ALPINE RIVER GIG Update: Macroinvertebrates Phytobenthos.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
River Fish Intercalibration group Coordination: D. Pont,Cemagref, France) N. Jepsen (JRC Ispra)
Advertisements

Anne Lyche Solheim (NIVA/JRC) – team leader for ETC Water Joint NRC Freshwater and SoE drafting group meeting EEA Copenhagen – 3 rd October 2007 SoE Guidance.
ECOSTAT meeting – Ispra (IT), July of 14 CBriv GIG Macrophyte Intercalibration.
DRAFT Intercalibration of methods to evaluate river EQ using fish Niels Jepsen, JRC & Didier Pont, Cemagref.
Biological methods to detect the effects of hydrological and morphological pressures Introduction and overview of questionnaire responses.
Seite Foto Pulkau Foto Gebirgsbach General chemical and physico- chemical elements – Type-specific assessment of rivers in Austria Karin Deutsch.
Presented by Sandra Poikane EC Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability Biological indicators of lakes and rivers and the Intercalibration.
1 Intercalibration in the Eastern Continental Region 1 Dr. Ursula Schmedtje International Commission for the Protection of the Danube River.
Böhmer, J. Birk, S., Schöll, F. Intercalibration of large river assessment methods.
ECOSTAT 8-9 October 2007 River GIGs: Future intercalibration needs/plans Presented by Wouter van de Bund Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment.
Framework for the intercalibration process  Must be simple  Aiming to identify and resolve big inconsistencies with the normative definitions and big.
River Intercalibration Phase 2: Milestone 4 reports Presented by Wouter van de Bund Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability.
Intercalibration CB GIG River Macroinvertebrates Final Report ECOSTAT June 2011 Isabel Pardo Roger Owen.
Intercalibration Option 3 results: what is acceptable and what is not ? Sandra Poikane Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability.
ECOSTAT 8-9 October 2007 Comparability of the results of the intercalibration exercise – MS sharing the same method Presented by Wouter van de Bund Joint.
River Intercalibration Phase 2: Milestone 2 reports Presented by Wouter van de Bund Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability.
Meeting of the Working Group 2A on Ecological Status (ECOSTAT) – 3+4 July 2006, Stresa (IT) Eastern Continental GIG Draft final report on the results of.
River Intercalibration Phase 2: Milestone 3 reports Presented by Wouter van de Bund Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability.
Northern GIG Intercalibration of lake macrophytes Seppo Hellsten, Nigel Willby, Geoff Phillips, Frauke Ecke, Marit Mjelde, Deirdre Tierney.
Marcel van den Berg / Centre for Water Management The Netherlands
Intercalibration results 2006/2007
Intercalibration Results 2006
Results of the Intercalibration in the ALPINE RIVER GIG
Intercalibration progress: Central - Baltic GIG Rivers
WG 2A Ecological Status First results of the metadata collection for the draft intercalibration register: RIVERS.
Results of the metadata analysis Meeting of the Working Group 2A on Ecological Status (ECOSTAT) March 4-5 , 2004, Ispra, Italy Peeter Nõges Anna-Stiina.
Working Group A ECOSTAT River GIG results Wouter van de Bund Vaida Olsauskyte Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability.
Anne Lyche Solheim, NIVA EEA European Topic Centre on Water
Working Group A ECOSTAT October 2006 Summary/Conclusions
ECOSTAT WG 2A, JRC - Ispra (I), 7-8 July 2004
Alan Hildrew Martin Pusch Klement Tockner
Central Rivers Geographical Intercalibration Group
Mediterranean GIG River BQEs Intercalibration Exercise
RIVER GIG reports to ECOSTAT Central Baltic Rivers GIG
Summary of the activities of the Central/Baltic River GIG
Working Group 2A ECOSTAT Summary progress report River GIGs Wouter van de Bund Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability Inland.
SoE Guidance – Biological reporting sheets
Central-Baltic Rivers GIG progress
Working Group 2A ECOSTAT Intercalibration process - state of play Wouter van de Bund & Anna-Stiina Heiskanen Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment.
Alpine GIG - Rivers Gisela Ofenböck
Working Group A Ecological Status - ECOSTAT WFD CIS Strategic Coordination Group meeting, October 2005 Progress in the intercalibration exercise.
Alpine GIG Rivers Progress Report Gisela Ofenböck
Intercalibration : a “WFD compliant” boundary comparing procedure
Lake Intercalibration
Working Group A ECOSTAT Summary Milestone Reports: River GIGs Wouter van de Bund Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability.
Ecostat meeting - Ispra March 2006
CBriv GIG Macrophyte Intercalibration Status Overview
Working Group A Ecological Status - ECOSTAT State of play in the intercalibration exercise Water Directors Meeting, November 2005.
River Fish Intercalibration group ( )
EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE GENERAL JRC JOINT RESEARCH CENTRE
Intercalibration Decision and Technical Report
WFD – CIS Working group A ECOSTAT
ECOSTAT, JRC April 2007 MEDiterranean RIVers GIG Report
Working Group 2A ECOSTAT progress report Presented by Wouter van de Bund Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability.
Rivers X-GIG phytobenthos intercalibration
FITTING THE ITALIAN METHOD FOR EVALUATING LAKE ECOLOGICAL QUALITY FROM BENTHIC DIATOMS (EPI-L) IN THE “PHYTOBENTHOS CROSS-GIG” INTERCALIBRATION EXERCISE.
Lake Intercalibration – IC Decision Annexes + what to do in future
River Fish Intercalibration group D. Pont,Cemagref, France)
Lake Intercalibration
First issue: same classification system - different boundaries (1)
Angel Borja Coordinator of the Group
2nd phase intercalibration
Intercalibration round 2: finalisation and open technical issues – RIVERS ECOSTAT October 2012.
Ecostat Meeting, March 15/
Fish intercalibration – rivers Progress and expected outcome
Summary overview of methods used to define GEP in practice by countries represented in the ad-hoc group Dr. Ursula Schmedtje.
WG A Ecological Status Intercalibration: Where do we go from here ?
Working Group on Reference Conditions
Relationships for Broad & Intercalibration Types Geoff Phillips
Why are we reviewing reference conditions in intercalibration?
Presentation transcript:

