Volume 10, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Determination of Endothelial Stalk versus Tip Cell Potential during Angiogenesis by H2.0-like Homeobox-1  Shane P. Herbert, Julia Y.M. Cheung, Didier Y.R.
Advertisements

High Incidence of Cardiac Malformations in Connexin40-Deficient Mice
by Yuka Morikawa, and Peter Cserjesi
Jena Donovan, Anna Kordylewska, Yuh Nung Jan, Manuel F Utset 
Volume 18, Issue 1, Pages (January 2010)
Volume 17, Issue 4, Pages (October 2009)
Volume 18, Issue 1, Pages (January 2010)
Volume 25, Issue 5, Pages (June 2013)
Volume 5, Issue 6, Pages (December 2003)
Transcriptional Control of Endothelial Cell Development
Endothelial Expression of Bone Morphogenetic Protein Receptor Type 1a is Required for Atrioventricular Valve Formation  Kan Kaneko, MD, PhD, Xiaodong.
Volume 10, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Martin Gering, Roger Patient  Developmental Cell 
Volume 6, Issue 5, Pages (May 2004)
Smoothened Mutants Reveal Redundant Roles for Shh and Ihh Signaling Including Regulation of L/R Asymmetry by the Mouse Node  Xiaoyan M. Zhang, Miguel.
Volume 5, Issue 6, Pages (December 2003)
Volume 33, Issue 4, Pages (May 2015)
Volume 23, Issue 3, Pages (September 2012)
Volume 8, Issue 1, Pages (January 2005)
The Neural Plate Specifies Somite Size in the Xenopus laevis Gastrula
Retinoic Acid Regulates Differentiation of the Secondary Heart Field and TGFβ- Mediated Outflow Tract Septation  Peng Li, Mohammad Pashmforoush, Henry.
Volume 10, Issue 9, Pages (May 2000)
Morphologic Spectrum of Ventriculoarterial Connection in Hearts With Double Inlet Left Ventricle: Implications for Surgical Procedures  Hideki Uemura,
Volume 126, Issue 6, Pages (September 2006)
Volume 16, Issue 12, Pages (June 2006)
Volume 14, Issue 2, Pages (February 2008)
Reprogramming Hox Expression in the Vertebrate Hindbrain: Influence of Paraxial Mesoderm and Rhombomere Transposition  Nobue Itasaki, James Sharpe, Alastair.
All Mouse Ventral Spinal Cord Patterning by Hedgehog Is Gli Dependent and Involves an Activator Function of Gli3  C.Brian Bai, Daniel Stephen, Alexandra.
Aaron D Gitler, Min Min Lu, Jonathan A Epstein  Developmental Cell 
David Stafford, Victoria E. Prince  Current Biology 
Robert G. Kelly, Nigel A. Brown, Margaret E. Buckingham 
Volume 8, Issue 4, Pages (April 2005)
SoxE Factors Function Equivalently during Neural Crest and Inner Ear Development and Their Activity Is Regulated by SUMOylation  Kimberly M. Taylor, Carole.
Sara C. Ahlgren, Marianne Bronner-Fraser  Current Biology 
Volume 16, Issue 6, Pages (June 2009)
Volume 11, Issue 4, Pages (October 2006)
BMP Signaling Protects Telencephalic Fate by Repressing Eye Identity and Its Cxcr4- Dependent Morphogenesis  Holger Bielen, Corinne Houart  Developmental.
Neuropeptides: Developmental Signals in Placode Progenitor Formation
Boss/Sev Signaling from Germline to Soma Restricts Germline-Stem-Cell-Niche Formation in the Anterior Region of Drosophila Male Gonads  Yu Kitadate, Shuji.
