Causality and Causal Reasoning

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Analyzing Significant Differences between Means
Advertisements

Andrea M. Landis, PhD, RN UW LEAH
Ch 8: Experimental Design Ch 9: Conducting Experiments
GROUP-LEVEL DESIGNS Chapter 9.
Testing Theories: Three Reasons Why Data Might not Match the Theory.
Correlation AND EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN
Estimation and Reporting of Heterogeneity of Treatment Effects in Observational Comparative Effectiveness Research Prepared for: Agency for Healthcare.
Correlation Chapter 9.
Intro to Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences PSYC 1900
Review: The Logic Underlying ANOVA The possible pair-wise comparisons: X 11 X 12. X 1n X 21 X 22. X 2n Sample 1Sample 2 means: X 31 X 32. X 3n Sample 3.
Chapter 14 Inferential Data Analysis
The research centre for inclusive access to outdoor environments Edinburgh College of Art/Heriot-Watt University.
Statistical Analyses & Threats to Validity
The Characteristics of an Experimental Hypothesis
Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs
Theory testing Part of what differentiates science from non-science is the process of theory testing. When a theory has been articulated carefully, it.
Epidemiology The Basics Only… Adapted with permission from a class presentation developed by Dr. Charles Lynch – University of Iowa, Iowa City.
Testing Theories: Three Reasons Why Data Might not Match the Theory Psych 437.
Chapter 1: Psychology, Research, and You Pages 2 – 21.
CAUSAL INFERENCE Presented by: Dan Dowhower Alysia Cohen H 615 Friday, October 4, 2013.
LECTURE 3 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY Research framework and Hypotheses development.
Review of Research Methods. Overview of the Research Process I. Develop a research question II. Develop a hypothesis III. Choose a research design IV.
©2005, Pearson Education/Prentice Hall CHAPTER 2 Choosing Topics and Methods for Research.
The Scientific Method. Objectives Explain how science is different from other forms of human endeavor. Identify the steps that make up scientific methods.
1 Chapter 13: Interpreting Research Results Describing Results Inferences in Behavioral Science Research Null Results Integrating Results of Research Summary.
Signal identification and development I.Ralph Edwards.
PERSONALITY AND HEALTH Lecture 6 Yvette Lamb. CURRENT ISSUES.
Comprehensive Evaluation Concept & Design Analysis Process Evaluation Outcome Assessment.
Mediation. 1.Definition 2. Testing mediation using multiple regression Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction.
Some Terminology experiment vs. correlational study IV vs. DV descriptive vs. inferential statistics sample vs. population statistic vs. parameter H 0.
Methods of Presenting and Interpreting Information Class 9.
Research Problems, Purposes, & Hypotheses The Pennsylvania State University College of Nursing Nursing 200W.
Chapter 2 Research Methods.
COM 295 STUDY Inspiring Minds/com295study.com
ScWk 298 Quantitative Review Session
Chapter 2: The Research Enterprise in Psychology
Research Problems, Purposes, & Hypotheses
Causality, Null Hypothesis Testing, and Bivariate Analysis
Multiple Regression: II
Literature Reviews and Research Overview
Scientific Methodology
Statistics made simple Dr. Jennifer Capers
PSY 325 aid Something Great/psy325aid.com
Putting it all together: Writing research proposals and reports
8. Causality assessment:
Chapter 10 Causal Inference and Correlational Designs
Overview of Research Process
psy 325 aid Expect Success/psy325aiddotcom
Article Review By: Jenna Faiella
Section 2: Science as a Process
APPROACHES TO QUANTITATIVE DATA ANALYSIS
Basic Statistics Overview
Statistical Analyses & Threats to Validity
Research Design & Analysis II: Class 10
Experimental Psychology PSY 433
RES 723 Enthusiastic Study/snaptutorial.com
HLT 540 Education for Service-- snaptutorial.com
PSY 325 TUTOR Lessons in Excellence -- psy325tutor.com.
HLT 540 Teaching Effectively-- snaptutorial.com
Chapter Eight: Quantitative Methods
2 independent Groups Graziano & Raulin (1997).
NURS 790: Methods for Research and Evidence Based Practice
Ass. Prof. Dr. Mogeeb Mosleh
Introduction to Hypothesis Testing
15.1 The Role of Statistics in the Research Process
Conducting experiments
What determines Sex Ratio in Mammals?
Unit 2 – Methods Objective 1 Describe quantitative and qualitative  methods such as surveys, polls, and statistics used in sociological research.  Objective.
Chapter 4 Summary.
Univariate analysis Önder Ergönül, MD, MPH June 2019.
Presentation transcript:

Causality and Causal Reasoning Validity and threats to validity Examples of causal studies

Snow on Cholera London Cholera epidemic of August 1854 It was assumed that cholera was airborne, but Snow argued that it was in water Cholera was unevenly distributed, with some anomalies

What Do We Mean by Causality? In the strictest case, when A causes B we mean that: A precedes B No B without A If A exists then B always exists But in science we allow for contributions to statistical changes in rates. The difference between prediction and causality is usually specifying mechanism.

Analyzing and Mapping Research Articles Read the article to identify key components: Hypothesis (sometimes this needs to be constructed from the text) Predictors (the hypothesized cause): High-level construct Variable that is measured Actual measures or metrics Mediator/Mechanisms/Intervening variables (what are the actual causes or necessary steps) Outcomes Constructs, variables, measures Controls (what is held constant to reduce alternate explanations) Mediators (what amplifies or reduces the effect) Plausible alternative hypotheses (that are correlated with predictor)—this should reflect a knowledge of the world and literature Statistical methods Generalizability questions Map the articles using the template

Effects of nature window view on pain following surgery (Ulrich, 1984) Number of Pain Drug Doses (days 2-5 after surgery) Analgesic NATURE WALL Strength patients patients Strong 0.96 2.48 Moderate 1.74 3.65 Weak 5.39 2.57

Generalizability questions Alternative explanations View Through a Window Hypothesis: View of nature improves recovery from surgery Ulrich, R.(1984). View through a window may influence recovery. Science, 224(4647), 224-225. Outcomes <Construct> Recovery from surgery <Variables> Variables: Length of stay Analgesic use Anxiety medications Patient sleep disturbance Patient anxiety Minor complications (Patient cardio arousal) (Patient wound healing) <Measures> Day of surgery to day of discharge Weighted score of minor complications Number of positive or negative notes Average number of analgesic doses per patient by strength level for days 2-5, 6-7 Predictor Variables <Construct> restorative effect of natural view <Variable> View of nature <Measure> Window view with trees v Window view of walls Mediators/Mechanism Stress Control variables Controls Matching on 23 pairs for sex, age, smoker/non-smoker, obesity, previous hospitalization, year of surgery, floor level, wall color, physician (7 pairs) Surgery type: cholecystectomy (gall bladder) Summer season (1 May-20 October) Statistical methods Multivariate two-sample Hotelling test for analgesic dosages, antianxiety drugs Chi-square for frequency of dosages Generalizability questions Does this apply to other patients, diseases, treatment cultures, care processes? Partly addressed by citing other studies. Alternative explanations Chance occurrence Exposure to natural light

Generalizability questions Alternative explanations When the World Is Closing In Hypothesis: View of nature improves recovery from surgery Okken, V. S., van Rompay, T. J. L., & Pruyn, A. Th. H. (2013). When the world is closing in: Effects of perceived room brightness and communicated threat during patient-physician interaction. Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 7(1), 37–53. Outcomes <Construct> Recovery from surgery <Variables> Variables: Affective experience Intended self-disclosure Liking (of physician) <Measures> Self report scales Mediators/Mechanism Spaciousness of environment Predictor Variables <Construct> Perceived room Brightness Communicated threat <Variable> Brightness of photograph of simulated scene Seriousness of discussion <Measure> Light v dark photograph Manipulated script Control variables People were their own controls within a threat condition Moderators Brightness Threat Statistical methods ANOVA Generalizability questions Does this apply real world conditions? Alternative explanations Chance occurrence

Implementation variable (intermediate steps) Name of the article Causal hypothesis Reference APA 6 style Use dotted lines and italics if the article doesn't discuss Predictors/independent variables <Construct> High level idea from the research or professional literature <Variable> What is being measured? <Measure> How is it actually measured (what metrics, scales, etc.)? Outcomes/Dependent Variable <Construct> <Variables> <Measures> Mediators/Mechanism/Intervening variables Implementation variable (intermediate steps) Control variables Controls What is held constant in the population or settings studied to reduce likelihood of other causes? Moderators/”Bridging” variables What amplifies or reduces the effect such as demographics, vulnerability of patients, etc? Add key assumptions if you can Alternative explanations What plausible alternative explanations might explain this effect (and is correlated with the predictor)? Should come from the literature Statistical methods e.g., Multivariate two-sample Hotelling test for analgesic dosages, antianxiety drugs Chi-square for frequency of dosages Latent/unintended consequences What happened outside of the hypotheses that was unexpected or has design implications? Generalizability questions Do results reasonably apply to other settings, patients, diseases, treatment cultures, care processes?