Palo Alto Grade Separation Financing White Paper

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Module 3 SMART PARKING. Module 3 Smart Parking Introduction This is one of seven Transit Oriented Development training modules developed by the Regional.
Advertisements

AIRPORT AREA INFRASTRUCTURE TIF DISTRICT: Public Hearing Presentation Oct 21, 2013.
Colorado Transportation Finance and Implementation Panel Overview Fort Morgan,Colorado September 13, 2007.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to Talking Freight Seminar presented by Iris N. Ortiz Cambridge Systematics, Inc. September 20, 2006.
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc Gateway Oaks Drive, Suite 250, Sacramento, CA fax presented to Fort Ord Reuse Authority.
Utility Extension Project
3 rd Annual California Passenger Rail Summit Innovative Transportation Financing Art Guzzetti Vice President – Policy American Public Transportation Association.
Karen Hedlund Director, Public-Private Partnerships 2015 Federal Rail Legislation.
Financial Management by Jon Lang. Financial Management Why we do it! “The difference between financial management in the public and private sectors is.
Randy Wade TRB Intercity Passenger Rail Committee Tuesday January 25, 2011 Washington, DC.
Tucson Modern Streetcar Project Overview July 15, 2011.
Doug Brown October 23, Budget Overview A Budget Planning Process (Overland Park’s) Financial Management.
Beech Grove, Indiana TAX INCREMENT FINANCING Heather R. James, Ice Miller LLP April 18, 2013.
City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota Financing Plan Highlights Citizens’ Charter Review Task Force March 29,2007 Pavement Management Report Financing Plan Presenter:
Freight Issues in the Report of the National Surface Transportation Policy and Revenue Study Commission Transportation for Tomorrow.
Financial Planning Session E-1 The Metropolitan Transportation Planning Process.
WHITE FLINT SECTOR PLAN Financial Analysis, Infrastructure Financing & Economic Benefits.
Orange County Business Council Infrastructure Committee Overview of RCTC’s Major Projects December 8, 2015.
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) 2295 Gateway Oaks Drive, Suite 250, Sacramento, CA fax presented to California.
Freight Railway Integration Strategy For Inter-American Development Bank Transport Week 2009 by Transportation Technology Center, Inc. (TTCI) Subsidiary.
The Reno Streetcar March 8, 2016 RTC 2040 Regional Transportation Plan Economic Development Forum.
Detroit River International Crossing Project March 31, 2010.
The impact of the economic downturn on local government: what is happening and what can be done about it? Local government contribution to economic recovery.
County Road 19(Manning Road) & County Road 22 Improvements Environmental Study/ Preliminary Design Report November 2008.
Loan Programs.  What is the PFA?  How does PFA financing work?  What is the Capital Financing Program?  What is the State Revolving Fund Program?
Oregon State Rail Plan Update
Financial Management by Jon Lang
Community Improvement Districts County Counselors Association of Kansas Annual Meeting November 15, 2010 Janet S. Garms
Alternative Financing
State Legislative Update and Government Relations Overview
FAST Act Overview $305 billion 5 year bill – FY ‘16 – FY ’20
Finance Committee & City Council October 10, 2016
Transportation Funding Deal Explained
Office of Transportation Planning Modal Planning Update
Regional Roads Committee
21st Century Transportation Committee Finance Subcommittee
Capital Financing Strategy
Architecture and institutional issues for AeroMACS
NGTA Halton Planning and Public Works Committee
Financial Indicator Graphs for the Year Ended December 31, 2008
Draft Transportation Element September 6, 2017
Does a Diversity of Funding Sources Improve Feasibility?
WGFOA Spring Conference Egg Harbor, WI April 20, 2017
Transportation Funding Update
Ohio Rail Development Commission November 15, 2017 Meeting
ITTS FEAT Tool Methodology Review ITTS Member States Paula Dowell, PhD
Efforts to Pass Prop 69 & Protect SB 1
Comprehensive Transportation Plan
Transportation Forum for Northern Virginia’s Elected Leaders April 23, 2018 Presented by: Monica Backmon, Executive Director.
NC RPO Meeting July 25, 2018.
Transportation Task Force Mission and Vision
Practical Issues Working with Special Taxing Districts
Funding Water Quality Mandates
Financial Considerations
November 2018 Ballot Measures
2019 Legislative Session Preview
I-81 Corridor Improvement Plan
Rail Program Management Services Review Grade Separation Recommended Ideas Palo Alto Rail Committee Meeting ……..
Funding the Town’s Transportation Infrastructure Improvement Plan (IIP) – An Initial Discussion of Impact Fees Town Council Meeting March 1, 2017.
Efforts to Pass Prop 69 & Protect SB 1
Comprehensive Transportation Plan
City of West Fargo special assessment forums
Rail Program Management Services Review Grade Separation Recommended Ideas Palo Alto Rail Committee Meeting ……..
Franchise Fee Informational Meeting
Quarterly Budget Update 2017 Quarterly Reports
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT TOOLS
Transportation Planning and Funding Overview
DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES AB 1600 UPDATE
Financial Roundtable Association of Defense Communities
Presentation transcript:

Palo Alto Grade Separation Financing White Paper presented to Palo Alto City Council Rail Committee Meeting presented by Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. November 29, 2017 Oakland Sacramento Denver Los Angeles Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. One Kaiser Plaza, Suite 1410, Oakland, CA 94612 510.841.9190 • 510.740.2080 fax

Presentation Overview Purpose and Context Project Cost Scenarios Types of Funding & Financing Considered Voter Approved Taxes Value Capture Tool Other Local Sources (not quantified) Regional Funding (e.g., Measure B) State and Federal Funding

Study Purpose and Context Preliminary consideration (and quantification where possible) of potential grade separation funding and financing to inform the planning process Qualifications and Limitations Projections based on readily available information and generic assumptions Some sources may be politically infeasible and/or mutually exclusive Funding landscape is subject to change based on economic, political, legal, and other factors.

Preliminary Project Cost Scenarios City’s own Model – CUBE. Compatible with all other modeling work in the area. Use of Synchro 8 – universally used software. Alma Street assumed connected in all cases. The study did not take the output from the model directly but combined it with up-to-date traffic counts ( Feb 2017 ) for the traffic assignments . The method is called the “Difference Method “ in chapter 6 of the NCHRP ( Report 765 ) – National Cooperative Highway Research Program .

Local Taxes Requiring Voter Approval General Tax: The revenues from a General Tax are expended at the discretion of the local government’s governing body on any programs or services. Requires a simple majority (50% +1). Special Tax: The revenue from special tax are dedicated to a specific purpose as defined in the ballot initiative. Requires super-majority (66% +1) “A/B Strategy”: General purpose tax measures accompanied by an advisory measure indicating the recommended use for the funds. Synchro is the correct tool for this level of assessment – a set of VISSIM models would not say anything different although , obviously the values of the MOEs won’t be exactly the same . VISSIM is more appropriate when designing the new interchanges . For the comparison of Synchro & VISSIM done by F & P , see slide 35

Voter Approved Tax – Preliminary Quantification Synchro is the correct tool for this level of assessment – a set of VISSIM models would not say anything different although , obviously the values of the MOEs won’t be exactly the same . VISSIM is more appropriate when designing the new interchanges . For the comparison of Synchro & VISSIM done by F & P , see slide 35

Value Capture Tools Description Funding tools and techniques that extract a portion of private sector benefit resulting from new infrastructure, amenities, or development enabled by the public sector. Potential Grade Separation Benefits Improved access and circulation to nearby property owners New development opportunities (e.g., “air rights”) Reduced sound and visual impacts Synchro is the correct tool for this level of assessment – a set of VISSIM models would not say anything different although , obviously the values of the MOEs won’t be exactly the same . VISSIM is more appropriate when designing the new interchanges . For the comparison of Synchro & VISSIM done by F & P , see slide 35

Map of Primary Benefit Area(s) Churchill Ave. Meadow Dr. Caltrain Corridor: Primary Benefit Area Charleston Rd. Secondary Benefit Areas

Value Capture Tools -- Preliminary Quantification Synchro is the correct tool for this level of assessment – a set of VISSIM models would not say anything different although , obviously the values of the MOEs won’t be exactly the same . VISSIM is more appropriate when designing the new interchanges . For the comparison of Synchro & VISSIM done by F & P , see slide 35

Other Local Sources (not quantified) Local parking fees: Allocate a portion of future parking fees to grade separation Transportation Network Company Fees: Registration fee applied to company shuttle and ride share (e.g., Lyft, Uber) Roadway User Fees: Electronic auto charge on selected access points/lanes (e.g., Alma St.) Utility ROW Fees: Lease modern utility bank/conduit along Caltrain/Alma St. corridor Synchro is the correct tool for this level of assessment – a set of VISSIM models would not say anything different although , obviously the values of the MOEs won’t be exactly the same . VISSIM is more appropriate when designing the new interchanges . For the comparison of Synchro & VISSIM done by F & P , see slide 35

Selected Regional, State, or Federal Sources Synchro is the correct tool for this level of assessment – a set of VISSIM models would not say anything different although , obviously the values of the MOEs won’t be exactly the same . VISSIM is more appropriate when designing the new interchanges . For the comparison of Synchro & VISSIM done by F & P , see slide 35

Other State/Federal Sources (not quantified) State Sources/Programs Caltrain Sales Tax Initiative State Infrastructure Bank (IBank) The Statewide Community Infrastructure Program (SCIP) State Road Repair and Accountability Act (SB 1) Federal Sources/Programs Infrastructure For Rebuilding America Grants Transportation Investment Generating Economic Recovery (TIGER) grant Transportation Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act (TIFIA) Loans The Railroad Rehabilitation & Improvement Financing (RRIF) program Synchro is the correct tool for this level of assessment – a set of VISSIM models would not say anything different although , obviously the values of the MOEs won’t be exactly the same . VISSIM is more appropriate when designing the new interchanges . For the comparison of Synchro & VISSIM done by F & P , see slide 35

Questions/Discussion For non-coincident peaks (train, traffic & queues), see slides 33 and 34. ( the points raised at outreach # 2 ) The model needs to be representative of peak periods, not individual peaks. 2030 is the important model. Caltrain assumed at-rail services saturation of services. (Without passing or more tracks)