form Sections 4-9 Christopher Parker & Kirsti Mijnhijmer 28 January 2009 – Copenhagen, Denmark European Union European Regional Development.
Updating the Value Proposition:
C2CAMP (A Working Title)
European Open Science Cloud All Hands Meeting Pisa 8-9 March 2018
EOSCpilot Skills Landscape & Framework
EOSC & e-Science: enabling the digital transformation of Science
EOSC Governance Development Forum
EOSC Concepts Comparison EOSC Glossary Jesse Oikarinen (CSC)
WP2 Governance Per Öster
EOSCpilot All Hands Meeting 9 March 2018, Pisa
EOSC services architecture
EOSCpilot All Hands Meeting 8 March 2018 Pisa
EOSCpilot All Hands Meeting 8 March 2018 Pisa
6.2 data interoperability Rafael C Jimenez ELIXIR
WIS Strategy – WIS 2.0 Submitted by: Matteo Dell’Acqua(CBS) (Doc 5b)
European policy perspectives on social experimentation
European Open Science Cloud All Hands Meeting Pisa 8-9 March 2018
Integrating social science data in Europe
Brian Matthews STFC EOSCpilot Brian Matthews STFC
EOSCpilot All Hands Meeting 9 March 2018, Pisa
CSPA: The Future of Statistical Production
Outline Background: development of the Commission’s position
Skills Framework FAIR 4S DI4R18 Lisbon
WP6 – EOSC integration J-F. Perrin (ILL) 15th Jan 2019
The EU Model of PIC Raymond Hill Team Leader, PIC Task Force
EOSC-hub Contribution to the EOSC WGs
eContentplus 2007 Work Programme
Presentation transcript:

WP5.2 Report & outlook Jan Bot, SURF

Task 5.2 EOSC Service Portfolio Service Portfolio Management The purpose of a Service Portfolio is to understand, both internally and externally, what services an organisation provides. This is necessary for effective service management as much of it is arranged and managed by service. A Service Portfolio also help create an internal awareness within the organisation of the concept of a ‘Service’ from an ITSM point of view, rather than a more technology orientated point of view (which tends to refer to Service Components as Services). Inclusion criteria Removal criteria Update criteria www.eoscpilot.eu The European Open Science Cloud for Research pilot project is funded by the European Commission, DG Research & Innovation under contract no. 739563

WP5.2 Results Collaboration with eInfraCentral Sharing of service descriptions Adoption of eInfraCentral Service Description Template Gather input on service requirements from science demonstrators In collaboration with T5.1, T5.4 and WP6 Description of services of project partners Description of Service Portfolio Management (SPM) methodologies of project partners First design of EOSC SPM process More detailed description of output available in D5.2 “EOSC Service Portfolio” Collaboration with eInfraCentral meant a shift in the task’s objectives. www.eoscpilot.eu The European Open Science Cloud for Research pilot project is funded by the European Commission, DG Research & Innovation under contract no. 739563

Service Portfolio Management: Challenges and first design Federated setting: augment existing ITSM frameworks with EOSC specific processes when needed. Provider heterogeneity: provide multiple levels of EOSC ‘compliance’ and ‘compatibility’ to be able to include providers with various maturity levels. Consumer heterogeneity: enable communities / scientific disciplines to define their own set of requirements and provide the ability to label services according to their needs. Service quality vs. inclusiveness: allow various levels of service quality but make sure services are properly described Structure of slide is Challenge: proposed solution. www.eoscpilot.eu The European Open Science Cloud for Research pilot project is funded by the European Commission, DG Research & Innovation under contract no. 739563

EOSC Portfolio Process www.eoscpilot.eu The European Open Science Cloud for Research pilot project is funded by the European Commission, DG Research & Innovation under contract no. 739563

EOSC Service Categories Service status: EOSC Compatible: minimal requirements set by principles of engagement EOSC Compliant: adherence to a more strict set of requirements posed by EOSC Service sponsoring EOSC Supported Services: Services that are commissioned and therefore financially supported by EOSC. Service types & audience Core Services: the fabric on which the EOSC is built, includes e.g. AAI, monitoring and accounting services. Service components: e-infrastructure and software components that can be combined to create end-user services. End-user services: services that are directly accessed by scientists Important to realise that services can be part of multiple categories, as shown in the Venn diagram. Service status: how well does a service ‘fit in’ to EOSC? Service sponsoring: how is a service being financed? Service types & audience: who / what is the intended user of a service? www.eoscpilot.eu The European Open Science Cloud for Research pilot project is funded by the European Commission, DG Research & Innovation under contract no. 739563

Service Portfolio: Minimal requirements Provide service & service provider descriptions Only include actively supported services Provide access route for international users Be compliant with EU rules and regulations www.eoscpilot.eu The European Open Science Cloud for Research pilot project is funded by the European Commission, DG Research & Innovation under contract no. 739563

WP5.2 Issues Diversity of stakeholders and services: limit initial work to ‘core services’ and work outwards from there Circular project dependencies: bootstrap initial EOSC model and iteratively refine original setup Community involvement: organise discussion sessions and face-to-face meetings www.eoscpilot.eu The European Open Science Cloud for Research pilot project is funded by the European Commission, DG Research & Innovation under contract no. 739563

WP5.2 Future work Determine what the ‘core services’ are and specify their functionality Specify (in collaboration with other tasks) what the rules of engagement are for the various service categories are Identify what service components are www.eoscpilot.eu The European Open Science Cloud for Research pilot project is funded by the European Commission, DG Research & Innovation under contract no. 739563

Service abstraction levels Type: indicating what functionality is to be expected. This can e.g. be an AAI service, for which you would expect it to provide a method to authenticate users from various sources Implementation: a software system that implements the required functionality as specified by the service type. This can e.g. be the GÉANT AAI system. Instance: a service implementation offered by a service provider at a particular moment in time. This could be an instance of the GÉANT AAI system currently running at SURFnet. www.eoscpilot.eu The European Open Science Cloud for Research pilot project is funded by the European Commission, DG Research & Innovation under contract no. 739563

Remodelling the layers Inner core All services to make EOSC work as a system Service types are dictated by EOSC Validity of service implementations is checked by EOSC Development of services is coordinated and funded through EOSC EOSC aims to limit the amount of service implementations & instances to make operation of these services more efficient and cost effective. The providers of service instances are required to be certified against international standards and make themselves available for auditing Service providers receive base level compensation for offering these services Services in other layers that aim to be EOSC compliant are required to use one of the EOSC approved instances of a service that provides the required functionality. Outer core Mantle Crust www.eoscpilot.eu The European Open Science Cloud for Research pilot project is funded by the European Commission, DG Research & Innovation under contract no. 739563

Remodelling the layers Inner core Outer core Services that e.g. RIs can use to build their own platform on. Consists mainly of e-infrastructure services. Offer a uniform interface to service providers to be able to easily scale-up or move operations Create synergy between service providers by Providing specialised services to a wider demographic that would otherwise not be economically viable Provide services that require cross provider collaboration (e.g. a cross- data-center data replication services) Facilitate knowledge sharing between service providers by focusing on a limited set of technologies that are used across the EOSC Service types include (but are not limited to): Cloud compute, object storage, networking, PID systems, etc. EOSC aims to standardise the interfaces that these service implementations expose (e.g. S3 object protocol, OAI-PMH). Mantle Crust www.eoscpilot.eu The European Open Science Cloud for Research pilot project is funded by the European Commission, DG Research & Innovation under contract no. 739563

Remodelling the layers Inner core Outer core Mantle Non-scientific discipline specific higher-level services. Aim of this layer is to: Guide the development of software platforms (implementations) that can be instantiated by various service providers. To standardise on a limited number of platforms and protocols to facilitate data and tool re-use across disciplines. To build on top of the interfaces as exposed by the outer core services. Service types include (but are not limited to): scientific gateways, VREs, web- platforms, analysis engines, etc. Examples of service implementations: D4Science, Catania Science Gateway, Galaxy. To be EOSC compliant, these service implementations are required to interface with inner core services where applicable. These service implementations are encouraged to build on top of outer core service interfaces, which will contribute to their EOSC compatibility. These services can be part of the EOSC Supported Services (for which funding is available to develop or run the service) but don’t have to be. Crust www.eoscpilot.eu The European Open Science Cloud for Research pilot project is funded by the European Commission, DG Research & Innovation under contract no. 739563

Remodelling the layers Inner core Outer core Mantle Crust All end-user facing services. Aim of this layer is to: Provide scientists with fit-for-purpose services Service types: can roughly be anything IT infrastructure related. Can be instantiated outer core or mantle services, but don’t have to be. To be EOSC compliant, they are required to use inner core services where applicable. Services in this layer will, in the most part, be provided by RIs and will be geared towards specific scientific communities. These services could be made available to the ‘long tail of science’ as well, but that can probably better be done on a national, regional or local level (which is also where the funding for these types of services is). www.eoscpilot.eu The European Open Science Cloud for Research pilot project is funded by the European Commission, DG Research & Innovation under contract no. 739563

Questions & discussion Input on layer model? One approach for all service types doesn’t seem to work: focus on ’core services’ and work out from there? This does imply less (no?) work on higher level services Core services discussion, which services to include: In: Accounting, Monitoring, … Out: AAI, … How should quality and inclusiveness be balanced? Should / can we rely on the RIs to define their own inclusion criteria? Now mainly focussing on inclusiveness Relationship between RIs and e-infrastructures: are e-infras ’just’ service providers or collaboration partners? This influences how services are offered and presented www.eoscpilot.eu The European Open Science Cloud for Research pilot project is funded by the European Commission, DG Research & Innovation under contract no. 739563

Timeboxing Inner core service types and implementations need to be identified and agreed on before the end of this year. Inner core service provider requirements (including required certification) need to be identified and agreed on before the end of this year. Funding methodology for inner core services must be established before the end of this year. Outer core service types and implementations need to be identified (inventoried) before the end of this year. Make a start with interface analysis of outer core and mantle services. Everything else is considered to be out of scope for the remaining period of EOSCpilot. As for the broader EOSC setting: priority should be given to get instances running for every inner core service type. That will give EOSC partners something to work with and show concrete results. Once the inner core services are established, outer core services can be added to the mix. www.eoscpilot.eu The European Open Science Cloud for Research pilot project is funded by the European Commission, DG Research & Innovation under contract no. 739563