KAGRA+ Upgrade Plans Yuta Michimura1, Kentaro Komori1

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Albert-Einstein-Institute Hannover ET filter cavities for third generation detectors ET filter cavities for third generation detectors Keiko Kokeyama Andre.
Advertisements

Laser Interferometer Gravitational-wave Detectors: Advancing toward a Global Network Stan Whitcomb LIGO/Caltech ICGC, Goa, 18 December 2011 LIGO-G v1.
LCGT Program Advisory Board (June , Kashiwa, Chiba) On behalf of LCGT special working group Masaki Ando (Department of Physics, Kyoto University)
1st ET General meeting, Pisa, November 2008 The ET sensitivity curve with ‘conventional‘ techniques Stefan Hild and Andreas Freise University of Birmingham.
Rahul Kumar1, T. Takayuki1, K. Yamamoto2, H. Tanaka2,T. Miyamoto2, T
1 New suspension study for LCGT Erina Nishida Ochanomizu University The Graduate School of Humanities and Sciences The Division of Advanced Sciences/ NAOJ.
GWADW, May 2012, Hawaii D. Friedrich ICRR, The University of Tokyo K. Agatsuma, S. Sakata, T. Mori, S. Kawamura QRPN Experiment with Suspended 20mg Mirrors.
GWADW 2010 in Kyoto, May 19, Development for Observation and Reduction of Radiation Pressure Noise T. Mori, S. Ballmer, K. Agatsuma, S. Sakata,
Overview of Research in the Optics Working Group Gregory Harry, on behalf of the OWG Massachusetts Institute of Technology July 25, 2007 LSC Meeting –
Status of LCGT and CLIO Masatake Ohashi (ICRR, The University of TOKYO) and LCGT, CLIO collaborators TAUP2007 Sendai, Japan 2007/9/12.
Optical Configuration Advanced Virgo Review Andreas Freise for the OSD subsystem.
Test mass dynamics with optical springs proposed experiments at Gingin Chunnong Zhao (University of Western Australia) Thanks to ACIGA members Stefan Danilishin.
Australia-Italy Australia 6, October 2005 LCGT project Kazuaki Kuroda LCGT Collaboration Cryogenics for LCGT.
Thermal noise from optical coatings Gregory Harry Massachusetts Institute of Technology - on behalf of the LIGO Science Collaboration - 25 July
Nawrodt 23/03/2011 Experimental Approaches for the Einstein Telescope Ronny Nawrodt on behalf of the Einstein Telescope Science Team and the ET DS Writing.
Topology comparison RSE vs. SAGNAC using GWINC S. Chelkowski, H. Müller-Ebhardt, S. Hild 21/09/2009 S. ChelkowskiSlide 1ET Workshop, Erice, 10/2009.
1 Kazuhiro Yamamoto Institute for Cosmic Ray Research (ICRR) the University of Tokyo ELiTES first collaboration meeting Sanjo conference hall, the University.
GWADW2010 (May 17, 2010, Kyoto, Japan) On behalf of LCGT BW special working group Masaki Ando (Department of Physics, Kyoto University) Design of the LCGT.
Simulation for KAGRA cryogenic payload: vibration via heat links and thermal noise Univ. Tokyo, D1 Takanori Sekiguchi.
18 th - 22 nd May 2015 LIGO-G GWADW Alaska Suspension Upgrades: Discussion Points + Questions Giles Hammond (Institute for Gravitational Research,
18 th - 22 nd May 2015 LIGO-G GWADW Alaska Suspension Upgrades for Enhanced Interferometers Giles Hammond (Institute for Gravitational Research,
External forces from heat links in cryogenic suspensions D1, ICRR, Univ. Tokyo Takanori Sekiguchi GWADW in Hawaii.
New iKAGRA Configuration Yuta Michimura Department of Physics, University of Tokyo 11th KAGRA F2F (University of Tokyo) Feb 6, 2015.
AIGO 2K Australia - Italy Workshop th October th October 2005 Pablo Barriga for AIGO group.
Large-scale Cryogenic Gravitational- wave Telescope, LCGT Keiko Kokeyama University of Birmingham 23 rd July 2010 Friday Science.
Sapphire for the LCGT project Eiichi Hirose ICRR, University of Tokyo Kyohei Watanabe, Norikatsu Mio PSC, University of Tokyo GT Advanced Technology, Sep.
Cryogenic Xylophone Kyoto May Kentaro Somiya Waseda Inst. for Adv. Study Collaboration work with S.Hild, K.Kokeyama, H.Mueller-Ebhardt, R.Nawrodt,
Cryogenic Payload Issues
111 Kazuhiro Yamamoto Institute for Cosmic Ray Research, the University of Tokyo Cryogenic interferometer technologies 19 May 2014 Gravitational Wave Advanced.
LIGO Scientific Collaboration
ALIGO 0.45 Gpc 2014 iLIGO 35 Mpc 2007 Future Range to Neutron Star Coalescence Better Seismic Isolation Increased Laser Power and Signal Recycling Reduced.
1 Kazuhiro Yamamoto Institute for Cosmic Ray Research The university of Tokyo LCGT internal review (Cryogenic payload) 30 January 2012.
Measurement of coating mechanical loss Junko Katayama, K.Craig, K.Yamamoto, M.Ohashi ICRR 0.
Lessons from CLIO Masatake Ohashi (ICRR, The University of TOKYO) and CLIO collaborators GWADW2012 Hawaii 2012/5/16.
Status of the cryogenic payload system for baseline KAGRA Rahul Kumar 1, K. Craig 2, K. Yamamoto 2, H. Tanaka 2, T. Miyamoto 2,T. Kajita 2, T. Suzuki 1,
R&D for the gravitational wave detector KAGRA
Material Downselect Rationale and Directions Gregory Harry LIGO/MIT Kavli Institute for Astrophysics and Space Technology On behalf of downselect working.
bKAGRA PSL Design Study
Characterization of Advanced LIGO Core Optics
Overview of the 20K configuration
New suspension study for LCGT
Possible KAGRA Upgrades
The Proposed Holographic Noise Experiment
Topology comparison RSE vs. SAGNAC using GWINC
Pros and cons of cryogenics for Einstein Telescope and Cosmic Explorer
KAGRA+ Upgrade Plans Yuta Michimura1, Kentaro Komori1
Kazuhiro Yamamoto on behalf of KAGRA collaboration
Interferometric speed meter as a low-frequency gravitational-wave detector Helge Müller-Ebhardt Max-Planck-Institut für Gravitationsphysik (AEI) and Leibniz.
Yuta Michimura Department of Physics, University of Tokyo
Control of the KAGRA Cryogenic Vibration Isolation System
External forces from heat links in cryogenic suspensions
Quantum noise reduction techniques for the Einstein telescope
Cryogenic Payload Modeling: Vibration via Heat Links
KAGRA+ Upgrade Plans Yuta Michimura1, Kentaro Komori1
Possible KAGRA Upgrades
Possibility of Upgrading KAGRA
Ponderomotive Squeezing Quantum Measurement Group
Possible KAGRA Upgrades
KAGRA+ Upgrade Plans Yuta Michimura1, Kentaro Komori1
Summary of Issues for KAGRA+
3rd generation ITF sensitivity curve
New suspension study for LCGT
Yuta Michimura Department of Physics, University of Tokyo
Status of KAGRA Yuta Michimura on behalf of the KAGRA Collaboration
Status of KAGRA Yuta Michimura on behalf of the KAGRA Collaboration
Beam Propagation for bKAGRA Phase 1 with flat ETMs
KAGRA – 3km Cryogenic Laser Interferometer
Yuta Michimura Department of Physics, University of Tokyo
The ET sensitivity curve with ‘conventional‘ techniques
Cryogenic Payload Modeling: Vibration via Heat Links
Presentation transcript:

KAGRA+ Upgrade Plans Yuta Michimura1, Kentaro Komori1 GWADW 2017 @ Hamilton Island, Queensland May 9, 2017 KAGRA+ Upgrade Plans Yuta Michimura1, Kentaro Komori1 Yutaro Enomoto1, Koji Nagano2 Kentaro Somiya3 (for KAGRA R&D Team) 1Department of Physics, University of Tokyo 2ICRR, University of Tokyo 3Department of Physics, Tokyo Institute of Technology

Overview No concrete plan, no consensus yet Some R&D on-going Integrated study initiated recently Upgrade within current facility

KAGRA Timeline Initial KAGRA (iKAGRA) 2016 2017 Phase 1 2018 Phase 2 3-km Michelson room temperature simplified suspensions First test operation Initial KAGRA (iKAGRA) 2016 2017 Phase 1 2018 3-km Michelson cryogenic temperature Phase 2 2019 3-km RSE cryogenic temperature Baseline KAGRA (bKAGRA) Phase 3 2020 3-km RSE cryogenic temperature observation runs 2021 2022 KAGRA+ ?

KAGRA Sensitivity (v2009) 30 kg, 20 K, 825 W at BS → BNS 171 Mpc Seismic SQL Suspension Quantum Coating Vertical thermal noise not included

KAGRA Sensitivity (v2013) 23 kg, 20 K, 780 W at BS → BNS 148 Mpc Seismic SQL Suspension Quantum Coating Vertical thermal noise peak from RM, sapphire fiber

KAGRA Sensitivity (v2017) 23 kg, 21.5 K, 780 W at BS → BNS 158 Mpc BBH 1.0 Gpc Suspension Seismic SQL Quantum Coating Thermal noise peak from sapphire blades, CuBe fiber

Update Details Included sapphire blades into calculation 120 Hz vertical thermal noise peak now at 1.5 kHz Temperature increased by 0.5 K from sapphire blades and indium bonding Sapphire fiber length change (30 cm → 35 cm) less heat extraction ITM absorption was ~30 ppm/cm spec: 50 ppm/cm → 21.5 K     Figure from K. Craig

KAGRA vs Other 2G Not better even with cryogenic and underground O1 aLIGO KAGRA AdVirgo Spectra data from LIGO-T1500293

KAGRA vs Other 2G Lighter mass because of sapphire Lower power for heat extraction Thick sapphire and lossy CuBe suspension increase suspension thermal noise (low frequency sensitivity is not limited by underground seismic noise) CuBe fibers (φ=5e-6) 1.6 mm dia. Sapphire fibers

Ideas for Improving Sensitivity Increase the mass - GAST project (upto 30 cm dia.) - composite mass - A-axis sapphire (upto 50 kg, 26 cm dia.) - non-cylindrical mass (upto 30 kg) - go silicon (upto 200 kg, 45 cm dia.) Focus on low frequency - low laser power, thin and long suspension Filter cavity - effectively increase mass and laser power Better cryopayload design ETM different from ITM, half-cryogenic, delay-line, folded arms, higher-order modes …… ??? A-axis (Czochralski process) C-axis (no birefringence)

R&D Activities Crystalline coating on sapphire Cryogenic silicon cavity for thermal noise measurements Mirror absorption characterization 300m filter cavity at TAMA300 Quantum radiation pressure noise measurement with mg-scale mirror Talk by Raffaele 2-inch GaAs/AlGaAs on sapphire 6ppm scattering, 9 large defects (M. Marchio, R. Flaminio) TAMA300 E. Capocasa et al.: PRD 93, 082004 (2016) N. Matsumoto, K. Komori et al.: PRA 92, 033825 (2015) Cryogenic silicon cavity (Photo by T. Ushiba) Cryostat for silicon cavity (Photo by S. Tanioka)

Integrated Design Study Informal meeting in February 2017 to start integrated study To begin with, appointed three students to show example sensitivity - Team Blue (Y. Enomoto et al.) use heavier sapphire mirrors - Team Black (K. Komori et al.) use Silicon - Team Brown (K. Nagano et al.) low power to focus on low frequency

KAGRA+ Sensitivity: Blue Heavier sapphire and heavier IM, 20 K BNS 296 Mpc BBH 2.7 Gpc λ = 1064 nm Mass: 73 kg (36 cm dia., 18 cm thick) P_BS: 620 W φ_susp: 2e-7 φ_coat: 5e-4 r_beam: 5.7 cm 100m F. C. 10 dB input sqz T_SRM: 32 % Seismic SQL Quantum Coating Suspension

KAGRA+ Sensitivity: Black Silicon 123 K, radiative cooling BNS 296 Mpc BBH 3.2 Gpc λ = 1550 nm Mass: 114 kg (50 cm dia., 25 cm thick) P_BS: 500 W φ_susp: 1e-8 φ_coat: 1e-4 r_beam: 8.6 cm 100m F. C. 10 dB input sqz T_SRM: 16 % Seismic SQL Coating Quantum Suspension

KAGRA+ Sensitivity: Brown Same test mass, low power, high detuning, 20 K BNS 133 Mpc BBH 1.7 Gpc λ = 1064 nm Mass: 23 kg (22 cm dia., 15 cm thick) P_BS: 5.7 W φ_susp: 2e-7 φ_coat: 5e-4 r_beam: 3.5 cm No sqz T_SRM: 4.35 % Seismic Quantum SQL Coating Suspension

Example Astrophysical Reach Science case discussion on going Silicon Heavier sapphire Baseline KAGRA Low frequency Code provided by M. Ando Optimal direction and polarization SNR threshold 8

Summary R&D on going for future KAGRA upgrade Integrated sensitivity design study on KAGRA+ initiated recently Maybe we will make three teams to compare their proposals Science case discussion also on going Any comments are welcome

Supplementary Slides

2G/2G+ Parameter Comparison KAGRA AdVirgo aLIGO A+ Voyager Arm length [km] 3 4 Mirror mass [kg] 23 42 40 80 200 Mirror material Sapphire Silica Silicon Mirror temp [K] 295 123 Sus fiber 35cm Sap. 70cm SiO2 60cm SiO2 60cm Si Fiber type Fiber Ribbon Input power [W] 55 125 140 Arm power [kW] 290 700 710 1150 3000 Wavelength [nm] 1064 2000 Beam size [cm] 3.5 / 3.5 4.9 / 5.8 5.5 / 6.2 5.8 / 6.2 SQZ factor 6 8 F. C. length [m] none 16 300 LIGO parameters from LIGO-T1600119, AdVirgo parameters from JPCS 610, 01201 (2015)

KAGRA Detailed Parameters Optical parameters - Mirror transmission: 0.4 % for ITM, 10 % for PRM, 15.36 % for SRM - Power at BS: 550 W - Detune phase: 3.5 deg (DRSE case) - Homodyne phase: 133 deg (DRSE case) Sapphire mirror parameters - TM size: 220 mm dia., 150 mm thick - TM mass: 22.8 kg - TM temperature: 21.5 K - Beam radius at ITM: 3.5 cm - Beam radius at ETM: 3.5 cm - Q of mirror substrate: 1e8 - Coating: tantala/silica - Coating loss angle: 3e-4 for silica, 5e-4 for tantala - Number of layers: 9 for ITM, 18 for ETM - Coating absorption: 0.5 ppm - Substrate absorption: 20 ppm/cm Suspension parameters - TM-IM fiber: 35 cm long, 1.6 mm dia. - IM temperature: 16.3 K - Heat extraction: 6580 W/m/K - Loss angle: 5e-6/2e-7/7e-7 for CuBe fiber?/sapphire fiber/sapphire blade Inspiral range calculation - SNR=8, fmin=10 Hz, sky average constant 0.442478

KAGRA Cryopayload 3 CuBe blade springs Platform (SUS, 65 kg) Provided by T. Ushiba and T. Miyamoto 3 CuBe blade springs Platform (SUS, 65 kg) MN suspended by 1 Maraging steel fiber (35 cm long, 2-7mm dia.) MRM suspended by 3 CuBe fibers Marionette (SUS, 22.5 kg) Heat link attached to MN IM suspended by 4 CuBe fibers (24 cm long, 0.6 mm dia) IRM suspended by 4 CuBe fibers Intermediate Mass (SUS, 20.1 kg, 16.3 K) 4 sapphire blades Test Mass (Sapphire, 23 kg, 21.5 K) TM suspended by 4 sapphire fibers (35 cm long, 1.6 mm dia.) RM suspended by 4 CuBe fibers

2-3G Sensitivity Comparison KAGRA AdVirgo aLIGO A+ Voyager ET-D CE Spectra data from LIGO-T1500293

Other References K. Somiya, 感度について JGW-G1605698 On recent official sensitivity update K. Somiya, KAGRA2020 JGW-G1503551 Slides for GWADW2015 on KAGRA upgrade K. Somiya et al.: LCGT-LF report JGW-T1100446 Study report on a reconsideration of the LCGT bandwidth for low-frequency measurements M. Ando et al.: Study report on LCGT interferometer observation band JGW-T1000065