Debra S. Baker and Donald G. Huggins

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Incremental Measure Progress and R3 Conditions Report Status Discussion R3 Water Programs Meeting May 12, 2009.
Advertisements

Periphyton Data from National-Scale Assessments Can Inform Nutrient Criteria Development for Southeastern States R. Jan Stevenson Michigan State University.
Approach for Including Nutrient Limitations within NDPDES Permits Dallas Grossman Division of Water Quality
EPA’s Guidance on Nutrient Criteria Development
Transport of nitrogen and phosphorus from Rhode River watersheds during storm events David Correll, Thomas Jordan, and Donald Weller Water Resources Research,
Lakes of Missouri Volunteer Program University of Missouri-Columbia The Missouri’s Lakes and Reservoirs The Missouri Department of Natural Resources Region.
New Hampshire Estuaries Project September 30, 2005 Estuarine Nutrient Criteria Presentation to New Hampshire Estuaries Project Technical Advisory Committee.
SENSORS, CYBERINFRASTRUCTURE, AND EXAMINATION OF HYDROLOGIC AND HYDROCHEMICAL RESPONSE IN THE LITTLE BEAR RIVER OBSERVATORY TEST BED Jeffery S. Horsburgh.
Missouri Nutrient Criteria Plan Mark Osborn October 20, 2005.
Agricultural Nonpoint Source Pollution and Water Quality as a function of Land Management Practices on Four Kansas Farms William W. Spotts Dr. Donald Huggins.
Nutrient Benchmark Development Gary Welker, Ph.D. USEPA Region 7 Environmental Services Division.
Nutrient and Sediment Concentrations, Yields and Loads in Impaired Streams and Rivers in the Taunton River Basin, Massachusetts, Jeffrey R. Barbaro.
Macroinvertebrate Bioassessment Tools Aquatic Life/Nutrient Workgroup August 11, 2008.
Site Classification for Re-calibration of the Alabama Index of Stream Macroinvertebrate Condition Ben Jessup and Jen Stamp Tetra Tech, Inc. SWPBA November.
The Cahaba River Watershed Nutrient TMDL 2006 National Monitoring Conference San Jose, CA 2006 National Monitoring Conference San Jose, CA Presented by:
Surface coal mining impacts on concentration-discharge relationships: Identifying spatial and temporal changes in the New River, TN Jenny Murphy Vanderbilt.
` CCAMP.org “About CCAMP” wiki upgrade Replace old data navigator Include links to healthy watersheds, coastal confl., groundwater Central Coast Water.
Developing Monitoring Programs to Detect NPS Load Reductions.
Florida Numerical Nutrient Criteria Southwest Florida Water Resources Conference Scott I. McClelland Vice President November 20, 2009.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Regional scale point source nutrient load estimation in support of SPARROW* modeling Gerard McMahon,
CRITICAL TECHNICAL ELEMENTS FOR A BIOASSESSMENT PROGRAM Michael T. Barbour, Tetra Tech Chris O. Yoder, MBI.
Nicole Reid, Jane Herbert, and Dean Baas MSU Extension Land & Water Program W. K. Kellogg Biological Station Transparency tube as a surrogate for turbidity,
Highlights A Study of Phosphorus Loading of Ballston Lake by Tributary Inflow Presentation to BLIA Annual Meeting June 16, 2014 Scott Miller, Bob Duncan,
Abandoned Mine Lands Assessment of the North Yuba Watershed.
Central Plains Center for BioAssessment Debbie Baker An overview of our projects. Sept
Water Quality Sampling, Analysis and Annual Load Determinations for Nutrients and Solids on the Ballard Creek, 2008 Arkansas Water Resources Center UA.
Applications of Regression to Water Quality Analysis Unite 5: Module 18, Lecture 1.
A Chemical and Vegetative Characterization of the Ichetucknee River Sky K. Notestein and Thomas K. Frazer.
Sentinel Lakes Program: MPCA Update – WQ Sampling, Data Analysis & Reporting Steve Heiskary Prepared in conjunction with: Jesse Anderson Pam Anderson Lee.
Nutrient and Sulfide Export From a Mine Drainage Passive Treatment System S.A. Yepez & R.W. Nairn 29 th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Mining.
STORET 1001 and the State of Utah Monitoring Strategy Today you will see: –What kind of attributes are available in STORET –How results, stations, and.
Water Quality Monitoring in the Upper Illinois River Watershed and Upper White River Basin Project Brian E. Haggard University of Arkansas.
Response of benthic algae communities to nutrient enrichment in agricultural streams: Implications for establishing nutrient criteria R.W. Black 1, P.W.
Chesapeake Bay Program’s Baywide and Basinwide Monitoring Networks: Options for Adapting Monitoring Networks and Realigning Resources to Address Partner.
Trends in Precipitation and Stream Discharge over the Past Century for the Continental United States Andrew Simon 1 and Lauren Klimetz 1,2 1 USDA-ARS National.
Adem.alabama.gov ADEM’s Monitoring Summary Reports Alabama – Tombigbee CWP Stakeholders Meeting Montgomery, Alabama 3 February 2010 Lisa Huff – ADEM Field.
Nutrient and Sediment Loading in Sougahatchee Creek and the Impacts on Aquatic Biota Report submitted to West Point Stevens and the Cities of Auburn and.
Eutrophication Status of the Wadden Sea Justus van Beusekom Wadden Sea Station Sylt Alfred-Wegener-Institute for Polar and Marine Research List/Sylt.
K aren Worcester Staff Environmental Scientist with thanks to M. Thomas, D. Paradies, L. Harlan, and P. Meertens California Central Coast Regional Water.
Detecting Ecological Effects of Development in the Wappingers and Fishkill Watersheds Karin Limburg, Karen Stainbrook, Bongghi Hong SUNY College of Environmental.
Integrating a Continuous Water Quality Monitoring Network into Texas’ Surface Water Quality Monitoring Program Jill D. Csekitz, Aquatic Scientist Texas.
Water Quality Standards History – Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow ENVIRONMENTAL FEDERATION OF OKLAHOMA 17th Annual Meeting October 1-3, 2008 Derek Smithee.
Nutrient Criteria Development for Rhode Island Estuarine Waters CHRP/Managers Meeting October 8, 2009.
A Tool to Evaluate the Health of Streams and Rivers within the Chesapeake Bay Watershed Katie Foreman 1, Claire Buchanan 2, Adam Griggs 2, Andrea Nagel.
ORSANCO’s FY16 Technical Program. WQ Monitoring Programs Bimonthly & Clean Metals Sampling – Metals & traditional 15 mainstem, 14 tribs,
1 Collaboration on EMAP Stream Condition Assessments in EPA Region 8 Thomas R. Johnson and Karl A. Hermann EPA Region 8.
Nutrient Criteria Development Update Emily McArdle Nutrient Criteria Coordinator | Water Quality Standards Group
Nutrient Criteria for Reservoirs – A Review of Missouri’s Proposed Approach Daniel V. Obrecht Dept. of Fisheries and Wildlife Sciences University of Missouri.
Land Use Influences on Water, Sediment and Nutrients in the Napa Valley Watershed: Conceptual Models and Examples Lester McKee (PhD) Watershed Program.
EVALUATING STREAM COMPENSATION PERFORMANCE: Overcoming the Data Deficit Through Standardized Study Design Kenton L. Sena (EPA VSFS Intern), Joe Morgan,
Investigation of the Influence of Naturally Elevated Total Dissolved Solids on Macroinvertebrate Communities in the Southern California Region John D.
Reducing sediment & nutrient losses from intensive agriculture Restoring eutrophic shallow lakes Pastoral agriculture is the dominant land use in New.
GREAT BAY and NEW HAMPSHIRE WATER QUALITY STANDARDS
Characterization of Dissolved Solids in the Ohio River
Emily Saad EAS 4480 Oral Presentation 27 April 2010
Shirley Birosik Environmental Specialist
Bill Vant, Waikato Regional Council
Nutrient Benchmark Development
Nebraska Water Quality Index
Henrico County Stream Assessment / Watershed Management Program
Public Meeting February 19, 2009
Des Plaines River Watershed Workgroup Midwest Biodiversity Institute
Statistical Analysis Error Bars
ADEQ Approaches to the Assessment Methodology
Straight to the Point – Watershed-based Plans Should:
Little River Ditches Watershed Monitoring
Overview of US EPA & State Manure Management Regulations
High Rock Lake TMDL Development
State of the Bay Conference
Marco island water quality monitoring
Presentation transcript:

