Which mutations matter in myelofibrosis?

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Tiziano Barbui MD Ospedale Papa Giovanni XXIII Bergamo, Italy
Advertisements

An overview of the differences of different JAK inhibitors
Why do we need new drugs in PV and ET?
Perspectives on defining ruxolitinib resistance/suboptimal response and therapeutic decision-making in this setting Claire Harrison, MD.
Srdan (Serge) Verstovsek M.D., Ph.D. Professor of Medicine Department of Leukemia University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston, Texas, USA Therapy.
GENETICS & biology OF MYELOPROLIFERATIVE NEOPLASMS
Results of a Randomized Study of the JAK Inhibitor Ruxolitinib (INC424) versus Best Available Therapy (BAT) in Primary Myelofibrosis (PMF), Post- Polycythemia.
Benefits of JAK2 Inhibitor Therapy: Why Do They Work in Patients With and Without JAK2 Mutation Alessandro M. Vannucchi Section of Hematology, University.
Prognostication in MF: From CBC to cytogenetics to molecular markers
Results of a Phase II Study of Pacritinib (SB1518), a Novel Oral JAK2 Inhibitor, in Patients with Primary, Post-Polycythemia Vera, and Post- Essential.
Genetic changes in MDS.
Risk Stratification of Patients with Myelofibrosis and the Role of Transplant Alessandro M. Vannucchi Section of Hematology, University of Florence, Italy.
ET vs. Prefibrotic myelofibrosis: Why does it matter
Good morning… My presentation is about Calreticulin and PMF
Changes in Quality of Life and Disease- Related Symptoms in Patients with Polycythemia Vera Receiving Ruxolitinib or Best Available Therapy: RESPONSE Trial.
Second Interim Analysis of a Phase 3 Study of Idelalisib Plus Rituximab (R) for Relapsed Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL): Efficacy Analysis in Patient.
JAK2 or CALR mutation status defines subtypes of essential thrombocythemia with substantially different clinical course and outcomes by Elisa Rumi, Daniela.
ASH UPDATE 2014 Las Vegas, Nevada
Role of JAK inhibitors and JAK2 V617F mutation monitoring in timing and conduct of transplant in MF Radovan Vrhovac, MD, PhD University Hospital Centre.
  PROGNOSTIC SIGNIFICANCE OF GENE MUTATIONS IN MDS DEPENDS ON THE LOCI OF GENE VARIANCES PROGNOSTIC SIGNIFICANCE OF GENE MUTATIONS IN MDS DEPENDS ON THE.
CCO Independent Conference Highlights
New Findings in Hematology: Independent Conference Coverage
CCO Independent Conference Highlights
New Findings in Hematology: Independent Conference Coverage
5-Azacytidine (AZA) in Combination with Ruxolitinib (RUX) as Therapy for Patients (pts) with Myelodysplastic/Myeloproliferative Neoplasms (MDS/MPNs)1  
Verstovsek S et al. Proc ASH 2011;Abstract 793.
Harrison CN et al. Proc ASH 2015;Abstract 59.
Ruxolitinib + Azacitidine in Newly Diagnosed or R/R, Intermediate- or High-Risk Myelofibrosis New Findings in Hematology: Independent Conference Coverage.
Combination Ruxolitinib + Sonidegib in Myelofibrosis
PERSIST-1: Pacritinib Improved Spleen Volume Reductions in Myelofibrosis vs Best Available Therapy CCO Independent Conference Highlights of the 2015 ASCO.
New Findings in Hematology: Independent Conference Coverage
CALR mutations in patients with essential thrombocythemia diagnosed in childhood and adolescence by Fiorina Giona, Luciana Teofili, Sara Capodimonti, Marica.
How Many Inhibitors for JAK2?
BRAF mutant mCRC patients – What would you recommend? FOLFIRINOX/Bev
Program Goals Case 1: Woman With MDS Risk: Cytogenetic Subgroups.
Chronic Myeloproliferative Neoplasms (MPN) Ph-negative
Biology of MDS/MPN overlap syndromes (except CMML)
Kantarjian H et al. Cancer 2009;[Epub ahead of print].
Three-year efficacy, safety, and survival findings from COMFORT-II, a phase 3 study comparing ruxolitinib with best available therapy for myelofibrosis.
Prognostic factors for thrombosis and survival in PV, revisited
Giovanni Barosi Center for the Study of Myelofibrosis.
Fenaux P et al. Lancet Oncol 2009;10(3):
Whom should you refer for allogeneic stem cell transplantation?
WT G>A G>C G>T (n = 93) (n = 21) (n = 10) (n = 51)
European Focus on MPN and MDS 2014
Long-term outcome of higher-risk MDS patients treated with azacitidine: an update of the GFM compassionate program cohort by Raphael Itzykson, Sylvain.
Whom should you refer for allogeneic transplantation?
Detection of CALR and MPL Mutations in Low Allelic Burden JAK2 V617F Essential Thrombocythemia  Fabrice Usseglio, Nathalie Beaufils, Anne Calleja, Sophie.
The genetic basis of myelodysplasia and its clinical relevance
Treatment With JAK Inhibitors in Myelofibrosis Patients Nullifies the Prognostic Impact of Unfavorable Cytogenetics  Vincent T. Ma, Philip S. Boonstra,
Integrated mutational and cytogenetic analysis identifies new prognostic subgroups in chronic lymphocytic leukemia by Davide Rossi, Silvia Rasi, Valeria.
TET2 mutations predict response to hypomethylating agents in myelodysplastic syndrome patients by Rafael Bejar, Allegra Lord, Kristen Stevenson, Michal.
Future Directions in Myelofibrosis: Implications of Emerging Approaches.
If platelets are not a prognostic factor
Addressing Unmet Needs in Myelofibrosis
JAK2 INHIBITORS AND ALLOGRAFTING
1 Verstovsek S et al. Proc ASH 2012;Abstract Cervantes F et al.
Tips on using ruxolitinib
1Kantarjian HM et al. Lancet Oncol 2011;12:
A 4-lncRNA scoring system for prognostication of adult myelodysplastic syndromes by Chi-Yuan Yao, Ching-Hsuan Chen, Huai-Hsuan Huang, Hsin-An Hou, Chien-Chin.
by Ayalew Tefferi, Terra L. Lasho, Paola Guglielmelli, Christy M
Ayalew Tefferi, MD, Terra L. Lasho, MT, Thitina Jimma, MD, Christy M
The mutational landscape of accelerated- and blast-phase myeloproliferative neoplasms impacts patient outcomes by Caroline J. McNamara, Tony Panzarella,
Baseline Clinical Characteristics of All Patients and Patients Grouped by Statin Therapy - Part I H. Fukuta et al. Circulation 2005;112:
Kantarjian HM et al. Blood 2008;112:Abstract 635.
Survival based on V gene mutation status and CD38 expression among B-CLL patients who stratify to the Rai intermediate risk category. Survival based on.
by Elisa Rumi, and Mario Cazzola
JAK2 or CALR mutation status defines subtypes of essential thrombocythemia with substantially different clinical course and outcomes by Elisa Rumi, Daniela.
Ruxolitinib for Myelofibrosis–An Update of Its Clinical Effects
Current Treatment Landscape in MF
Presentation transcript:

