Is Montana’s “24/7 Sobriety Program” Deterring Drunk Drivers?

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chapter 7 Crime in America. The Nature of Crimes Crime- to do or fail to do something that violates law criminal and noncriminal Crime defined by leg.
Advertisements

Ignition Interlock Devices: An Overview John M. Priester NHTSA/ABA Judicial Fellow Administrative Law Judge Iowa Dept. of Inspections & Appeals.
Tiffini Diage University of Wisconsin, Madison. Objective  Ignition Interlock Device (IID) sentencing, impact on Wisconsin motor vehicle crashes? IID.
By: David Salinas.  Driving while either intoxicated or drunk is dangerous and drivers with high blood alcohol content or concentration (BAC) are at.
Preventing Drunk Driving in Adolescents Zane Mehl.
ALCOHOL, DRUGS, AND CRIME DUI Trends and Countermeasures  Association for Criminal Justice Research  McClellan, CA  March 17, 2005 Cliff Helander, Chief,
Does a DUI Arrest Equal a Drinking Problem? By: Larissa Duron.
879 Productions Presents Copyright 2000 Alcohol, Drugs & Driving with Officer Darin “Crash” Leonard.
Chapter 8 Alcohol. Alcohol Facts One half of victims killed haven’t been drinking. More Young drivers are involved in crashes twice the the rate of drivers.
All you ever wanted to know about drunk driving in teens. +=
DWI/DUI. Ultimate Goal Increase DWI deterrence and decrease alcohol related crashes deaths and injuries.
Llad Phillips1 Part I Strategies to Estimate Deterrence Part II Optimization of the Criminal Justice System.
Llad Phillips1 Part I Strategies to Estimate Deterrence Part II Optimization of the Criminal Justice System.
Richard Stansfield Benson, B. L, Mast, B. D, and Rasmussen, D. W, “Can police deter drunk driving?”, Applied Economics, 2000, 32, pp
THE 24/7 SOBRIETY PROJECT. Origins Created by South Dakota Created by South Dakota Has existed since 2005 Has existed since 2005 Now in use in 57 of 66.
By Matthew Tseu. Intro  While drinking and driving increases the risk of a person get into car accidents, highway injuries and vehicle deaths.  There.
Folashade Momodu.  Researched the feasibility of creating a sobriety checkpoint program in Anchorage, Alaska  Researched the statistics and costs.
Alcohol Abuse By:Austin.B, Clay, Adam, Austin.H. Disease from alcohol 1. Liver disease 2. Heart disease 3. Psychiatric and social problems 4. Increased.
Developing Surveillance for Alcohol Abuse, Dependence, and Related Consequences in New Mexico Sandra Woerle, MA New Mexico Department of Health Office.
Dangers of Alcohol and Driving
DUI By W. Clay Abbott DWI Resource Prosecutor Texas District and County Attorneys Association.
A Follow-up of An Analysis of the New Mexico Screening and Tracking Data for DWI Offenders Judith S. Harmon, MA New Mexico Department of Health Office.
Underage Drinking The Law.  Your driving privilege will be suspended if you are convicted of: Lying about your age to obtain alcohol. Lying about your.
Evidenced-Based Effective Strategies for Alcohol Related Injury Intermediate Injury Prevention Course Indian Health Service.
Intoxicated Driving NAME Prosecuting Attorney. Intoxicated Driving Over The Limit, Under Arrest Common Traffic Issues Intoxicated Driving Intoxicated.
1 Highway Venue. Injury Facts  2 Injury Data Highlights Injury Facts® 2011 Edition Injury Facts® 2011 Edition Most current data available – 2009, 2008,
Imprisonment and Crime: Can Both be Reduced? Daniel S. Nagin Carnegie Mellon University National Association of Sentencing Commissions August 7, 2012.
Grab a handout in the pick-up basket . The Impact of Alcohol.
 BAC =  0.08 =  OTHER DRUGS = Implied Consent Law Consent to submit certain tests Statutory Summary Suspension Law BAC 0.08 or greater – DL suspended.
1 An Introduction to the Minnesota Epidemiological Profile Minnesota State Epidemiological Workgroup and Minnesota Institute of Public Health Fall Forums.
Presentation to the Illinois State University April 20, 2006 Dr. Ronald Henson, Ph.D. Ignition Interlock Devices: Should they be Mandated for DUI Offenders?
Submitted to: Mrs. Stead Submitted by: Skylene Lane.
ARRIVE ALIVE DON’T DRINK AND DRIVE or RIDE! Alcohol Drug Awareness Program A.D.A.P.
Why You Should Not Drink and Drive David Mockus Penn State Hazleton CAS 100A- 07.
Chapter 7 Prison Populations Size and Nature of Prison Populations Severity of legal sanctions General social-demographic trends –Aging of population.
Legal Consequences Illegal Drug Possession And Underage Drinking Presented by Mrs. Noël.
DRINKING AND DRIVING. ALCOHOL WITH A PARTNER NEXT TO YOU: WRITE DOWN HOW ALCOHOL IMPAIRS YOUR MIND AND BODY WOULD THOSE IMPAIRMENTS HINDER OR BENEFIT.
The population in a statistical study is the entire group of individuals about which we want information The population is the group we want to study.
UNDERAGE DRINKING. KNOW THE FACTS! Alcohol is the most misused drug in our society. Most people don’t consider alcohol to be a drug. Kids start drinking.
SPEEDING LAW VS. D.U.I. Class B misdemeanor Penalty of up to six months in jail Fine of $1,500 Class A misdemeanor Maximum penalty of up to one year in.
California DUI Trends Orange County Drinking and Driving 2008 Community Forum Steven A. Bloch, Ph.D. Automobile Club of Southern California
The Consequences of Underage Drinking
What's Aggravated Driving While Intoxicated PER SE IN BUFFALO?
Effects of Drunk Driving..
STATE OF ALABAMA DUI LAW
Alcohol, other drugs, and driving
Campaign to Eliminate Drunk Driving Update
Driver Privileges and Penalties
Drinking and Driving A Preventable Tragedy.
Biomarker Project – OWI Enhancement Grant
Changes in DUI Law: An Examination of a Nonadjudication Option
Tara Casanova Powell TIRF USA
Factors in Traffic Fatality Fluctuations
3/07/2018 3/07/2018 SIT 3 mins Quick 1 1.
Analysis of New Mexico’s Drunk Driving
Chapter 7 Bell Ringer What are some reasons why an individual would lose their driving privileges?
Drunk Driving Statistics
Why You Need a DUI Court and How to Get Started
Evaluating the Long Term Effects of Saskatchewan’s Legislation Banning the Use of Hand-held Cell Phones while Driving in Reducing Distracted-Driving Related.
The Impact of Alcohol Abuse (1:54)
Driving Under the Influence
Post Policy Adoption: Key Elements for Implementation
Day 8/ Chapter 7 Bell Ringer
Driver Privileges and Penalties
Post Policy Adoption: Key Elements for Implementation
Driving under the Influence of Alcohol.
Presentation transcript:

Is Montana’s “24/7 Sobriety Program” Deterring Drunk Drivers? Jessica Stevens Economics Spring 2016

WHY? Background 10,000+ DUI-related deaths yearly First DUI laws enacted over 100 years ago 10,000+ DUI-related deaths yearly More than$56 billion in damages WHY? Some background facts and figures. Why have these high rates of drunk driving persisted and why is it so hard to deter drunk drivers? Drinking culture, social tolerance, hard to know when you are drunk. Leads to people not knowing risk they impose on society when they drive drunk.

Montana ranked “deadliest state” for DUI fatalities in 2008 Background Montana ranked “deadliest state” for DUI fatalities in 2008 pilot “24/7 Sobriety Program” Increase the likelihood and severity of punishment for repeat offenders Montana is not immune to this epidemic. In 2008 Montana was ranked the Deadliest State based on per capita DUI related fatalities.

“24/7 Sobriety Program” Montana DUI Policy repeat DUI offenders required to abstain from alcohol failure resulted in jail time or license suspension alcohol education class and counseling

South Dakota case study piloted exact same “24/7” program in 2005 highly successful reduce recidivism by 12% decrease in heavy drinking Certain, swift penalties effective at changing behaviors

Is “24/7” deterring drunk drivers? Montana and “24/7” 2011- MT legislature pass “the 24/7 sobriety program act” 22 counties adopt program Fewer alcohol related crashes and property damage More DUI related fatalities and DUI arrests Is “24/7” deterring drunk drivers?

Thesis question My research addressed the following question: is Montana’s “24/7 Sobriety Program” a more effective deterrent for drunk driving than previous Montana DUI policies? My goal in conducting the research that follows is to determine whether the “24/7 Sobriety Program” has lived up to expectations namely whether it has served as a better deterrent for drunk driving than previous MT DUI policies. Determining the deterrent effect of the program for drunk driving has policy relevance nation-wide. If “24/7” is deterring drunk drivers, it is in the best interest of other states to consider implementing the program. If it is not deterring drunk drivers, perhaps it is time for Montana to go back to the drawing board and re-think its current drunk driving policies.

Dui OFFENSES PER 1000 PEOPLE BEFORE AND AFTER “24/7” implementation

Methods Data: MTIBRS- DUI arrests from 1994 by county by month Differences-in-Differences Analysis statistical model: Yit= 𝛼 24 7 𝑖𝑡 + 𝛽𝑋 𝑖𝑡 + 𝛾 𝑖 + 𝛿 𝑡 + 𝜀 𝑖𝑡 Data: MTIBRS- DUI arrests from 1994 by county by month Describe the model and where you got all the variable data from

results Variable Mean SD Count Min Max Offense 7.147341 14.95552 7201 135 Unemployment 5.268304 2.468462 6720 1.3 20.5 Population 17630.88 29770.39 470 158217 Month 18246.97 1054.434 16437 20058 Jurisdiction 28.5 16.16443 1 56 1=Program in Effect .3071429 .4613435 Offenses per 1000 People .1966588 .3222839 10999 2.49 Female Offenses 1.378762 4.016244 48 Male Offenses 3.80971 10.20146 102 Income 33590.98 7052.169 19254 62255 1=College in Session .0520833 .2222116 results Summary Statistics for all variables included in the model

unobserved differences in trends across treatment and control counties Challenges unobserved differences in trends across treatment and control counties Most drunk driving goes undetected Repeat offenses v. Total offenses Very young program

Results

Female Total DUI Offense Results   Female Total DUI Offense Male Total DUI Offense 1=Program in Effect 0.551 -0.885 (0.803) (1.705) Unemployment 0.0372 0.352** (0.0540) (0.115) Population -0.00000122 0.000000897 (0.0000393) (0.0000833) Income 0.00000211 -0.0000184 (0.0000140) (0.0000297) College -0.0675 -0.0701 (0.239) (0.507) Constant 2.599** 7.879*** (0.913) (1.938) Observations 2921 Adjusted R2 -0.003 0.006

Conclusion The “24/7 Sobriety Program” is not causing a decline in the number of total DUI offenses in Montana counties may be decreasing the number of repeat DUI offenses No visible impact on the number of total DUI offenses

Going Forward Additional research on “24/7” using repeat offense data More Dynamic DUI policy- 1st time offenders and repeat offenders Public education and outreach

Questions?