ALPINE RIVER GIG Update: Macroinvertebrates Phytobenthos

Introduction: Common Intercalibration Type: Alpine Rivers From: ECOSTAT WG 2.A, 2004: Overview of common Intercalibration types

Macroinvertebrates Italy has revised the national assessment method (ICMi) Reference criteria Calculations ICMi alpine Data set is missing Accepted by GIG

Results 0,96 0,67

Results 0,97 0,67

Phytobenthos First (preliminary) results Final check of calculations and data sets Calculation of the ICM – metrics: Similar to the Central Baltic GIG: IPS: EQR_IPS = Observed value / reference value TI: EQR_TI = (4-observed value) / (4-reference value ) Calculation of the final ICM: Arithmetic mean of IPS and TI (Minimum of IPS and TI was also tested)

MS National metric Austria Multimetric method: trophic status module (based on TI: Rott et al. 1999) saprobic status module (based on SI: Rott et al. 1997) reference species module (portion of defined reference and bioregion-specific species in total abundance and species number) worst-case-approach France IBD (national routine index: AFNOR, 2000) IPS (one of the reference indices: Lenoir & Coste, 1996) Germany Diatom Module Non Diatom Module Macrophyte Module Ecological status: average of the three module scores Italy Slovenia Saprobic index (Zelinka & Marvan 1961) Trophic index (Rott et al. 1997) worst case approach Spain three indexes: IPS (Coste in Cemagref 1982) IBD (Prygiel & Coste 2000) CEE (Descy & Coste 1990, 1991) (IPS seems to be the most adequate index for the Alpine GIG)

Regression between national methods and ICM: RA1

Regression between national methods and ICM: RA2

Data from Regressions: number of sites reference sites R² lowest EQR value Type R-A1 Austria 157 18 0,96 0,39 France 117 66 0,56 0,43 Germany 46 9 0,90 0,20 Italy - Slovenia 11 4 0,68 0,60 Type R-A2 111 17 0,92 0,27 52 26 0,82 Spain 40 6 0,81 0,66

National boundary ICMi Boundary values:   National boundary National boundary ICMi MS H/G G/M value +/-95% CL Type R-A1 Austria 0,87 0,56 0,92 0,003 0,72 0,006 France 0,86 0,71 0,020 0,76 0,031 Germany 0,73 0,54 0,011 0,78 0,018 Italy - Slovenia 0,80 0,60 0,95 0,054 0,75 0,106 Type R-A2 0,008 0,012 0,84 0,024 0,69 0,034 Spain 0,94 0,74 0,89 0,023 0,67 0,051

Boundary values at the ICM-scale (+/- 95% CL) The Band represents the average boundary values +/- 0.05

Boundary values at the ICM-scale (+/- 95% CL) The Band represents the average boundary values +/- 0.05

Thank you for your attention!