Lesson 17: Learning Goals

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Facilitation skills & Group based learning
Advertisements

Teacher Professional Growth & Effectiveness System (TPGES) Laying the Groundwork ISLN September 2012.
Science Inquiry Minds-on Hands-on.
Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (INTASC)
ID: Semester: Class: Professor: Advisor: Student Dashboard for: Studenting Rubric Writing Rubric Student Name Faculty Member.
What is the TPA? Teacher candidates must show through a work sample that they have the knowledge, skills, and abilities required of a beginning teacher.
STUDENT-LED DISCUSSIONS TO REINFORCE READING
Summative vs. Formative Assessment. What Is Formative Assessment? Formative assessment is a systematic process to continuously gather evidence about learning.
In-service January 17, 2011 Claysburg-Kimmel School District.
WELCOME! After you’ve set your belongings down go around the room and read the 7 Characteristics of Teachers and Writing When you have finished reading.
Welcome to the Washtenaw Writing Collaborative. Quickwrite: Jot down some ideas about a memorable writing moment you have had. Be ready to share.
Going Deeper with Academic Talk
Communication Skills.
Australian Professional Standards for Teachers Unpacking the Standards
02086 Writing Inspirations Aalto University
AP CSP: Data Assumptions & Good and Bad Data Visualizations
Creating the Informative Speech
02086 Writing Inspirations Aalto University
Taking the TEAM Approach: Writing with a Purpose
Rubrics, Rubrics, & More Rubrics
Turn and Talk: * Share 1 thing that you have found to be easier than you thought with edTPA & how it.
EFFECTIVE LESSON PLANNING Teacher Academy
Peer Review Workshop ENG 113: Composition I.
Lesson 7: How Documentation Can Extend the Learning
PERFORMING ARTS DANCE.
02086 Writing Inspirations Aalto University
Chapter 4 • Expectations Generate Clear Expectations
Questions and Questioning Strategies
Preparing to Teach and Overview of Teaching Assignments
Formative assessment through class discussion
High Expectations for a School Community
Week 3 – day 1 Tuesday, January 30, 2018
Sequencing Writing Assignments
Peer Review.
Seminar Four Quality Academic feedback: oral and written
Sequencing Writing Assignments
Connecticut Core Standards for Mathematics
Handout: Sign-in Sheet
Foundation of Socratic Seminars
Delivering Feedback Effectively
The Call for Action: Coaching and Supporting Mathematics Instruction
THRILLER PROJECT!! Week 1: Week 2: Recap ideas from week 1. Week 1:
Connecticut Core Standards for Mathematics
PERFORMING ARTS DANCE.
Six Trait Writing Voice!
Workshop 4 – 1 hour.
Workshop hours.
Blogging in the Classroom
PERFORMING ARTS DANCE.
L16: Big Idea 5-Team, Transform, Transmit-Performance Assessment Task-The Presentation & Oral Defense.
L13:Formative Assessment and Feedback-The Proposal Form
COMMUNICATION SKILLS for Officials
Communicating in Oral Presentations
Marzano Art and Science Teaching Framework Learning Map
PERFORMING ARTS DANCE.
What do we know (page 1)? Define the word "Taxonomy." (Knowledge)
Executive Directors do it all… How can WE do it even better?
©Joan Sedita, Kinds of PD Follow Up ©Joan Sedita,
Teacher Aide Interaction that Supports Student Learning
YEAR 7 DANCE.
Interpersonal/Social Skills
Preparing to Teach and Overview of Teaching Assignments
Opening * State the Objective(s)/Standard (s)-
Lesson 35: Culminating writing task: revising your essay
L16: Big Idea 5-Team, Transform, Transmit-Performance Assessment Task-The Presentation & Oral Defense.
Lesson 17: Focus 1. Think about the best and worst presentations you have ever seen. What made them memorably good and/or bad? Be prepared to share your.
Introduction to myIMPACT-Adjuncts
THE TECHNICAL WRITING PROCESS
The resources for this candidate support has been created and provided by CERRA utilizing materials from the National Board of Professional Teaching Standards.
Presentation transcript:

L17: Big Idea 5-Team, Transform, Transmit-Practice and Peer-Review Makes Permanent

Lesson 17: Learning Goals Learning Objective 5.4A: Engaging in peer review to provide constructive responses to one another’s work, appropriate to the stage of a project’s development. Learning Objective 5.4B: Engaging in peer review to receive and consider responses to their work.

Lesson 17: Focus 1. Think about the best and worst presentations you have ever seen. What made them memorably good and/or bad? Be prepared to share your responses. 2. After watching the video, “Worst Presentation Ever,” have a short discussion with your group about the extent to which you anticipate making some of the same presentation errors you saw in the video. Which errors do you think will be the most prevalent? If you fail to plan (and practice), you plan to fail.

▶ Point out that most presentations fail before they are presented due to poor planning, preparation, and lack of practice. These presentations also show how easy it is to lose or alienate your audience if they cannot connect with what you are saying. Facilitate a brief conversation about participant responses to the second question. L17: Teach

Example Strategies for Reviewing Presentation Skills TedTalks on Mute Using a feedback table Small group practice

Avoiding Good Information Presented Poorly Did presenters in your previous Thinking Ahead assignment make any of the following errors? Disqualifying yourself by understating your credentials Never making eye contact Not checking equipment set-up beforehand “Kind of” knowing your content Alienating your audience by communicating “at” them, not “with” them Rambling on or going too far off-topic with no reason Taking on too large a topic for a short presentation Contradicting themselves Being unprepared for the questions after the presentation

Stop and Think What weaknesses were common in some of the presentations you viewed last night (according to the Presentation and Oral Defense rubric)? How much practice and what type of feedback could have improved these presentations? Reflect on the times you have practiced your presentation skills in your class, up to this point. Reflect on the times you have already engaged in peer review in your class, up to this point. What additional strategies could you employ to strengthen your skills required for the Presentation and Oral Defense?

Best Way to a Well-Prepared Presentation Plan and organize throughout the year (the information you have) Practice throughout the year (the parts of the inquiry process that you have completed) Peer-Review others (best way to increase the critique of your own work is to critique others and have them critique you (constructive criticism and actionable feedback)

L17: Practice I

Peer- Review Personalities https://www.dropbox.com/s/zo5t22wvfl919uf/L27_Practice_Peer%20Review%20Pers.mp4?dl=0 1. Watch the video and complete the Peer-Review Personalities table in your workbook. 2. Discuss with your group which peer-review personalities you anticipate will be most common in your classroom. Determine what traits would constitute the “right” peer-review personality. 3. Work with your group to create a peer-review acronym or graphic to quickly convey appropriate and effective guidelines or tips for you and your peers to use the right peer-review personality traits in your classroom. Share your acronym or graphic when prompted.

Peer-Review Personalities Do you recognize any of the “personalities” in your class when attempting a formal peer-review process? Peer-Review Personalities Major Issue Identified Here Possible Suggestions to Remedy this Issue Picky Patty  trivial comments are not useful Do not correct spelling/grammar on read through. Read for main ideas, strengths, weaknesses. Whatever William  ownership and acceptance of help Ensure that students know why the process is worth their time. Peers are a great example of the audience you are writing for. Social Sammy/Off-Task Oliver  focused and serious work Be present with your partner: the task at hand is the most important thing right now. Set aside specific time and space. Jean the Generalizer  precise and honest commentary Comments should focus on the rubric and/or specific examples demonstrating the issue. Provide time to review the rubric. Mean Margaret/Defensive Dave  negative criticism vs. constructive critique Treat peer-review as a professional relationship, bettering both participants’ understanding of the rubric.