Alternative Road Impact Fee Methodologies

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Overview Examples of TranSight Applications What Does TranSight Analyze? Model Structure.

Advertisements

RTC Board Meeting Regional Road Impact Fee Program September 21, 2012.

Infrastructure and Public Facilities Needs Assessment Planning Department County of Hawai`i.

A Comparison of Residential and Commercial Real Estate Barry Gross Developers Research May 30, 2013.

1 Financing Transportation Improvements Issues and Options Transportation Strategy Board November 17, 2010.

Alachua County Mobility Plan Southwest Alachua County Transportation Improvement District Jonathan B. Paul, AICP, MA 2 Jeffrey L. Hays Chris Dawson, AICP.

PUBLIC HEARING: Development (Impact) Fees - Land Use Assumptions & Infrastructure Improvement Plan Reports June 30, 2014.

1 Idaho Highway Cost Allocation Study Patrick Balducci, Battelle Joe Stowers, Sydec July 27, 2010.

Alternative Financing for City Streets Preservation Is the SMU Right for Your City? Presented By: Dennis Dowdy, PEPublic Works Director, City of Auburn.

Funding Your Journey Florida Transportation Economics 101 Howard Glassman Executive Director MPOAC.

SB 360 and Multi-Modal Impact Fees & Efficiently Managing a Street Lightning System.

Reduction and Deferral of Impact Fees Board of County Commissioners Discussion Item March 29, 2011.

Part Ten Other types of tax accounting. City Maintenance and Construction Tax Definition: City maintenance and construction tax, is the country to engage.

Paying for Growth Rough Proportionality & Transportation Impact Fee Austin Neighborhoods Council June 24, 2015.

Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. National Impact Fee Roundtable Public Safety Impact Fees and Alternatives – Fire Flow Methodology Robert P. Wallace,

Law Enforcement Impact Fee Study Update Board of County Commissioners Public Hearing January 15, 2013.

Funding Your Journey Florida Transportation Economics 101 Presenter’s Name Organization.

Quantifying Transportation Needs and Assessing Revenue Options: The Texas Experience presented to The Arkansas Blue Ribbon Committee on Highway Finance.

Presentation to ***(group) on ***(date) 1.  Cities - 11  Highway districts – 3  Ada and Canyon Counties  School districts – 2  Valley Regional Transit.

Elk Grove Water District Water Rate Update and Connection Fees Habib Isaac – Principal April 10, 2013.

Revenue Credits: Back to First Principles Clancy Mullen National Impact Fee Roundtable October 6, 2005.

2030 Mobility Plan City of Jacksonville Planning and Development Department January 2011.

Convergence of Transportation Policy and RFID Enabler of Future Transportation Policy Chris Body Mark IV Vice President, Business Development.

James B. Duncan, FAICP President – Duncan Associates – Austin, TX Arthur C. Nelson, Ph.D., FAICP Presidential Professor – University of Utah, Salt Lake.

Revenue Credits: The Methodological Frontier National Impact Fee Roundtable Arlington, VA October 5, 2006.

Forecasting and Evaluating Network Growth David Levinson Norah Montes de Oca Feng Xie.

Blueprint for Good Growth Adequate Public Facilities Implementation Capacity LOS Capital Plan Demand Unintended consequence slides adapted from presentation.

Russell Provost Urban and Regional Planning Principal Investigator: Ruth Steiner.

Slide Congestion Management Program Update Presentation to PPLC April 11, 2011.

Road Impact Fee Update Orange County Board of County Commissioners June 9, 2009.

Road Impact Fee Update Discussion Item June 21, 2011 Transportation Impact Fee Update Discussion Item June 21, 2011.

Department of Public Works Recommended Residential Impact Fee Distribution Methodology Change October 26, 2015.

An AQ Assessment Tool for Local Land Use Decisio ns 13 th TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference May 9, 2011 Reno, Nevada Mark Filipi, AICP.

Impact Fees Among the States (and Canada and UK) National Impact Fee Roundtable Arlington, VA October 5, 2006.

Board of County Commissioners Discussion Item E. 1. – Trinity Preparatory School Transportation Impact Fees August 5, 2014.

Municipal Tax Rates: How Are They Calculated, And How Do They Change December 2, 2015 Stephan W. Hamilton, Director Municipal and Property Division NH.

Presented By Public Resources Management Group, Inc. RECREATION IMPACT FEE STUDY Prepared: December 9 th, 2013.