Debra S. Baker and Donald G. Huggins Nutrient Trends in Reference Streams of the Central Plains Debra S. Baker and Donald G. Huggins Central Plains Center for BioAssessment Kansas Biological Survey, University of Kansas 30th Annual Great Plains Limnology Conference, Lincoln, NE, 10 – 11 October 2003

Nutrients in Streams Clean Water Action Plan 1998 - USEPA initiative to establish regionally-based nutrient criteria for waterbodies via Regional Technical Assistance Groups (RTAGs). Develop a dataset of nutrient levels found in “reference” or least impacted streams of USEPA Region 7. Should criteria be single values for the entire EPA Region, or should criteria be based on a subset of stream characteristics, such as ecoregion?

Stream Sites

Parameters in situ: DO, turbidity, pH, conductivity Lab analysis: TN, NH4-N, NO3-N, TP, PO4-P, chlorophyll a, phaeophytin a

Hypothesis Streams will show affiliations based on some suite of water quality characteristics (e.g. nutrient concentrations). Principal Components Analysis (PCA) was used to determine probable relationships among the parameters. Resulting factor scores were used as input for clustering analyses to identify stream groupings and compare resulting spatial differences to ecoregions. Analyses

Resulting Dataset May 1999 – June 2002 94 streams, 522 records, taken at base flow TN: 5 – 20410 g/l; Median: 1180 g/l TP: 2.5 – 1320 g/l; Median: 86 g/l Chlorophyll a: 0.5 – 216 g/l; Median: 4 g/l

PCA Analysis Factor 1 TP, PO4-P Factor 2 TN, NO3-N Factor 3 chlorophyll a, phaeophytin a Factor 4 pH, DO Factor 5 conductivity Factor 6 NH4-N

K-means Cluster Analysis Calculated medians of the 6 PCA factor scores for each of the 94 sites. K-means cluster analysis on all PCA factors – resulted in 6 clusters. K-means cluster analysis on just the nutrient factors – resulted in 6 clusters.

Clustering on All Factors

Clustering on Nutrient Factors

N & P Factors

N & P Factors

N & P Factors

N & P Factors

N & P Factors

N & P Factors

N & P Factors

The 94 reference streams vs The 94 reference streams vs. a database of nonreference streams (# records ~ 24000; # streams ~ 1500)

Conclusions Nutrient levels varied by ecoregion. Streams that we clustered by nutrient factors and independently of ecoregion showed ecoregional affiliations.

Future Study Seasonal influences Chlorophyll a USEPA Region7 Nutrient RTAG Macroinvertebrates Watershed and land use