Which mutations matter in myelofibrosis? Alessandro M. Vannucchi Laboratorio Congiunto MMPC Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine University of Florence, Italy

PMF-associated Mutations: Current Status JAK2 V617F MPL W515 Unmutated CALR Klampfl T et al. NEJM 2013; 369:2379-90; Nangalia J et al. NEJM 2013;369:2391-405.

JAK2 V617F Mutation and Prognosis in PMF Overall Survival Blast Transformation P=0.198 WT V617F WT V617F P=0.839 HR: 1.05 (95% CI, 0.7-1.7) A JAK2 V617F mutated genotype did not impact significantly on prognosis compared with JAK2 wild type (but might be different if we consider CALR mutated and triple-negative patients separate) N=483 Vannucchi AM et al, Leukemia 2013;27:1861-9

JAK2 V617F Allele Burden and Blast Transformation IPSS prognostic score 4.33 (1.5-12.6) 0.007 JAK2 V617F wt or Homo vs. Hetero 2.43 (1.44-4) 0.02 Barosi G. et al. PlosOne 2013; 3:e59791

Prognostic Impact of CALR Mutations in PMF Median 8.2 years P<0.0001 MPL mut Median 4.3 years Triple negative Median 2.5 years JAK2 mut Median 4.3 years CALR mutated patients have better prognosis than other mutation categories Klampfl T et al. NEJM 2013;369:2379-90; Tefferi A et al. Leukemia. 2014 Feb 5, online.

CALR mutations :Type 1 & Type 2 Klampfl T et al. NEJM 2013; 369:2379-90; Tefferi A et al., Leukemia 2014; Feb 26 Epub

CALR Type 1 vs Type 2 Mutations in PMF Type 1 CALR mut Median 10.3 years Median 3.1 years JAK2 V617F mut Median 4.0 years P<0.0001 Tefferi A et al., Leukemia 2014; Feb 26 Epub

Mutation Landscape* in PMF 79.1% had at least one mutation 154 pts (32.5%) had > 2 mutations 31 pts (6.4%) had > 3 mutations * Partial view Vannucchi AM et al, Leukemia 2013;27(9):1861-9

High Molecular Risk Prognostic Category harboring >1 mutation in any one of ASXL1, EZH2, SRSF2, IDH1/2 Overall Survival Blast Transformation A HMR status is associated with reduced OS and increased risk of blast transformation in PMF patients independent of IPSS/DIPPS-plus Vannucchi AM et al, Leukemia 2013;27:1861-9

HMR: How many patients would be reclassified? IPSS Risk Categories ASXL1 N. (%) EZH2 SRSF2 N.(%) IDHs N (%) Of HMR patients LOW 24/162 (14.8%) 6/165 (3.6%) 7/151 (4.6%) 2/157 (1.3%) 35/166 (21.1%) INT- 1 28/142 (19.7%) 6/143 (4.2%) 6/136 (4.4%) 6/142 34 /146 (23.4%) INT- 2 23/100 (23.0%) 4/99 (4.0%) 9/97 (9.3%) 2/96 (2.1%) 31 /104 (29.8%) HIGH 27/65 (41.5%) 8/66 (12.1%) 16/63 (25.4%) 1/60 (1.7%) 39/68 (57.3%)

Patients Distribution by Number of HMR Mutated Genes (no mut, 1 mut, > 2mut) LMR LMR Test Cohort N= 537 Validation Cohort N= 292 Refers to mutations in any one of ASXL1, EZH2, SRSF2, IDH1 & 2 Guglielmelli P, et al. Leukemia 2014, Febr 19 Epub

Overall Survival by Number of Mutated Genes P < 0.0001 No HMR mutation Median 12.2 years N=370 N=127 1 mutation Median 7.0 years HR 1.8 (1.3-2.5) N=40 >2 mutations Median 2.6 years HR 3.8 (2.6-5.7) In a Cox multivariable analysis adjusted for IPSS, the HR for OS for 2 or more mutations was 2.4 (95% CI=1.6-3.6) Guglielmelli P, et al. Leukemia 2014, Febr 19 Epub

The Impact of the Number of HMR Mutated Genes on Survival of IPSS-Stratified Patients LOW + INT-1 INT-2 + HIGH No mutation Median 20.2 years No mutation Median 5.7 years 1 mutation Median 4.4 years HR 1.4 (0.9-2.1) >2 mutations Median 2.2 years HR 2.2 (1.3-4.0) >2 mutations Median 3.2 years HR 4.0 (2.3-7.1) 1 mutation Median 11.3 years HR 1.4 (0.9-2.4) Guglielmelli P, et al. Leukemia 2014, Febr 19 Epub

Leukemia Free Survival by Number of HMR Mutated Genes P < 0.0001 No mutation Median 26.7 years 1 mutation Median 11.1years HR 2.6 (1.6-4.1) >2 mutations Median 6.6years HR 6.2 (3.5-10.7) N=370 N=127 N=40 The negative impact of harboring >2 mutated genes on the time to progression to blast transformation was maintained in the lower (HR 1.8; 95% CI 0.8-4.4; P=0.061) and higher (HR 2.5; 95% CI 1.1-5.8, P=0.02) IPSS risk categories. Guglielmelli P, et al. Leukemia 2014

Prognostic Relevance of the Number of Mutated Genes Lundberg P et al. Blood 2013; Jan 29

CALR and ASXL1 Mutations-Based Prognostic Risk Stratification Mayo Clinic, n=277 Florence, n=293 Overall survival Tefferi A et al, Leukemia 2014, Feb 5,online.

CALR and ASXL1 Mutations-Based Risk Stratification According to IPPS Categories IPSS LOW + INT1 IPSS INT2 + HIGH CALR- ASXL1+ Median 6.03 years HR 18.7 (2.3-153.9) Median 3.1 years HR 3.9 (1.1-13.4) CALR- ASXL1- CALR+ ASXL1+ Median n.r. HR 5.4 (0.7-40.4) Median 3.7 years HR 3.0 (0.9-9.8) CALR+ ASXL1- P<0.001 P=0.07 CALR/ASXL1 mutations-based prognostic model was DIPSS-plus independent (p<0.0001) Tefferi A et al, Leukemia 2014, Feb 5,online.

