Component 4 Effective and Reflective Practitioner

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Five -Year Strategic Title I School Plan. Session Objectives Review the five year components utilizing the rubric Organize actions steps to meet the requirements.
Advertisements

Authentic Assessment Abdelmoneim A. Hassan. Welcome Authentic Assessment Qatar University Workshop.
Kyrene Professional Growth Plan
Copyright VCU Center for Teacher Leadership Welcome National Board Candidates Sign in. Pick up the handouts and your name tag. Turn in one copy of your.
Assess the effectiveness of strategies Analyze that evidence/data Identify the most powerful teaching strategies Identify and gather evidence/data of student.
Programs of the Intel Education Initiative are funded by the Intel Foundation and Intel Corporation. Copyright © 2007 Intel Corporation. All rights reserved.
Eloise Forster, Ed.D. Foundation for Educational Administration (FEA)
1. How can we gather and use evidence of the qualities of teaching performance that inspire, engage, and sustain students as learners – to improve teaching.
Tri City United Public Schools August 6, 2013 “Leading for educational excellence and equity. Every day for every one.”
Teacher Licensure PI-34 Wisconsin’s New Process. New License Stages  Initial Educator 5 year, non-renewable  Professional Educator 5 year renewable.
Peer Consultancy: Observation, Debrief, Analysis.
Copyright © Intel Corporation. All rights reserved. Intel, the Intel logo, Intel Education Initiative, and Intel Teach Program are trademarks of.
FACILITATING IMPORTANT CONVERSATIONS PROFESSIONAL LEARNING COMMUNITY FACILITATOR’S SKILLS.
Developed by the Southern Alberta Professional Development Consortium (SAPDC) as a result of a grant from Alberta Education to support implementation of.
Coaching in Early Intervention Provider Onboarding Series 3
Welcome Back National Board Candidates!
Planning Instruction Component 3: Session 4
School – Based Assessment – Framework
National Board Certification Cohort
Analyzing Assessments and Needs
Avon Grove School District October 2009
Instructional Leadership for a Professional Learning Culture:
Analyzing Student Work – Whole Class
Articulating Your Practice C3 - Session #3
Using Collaborative Learning Techniques in the Writing Classroom
National Board Certified Teacher
Essentials Course Module 8: Showcasing Unit Portfolios
Component 4 Effective and Reflective Practitioner
Component 4 Effective and Reflective Practitioner
Component 1: Content Knowledge
Welcome Candidates! Please find a seat in your certificate area.
Please sit at the appropriate table with your IC/Principal.
EdTPA, Pro-Cert, National Boards
Component 2 Differentiation in Instruction
Refining Assessment Kindergarten October 20, 2011.
Teaching and Learning with Technology
Social Studies Not Left Behind
Introduction to the Cohort & NBPTS Process
DEVELOPING TEACHING SKILLS IN PE (GED3043)
Honors Level Course Implementation Guide Q & A Session Social Studies
Articulating Your Practice C3 - Session #3
Learning Forward Annual Conference Session F28
Welcome National Board Candidates 
Component 2: Differentiation in Instruction Session 2
Component 4: Effective and Reflective Practitioner Session 2
Component 4 Effective and Reflective Practitioner
Component 2 Differentiation In Instruction Session 3
Component 4 Effective and Reflective Practitioner
Revisit Differentiation and Reflection Standard
Analyze Student Work Sample 2 Instructional Next Steps
Component 4 Effective and Reflective Practitioner
Planning Instruction Component 3: Session 4
Revisit Differentiation and Reflection Standard Prepare for Submission
Introduction to Student Achievement Objectives
Session 1: Introduction to the NBPTS Process Component 2 & Component 4 Overview Copyright © 2018 National Board Resource Center at Illinois State University.
Component 4 Effective and Reflective Practitioner
Instructional strategies
Analyzing Student Work Sample 2 Instructional Next Steps
Q uality uestioning Henrico County Public Schools
Communication skills Part A: Building an effective teacher-learner relationship GRACE Session 7A.
Eloise Forster, Ed.D. Foundation for Educational Administration (FEA)
The Nuts and Bolts of National Board Certification
Designing Your Performance Task Assessment
National Board Certification
Seminar Four Quality Academic feedback: oral and written
The resources for this candidate support has been created and provided by CERRA utilizing materials from the National Board of Professional Teaching Standards.
The resources for this candidate support has been created and provided by CERRA utilizing materials from the National Board of Professional Teaching Standards.
The resources for this candidate support has been created and provided by CERRA utilizing materials from the National Board of Professional Teaching Standards.
The resources for this candidate support has been created and provided by CERRA utilizing materials from the National Board of Professional Teaching Standards.
Presentation transcript:

Component 4 Effective and Reflective Practitioner Session 4 Reflecting on Effectiveness Copyright © 2018 National Board Resource Center at Illinois State University. All Rights Reserved.

Welcome! Please sign-in Login to your National Board Profile on nbpts.org to check for accuracy of information. “How have you impacted your students’ learning since our last meeting?” Preview Agenda Be ready to share comments, questions, or concerns Copyright © 2018 National Board Resource Center at Illinois State University. All Rights Reserved.

Goals for Session 4 Explain how Written Commentary & Supporting Required Documents are connected Unpack Certificate Specific Reflection Standard Analyze and reflect on Unit of Study’s Summative data Use peer feedback to make refinements to Component 4 Continue revising all parts of Component 4 Copyright © 2018 National Board Resource Center at Illinois State University. All Rights Reserved.

