@childatrisk #nvc #nonviolentchildhoods

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Parental Involvement in Decision-Making. 2 The importance of parental involvement Why involve parents? Degrees of involvement Strategies for engaging.
Advertisements

Workshop Purpose To provide opportunities to enable you to acquire the knowledge and skills to design and develop learning programmes to satisfy organisational.
Challenging Behaviour: a unified approach- refresh
Highly Specialised Technologies Evaluations
NOTES TO ANDERSON, CHAPTERS 3 PROFESSIONAL WRITING.
Lecture 3: Writing the Project Documentation Part I
Unpacking the ‘Parenting in Wales: Guidance on engagement and support’ 10 September 2014 Workshop 3 Gail Bennett, Flintshire Parenting Strategy Coordinator.
Introduction to the Framework: Unit 1, Key Topic 2http://facultyinitiative.wested.org/1.
What Works: for children with speech, language and communication needs? New database launched to help you find evidenced interventions appropriate for.
Scaling-up male circumcision programmes in the Eastern and Southern Africa region Country Update Meeting June 2010 Dr Sibongile Dludlu UNAIDS RST/ESA.
How to Write a Critical Review of Research Articles
Understanding Need and Risk. GIRFEC History and Background –Numerous policies relating to Multi-Agency working Principles –Co-ordinated Support for Families.
Learning Metrics Task Force Catalyzing a Shared Vision for Education and Learning.
Summary of Local Seminars & Focus Groups 20/06/ Athens WP8 – TESTING II coordinated by IFI.
Considering the range of stakeholder perspectives in the development and delivery of personalised local services Alex Mills National Services Manager KIDS.
European strategy on validation and recognition of non-formal learning within the context of YOUTH “YOUTH-PASS” Development and implementation of validation.
For children with speech, language and communication needs A library of evidenced interventions to support professional decision-making.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Methodology and Responsibilities for Periodic Safety Review for Research Reactors William Kennedy Research Reactor.
Guide to Options Comparison Revision of the SAFEGROUNDS Guidance James Penfold, Quintessa SAFESPUR, 4 October 2007.
Commission Guidance on inland waterway development in the context of the EU Birds and Habitats Directives Kerstin Sundseth, Ecosystems LTD.
International Family Mediation A global Programme International Social Service General Secretariat 4th April 2016, Melbourne.
Child Friendly Technology Framework and Disabilities Overview Presentation UNICEF - Innovation Unit.
Art.12.2: The right of children to express views in legal and administrative proceedings Dr. Susan Bissell Chief, Implementing International Standards.
A LOOK AT AMENDMENTS TO ISO/IEC (1999) Presented at NCSLI Conference Washington DC August 11, 2005 by Roxanne Robinson.
Dr Wiktor Szydarowski Freelance consultant NDPHS SWG meeting Stockholm, 10 February 2015 Progress in developing the NDPHS Strategy 2020.
Planning (primary version)
ED6016: Leading and Managing Partnerships in the Early Years
Understanding Standards: Nominee Training Event
Towards child and family oriented and preventive services
California's Early Learning and Development System Overview
Planning (secondary version)
Interreg V-A Romania-Bulgaria Programme
Mapping Study – Baltic Sea Region
Needs assessment and evaluation : service improvement and women
Outline What is Literature Review? Purpose of Literature Review
Work Package 3 Cooperation and co-ordination mechanisms in guidance policy and systems development Peter Härtel.
Roadmap to Enhanced Technical Regulations of WMO
ESCM – Chapter 1.
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
MODULE ONE Background to the GBV Guidelines
2018 UN flagship report on disability and development overview of work
Telling Your SSIP Story
Elizabeth Hoerath Manager FSL Policy and Implementation Unit
Project Plan Template (Help text appears in cursive on slides and in the notes field)
IMPROVING JSR PRACTICES AT COUNTRY LEVEL: ACHIEVEMENTS AND GAPS
The Early Childhood Technical Assistance Center
Parenting for non-violent childhoods
Integrated DRR and CCA Mainstreaming TOOL OUTLINE
The Global Initiative to End All Corporal Punishment of Children
Updates about Work Track 5 Geographic Names at the Top-Level
Introduction to the Framework: Unit 1, Getting Ready
Using outcomes data for program improvement
Building aware and supportive societies for non-violent childhoods
Multi-agency Safeguarding Adults Policy and Procedure
GENERAL INTRODUCTION TO ADVOCACY
A Focus on Outcomes and Impact
IAESB Meeting IFAC Headquarters, New York July , 2018
Family meeting including a discussion on positive memories
Standard for Teachers’ Professional Development July 2016
Briefing on EWP assignment
Strengthening the Role of EQAVET National Reference Points
Guidelines on the Mid-term Evaluation
Assistive Technology Implementation
Exercise Name player Briefing
Academic Skills Adviser
NICE has many methods and processes
Language B syllabus outline
Adaptation and Translation
SAAEA Conference: 19 – 22 May Gaborone, Botswana
Students can fail professionally if they:
Presentation transcript:

@childatrisk #nvc #nonviolentchildhoods Parenting for non-violent childhoods Expert Meeting Tallinn, 17-18 April 2018 www.childrenatrisk.eu/nonviolence @childatrisk #nvc #nonviolentchildhoods

Scope and purpose of guidance Guide and support choice and implementation of positive parenting programmes Informed by national consultations, experts, literature Rooted in experience and evidence from the Baltic Sea Region and the wider European region Aspiration to inspire also other regions Target group: Relevant Ministries, Government Agencies Final version: Easily accessible content and lay-out

Structure General introduction to the topic and Non-violent Childhoods project (similar for all guidance documents) Brief introduction to parenting in a changing world What is positive parenting and positive parenting programmes? Overview of principles to take into account when planning, developing and implementing positive programmes, with examples from the region and globally Identifying and implementing the right programme, framework of questions to select programme

Considerations that guide drafting … There is a wealth of material - avoiding overlap and repetition of already existing material Who is the target group for the report? Balancing theory and principles with practical guidance Limited number of pages - an opportunity to keep things simple and seek to inspire and gently guide readers to start to think about what works best for them rather than being too descriptive Numerous positive parenting programmes – which ones really represent the best example? From a children’s right perspective? From a child-centred perspective? In terms of generating not only change in behaviour but a change in culture? Evidence and evaluations – key issue here is to address lack of child-centred evaluations, lack of evaluations of programmes that take a children’s rights approach

Task for the expert meeting Review the draft guidance report: Content, approach, language and style Enrich with good practice examples, experience and recommendations Help identifying significant evaluations and evidence Advise on positioning with regard to sensitive / contentious questions Advise on expectations and needs of target audiences in different countries

General & Crosscutting Considerations Target Group & Added value of the report: Is the target group correct and what are the special needs in terms of guidance? How does this guidance stand in relation to other material that you are aware of? Do you see an added value in terms of its content, approach and style? What other material should we make cross-references to? Balancing theory with practical guidance: Is the balance right? Do the examples help illustrate theory and principles? Good Practice: Are the examples relevant? What examples would you like to add, e.g. from your own countries? Has there been an evaluation of their impact? Is there good practice examples on evaluations of positive parenting programmes that take into account children’s views and/or a children’s rights perspective? Key Principles: Do we capture the most important principles? Is it helpful to think about positive parenting programmes in a principles way? General & Crosscutting Considerations

Specific considerations Inclusive programmes: Do we capture key target groups? What special considerations should be made in relation to these groups? Good practice examples? (e.g. families at heightened risk of violence, fathers, mothers, migrants and asylum-seekers, children with disabilities) Working together: Do we capture key actors? What special considerations should be made in relation to these actors? Good practice examples? Selecting programmes: Which criteria guide the selection of the most appropriate parenting programmes for a country or for a specific context? What is the role of evidence in this? Does this chapter provide enough of an overview of steps that can be taken for those who want to think about selecting positive parenting programmes? Is the framework helpful? What else could helpfully be added to this?