Road Services Funding Options Bridges and Roads Task Force October 28,

1 Briefing Document for Impact Fee Proposal Citrus County, Florida Submitted By:

Orange County Government Adoption Public Hearing May 10, 2016 Board of County Commissioners School Impact Fee Update.

2014 Mobility Fee Update Study Stakeholder Kick-off Meeting March 20, 2014.

Residential Impact Fee - Nexus Study Update City of Pasadena Conclusions & Findings Prepared by Brion & Associates In association with Nilsson Consulting.

Concurrency Management &ProportionateFair-ShareTransportationMitigation.

Transportation Impact Fee BCC Public Hearing

2014 Mobility Fee Update Study Adoption Reading 1 October 21, 2014.

Planning Commission Impact fees Planning Commission

5th Edition Regional Road Impact Fee General Administrative Manual

TVTC Impact Fee Update Nexus Study January 30, 2008

City of Madras System Development Charges

County Transportation Overview

Impact Fee Advisory Committee November 10, 2016

Summit County – Canyons Employee Housing

Mobility Fee Model Process Standardization

Fire Protection Impact Fee

Transportation System Development Charge Working Group

Ventura County Traffic Model (VCTM) VCTC Update

Idyllwild Water District

Improvement-Driven Fees

Property Tax Rates Property Taxes.

Transportation Impact Fees and Funding

Presentation and Discussion of the Draft Transportation Land Use Assumptions and Infrastructure Improvement Plan Report (Impact Fee Report) Town Council.

SB 743 and New Models for Estimation of VMT

Town Council Strategic Planning Session

STIP Development OTO Board Meeting

Recommended Methods for Assessing VMT

Funding the Transportation Infrastructure Improvement Plan (IIP): A Discussion of Cash Flows Town Council Meeting February 15, 2017.

Funding the Town’s Transportation Infrastructure Improvement Plan (IIP) – An Initial Discussion of Impact Fees Town Council Meeting March 1, 2017.

How to Put Together the Pieces of Road Usage Charge Legislation

Sidewalk Maintenance Program

Public Workshop September 26, 2019.

Presentation transcript:

Alternative Road Impact Fee Methodologies Clancy Mullen, AICP Duncan Associates Austin, TX

Basic Impact Fee Formula Travel Demand (Trips or Vehicle-Miles) [Consumption-Based Must Use VMT] X Cost per Trip/VMT [Consumption: Cost ÷ Capacity] [Improvement: Cost ÷ Future Trips or VMT] = Gross Impact Fee

Consumption-Based Method Cost of Representative List of Projects ÷ Vehicle-Miles of Capacity (VMC) = Cost per VMC x System VMC/VMT Ratio = Cost per VMT

Improvement-Based Method Cost of Improvements Needed ÷ Projected New Trips or VMT = Cost per Trip or VMT

History of ACHD’s Impact Fees 1989: Original Study by Duncan Assoc. 1991: Auto Tag Fee Increase Vote 1992: Ord. 184 1992: Idaho Development Fees Act 1993: CIP and Revised Ordinance 1995: CIP Update 1996: Revised Study by Duncan Assoc. 1999: Ord. 193 Based on Staff Study 2000: Developers Sue 2001: Ord. 194 Based on Updated Study 2002: HB 604 Amended State Act 2003: Ord. 197 Based on Improvement Method

Original Study Consumption-Based Methodology Fees Varied Based on Trip Length County-Wide Construction/ROW Costs Trip Length Reduced for State Roads Four Assessment Districts Boise/Garden City ($837) Western Cities ($900) Near Rural ($964) Far Rural ($1,039)

1999 Amendments (Ord. 193) County-Wide Fee for Residential Uses Variable Fee for Nonresidential: Boise/Garden City ($3,158/1000 sf) Eagle ($2,701) Meridian ($2,466) Kuna/Star ($1,486) Variable ROW Costs ($22k-$365k/LM) Credit Error: Pk Hr Cost – ADT Credit Reduced Construction Cost

Assessment Districts

Benefit Districts

Idaho HB 607, effective 3/2002 Micron vs. Ada County Hwy Dist Micron expanding plant, wanted credit for all past and future taxes to ACHD Law now requires credit based on what developer paid Unfair to New Firms to Area

Advantages of Standards-Driven Method Flexibility to Spend Revenues No Need to Be Tied to Specific List of Projects Simple to Calculate

Advantages of Improvements-Driven Method Ties Fees to Improvements Benefiting Development Sound “Rational Nexus” to Impacts Ensures No Fees Used to Pay for Deficiencies Relates Directly to CIP and Long Range Plans