Topic 1: Entry Connections Component 4: Effective and Reflective Practitioner Session 4: Reflecting on Effectiveness Topic 1: Entry Connections Forms provide evidence for the Written Commentary responses Each section of the Written Commentary is targeted to a major area of professional practice: Developing Knowledge of Students Collaborating with Others Using Assessment Participating in Learning Communities Analyzing Written Commentary questions helps candidates give more specific responses to the questions Copyright © 2018 National Board Resource Center at Illinois State University. All Rights Reserved.

Entry Connections Copyright © 2018 National Board Resource Center at Illinois State University. All Rights Reserved.

Knowledge of Students Collaboration with Others Relevant characteristics of entire class that will help others “see” students as a group of learners who will benefit from information gathered. Copyright © 2018 National Board Resource Center at Illinois State University. All Rights Reserved.

Generation & Use of Assessment Data Copyright © 2018 National Board Resource Center at Illinois State University. All Rights Reserved.

Participation in Learning Communities Collaboration with Others Copyright © 2018 National Board Resource Center at Illinois State University. All Rights Reserved.

Topic 2: Reflection Standard Component 4: Effective and Reflective Practitioner Session 4: Reflecting on Effectiveness Topic 2: Reflection Standard Each section of the Written Commentary is targeted to a major area of professional practice: Developing Knowledge of Students Collaborating with Others Using Assessment Participating in Learning Communities Candidates will examine their Reflection Standard from a different vantage point than required for Component 2 Copyright © 2018 National Board Resource Center at Illinois State University. All Rights Reserved.

Revisit Your Reflection Standard New Vantage Point: Major Areas of Professional Practice Developing Knowledge of Students Collaborating with Others Using Assessment Participating in Learning Communities Copyright © 2018 National Board Resource Center at Illinois State University. All Rights Reserved.

Reflection Copyright © 2018 National Board Resource Center at Illinois State University. All Rights Reserved.

Topic 3: Analysis of Summative Assessment Data Component 4: Effective and Reflective Practitioner Session 4: Reflecting on Effectiveness Topic 3: Analysis of Summative Assessment Data Summative Assessments – Used to make judgments about level of learning or achievement Did students meet set learning goals/objectives? Formative Assessments are used for improving learning Analyzing data includes determining how to organize synthesize interrelate compare present assessment results Copyright © 2018 National Board Resource Center at Illinois State University. All Rights Reserved.

Focus on Summative Data Copyright © 2018 National Board Resource Center at Illinois State University. All Rights Reserved.

This resource may help unpack the questions C4 Resource 4.2 Generation & Use of Assessment Data This resource may help unpack the questions Copyright © 2018 National Board Resource Center at Illinois State University. All Rights Reserved.

Different approaches to peer reading: Component 4: Effective and Reflective Practitioner Session 4: Reflecting on Effectiveness Topic 4: Peer Review of the Written Commentary Different approaches to peer reading: Begin by analyzing if all parts of questions have been answered Read & give feedback on draft noting if any sentences/passages were unclear or confusing Peer readers read entire draft & note questions at end of draft Reading for specific information as directed by draft writer Feedback from colleagues can help candidates write more concisely When candidates read another candidate’s entry, their role isn’t to evaluate, but to read for evidence aligned to the rubric & standard Copyright © 2018 National Board Resource Center at Illinois State University. All Rights Reserved.

Peer Reading / Responding Copyright © 2018 National Board Resource Center at Illinois State University. All Rights Reserved.

Peer Reading & Responding Roles Read Draft Entry Share Comments with Candidate Writer Expectations Fair and Objective Ask Probing and/or Clarifying Questions Provide Feedback that is not opinion Do not rewrite entry Copyright © 2018 National Board Resource Center at Illinois State University. All Rights Reserved.

Closure Entry Connections: Reflect on major areas of your professional practice- Knowledge of Students Collaboration with Others Using Assessment Participating in Learning Communities Analyzing Summative Assessment: What did you notice about your assessment practices? What are you learning about your students’ self-assessment? Peer Review of drafts of the Written Commentary: How will you use the feedback to revise your entry? Work on your Entry: What did you accomplish today? What are your next steps toward completing the entry? Copyright © 2018 National Board Resource Center at Illinois State University. All Rights Reserved.

Preparing for C4: Session 5 Forms: Refine all C4 Forms Unit of Study: Complete the Unit of Study Refine your Unit’s Assessment Plan & bring student self-assessments to Session 5 Bring any certificate specific evidence needed for your entry Written Commentary Revise Knowledge of Students, Generation & Use of Assessment Data & Participation in Learning Communities sections Bring draft of Reflection section Review National Board Guide to Electronic Submission (2018) Copyright © 2018 National Board Resource Center at Illinois State University. All Rights Reserved.

Cohort members reflect on the session together Any cohort member can take notes for the group Teacher Liaison uses this form to share what’s happening in the cohort with the administrator Copyright © 2018 National Board Resource Center at Illinois State University. All Rights Reserved.

Be Sure to Reflect on: Students Teaching Strategies It’s essential that candidates take time to consider what they noticed about their students in reflecting on their teaching. As they reflect on their students, they may determine other teaching strategies they need to try or revisit based upon their student knowledge and the conversations today. It may be too much to ask to have them reflect on both, but perhaps it isn’t for your candidates. This is also an opportunity for candidates to share logistical information with you about the cohort session. Using this individual form may be a safer way for some candidates to share concerns or questions. Copyright © 2018 National Board Resource Center at Illinois State University. All Rights Reserved.