Ohio County, Indiana THE INDIANA PREVENTION RESOURCE CENTER GIS in Prevention County Profiles Series, No. 3 Ohio County, Indiana Barbara Seitz de Martinez, PhD, MLS, CPP The Indiana Prevention Resource Center at Indiana University is funded, in part, by a contract with the Indiana Family and Social Services Administration, Division of Mental Health and Addiction, financially supported through HHS/Substance Abuse Mental Health Services Administration, Center for Substance Abuse Prevention, Substance Abuse Prevention and Treatment Block Grant. The IPRC is operated by the Department of Applied Health Science and The School of Health, Physical Education and Recreation.

GIS in Prevention County Profile Series, No. 3 Ohio County, Indiana Barbara Seitz de Martinez, PhD, MLS, CPP Project Staff: Ritika Bhawal, MPH Solomon Briggs Kyoungsun Heo, MPA Srinivasa Konchada Indiana Prevention Resource Center Opinions expressed herein are those of the authors, and not necessarily those of the Trustees of Indiana University or the Division of Mental Health and Addiction. Indiana University accepts full Responsibility for the content of this publication. ©2005 The Trustees of Indiana University. Permission is extended to reproduce this County Profile for non-profit educational purposes. All other rights reserved.

6.6 - 6.15 Archival Risk Factors Community Risk Factors: Laws & Norms Introduction: Community Laws/Norms HH Spending on Alcohol HH Spending on Tobacco Adult Tobacco Behavior Tobacco Production Intensity of Inspection (TRIP) Gambling Locations Adult Gambling Behaviors Hoosier Lottery Statistics Crime Statistics: Introduction Crime Indices: Main Categories Crime Indices: Specific Crimes FBI UCR – All Arrests FBI UCR – Juvenile Arrests Alcohol Related Crashes More Alcohol Related Crashes Community Risk Factors: Transitions & Mobility Net Migration (Domestic and International)

Introduction: Community Risk Factors A child’s view of normal is critically impacted by the child’s environment: the sights, sounds, tastes, textures, and smells of the child’s world: “Infants participate, from birth on, in sociocultural activities that are committed to cultural goals and values . . .” (Keller, et al. 2004) If the child grows up seeing drugs and drug use portrayed in a positive manner on local billboards and local television and modeled at home and elsewhere in the child’s community, the presence of drugs (and hence potential availability) and use of drugs easily becomes the child’s norm. In this circumstance logic suggests it would be “norm-al” for the child to have the expectation that later in life he or she, too, for better or worse, may use drugs. As success tends to beget success, and good parenting practices tend to be replicated by the children raised in that environment, so unfortunately, those who are abused are more likely to become abusers, and those raised in a climate of drug use are more likely to become users. The smell of cigarettes, the feel of icy beer bottles and of delicate wine glasses, song lyrics glamorizing drug use, and the over-use of over-the-counter or prescription medications to eliminate every small discomfort creates a notion of normal that impacts the child’s expectations of human behavior, including his or her own. In some instances, it can be difficult to separate family norms and community norms. Many factors contribute to the creation of community norms, including family traditions, public policies, and law enforcement practices. In general, community norms will be the outcome of the beliefs and practices of all the community’s governmental, educational, social, religious, and business enterprises. Drug use modeling by adults in a community creates an environment that is more hospitable and encouraging of drug use by youth. This modeling takes place within and outside of the home. Since the statistics don’t separate adults from family settings from other adults, we have included adult behaviors with regard to drugs as a community indicator and simply mention it again in the context of family indicators. Still, clearly, this information from a community has strong implications for family settings as well, since one could assume that a significant number of those adults live in family settings. Each County Profile contains several maps and tables comparing the block groups in a county for the counts and percents of adults who smoke cigarettes or cigars, drink alcohol, or gamble. Where possible, indicator data is given in terms of per household amounts. Heide Keller, et al., 2004 “The Bio-Culture of Parenting: Evidence from Five Cultural Communities,” Parenting: Science and Practice 4/1 (2004):25-50.

6.6 Household Spending on Alcohol The following table presents per household spending on alcohol for the year for this county, the state and the nation. Per Household Spending on Alcohol, 2004 est. (AGS, 2005)   Ohio Co. Indiana U.S. Consumer spending on alcoholic beverages 428 439 460 Spending on Alcohol for Consumption outside the Home 183 188 197 Beer and ale away from home 61 62 65 Wine away from home 28 29 30 Whiskey away from home 47 48 50 Alcohol On Out-Of-Town Trips 49 52 Spending on Alcohol for Consumption in the Home 244 250 261 Beer and ale at home 141 145 152 Wine at home 59 60 63 Whiskey and other liquor at home 44 45 46 Table 6.6: Per Household Spending on Alcohol (AGS, Consumer Spending 2004, 2005)

Map: Spending on Beer/Ale for Home Indiana Prevention Resource Center AGS, Consumer Spending, 2004 est., 2005

6.7 Household Spending on Tobacco The following table shows per household spending on tobacco products. To give a better perspective we will compare this figure to household spending on miscellaneous reading materials and personal insurance. Per Household Spending on Tobacco, 2004, est. (AGS, 2005) County Ohio Co. Indiana U.S. Per Household Spending on Tobacco Products 418 428 443 Cigarettes 378 388 400 Other Tobacco Products 40 41 44 Per Household Spending on Misc. Reading 238 245 257 Newspapers 106 109 114 Magazines 51 52 54 Books 82 84 88 Personal insurance 510 523 552 Table 6.7: Per Household Spending on Tobacco Products, Miscellaneous Reading and Personal Insurance (AGS, Consumer Spending 2004, 2005)

6.8 Tobacco Production Many counties in Indiana produce tobacco. Economic dependence upon tobacco influences community norms regarding smoking. It is therefore important to take into account which counties produce tobacco, the prevalence of production, number of farms producing tobacco, acres in tobacco production, and pounds of tobacco harvested. If the county does not produce tobacco, the rest of this page will be empty. Tobacco Production, 2002 (Department of Agriculture, 2006)   Ohio Indiana Farms 65 1282 Rank 2 Acres 229 4034 Pounds 449,025 7,411,634 Farms Irrigated 10 57 Acres Irrigated 87 317 Table 6.8: Tobacco Production, 2002. Source: Department of Agriculture, 2006. http://www.nass.usda.gov/census/census02/volume1/in/st18_2_023_023.pdf

6.9 Youth Access to Tobacco The IPRC is grateful to Sergeant Poindexter, State Director of the Indiana Tobacco Retailer Inspection Program (TRIP) and to Desiree Goetze, Coordinator of TRIP at the Indiana Prevention Resource Center, and to the staff and police officers of TRIP for all the support they have given to this project. The IPRC has studied the TRIP data generously made available by the Indiana State Excise Police and has created two additional statistical measurements: for the intensity of inspections (the number of inspections relative to the total number of outlets); for the number of inspections per capita for the population of youth most likely to seek access to tobacco, (i.e., youth ages 10-17). Intensity of inspection can be viewed as one of many possible indicators of the degree of a county’s involvement in activities to create or maintain a community norm that youth access to tobacco is not tolerated.

6.9 Intensity of Inspection (TRIP) This table presents summary information relevant to the Tobacco Retail Inspection Program (TRIP) and tobacco access for minors. The Intensity of Inspection is one indicator of the degree of determination to establish and maintain a social norm of “no tolerance” for the sale of tobacco to minors and youth access to tobacco. This table also includes rankings of key variables. Table 6.9: Intensity of TRIP Inspections and Related Statistics, Calculations for 2004 Based on Data from the TRIP Program (ATC, Indiana State Excise Police, 2005) TRIP Inspection Data, Ohio Co. (using data for 2004 from IN State Excise Police), ATC 2005 County Name Ohio Indiana Intensity of Inspection 0.20 1.50 No of Inspections per 1,000 Youth, 10-17 1.56 10.30 Population Age, 10-17 641 720,070 Total Population 5,762 6,230,346 Total No. of Tobacco Retail Outlets 5 4938 Total Inspections Completed 1 7416 Failed Inspections 981 Percent, Failed Inspections 0.00% 13.23% Percent, Passed Inspections 100.00% 86.77% Ranking (1-78) for % Failed Inspections 78   Ranking (1-78) for % Passed Inspections

6.10 Gambling Casinos & Race Tracks The presence of gambling establishments -- like the presence of tobacco and alcohol outlets, billboards and other forms of advertising – provides information on community environment and, because of the relationship between gambling and ATOD use, would appear to be an indicator of risk for ATOD problems in a community. Below is a listing of casinos and no horse-racing establishments located in this county. Casinos and Horse Racing Gambling Establishments as of August 2006 Gambling Establishment Address City Zip GRAND VICTORIA CASINO & RESORT 600 GRAND VICTORIA DRIVE Rising Sun 47040

6.11a Adult Gambling Behavior Like the modeling of smoking and drinking, gambling by adults sets a tone for youth expectations about what it means to be an adult. This report includes maps and tables detailing gambling behaviors by persons 18 and older. The following tables describe gambling and related leisure activities by persons ages 18 and over. Also included is a ranking for any casino gambling. Adult Gambling Behaviors, 2004 est. (2005) Percent of Households County Ohio Indiana U.S. Current Year Estimated Households 2,301 2,465,349 112,708,665 Casino Gambling (Any) 18.4 19.6 19.5 Atlantic City gambling 2 4.2 4.3 Las Vegas gambling 4.1 5.8 6.4 Mississippi Gulf Coast gambling 1.7 1.4 1.3 Reno gambling 1.2 Other casino gambling 11.4 9.6 8.7 Rank for Any Casino Gambling 81 27th of 51   Table 6.11a.1: Adult Gambling Behaviors (Casino Gambling) (MRI, Consumer Behavior Lifestyle 2004, 2005)

Casino Gambling Indiana Prevention Resource Center Source: AGS Consumer Behavior, 2004 (2005)

6.11b Adult Gambling Behavior The following table compares the percent of households which engaged in leisure activities related to gambling (playing bingo, playing cards, and attending horseraces) in this county compared to the state and nation. Leisure Activities, 2004 est. (2005) Percent of Households County Ohio Indiana U.S. Current Year Estimated Households 2,301 2,465,349 112,708,665 Play bingo 3.3 3.5 3.7 Play cards 22.1 21.9 21.3 Attend Horse Races 2.7 3 Table 6.11b.2: Leisure Activities by Household (bingo, playing cards, attending horse races) (MRI, Consumer Behavior Lifestyle 2004, 2005)

Playing Bingo Indiana Prevention Resource Center Source: AGS Consumer Behavior, 2004 (2005)

6.11b Gambling: Hoosier Lottery Sales The following statistics show Hoosier Lottery sales by zip code for this county from the fiscal year. Hoosier Lottery Sales by Zip Code for Ohio County for Fiscal Year 2004 (Hoosier Lottery) Zip Code City Scratch Off Draw Pull-Tabs TOTAL 47040 RISING SUN $425,739 $268,032 $15,792 $709,563 County Totals:   IN Totals: $422,608,706 $291,464,296 $18,897,312 $732,970,314 Table 6.11b: Hoosier Lottery Sales by Zip Code, Fiscal Year 2004 (Hoosier Lottery, 2005)

6.12 Crime Statistics: Introduction People prefer to reside and businesses prefer to locate where they feel safe to move about, to study and to work. Levels of criminal activity in an area constitute an environmental influence on many aspects of life. People plan their lives taking into account levels of danger associated with activities. How late at night is it safe to be out? on foot? by car? alone? with a group? For a child, the nature of their environment and the behaviors of their family, friends, neighbors, classmates, and community members strongly contribute to the child’s view of the world and of human nature, and to the child’s expectations for his or her own future behaviors and fate. If people close to the child model criminal behaviors or are often victims of the same, the child will likely hold expectations, including fears, of encountering similar future circumstances. Hence crime statistics are a useful insight into the character of a place and are important to consider in prevention planning. A prevention program needs to be conducted in a safe place and at a time when it is safe for people to attend. The prevention professionals planning the program could consider specific activities designed to confront, enhance, or offer alternatives to norms and role modeling prevalent in the child’s world. Data about crimes, arrests and convictions is not collected in any one central location in the state of Indiana at this time.

6.12a Crime Indices One of the best sources of data available for Indiana at this time is the Crime Risk database published by AGS, who use the FBI’s Uniform Crime Report. Because the level and methods of reporting information to the FBI vary by jurisdiction, information about specific crimes should be viewed as a general indicator rather than for exact precision or exact comparisons. The AGS Crime Risk Index describes the risk of various types of crime in a given geographic area (e.g., city or state) by comparing the rate of crime in that location to the rate of crime in the nation as a whole. The crime rate for the U.S. is set to 100 for all crimes. Hence a rate of 200 means that the risk of crime in that place is twice as high as for the nation as a whole. (Think of these numbers not as counts of criminal incidents, but as degrees of risk. Hence, an index of 200 means that while the risk of this crime is x per 1000 persons for the nation as a whole, it is 2x per 1000 for the community in question). The following table shows the Crime Indices for Total Crime, Property Crime and Personal Crime. This table shows indices for this county, compared to Indiana and the nation. Crime Indices, 2004 (AGS, 2005, based on FBI UCR) County Ohio Indiana U.S. IN Rank in US Total Crime Index 10 93 101 30th of 51 Personal Crime Index 13 74 26th of 51 Property Crimes 5 110 102 27th of 51 Table 6.12a: Total Crime, Property Crime, and Personal Crime Indices, 2004. (AGS Crime Risk 2004, 2005)

6.12a Crime Indices -- Rankings The following table shows the ranking of this county among Indiana’s 92 counties, and the ranking of Indiana relative to the 50 states and the District of Columbia. Crime Indices, 2004 (AGS, 2005, based on FBI UCR) -- Rankings   Ohio IN Rank in US Rank Total Crime Index 87 30th of 51 Rank Personal Crime 78 26th of 51 Rank Property Crimes 89 27th of 51 Table 6.12a: Total Crime, Property Crime, and Personal Crime Indices, 2004. (AGS Crime Risk 2004, 2005)

Map: Total Crime Indices Bottom Quarter, Middle Range, Highest Quarter (above 56, above IN & over US) Above US (7), 101.55-208 Above IN (10), 93.55-208 Top Quarter (22), 56-208 Mid Range (48), 20-56 Lowest Quarter (22), 7-20 AGS, Crime Indices 2004 (2005) Indiana Prevention Resource Center

Map: Personal Crime Indices Bottom Quarter; Mid Range (17-42); Top Quarter (above 42, above IN, above US) Above US (2), 101.55-183 Above IN (6), 74.55-183 Top Quarter (22), 42-183 Mid Range (46), 17-42 Lowest Quarter (24), 7-17 AGS, Crime Indices 2004 (2005) Indiana Prevention Resource Center

Map: Property Crime Indices Bottom Quarter, Mid Range, Top Quarter (includes over IN & over US) Above US (9), 101.55-194 Above IN (12), 95.55-194 Top Quarter (23), 64-194 Mid Range (46), 19-64 Lowest Quarter (23), 4-19 AGS, Crime Indices 2004 (2005) Indiana Prevention Resource Center

6.12b Crime Indices – Specific Crimes The following table shows the Crime Indices for specific property and personal crimes. The method is to compare the risk in a given location to the general crime risk for the nation as a whole. We see that in the context of the U.S., Indiana is generally safer than other places for risk of robbery, but is more dangerous for risk of murder. See the Appendix Glossary for definitions of these crimes. This table shows indices for this county, compared to Indiana and the nation (which is the point of comparison) and rankings comparing this county to the other 92 counties. Crime Indices, 2004 (AGS, 2005, based on FBI UCR)   Ohio Indiana US Personal Crime Index 13 74 101 Murder Index 9 107 100 Rape Index 24 94 Robbery Index 3 76 Assault Index 21 70 Property Crime Index 5 110 102 Burglary Index 98 Larceny Index 8 109 Motor Vehicle Theft Index 142 Table 6.12b: Specific Crimes, Indices (AGS Crime Risk 2004, 2005)

6.12b Crime Indices – Specific Crimes – Rankings The following table shows the ranking of this county among Indiana’s 92 counties, and the ranking of Indiana relative to the 50 states and the District of Columbia. Crime Indices, 2004 (AGS, 2005, based on FBI UCR) -- Rankings   Ohio IN Rank in US Rank Personal Crime 78 26th of 51 Rank Murder 77 18th of 51 Rank Rape 68 28th of 51 Rank Robbery 85 25th of 51 Rank Assault 60 29th of 51 Rank Property Crime 89 27th of 51 Rank Burglary 92 21st of 51 Rank Larceny 24th of 51 Rank Motor Vehicle Theft 91 7th of 51 Table 6.12b: Specific Crimes, Indices (AGS Crime Risk 2004, 2005)

6.13a FBI UCR: All Arrests The following data is from the FBI Uniform Crime Report as published by the University of Virginia Library website. Below are data for all arrests for crimes, including drug arrests, for the indicated year and rankings comparing this county to the other 92 counties. FBI UCR All Arrests, 2002:2005 Ohio Coverage Alcohol-Related Arrests   Liquor Law Violation 10 Driving Under the Influence 28 Drunkenness 6 Drug Possession: 11 Marijuana 8 Opium/Cocaine 2 Other Drug Possession 1 Other Dangerous Narcotic Synthetic Drug Possession FBI UCR All Arrests, 2002:2005 Ohio Sale/Manufacturing of Drugs 3 Marijuana Sale/Manufacture 1 Opium/Cocaine Sale/Manufacture Synthetic Drug Sale/Manufacture Gambling Sexual Offenses   Prostitution & Communication Sex Offenses Select Behaviors Disorderly Conduct 2 Runaway Juveniles Weapons Violations Table 6.13a: All Arrests, including Drug Arrests, 2003 (FBI Uniform Crime Reports, 2005, from http://www.virginia.edu/library/FBI, September 2005).

6.13b FBI UCR: Juvenile Arrests The following data is from the FBI Uniform Crime Report as published by the University of Virginia Library website. Below are data for juvenile arrests for crimes, including drug arrests, for the indicated year and rankings comparing this county to the other 92 counties. Juvenile Arrests, FBI UCR, 2002 (2005) Ohio Coverage Number of Agencies in County Report Arrests 2 Total Co. Population - Agencies Reporting Arrests 5696 Alcohol-Related Arrests:   Liquor Law Violation 4 Driving Under the Influence Drunkenness Drug Possession (Subtotal) 1 Marijuana Possession Opium/Cocaine Possession Other Drug Possession Other Dangerous Non-Narcotics Synthetic Narcotics Possession Juvenile Arrests, FBI UCR, 2002 (2005) Ohio Drug Abuse Sale/Manufacture Marijuana Sale/Manufacture Opium/Cocaine Sale/Manufacture Synthetic Drug Sale/Manufacture Drug Abuse Violations - Total 1 Gambling Select Behaviors:   Disorderly Conduct Runaway Juveniles 3 Sex Offenses Weapons Violations Table 6.13b Juvenile Arrests, including Drug Arrests, 2003 (FBI Uniform Crime Reports, 2005, from http://www.virginia.edu/library/FBI, September 2005).

6.14 Alcohol-Related Crashes The Indiana Council on Drugged and Dangerous Driving through the Indiana Criminal Justice Institute publishes crash data for each county. The most recent of data on drivers involved in fatal crashes by blood alcohol content of the driver are included in the following tables: Alcohol Related Crashes, FARS, 2004 data (2006) County OHIO Indiana BAC 0 (No.) 1 648 BAC 0 (%) 100 68 BAC .01-.07(No.) 45 BAC .01-.07(%) 5 BAC .08 (No.) 254 BAC .08 (%) 27 Total Alc-Related Killed (No.) 299 Total Alc-Related Killed (%) 32 Total Killed (No.) 947 Total Killed (%) Table 6.14a.: Drivers Involved in Fatal Crashes by Blood Alcohol Content of the Driver, 2001 (Indiana Criminal Justice Institute, 2003)

6.14 Alcohol-Related Crashes The Indiana Council on Drugged and Dangerous Driving through the Indiana Criminal Justice Institute publishes crash data for each county. The following table compares figures for 1994 and 2001 for the estimated percent of alcohol-related fatalities and drivers with BAC 0.08 or greater in fatal crashes. Ohio County, Alcohol and Fatal Crash Information by Year, Gender and Age, FARS (2005) Year Gender AgeCat Fatality Alcohol Positive Crash Fatality Alcohol Negative Crash Drinking Driver Driver Not Drinking 2003 Male Ages 35 thru 54 1 Table 6.14b: Estimated Percent of Alcohol-Related Fatalities and Drivers with BAC 0.08 or Greater in Fatal Crashes, 2005 (Indiana Criminal Justice Institute) .

Community Risk Factors: Transitions & Migration & Mobility 6.15 Net Migration Periods of transition and frequent mobility are risk factors for substance abuse and other problems. Examples include the period of transition from middle school to high school, and from high school to college or work. Moving creates a period of transition and places a person at higher risk, e.g., moving from one neighborhood to another, from place to place or from job to job, or from incarceration to life in the community. For studies of a local neighborhood, the Department of Education web site offers information on retention and drop-out or transfers from neighborhood schools. The IYI web site offers data for the county on graduation rates, drop out rates, etc. Community Risk Factors: Transitions & Migration An excellent indicator of the “transitions and mobility” indicator is the figure for net migration. Data for domestic and international migration from the U.S. Census Bureau is summarized in the following table. Net Migration, 2003 to 2004 (U.S. Census Bureau, via STATS Indiana, 2006)   Ohio Indiana Net Domestic Migration (change 2002 to 2003) 79 -3082 Net International Migration (change 2002 to 2003) -1 10841 Natural Increase (Births Minus Deaths ) 28 30062 Table 6.15: Net Migration (U.S. Census Bureau, 2005)