Adjusting the CIS structure - Presentation to MSCG meeting 14 November

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Towards the UKs MSFD Initial Assessment and Data Management M. Charlesworth (BODC)
Advertisements

Gianna Casazza European Commission DG Environment, Marine Unit La Direttiva Quadro sulla Strategia per l’Ambiente Marino (Direttiva 2008/56/CE) Marine.
Marine Strategy Framework Directive: Goals and Challenges
The Marine Strategy Framework Directive 17th March 2010, Newcastle North Sea Stakeholders Conference Leo de Vrees European Commission (DG Environment,
Implementation process at EU level Marine Strategy Framework Directive: implementation process at EU level Gert Verreet – submitted to EMECO meeting -
Counselor dr. Otilia Mihail Ministry of Environment, Water and Forest Constanta 17 June
Main aims Reporting Data Agree overall approach/framework to reporting
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
1.
Regional experiences, case of the Mediterranean Sea
Marine Environment and Water Industry Unit
Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD)
Marine Strategy Framework Directive: implementation process at EU level Gert Verreet – WFD CIS SCG meeting of 11 March 2009.
Marine Strategy Framework Directive: an introduction
Project Coordination Group (PCG) for the implementation of the MSFD
Workshop on synergies & differences between WFD and MSFD
Marine Strategy Framework Directive Common Implementation Strategy
Regional and EU level data streams for D5 and D8
EU Service contract: Development of a shared data and information system between the EU and the Regional Sea Conventions (phase 1) WG DIKE , Brussels Deltares.
In-Depth Assessment (IDA) of MS submissions for MSFD article 8, 9 & 10 compiled and presented by Nikolaos Zampoukas based on material provided by V.
Workshop on synergies & differences between WFD and MSFD
Review of Decision 2010/477/EU and MSFD Annex III
16 april 2009 Draft OSPAR’s MSFD Advice Manual on Biodiversity approaches to determining GES, setting of environmental targets and selecting indicators.
Reporting for MSFD Article 13 and 14 –
Lena Bergström, Project Coordinator
Environment Public Health Justice & Fundamental Rights Cohesion Policy
Draft CIS work programme
Draft CIS work programme
Proposal for MSFD risk-based approach project in OSPAR region
Progress in the implementation of D11
European Commission DG Environment
CGBN Co-ordination Group for Biodiversity and Nature
MSFD list of criteria elements
Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD)
Revision of MSFD Decision 2010/477/EU - overview
16th Meeting of the Marine Strategy Coordination Group (MSCG) 4 April
Meeting of the WFD CIS Working Group on Ecological Status (ECOSTAT)
Conclusion and action points 13th meeting of ESA working group October 2015, Brussels MSCG 5th November 2015, Brussels.
Mark Tasker Joint Nature Conservation Committee, UK EU TG Noise
Technical and administrative support for the joint implementation of the MSFD in Bulgaria and Romania - Phase 3 Draft Final Report   Specific contract.
MSFD list of criteria elements
Information on projects
WG GES, 6 December 2016, Brussels
No: need to identify the sources and adress totally new pressures
Towards integrated environmental policy for the marine environment
Marine Environment and Water Industry
1.
Marine Strategy Framework Directive State of play and follow up
Developing a common understanding of Articles 8, 9 & 10 MSFD
Links with Marine Strategy Framework Directive
A Sea for Life The Marine Strategy Framework Directive
1.
Towards integrated environmental policy for the marine environment
Questionnaire on Elaboration of the MSFD Initial Assessment
1.
European Commission, DG Environment, Marine Unit
Draft CIS work programme
OSPAR progress on use of the decentralised option for reporting on monitoring programmes required under Article 11 of the MSFD.
European Environment Agency
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
WG GES Drafting Group June 2013 Berlin
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
Conclusion and action points
Marine Environment and Water Industry
Review of Decision 2010/477/EU and MSFD Annex III
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
Marine Environment and Water Industry
Marine Strategy Coordination Group 14 November 2011, Brussels
Preparatory meeting for the establishment of the Project Coordination Group (PCG) for the implementation of the MSFD 13 November :00-13:30 European.
Marine Strategy Framework Directive Strategic discussion on the future role of WG GES WG GES, 5-6 March 2013 European Commission, DG Environment, Marine.
Presentation transcript:

Adjusting the CIS structure - Presentation to MSCG meeting 14 November 2011 -

Getting specific Current structure useful for 2010 Decision and for high-level discussions on GES, targets & indicators. More concrete debates needed within WG: Mobilise expertise at European level on specific topics Cooperate closely with RSC on these topics, and Ensure convergence between marine regions on these topics. Growing trend to differentiate discussions per topics: Biodiversity, Contaminants & Nutrients, Disturbance (noise and marine litter) Already started: Informal meeting on targets of 7 September and WG GES meeting of 27-28 September WG ToR offer flexibility to focus the discussions around topic-oriented debates and mobilise additional specialised expertise

Regional Sea Conventions Review of RSC structures and activities show that they are based on a topic-oriented approach, sometimes adjusted for MSFD thematic needs: Existing permanent structures to deal with “biodiversity” topic (OSPAR BDC, HELCOM HABITAT, UNEP RAC/SPA and Black Sea CBD AG), with recent sub-activities related to MSFD thematic needs (e.g. OSPAR ICG-COBAM and HELCOM Coreset BD). Working groups/committees for “contaminants and/or nutrients” (OSPAR HASEC, HELCOM LAND, Black Sea LBS AG and MEDPOL), with recent sub-activities related to MSFD thematic needs (e.g. HELCOM Coreset HS and TARGREV, various OSPAR ICGs under HASEC). Some Conventions have recently established sub-activities related to MSFD thematic needs on marine litter and underwater noise (e.g. OSPAR Marine Litter-ICG) Acronyms Biodiversity topic: OSPAR: Biodiversity Committee (BDC) HELCOM: Nature Protection and Biodiversity Group (HELCOM HABITAT) UNEP/MAP: Special Protected Areas Regional Activity Centre (RAC/SPA) Black Sea: Biodiversity Protection and Conservation Advisory Group (CBD AG) Contaminant/Nutrient topic OSPAR Hazardous Substances and Eutrophication Committee (HASEC) HELCOM Land-based Pollution Group) (LAND) Black Sea Advisory Group to deal with land-based sources of pollution (LBS AG)

Benefits for Next Steps Discussions in WG GES should be becoming more concrete, focusing on actual targets and indicators WG DIKE work on reporting sheets and development of WISE- Marine also increasingly topic-oriented Topic-oriented approach will be crucial for discussions on: monitoring (biological vs chemistry-based monitoring) and programme of measures (mitigation measures to minimise biodiversity changes substantially different than those to control contaminants/hazardous substances) In relation to ESA, improved coordination between the work on natural science elements (definition of GES, indicators, etc.) and socio-economics elements (ESA, cost of degradation, etc.) can be made simpler along specific topics Acronyms Biodiversity topic: OSPAR: Biodiversity Committee (BDC) HELCOM: Nature Protection and Biodiversity Group (HELCOM HABITAT) UNEP/MAP: Special Protected Areas Regional Activity Centre (RAC/SPA) Black Sea: Biodiversity Protection and Conservation Advisory Group (CBD AG) Contaminant/Nutrient topic OSPAR Hazardous Substances and Eutrophication Committee (HASEC) HELCOM Land-based Pollution Group) (LAND) Black Sea Advisory Group to deal with land-based sources of pollution (LBS AG)

Recommendations Recommendation 1: Communication and linkages should be ensured between the different groups and sub-groups Enhanced integration between three WG (requirement of Marine Directors) Involvement of experts from WG ESA or DIKE to ensure coordination with socio- economic and reporting aspects, particularly for major topics Recommendation 2: Organise the work of WG GES along major topics (biodiversity and contaminants/nutrients) Allow for more detailed technical discussions on biodiversity and contaminants/nutrients Necessary to find ways to mobilize thematic expertise Recommendation 3: Organising biodiversity work requires specialised attention Effective progress only possible if organised into manageable packages Question of whether working along major biodiversity components (habitats and species) would be useful for a risk based approach and for prioritisation. Future work on monitoring and measures is related to major types of pressure in Table 2 Annex III. Acronyms Biodiversity topic: OSPAR: Biodiversity Committee (BDC) HELCOM: Nature Protection and Biodiversity Group (HELCOM HABITAT) UNEP/MAP: Special Protected Areas Regional Activity Centre (RAC/SPA) Black Sea: Biodiversity Protection and Conservation Advisory Group (CBD AG) Contaminant/Nutrient topic OSPAR Hazardous Substances and Eutrophication Committee (HASEC) HELCOM Land-based Pollution Group) (LAND) Black Sea Advisory Group to deal with land-based sources of pollution (LBS AG)

Thank you for your attention !