Kathleen S. Christine, Frank L. Conlon  Developmental Cell 
Control of Cell Proliferation in the Drosophila Eye by Notch Signaling
Nadine Peyriéras, Uwe Strähle, Frédéric Rosa  Current Biology 
Volume 20, Issue 21, Pages (November 2010)
Sonic hedgehog and vascular endothelial growth factor Act Upstream of the Notch Pathway during Arterial Endothelial Differentiation  Nathan D. Lawson,
The BMP Signaling Gradient Patterns Dorsoventral Tissues in a Temporally Progressive Manner along the Anteroposterior Axis  Jennifer A. Tucker, Keith.
Volume 25, Issue 16, Pages (August 2015)
Volume 19, Issue 12, Pages (June 2009)
Volume 19, Issue 2, Pages (August 2010)
Zebrafish pea3 and erm are general targets of FGF8 signaling
Brian A Hyatt, H.Joseph Yost  Cell 
Bmp2 Signaling Regulates the Hepatic versus Pancreatic Fate Decision
Volume 12, Issue 11, Pages (June 2002)
Recruitment of Ectodermal Attachment Cells via an EGFR-Dependent Mechanism during the Organogenesis of Drosophila Proprioceptors  Adi Inbal, Talila Volk,
Retinoic Acid Synthesis and Signaling during Early Organogenesis
Origins and Fates of Cardiovascular Progenitor Cells
RPK1 and TOAD2 Are Two Receptor-like Kinases Redundantly Required for Arabidopsis Embryonic Pattern Formation  Michael D. Nodine, Ramin Yadegari, Frans.
Won-Suk Chung, Didier Y.R. Stainier  Developmental Cell 
Stefano De Renzis, J. Yu, R. Zinzen, Eric Wieschaus  Developmental Cell 
Julie E. Cooke, Hilary A. Kemp, Cecilia B. Moens  Current Biology 
FGF Signaling Controls Somite Boundary Position and Regulates Segmentation Clock Control of Spatiotemporal Hox Gene Activation  Julien Dubrulle, Michael.
The REF-1 Family of bHLH Transcription Factors Pattern C
Volume 10, Issue 4, Pages (April 2006)
Volume 6, Issue 2, Pages (August 2000)
Abnormalities of the aortic arch in Hectd1opm/opm mutant embryos.
Pharyngeal arch patterning in the absence of neural crest
Abnormalities that are combined with or are indicators for life-threatening defects (Sc4). Abnormalities that are combined with or are indicators for life-threatening.
John Yap, Phillip A.R Hayward, Christopher Lincoln 
Volume 19, Issue 2, Pages (August 2010)
Reprogramming Hox Expression in the Vertebrate Hindbrain: Influence of Paraxial Mesoderm and Rhombomere Transposition  Nobue Itasaki, James Sharpe, Alastair.
Volume 13, Issue 6, Pages (March 2003)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 10, Issue 1, Pages 81-92 (January 2006) Dose-Dependent Interaction of Tbx1 and Crkl and Locally Aberrant RA Signaling in a Model of del22q11 Syndrome  Deborah L. Guris, Gregg Duester, Virginia E. Papaioannou, Akira Imamoto  Developmental Cell  Volume 10, Issue 1, Pages 81-92 (January 2006) DOI: 10.1016/j.devcel.2005.12.002 Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Aortic Arch, Thymic, and Parathyroid Defects in Crkl+/−;Tbx1+/− Compound Heterozygotes (A) Gross anatomy of the aortic arch and associated vessels in an E16.5 wild-type embryo. (B) Aberrant origin of the right subclavian artery in a Tbx1 heterozygote at E16.5. (C–E) Crkl+/−;Tbx1+/− embryos at E16.5 displayed fourth arch artery defects such as (C) cervical aortic arch, (D) right retro-esophageal aortic arch, (E) interrupted aortic arch type B, and (C–E) aberrant origin of the right subclavian artery. (C and E) The white arrows show the origin of either the right subclavian artery or the descending aorta. (D) The black arrow shows the origin of a right-sided arch connecting to the descending aorta behind the esophagus. (F and G) Thymus in (F) wild-type and (G) Crkl+/−;Tbx1+/− embryos at P2. Thymic lobes in compound heterozygotes were bilaterally hypoplastic compared to wild-type controls and were often located ectopically behind the vessels of the aortic arch in compound heterozygotes. (H and I) Histological sections of the heart in a (H) wild-type and (I) Crkl+/−;Tbx1+/− embryo at E16.5. A ventricular septal defect (indicated by the black arrow) accompanied by an overriding aorta is present in the (I) Crkl+/−;Tbx1+/− embryo. (J and K) The development of parathyroid glands was assessed in histological sections in (J) wild-type and (K) Crkl+/−;Tbx1+/− embryos. Parathyroid glands were unilaterally or bilaterally absent in the majority of Crkl+/−;Tbx1+/− embryos. (L and M) Expression of the parathyroid primordium marker Gcm2 in the third pharyngeal pouch of (L) wild-type and (M) Crkl+/−;Tbx1+/− embryos at E10.5. The inset shows an enlargement of the third pharyngeal pouch. Ab-RSA, aberrant origin of the right subclavian artery; ao, aorta; CAA, cervical aortic arch; da, descending aorta; es, esophagus; IAA-B, interrupted aortic arch type B; pt, pulmonary trunk; RAA, right retro-esophageal aortic arch; ra and la, right or left atrium; rcc and lcc, right or left common carotid artery; rsa and lsa, right or left subclavian artery; r-Th and l-Th, right or left thymic lobe; tr, trachea; vt, ventricle; es, esophagus; tr, trachea; td, thyroid gland; p, parathyroid gland. Developmental Cell 2006 10, 81-92DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2005.12.002) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Pharyngeal Pouch Development in Wild-Type and Mutant Embryos (A–F) Endodermal pouch formation was assessed by expression of Pax1 detected by in situ hybridization at E10.5 (∼34–38 somites). (A) Pharyngeal pouches 1–4 were present bilaterally in 12 wild-type embryos. (B) The fourth pharyngeal pouch was bilaterally hypoplastic in 7/8 Tbx1+/− embryos. In 1/8 embryos, the fourth pouch was unilaterally absent (data not shown). (C) Only the first pharyngeal pouch is formed in Tbx1−/− embryos. (D) The fourth pharyngeal pouch was hypoplastic in 6/6 Crkl−/− embryos. In two cases, this defect was bilateral, and, in four instances, it was unilateral. (E) The fourth pharyngeal pouch was absent in 16/16 Crkl+/−;Tbx1+/− compound heterozygotes. In 9/16 heterozygotes, the defect was bilateral, whereas, in 7/16, the fourth pouch was absent on one side and hypoplastic on the other. (F) No pharyngeal pouches were present in 4/4 Crkl−/−;Tbx1−/− double homozygous embryos, although the first arch forms and Pax1 expression is detected in the pharyngeal endoderm. a, arch; p, pharyngeal pouch; s, somite. Developmental Cell 2006 10, 81-92DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2005.12.002) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Altered Pharyngeal Patterning in Mutant Embryos (A–C) Hoxb1 expression detected by RNA in situ hybridization in (A) wild-type, (B) Crkl+/−;Tbx1+/−, and (C) Crkl−/−;Tbx1−/− embryos at E10.5. (D and E) Hoxb3 expression detected by RNA in situ hybridization in (D) wild-type and (E) Crkl+/−;Tbx1+/− embryos at E10.5. (F–H) Hoxb4 expression detected by RNA in situ hybridization in (F) wild-type, (G) Crkl+/−;Tbx1+/−, and (H) Tbx1−/− embryos at E10.5. Hoxb4 expression is expanded anteriorly in the pharyngeal endoderm in Tbx1−/− embryos ([H], indicated by the black arrow) and is detected in the neural crest immediately adjacent to rhombomere 7. Hoxb4 expression in Crkl−/−;Tbx1−/− double homozygous mutants is identical to that of Tbx1−/− embryos (data not shown). (I–K) Hoxd4 expression detected by RNA in situ hybridization in (I) wild-type, (J) Crkl+/−;Tbx1+/−, and (K) Crkl−/−;Tbx1−/− embryos at E10.5. Hoxd4 expression in Tbx1−/− embryos (data not shown) is identical to that of Crkl−/−;Tbx1−/− embryos. a, pharyngeal arch; ov, otic vesicle; p, pharyngeal pouch. Developmental Cell 2006 10, 81-92DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2005.12.002) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Altered RA Signaling in Mutant Embryos (A–D) Rarb expression detected by in situ hybridization in (A) wild-type, (B) Crkl+/−;Tbx1+/−, (C) Tbx1−/−, and (D) Crkl−/−;Tbx1−/− embryos at E10.5. The green and yellow arrows in (B) and the red arrow in (C) and (D) denote abnormal anterior limits of Rarb expression in the pharyngeal endoderm in these mutants. See text for details. (E–H) RARE-lacZ expression detected by assessing β-galactosidase activity in (E) wild-type, (F) Crkl−/−, (G) Tbx1−/−, and (H) Crkl−/−;Tbx1−/− embryos at E10.5. The white arrows denote the anterior limit of reporter expression in the pharyngeal endoderm. Note the endodermal staining in (H) that approaches the first pharyngeal arch. (F–H) The red arrows indicate ectopic reporter activity in the head mesoderm. (I–N) RARE-lacZ expression detected by assessing β-galactosidase activity in (I) wild-type, (J) Crkl−/−, (D) Tbx1−/−, (L and M) Crkl+/−;Tbx1+/−, and (N) Crkl−/−;Tbx1−/− embryos at E9.0. The position of otic vesicles is marked by dotted circles. Note that the anterior limit of RARE reporter (red arrows) in the head mesoderm overlaps with the position of the otic vesicles in Tbx1−/−, Crkl+/−;Tbx1+/−, and Crkl−/−;Tbx1−/− embryos, suggesting more anterior localization of an RA gradient compared to wild-type embryos. (O–R) Raldh2 expression detected by in situ hybridization in (O) wild-type, (P) Crkl+/−;Tbx1+/−, (Q) Tbx1−/−, and (R) Crkl−/−;Tbx1−/− embryos at E10.5. The red arrow in (P) indicates ectopic anterior expression of Raldh2 nearing pharyngeal pouch 3 and the cardiac outflow tract in the ventral mesoderm. Compare with the anterior limit of expression in the ventral mesoderm of the wild-type control indicated by the black arrow in (O). The red arrows in (Q) and (R) indicate dramatic anterior expansion of Raldh2 expression in the pharyngeal mesoderm. The staining in the first pharyngeal arch in (R) is a reflection of the slightly older stage of this embryo and is not abnormal. a, pharyngeal arch; ov, otic vesicle; p, pharyngeal pouch. Developmental Cell 2006 10, 81-92DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2005.12.002) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Altered Expression of Cyp26 Genes in Mutant Embryos (A–N) Cyp26a1 expression detected by in situ hybridization at (A–G) E9.5 and (H–N) E10.5 in (A and H) wild-type, (B and I) Crkl+/−, (C and J) Tbx1+/−, (D and K) Crkl+/−;Tbx1+/−, (E and L) Crkl−/−, (F and M) Tbx1−/−, and (G and N) Crkl−/−;Tbx1−/− embryos. See text for details. (O–V) (O–R) Lateral and frontal views of Cyp26b1 expression detected by in situ hybridization in (O and S) wild-type, (P and T) Crkl−/−, (Q and U) Tbx1−/−, and (R and V) Crkl−/−;Tbx1−/− embryos at E9.5. The black arrowheads in (S) and (T) indicate expression in the endoderm lining pharyngeal arch 3. The red arrowheads in (P)–(R) and (T)–(V) indicate ectopic expression in the pharyngeal ectoderm. Frontal views were photographed after removal of the heart. See text for details. a, pharyngeal arch. Developmental Cell 2006 10, 81-92DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2005.12.002) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions