Boundary Review Committee Milton #10 Elementary School

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Roles and Responsibilities. Collaborative Efforts to Improve Student Achievement Guidelines for developing integrated planning and decision making processes.
Advertisements

Rezoning Study -Community Forum- Thompson Middle School February 15, :30 – 7:30pm.
TCDSB School Accommodation Review Process CE19 Cluster of Schools – March 4, 2008.
Pupil Accommodation Reviews 2011 An Overview Of The Process.
St. Joseph’s (Thamesford) Accommodation Review Committee Public Meeting St. Joseph’s Catholic Elementary School April 30, 2013.
BOUNDARY REVISIONS TO ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS IN PANAMA-BUENA VISTA USD SUPERINTENDENT MR. KIP HEARRON ASSISTANT SUPERINTENDENTS MS. GERRIE KINCAID DR. PAM.
Attendance Boundary Realignment FONTANA UNIFIEDSCHOOL DISTRICT November 19, 2008.
Our recommendations were informed by an initial screen of all schools, community feedback and impact analyses, building walkthroughs, program assessments.
Space Utilization Project Chandler Unified School District 2010.
WELCOMEWELCOME. AGENDA – JANUARY 6, Welcome 2.Trustees Howard Goodman (Ward 8), Josh Matlow (Ward 11), and Maria Rodrigues (Ward 9) 3.Overview.
2008 Lamar CISD Thomas Elementary Meeting Agenda January 12, 2009  Welcome - Representatives from Campbell Elementary, Wessendorff MS, Dickinson.
GOVERNOR’S EARLY CHILDHOOD ADVISORY COUNCIL (ECAC) September 9, 2014.
The Facts About Schoolsite Councils The Roles and Responsibilities of a Schoolsite Council.
Warren Township Study To Examine Enrollment Project (STEEP) Project Plan & Criteria High Level Timeline Sub-Committee Goals & Deliverables Revised October.
Alton Village School Boundary Review Interim Report 1.
Alton Village School Boundary Review April 17, 2012 FINAL REPORT 1.
Alton Village School Boundary Review March 8, 2012 Open House/Community Information Meeting 1.
DRAFT – FOR DISCUSSION ONLY Student Reassignment Survey Nash-Rocky Mount Public Schools October 1 – November 1, 2012.
OCTOBER 15, 2015 SCHOOL CONSOLIDATION & REDISTRICTING Dr. Karen M. Couch, Superintendent Ron Kauffman, RK Educational Planning, LLC.
“Inspiring our students to reach their full potential.”
March 8, Presentation Overview  Review of the Past  Board Motions:  January, February, November – 2015  February – 2016  Education Act and.
A lens to ensure each student successfully completes their educational program in Prince Rupert with a sense of hope, purpose, and control.
Community Governance Consensus Based Governance RECOMMENDATIONS.
Hillsborough County Public School Siting MPO SCHOOL TRANSPORTATION WORKING GROUP
Program and Accommodation Review Burlington Secondary Schools Director’s Preliminary Report October 5, 2016.
Regina Catholic School Division École St
Preparation of the Self-Study and Documentation
Pre-planning Planning to plan (and adapt) Implementation starts Here!
Regina Catholic School Division St
SUNY Applied Learning Campus Plan Parts V-VII
The Federal programs department September 26, 2017
Regina Catholic School Division St
Dalton Public Schools Special Project Team
Regina Catholic School Division Deshaye Catholic School Parent Information Meeting April 12, 2016.
Boundary Review Committee Milton #10 Elementary School
Boundary Review Committee Martin Street PS Rebuild Elementary School
Public Information Meeting Martin Street PS Rebuild
Boundary Review Committee Milton #10 Elementary School
Moore County Schools Guiding Principles in Student Assignment Planning
OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK SEPTEMBER 22, 2014 CITY COUNCIL MEETING RESCIND RESOLUTION NO AND ADOPT A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING THE RULES GOVERNING.
Parent/Community Meeting March 13, 2018 Presented by:
Public Information Meeting Milton #10 Public School
Regina Catholic School Division École St
Boundary Review Committee Martin Street PS Rebuild Elementary School
Boundary Review Committee Martin Street PS Rebuild Elementary School
Boundary Review Committee Martin Street PS Rebuild Elementary School
Boundary Review Committee Martin Street PS Rebuild Elementary School
Expedited Policy Development Process on the Temporary Specification for gTLD Registration Data Name of Presenter Event Name DD Month 2018.
FC 335 Safe and Supportive Schools Competitive Grant Webinar
Systemic Student Support (S3) Academy
ES Existing Cond. Student Attendance Area Committee October 25, 2018.
March 19, 2018 CCPTA.
NPA 450/579 (Area Code) Relief in Quebec
DRAFT Buffer Zone Policy
Boundary Review Committee Milton #10 Elementary School
Greater Essex County District School Board
School Community Councils
Roles and Responsibilities
NPA 403/587/780/825 (Area Code) Relief in Alberta
Fall 2018 Elementary School Boundary Process: Superintendent’s Recommendation (To take effect September 2019) November 8, 2018.
Challenger Middle School SAC / PTO Meeting
PUBLIC SCHOOL CHOICE RENEWAL PROCESS
Supporting SEACs across the Province:
Preview of Moore County Board of Education
Roles and Responsibilities
Understanding Grade Level Reconfiguration
Facility and Grade Organization Study Massena Central School District
Attendance Boundary Development & Revisions
POSITIVE PARTNERSHIPS
Part II Objectives Describe how policies and procedures are used
Presentation transcript:

Boundary Review Committee Milton #10 Elementary School Tuesday, October 24, 2017 7:00 pm Boyne Public School (Library)

Agenda Introductions, agenda and materials Purpose and desired outcomes Roles Boundary Review Administrative Procedure Timelines Selection Criteria Scenarios and maps

Boundary Review Steering Committee Superintendent of Program Cristina Salmina   Superintendent of Business Lucy Veerman Manager from Planning Department Dom Renzella (Manager) Michelle D’Aguiar Mitchell Gundy Trustees for all of the affected areas Trustee Kim Graves Boundary Review Committee Chair (appointed by Director and Chair of the Board) Superintendent of Student Services Trustee Donna Danielli (Co-Chair of BRC) Gord Truffen (Co-Chair of BRC) Mark Zonneveld        Family of Schools Superintendent(s) of all affected areas Jacqueline Newton - Chair of BRSC Introduce

Parent Representation on BRC TWO representatives from each school to serve on the Boundary Review Committee (BRC). This will most likely be the School Council Members To ensure consistency in membership, alternates may not be sent in place of absent members. Meetings are open to public Introductions of BRC

Why A Boundary Review? At the September 20, 2017 Board meeting, HDSB Trustees approved a motion to initiate the process to establish a boundary for Milton sw #10 PS. Be it resolved that the Halton District School Board direct the Director to undertake a school boundary review for the new Milton sw #10 PS, with an expected completion date of no later than February 2018.

Purpose of Milton #10 PS The mandate of the Boundary Review Committee is to determine who will attend the new elementary school in Milton.

Milton #10 Map

Steering Committee Mandate A Boundary Review Steering Committee is established to lead the school boundary review process. Determine and communicate which schools are part of the Boundary Review Process Generate the initial boundary options for consideration by a larger Boundary Review Committee On behalf of the Boundary Review Committee, recommend preferred option(s) to Administrative Council and the Director Make the determination as to which consultation process pathway will be utilized. The options are: consult with the community through Public Information Meetings regarding the Boundary Review Committee’s preferred option(s); OR inform the community of the recommended option(s)

Role of Boundary Review Committee The BRC is established to examine the initial options generated by the Boundary Review Steering Committee and to have the opportunity to give feedback. Work collaboratively to examine the initial boundary options generated by the Steering Committee; Provide detailed feedback on the initial options, request modifications or additional options, if required; Over the course of a number of working meetings and based upon a set of agreed upon criteria, the committee will arrive at one or more preferred options; Preferred option(s) submitted to the Steering Committee to be considered for recommendation to Administrative Council and the Director; Final recommendations will be developed through a consensus process; Parent representatives speak on behalf of all students, regardless of school, program, or grade; Staff’s role on the committee is as a resource - to respond to inquiries and to provide committee members with the data and administrative experience required to assess options.

Boundary Review Process STEP 1 and 2 Director submits to Trustees for approval of boundary review. Boundary Review Steering Committee (BRSC) consisting of Board staff and trustees review enrolments, school capacities and programs. Initial boundary scenarios are generated. STEP 3 and 4 Public announcement of boundary review (October 6th email to schools). Boundary Review Committee (BRC) established, consisting of members of the BRSC and representatives from the affected school communities. 10

STEP 5 Boundary Review Steering Committee develops scenarios, and shares scenarios with the BRC for information and feedback. Boundary Review Committee reviews scenarios and considers revisions, and makes suggestions to the Boundary Review Steering Committee. After public consultation (Jan. 9th) consider feedback from community for revisions. BRSC receives feedback from BRC, along with community and make possible revisions to the recommendations. STEP 6 Boundary Review Steering Committee makes recommendation to the Director. The Superintendent responsible for the boundary review will write a report with the recommended option. Director takes recommended option to Trustees and/or may revise the recommended option prior to taking it to Trustees. Delegations to the Board occur within the timelines for the boundary review process. Board of Trustees make the final decision STEP 7 The Integration Committee will plan for and implement the positive integration of students and staff affected by the boundary decision and relocation into their new school environment. The appropriate Superintendent of Education would act as the Chair of the Integration Committee 11

Product Goals The BRC is established to examine the initial options generated by the Boundary Review Steering Committee and to have the opportunity to give feedback. it will use criteria to measure the impact and effectiveness of boundary options. will review the options generated by the BR Steering Committee and will offer suggestions/revisions or suggest new options to be considered will decide to either inform the community of the recommended option(s) or to consult the community regarding the recommended option(s).

Process Goals That we ensure a process that is fair and transparent That all members are heard and respected That our discussions focus on what is best for all students Our final recommendations will be developed through a consensus process

Tentative Timelines BRC Meetings Oct. 24 (7 pm) Nov. 7 (7 pm) Dec. 12 (7 pm) Jan. 16 (7 pm) Public Consultation Jan. 9 (7 pm) Admin Council Meeting Jan. 29 Board Meeting for information Feb. 7 Board Meeting for decision Feb. 21

Criteria to Measure Impact & Effectiveness of Boundary Options Possible criteria could include but is not limited to: Criteria (could include but should not be limited to the following) ● Viability of Program – How many students are required to offer and maintain program in an educationally sound and fiscally responsible way? ● Proximity to schools -- Are opportunities for walk-to schools being maximized, school routes safe, and natural boundaries incorporated into the proposed options? ● Portables and Portapaks -- Are students being accommodated in permanent facilities and is the use of portable classrooms minimized in the proposed options? ● Balance of overall enrolment -- Is student access to programs, resources and extracurricular opportunities being maximized? Is over and underutilization of buildings avoided to the extent possible? ● Stable, long-term boundaries -- Do the projections show long term stability and result in avoiding the need for additional boundary changes in the short term? ● Transportation -- Does the option demonstrate cost effective transportation? ● Fiscally Responsible -- Does the option strive to reduce unnecessary costs? ● Student Experience -- Does the option demonstrate an effort to reduce the number of school moves students have experienced? Are cohorts kept together? ● Other -- Any other criteria recommended by the Boundary Review Steering Committee or Boundary Review Committee

Milton #10 PS BRC

Communication BRC members - will occur through the HDSB website, FAQs, Meeting Minutes, email to the Chair Schools/Councils –common school newsletter content, HDSB website, email to inform of community consultation Community – email at end of process, HDSB website We will review the need for communication at the end of each meeting and decide upon the content and method

Initial Scenarios and Maps Guiding Questions What scenarios do you feel have promise? What can you offer to make a scenario better? What scenarios can you NOT live with? Why? What did we miss (e.g., alternate scenarios)? Dom, Laureen and Mitch

Next Meeting Tuesday, November 7 (7:00 – 9:00 p.m.) Boyne Public School - Library BRC Meetings Oct. 24 (7 pm) Nov. 7 (7 pm) Nov. 21 (7 pm) Dec. 12 (7 pm) Jan. 16 (7 pm)