Volume 18, Issue 3, Pages (September 2010)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 11, Issue 4, Pages (April 2007)
Advertisements

Volume 149, Issue 6, Pages (June 2012)
PML Is a Direct p53 Target that Modulates p53 Effector Functions
Volume 16, Issue 1, Pages (July 2009)
Takashi Tanaka, Michelle A. Soriano, Michael J. Grusby  Immunity 
Modulation of K-Ras-Dependent Lung Tumorigenesis by MicroRNA-21
Volume 35, Issue 3, Pages (August 2009)
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (August 2010)
Volume 43, Issue 4, Pages (August 2011)
Shobhan Gaddameedhi, Christopher P. Selby, Michael G
Volume 30, Issue 1, Pages (April 2008)
Volume 18, Issue 3, Pages (September 2010)
Short Telomeres Limit Tumor Progression In Vivo by Inducing Senescence
DNA Damage-Mediated Induction of a Chemoresistant Niche
The Circadian Gene Period2 Plays an Important Role in Tumor Suppression and DNA Damage Response In Vivo  Loning Fu, Helene Pelicano, Jinsong Liu, Peng.
Volume 11, Issue 6, Pages (December 1999)
Volume 43, Issue 4, Pages (August 2011)
Volume 149, Issue 6, Pages (June 2012)
UV-Induced RPA1 Acetylation Promotes Nucleotide Excision Repair
Balthazar B Cazac, Jürgen Roes  Immunity 
Oliver I. Fregoso, Shipra Das, Martin Akerman, Adrian R. Krainer 
Cdk2 Knockout Mice Are Viable
Volume 7, Issue 6, Pages (June 2005)
Volume 130, Issue 4, Pages (August 2007)
Volume 24, Issue 3, Pages (March 2006)
DNA Damage-Mediated Induction of a Chemoresistant Niche
The Mammalian UV Response
CD22 is a negative regulator of B-cell receptor signalling
Modeling the Therapeutic Efficacy of p53 Restoration in Tumors
JNK2 Is a Positive Regulator of the cJun Transcription Factor
Xiaolong Wei, Hai Xu, Donald Kufe  Cancer Cell 
Volume 130, Issue 5, Pages (September 2007)
Volume 19, Issue 6, Pages (June 2011)
Volume 35, Issue 3, Pages (August 2009)
Mutations in Human ARF Exon 2 Disrupt Its Nucleolar Localization and Impair Its Ability to Block Nuclear Export of MDM2 and p53  Yanping Zhang, Yue Xiong 
FOXO3a Is Activated in Response to Hypoxic Stress and Inhibits HIF1-Induced Apoptosis via Regulation of CITED2  Walbert J. Bakker, Isaac S. Harris, Tak.
Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages (January 2008)
HDAC5, a Key Component in Temporal Regulation of p53-Mediated Transactivation in Response to Genotoxic Stress  Nirmalya Sen, Rajni Kumari, Manika Indrajit.
p53DINP1, a p53-Inducible Gene, Regulates p53-Dependent Apoptosis
Volume 16, Issue 24, Pages (December 2006)
Volume 19, Issue 5, Pages (November 2003)
Volume 10, Issue 3, Pages (September 2006)
Yi Tang, Jianyuan Luo, Wenzhu Zhang, Wei Gu  Molecular Cell 
Volume 31, Issue 1, Pages (July 2008)
Attenuation of LDH-A expression uncovers a link between glycolysis, mitochondrial physiology, and tumor maintenance  Valeria R. Fantin, Julie St-Pierre,
Volume 3, Issue 5, Pages (May 2013)
Volume 8, Issue 6, Pages (December 2005)
Volume 31, Issue 2, Pages (August 2009)
Volume 10, Issue 4, Pages (April 1999)
Mitochondrial p32 Is a Critical Mediator of ARF-Induced Apoptosis
Volume 47, Issue 4, Pages (August 2012)
Volume 25, Issue 5, Pages (March 2007)
Volume 8, Issue 4, Pages (October 2005)
Volume 24, Issue 6, Pages (December 2006)
Volume 16, Issue 2, Pages (February 2009)
Yap1 Phosphorylation by c-Abl Is a Critical Step in Selective Activation of Proapoptotic Genes in Response to DNA Damage  Dan Levy, Yaarit Adamovich,
Negative Regulation of Tumor Suppressor p53 by MicroRNA miR-504
Prolonged Rapamycin Treatment Inhibits mTORC2 Assembly and Akt/PKB
Volume 49, Issue 5, Pages (March 2013)
Volume 6, Issue 4, Pages (October 2007)
Volume 12, Issue 5, Pages (November 2003)
Dong Zhang, Kathrin Zaugg, Tak W. Mak, Stephen J. Elledge  Cell 
Oliver I. Fregoso, Shipra Das, Martin Akerman, Adrian R. Krainer 
Volume 14, Issue 1, Pages (January 2001)
Volume 26, Issue 12, Pages e4 (March 2019)
PU.1 Expression Delineates Heterogeneity in Primary Th2 Cells
Volume 7, Issue 3, Pages (March 2005)
Jörg Hartkamp, Brian Carpenter, Stefan G.E. Roberts  Molecular Cell 
Volume 31, Issue 5, Pages (September 2008)
Volume 12, Issue 4, Pages (October 2007)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 18, Issue 3, Pages 231-243 (September 2010) An ARF-Independent c-MYC-Activated Tumor Suppression Pathway Mediated by Ribosomal Protein-Mdm2 Interaction  Everardo Macias, Aiwen Jin, Chad Deisenroth, Krishna Bhat, Hua Mao, Mikael S. Lindström, Yanping Zhang  Cancer Cell  Volume 18, Issue 3, Pages 231-243 (September 2010) DOI: 10.1016/j.ccr.2010.08.007 Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Generation and Analysis of Mdm2C305F Knockin Mice (A) A diagram of Mdm2 protein and approximate binding domains for p53, ARF, and several ribosomal proteins. (B) Schematic representation of Mdm2C305F targeting strategy. Exons 7–12 of Mdm2 are shown in black boxes. The targeting vector contains negative selection marker thymidine kinase (TK) and positive selection marker neomycin resistant gene (neo). Two loxP sites are shown as triangles. (C) Southern blot analysis was used to screen ES clones for the targeted allele. BamH1 digestion generates a 9.5 kb fragment from the wild-type allele. The targeted allele gives rise to two BamH1 fragments of 4.8 kb and 6.5 kb, respectively. (D) DNA from ES cells positive for the recombined allele identified was analyzed for the presence of Mdm2C305F mutation by PCR amplification and Spe1 digestion. (E) Shown are expected and observed birth ratios from a total of 151 mice obtained from Mdm2+/m intercross. (F) Kaplan-Meier survival curve for Mdm2+/+ (+/+), Mdm2+/C305F (+/m) and Mdm2C305F/C305F (m/m) mice are shown. Cancer Cell 2010 18, 231-243DOI: (10.1016/j.ccr.2010.08.007) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Characterization of Mdm2C305F Mutant Protein (A) Mdm2+/+ and Mdm2m/m MEFs were treated with 5 nM Act D and lysates were immunoprecipitated (IP) with anti-Mdm2 antibody and immunoblotted (IB) for Mdm2, p53, L5 and L11 as indicated. Loading represents 5% of total lysate used for IP. (B) MEFs were treated as in (A) and lysates were analyzed as indicated. (C) Half-life of p53 in Mdm2+/+ and Mdm2m/m MEFs. Half-life assay was carried out using early passage (P1) MEFs treated with cycloheximide (50 μg/ml) and harvested with SDS lysis buffer at the indicated time points. Relative amount of p53 was quantified by densitometry, normalized to actin, and plotted. (D) Half-life of Mdm2 and Mdm2C305F. MEFs were treated and analyzed as in (C) for Mdm2. Cancer Cell 2010 18, 231-243DOI: (10.1016/j.ccr.2010.08.007) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Mdm2C305F Mice Retain Intact p53 Response to DNA Damage (A) Mdm2+/+, Mdm2m/+, and Mdm2m/m MEFs were mock treated (Control) or treated with 1 μM doxorubicin (Dox) or 50 J/m2 of ultraviolet C (UV). The cells were harvested 18 hr posttreatment and immunoblotted for p53 and actin. (B) Mdm2+/+ and Mdm2m/m MEFs were treated with increasing dosage of Dox for 18 hr. Cell extracts were analyzed for p53, p21, and Mdm2. (C) Induction of p21 in spleen and thymus after γ-irradiation. Spleen and thymus were harvested from Mdm2+/+ and Mdm2m/m mice 18 hr after 8-Gy whole body γ-irradiation. Protein extracts were assayed for protein levels of p53, p21, and Actin. Spleen protein extract from a p53−/− mouse was used as a negative control. (D) Apoptotic response to whole body γ-irradiation. The level of apoptosis in spleen and thymus was determined by TUNEL assay, carried out on paraffin embedded tissues from mice 18 hr after receiving 8-Gy of whole body γ-irradiation. The percentage of TUNEL positive cells was quantified and averaged from three identically treated mice. Scale bars represent 75 μm. Error bars in all cases represent ± standard deviation. Cancer Cell 2010 18, 231-243DOI: (10.1016/j.ccr.2010.08.007) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Mdm2C305F Mice Demonstrate Attenuated p53 Response to Ribosome Biogenesis Stress (A) MEFs were treated with 5 nM Act D and harvested at indicated time points. Cell lysates were immunoblotted for p53 and actin. (B) Mdm2+/+, Mdm2+/m, and Mdm2m/m MEFs were either mock treated or treated with 5 nM Act D for 12 hr before harvesting for western blot analysis. (C) p53 response to a DNA damaging dosage of Act D in Mdm2m/m MEFs. MEFs were treated with 200 nM Act D for 12 hr and analyzed for p53. (D) Mouse dorsal skins were treated topically with 200 μl of acetone (Control) or Act D (1 μg/200 μl acetone). Protein lysates were prepared from snap frozen skin collected 18 hr after the treatment by epidermal scrapes and analyzed for p53. As a positive control, dorsal skins were treated with acetone and followed immediately by whole body 8-Gy γ-irradiation (IR), and the skin cells were collected 18 hr after the treatment. (E) Early passage MEFs were either mock treated or treated with 5 nM Act D for 18 hr. Cell cycle distribution was determined by flow cytometry using propidium iodide (PI) staining. Samples were run in triplicate with a minimum of 15,000 cells analyzed for each treatment. (F) BrdU incorporation analysis in Mdm2m/m keratinocytes. Mouse dorsal skins were treated as in (D) and fixed in formalin 18 hr posttreatment. BrdU incorporation was determined by immunohistochemistry. For quantification, BrdU positive interfollicular basal keratinocytes from 15 representative 200 μm fields were counted. Three mice were used for each group. Asterisk indicates p value of <0.01 determined by Tukey's multiple comparison tests. (G) p53 response to 5-FU and MPA. MEFs were treated with 1 μM 5-FU or 2 μM MPA for 12 hr and assessed for p53 by western blotting. Error bars in all cases represent ± standard deviation. Cancer Cell 2010 18, 231-243DOI: (10.1016/j.ccr.2010.08.007) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Myc-Induced Lymphomagenesis Is Accelerated by Mdm2C305F Mutation (A) Survival of Eμ-Myc transgenic mice. Kaplan-Meier survival curve shows a median survival of 20, 15, and 9 weeks for Eμ-Myc;Mdm2+/+ (+/+, n = 24), Eμ-Myc;Mdm2+/m (+/m, n = 27), and Eμ-Myc;Mdm2m/m (m/m, n = 18) mice, respectively. (B) Lymphoma onset in Eμ-Myc;Mdm2m/m mice. Image shows dissection of a 58-day old Eμ-Myc;Mdm2m/m mouse with typical enlargement of liver, spleen, thymus, and lymph nodes, including enlargement of Peyer's patches and mesenteric lymph nodes. (C) Extracts from spleen and thymus of wild-type (+/+) and tumor-bearing Eμ-Myc transgenic mice were analyzed for L5 and L11. (D) Accumulation of L11 in nucleus in Eμ-Myc transgenic mouse splenocytes. Lysates of splenocytes from wild-type and nontumor-bearing Eμ-Myc transgenic mice were subjected to fractionation as described in Experimental Procedures. The total (Total), cytoplasmic (Cyto), nucleoplasmic (NP), and nucleolar (NO) fractions were isolated and analyzed for L11. Actin (cytoplasmic) and histone H3 (nuclear) were used as fractionation markers. (E) L11-Mdm2 binding in Eμ-Myc transgenic splenocytes. Lysates from spleens of 4-week-old, nontumor-bearing mice were immunoprecipitated with anti-Mdm2 antibody and immunoblotted as indicated. Loading represents 5% of total lysate used for IP. Cancer Cell 2010 18, 231-243DOI: (10.1016/j.ccr.2010.08.007) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 p19ARF Is Dispensable for p53 Response to Nucleolar Stress (A) Oncogenic c-MYC induction of p53 in Mdm2C305F mice. Extracts from spleens of 4-week-old, non-tumor-bearing Eμ-Myc;Mdm2+/+ and Eμ-Myc;Mdm2m/m transgenics as well as from their nontransgenic counterparts were analyzed for p53, p19ARF, and L11. Two mice are used in each group. (B) Myc induction of p53 in the absence of p19ARF. Early passage wild-type, Mdm2m/m and p19ARF−/− MEFs were infected with retrovirus expressing either pBabe vector or pBabe-c-MYC, selected by puromycin for 3 days, then allowed to recover for 48 hr before harvesting for western analysis. (C) Early passage wild-type and p19ARF−/− MEFs were treated with 5 nM Act D and harvested at the indicated time points. Cell lysates were analyzed for indicated proteins. (D) p53 response to MPA in p19ARF−/− MEFs. Early passage wild-type and p19ARF−/− MEFs were treated with 2 μM MPA for 12 hr, then harvested and analyzed for p53. (E) L11-Mdm2 and p19ARF-Mdm2 interaction in Act D treated MEFs. Early passage wild-type, Mdm2m/m and p19ARF−/− MEFs were treated with 5 nM Act D for 4 hr. Cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with anti-Mdm2 antibody and immunoblotted as indicated. Loading represents 5% of total lysate used for IP. Cancer Cell 2010 18, 231-243DOI: (10.1016/j.ccr.2010.08.007) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Models for RP-Mdm2-p53 Signaling in Response to Ribosomal Stress and Oncogenic c-MYC (A) In response to ribosomal stress several ribosomal proteins, including L11 and L5, bind Mdm2 and inhibit its E3 ligase function, leading to stabilization and activation of p53. (B) Oncogenic c-MYC induces high expression of both p19ARF and ribosomal proteins. The RP-Mdm2-p53 and p19ARF-Mdm2-p53 represent two parallel signaling pathways in response to oncogenic c-MYC stimulation. Cancer Cell 2010 18, 231-243DOI: (10.1016/j.ccr.2010.08.007) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions