SPEAR Summer/Fall Downtime Alignment Schedule

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Roofs and Ceilings Revit® Architecture C H A P T E R OBJECTIVES Learn how to place a Roof by Footprint. Learn how to make a wall meet a roof. Learn.
Advertisements

Vector Operations Chapter 3 section 2 A + B = ? B A.
The Preassembling Installation Survey & Alignment Accelerator Center of IHEP Qu Huamin 2006 / 4 / 27.
STAIRS AND STAIR FRAMING
Machine / TA Inspections Rick Weight Cashman Mining Field Service Supervisor Brett Avery Cashman Field Service Technician.
The Comparison of API T3 and Leica AT401 in the Test and Survey CAI.Guozhu MAN. Kaidi Institute of Modern Physcis,CAS The 13 th international Workshops.
SpatialAnalyzer Advanced Uncertainty Analysis
Multipole Girders - Alignment & Stability (Multipole Girder Alignment technology & R&D) S. Sharma ASD: J. Skaritka, D. Hseuh, V. Ravindranath, G. Miglionico,
LCLS LCLS-II Survey & Alignment
Alignment Strategy for Light Source Facilities LCLS Case Catherine LeCocq SLAC 03/31/08.
October 20-21, 2005 Internal LCLS Undulator Alignment and Motion Review Catherine LeCocq, SLAC 1 Undulator Alignment Concept &
GEODETIC CONTROL SURVEYS
1 Institute of High Energy Physics 13/09/2010 Comparison and Study in Measurement Accuracy of Height Difference between Laser Tracker and Level Men LingLing.
MICE Alignment and Support Structure Tony Jones and Yury Ivanyushenkov Engineering Department RAL.
NETWORK LEVELING & CONTOURING 1 A contour line is a line that passes through points having the same elevation. It is produced by intersecting imaginary.
Metrology for NCSX Steve Raftopoulos and the NCSX Metrology Team.
8-4 Angles of Elevation and Depression Objective: To use angles of elevation and depression to solve problems Essential Understanding : You can use the.
9.6 Solving Right Triangles Inverse of the trigonometric functions.
DELTA Quadrant Tuning Y. Levashov, E. Reese. 2 Tolerances for prototype quadrant tuning Magnet center deviations from a nominal center line < ± 50  m.
STAIRS AND STAIR FRAMING
Surveying I. Lecture 13. Tacheometry.
Word Problems for Right Triangle Trig. Angle of Elevation: The angle above the horizontal that an observer must look at to see an object that is higher.
GEODETIC INFRASTRUCTURE Walter Volkmann Manager of Technical Operations L. D. Bradley Land Surveyors Gainesville, Florida.
Tilt meter fiducial Guide rail Abstract This poster covers the survey and alignment techniques selected for installation of the SPIRAL2 accelerator devices.
1/12 Sylvain GRIFFET, 17/10/2011 BE/ABP-SU/ Simulations of laser tracker AT401 measurements on TM0 CLIC girders EDMS Document No
Undulator Orientation & Electron Beam Spacing Should the undulator frames be toward the central aisle or the tunnel walls? What is the optimum spacing.
BEPCII Prealignment Installation Survey and Alignment Accelerator Center of IHEP Xiaolong Wang
G.Barber KEK Test Beam Update, Berkeley 9 Feb KEK Test Beam – Tracker Progress Contents:- Station Space Frame Light Guide Map Station Connectors.
The Mission: In order to produce luminosities appropriate for Run II levels, a better understanding of the Tevatron’s orbit would be required. To do that,
Performance Test of Laser Trackers of FARO Ryuhei Sugahara, Mika Masuzawa and Yasunobu Ohsawa KEK, High Energy Accelerator Research Organization Oho, Tsukuba,
Considerations on laser-p+ beam merging for CB, BG, PM.
1Page # Machine Assembly WBS 700 By: James H. Chrzanowski January 24, 2001.
Tuesday June 14, PHYS , Summer I 2005 Dr. Andrew Brandt PHYS 1443 – Section 001 Lecture #8 Tuesday June 14, 2005 Dr. Andrew Brandt Accelerated.
Survey, Alignment and Metrology Fiducials Requirements Fabien Rey ESS Survey, Alignment and Metrology Group ACCELERATOR TECHNICAL BOARD 23/09/2015.
Survey, Alignment and Metrology Fabien Rey Pawel Garsztka ESS Survey, Alignment and Metrology Group.
Survey, Alignment and Metrology Fabien Rey Pawel Garsztka ESS Survey, Alignment and Metrology Group Interface Workshops for ESS Warm-Linac: ISrc - LEBT.
1.Placement of support base for 70 degree-dipole magnet(D) ・ Support base for 70 degree-dipole magnet(D) should be placed horizontally with a spirit level,
45° a a a a a  2 60° 30° a 2a2a a3a3 Special Triangles Rules.
Objective To use angles of elevation and depression to solve problems.
Sector 0 To improve the performance of FACET, sectors 2-6 and (a total of 900m beam-line) were realigned using the laser alignment system as their.
The NOnA Experiment Survey of the NOvA Far Detector Gary Feldman
Company LOGO Technology and Application of Laser Tracker in Large Space Measurement Yang Fan, Li Guangyun, Fan Baixing IWAA2014 in Beijing, China Zhengzhou.
KEKBSuper KEKB LERHERLERHER GAIN Energy (GeV) Half crossing angle (mrad) Holizontal emittance (nm) Vertical  -function.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES 12th International Workshop on Accelerator Alignment September 10-14, 2012 Fermilab, Batavia, Illinois, U.S.A NSLS-II Girder.
Using Tangent The angle formed by a horizontal line and a line of sight to an object above the horizontal line. You can use the angle of elevation as.
1 Research on laser tracker measurement accuracy and data processing Liang Jing IHEP,CHINA
This material is based upon work supported by the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science under Cooperative Agreement DE-SC Michigan State.
November 12-13, 2007 Super-B Factory: Accelerator Costing, PEP-II Hardware and Schedule J. Seeman SLAC International Review Committee meeting November.
TcpTunnel.
Lecture IV Curvilinear Motion.
CBETA Technical Review
Workshop on Tau-Charm at High Luminosity
Perspective Drawing Techniques
Sponge - A golf ball rebounds from the floor and travels straight upward with an initial speed of 5.0 m/s. To what maximum height does the ball rise?
IWAA2014, 13th – 17th October 2014, IHEP, Beijing
Alignment Results of Magnets in the ATF2 Beam Line
The SPEAR3 Upgrade Project at SLAC
The SPEAR3 Upgrade Project at SLAC
Potential Use of PEP-II Magnets by Project X
The Storage Ring Control Network of NSLS-II
Overview of Alignment Engineering Group Downtime Activities
The height of the building
Rules of Projectile Motion
Preview Section 1 Introduction to Vectors Section 2 Vector Operations
Leveling.
How does a cannonball fly?
Surveying With Construction Applications, 7th Edition
Projectile Motion.
Horizontal Projectile Launch
Adjustment of the 3 reference tables at building 180 AT960 measurement
Presentation transcript:

SPEAR3 2004 Summer/Fall Downtime Alignment Schedule Recap of 2003 results Discussion Items: Mapping Options Sensitive Area Identification Scheduled Period: September 7-21, 2004 2 crews per day 08-31-2004 Alignment Engineering Group

Laser Tracker Mapping Options as presented on 11/04/2003 Monuments + Magnets + Vacuum Chambers 75 tracker set ups Monuments + Magnets 40 tracker set ups Monuments only 30 tracker set ups 08-31-2004 Alignment Engineering Group

Final Mapping Instrument Position Study as presented on 11/04/2003 Magnets Only - like SPEAR2 Vacuum Chambers and Magnets 08-31-2004 Alignment Engineering Group

Alignment Engineering Group 2003 Monument Mapping Network Description 217 Field Work Man Hour: 163 MH leveling, 64 MH laser tracker 40 laser tracker stations 368 points: 167 monuments 122 ring monuments: 38 floor 33 aisle (2 modified) 50 wall (7 were extended to allow leveling shot, 1 modified) 1 ceiling 45 others: 42 SSRL points for level observation only 3 miscellaneous 201 magnet TBs (missed SC01SF13) 636 triplet observations in 2 days (November 13&14, 2003): Distances: 40 µm Horizontal angles: 40 µm / D Vertical angles: 50 µm / D 303 height differences: 60 µm 08-31-2004 Alignment Engineering Group

Alignment Engineering Group 2003 Magnet Placement TC2002 local set-ups with the following details: Resection is based on a minimum of 5 points from which at least 2 are floor. Check with each “mapped” tooling ball. Goals: 5 mil in X and Y direction 15 mil along beamline Field Work ManPower: 6 days: November 17-22, 2003 360 MH 08-31-2004 Alignment Engineering Group

Example of Magnet Results SC04QF11 6036.58951 3015.42930 576.20259 SC04QF12 6036.75753 3015.15708 576.20271 SC04QF13 6036.10347 3015.12877 576.20281 SC04QF14 6036.27275 3014.85514 576.20270 SC04QF1M (Z,X,Y) 6036.430843 3015.142623 575.791222 (Tz,Tx,Ty) 0.000093 0.000003 0.000002 (Rz,Rx,Ry) -0.015955 0.007223 -0.000608 Vz Vx Vy 1 0.000072 0.000084 -0.000053 2 0.000015 0.000016 0.000053 3 -0.000035 -0.000011 0.000052 4 -0.000052 -0.000089 -0.000052 08-31-2004 Alignment Engineering Group

2003 Vacuum Chamber Placement Rough elevation set during the TC2002 set-ups for magnet placement. Special laser tracker local set-ups using an arcing technique with a 20” long extension arm for final set. Goals: 15 mil in X direction 10 mil in Y direction 30 mil along beamline when possible Field Work ManPower: 2 days: November 21 &22, 2003 40 MH 08-31-2004 Alignment Engineering Group

Example of Vacuum Chambers Results 08-31-2004 Alignment Engineering Group

Alignment Engineering Group http://www-group.slac.stanford.edu/met/Align/Spear3/Spear3.html 08-31-2004 Alignment Engineering Group

Alignment Engineering Group Conclusion The 2003 Final Alignment Campaign was complete: The SPEAR3 monuments were adjusted and used. All magnets and vacuum chambers were measured: the coordinates of TBs are archived. The 2004 Summer/Fall Downtime should solve the following questions: Are the SPEAR3 monuments stable? In light of the latest run, are there any ring components that could use new measurements? 08-31-2004 Alignment Engineering Group

Alignment Engineering Group Cell 1 East Straight Cell 18 08-31-2004 Alignment Engineering Group