Patients’ Mutation Profile in COMFORT-II Trial 150 pts (90.4%) presented with at least one mutation There was no difference in the frequency of individual mutations between ruxolitinib and BAT arms Overall, 46 patients in the ruxo arm (38.3%) and 20 patients (43.5%) in the BAT arm were classified as "high molecular risk" (HMR) Mutations in % JAK2 75.5 ASXL1 32.5 TET2 10.7 MPL 7.7 EZH2 7.2 CBL 4.4 SRSF2 3.0 KRAS 1.4 SH2B3 1.3 IDH1 0.7 SOCS1 SOCS2 IDH2 41.8 39.3 6.0 3 9.6 1 2 3 >4 0 No. mutations BAT, best available therapy Guglielmelli P, et al. Blood 2014

HMR LMR Spleen volume reduction of >35% from baseline 48 weeks 24 weeks Mean spleen volume % change from baseline -23.5 -30.6 -29.0 -29.9 Proportion of patients (%) Spleen Response by Molecular Status in Patients Receiving Ruxolitinib in COMFORT-II HMR status did not impact on symptomatic improvement HMR status did not increase the risk of developing anemia or thrombocytopenia under ruxolitinib treatment Guglielmelli P, et al. Blood 2014, Jan 23

Symptomatic Improvement by Molecular Status in Patients Receiving Ruxolitinib in COMFORT-II HMR LMR Proportion of patients (%) 48 weeks 24 weeks None of the individual mutations with a frequency >2% correlated with symptomatic improvement Guglielmelli P, et al. Blood 2014, Jan 23

Hematologic Toxicity by Molecular Status in Patients Receiving Ruxolitinib in COMFORT-II HMR LMR Proportion of patients (%) Anemia Thrombocythopenia Mutations of genes of the JAK/STAT signalling pathway (JAK2, MPL, SH3B2, CBL, SOCSs) did not correlate with development of anemia or thrombocytopenia at 48 wk of treatment Guglielmelli P, et al. Blood 2014, Jan 23

Survival Estimates in Patients Stratified by Treatment and Molecular Score Ruxolitinib arm§ BAT arm§ HMR LMR 0.79 0.85 0.58 0.71 In multivariate analysis of overall survival by treatment and molecular risk, the HR for treatment (ruxolitinib vs BAT) was 0.57 (95%CI= 0.30-1.08) and for LMR vs HMR the HR was 0.62 (95%CI=0.33-1.16) §Median follow up= 151 weeks; Kaplan Meier estimates at 144 weeks Guglielmelli P, et al. Blood 2014, Jan 23

Therapeutic Efficacy of JAK2 Inhibitor Fedratinib in CALR Mutated PMF Patients Passamonti F et al, NEJM 2014; 370:1168-9

Which Mutations Matter in Myelofibrosis (take home message) A mutated CALR status delineates a better outcome in PMF patients compared with JAK2/MPL mutated and “triple negative” A IPSS/DIPSS-plus independent “High-Molecular Risk” (HMR) condition is defined by the presence of any one mutated gene among EZH2, ASXL1, SRSF2 and IDH1/2 ASXL1 and CALR contribute to refine prognostic stratification The number of (HMR-) mutated genes is an additional determinant of survival Clinical response to JAK2 inhibitors is independent of HMR category (ruxolitinib) and CALR mutations (fedratinib)

Which Mutations Matter in Myelofibrosis (work to do for the future) How to integrate all these information in an unified molecular/clinical scoring system

Acknowledgments Nick Cross, Amy Jones Salisbury & Southampton, UK Tony Green, Jyoti Nangalia Cambridge, UK Robert Kralovics, Thorsten Klampfl CERMM, Wien, Austria Ayalew Tefferi, Animesh Pardanani Mayo Clinic, Rochester, US William Vainchenker, Jean Luc Villeval Inst G. Roussy, Paris, France Niccolò Bartalucci Costanza Bogani Laura Calabresi Tiziana Fanelli Rajmonda Fjerza Ilaria M. Farina Paola Guglielmelli Carmela Mannarelli Serena Martinelli Lucia Merli Annalisa Pacilli Alessandro Pancrazzi Chiara Paoli Lisa Pieri Giada Rotunno Gianni Barosi Mario Cazzola Rossella Manfredini Alessandro Rambaldi, Tiziano Barbui Daniela Cilloni Elisabetta Dejana