Mainring progress 6 fold emit:2.3nm

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Transport formalism Taylor map: Third order Linear matrix elementsSecond order matrix elements Truncated maps Violation of the symplectic condition !
Advertisements

Beamstrahlung and energy acceptance K. Ohmi (KEK) HF2014, Beijing Oct 9-12, 2014 Thanks to Y. Zhang and D. Shatilov.
S.J. Brooks RAL, Chilton, OX11 0QX, UK Options for a Multi-GeV Ring Ramping field synchrotron provides fixed tunes and small.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, N.Kazarinov.
Simulation of Positron Production and Capturing. W. Gai, W. Liu, H. Wang and K. Kim Working with SLAC & DESY.
New Progress of the Nonlinear Collimation System for A. Faus-Golfe J. Resta López D. Schulte F. Zimmermann.
Details of space charge calculations for J-PARC rings.
S2E optics design and particles tracking for the ILC undulator based e+ source Feng Zhou SLAC ILC e+ source meeting, Beijing, Jan. 31 – Feb. 2, 2007.
Quantitative Optimisation Studies of the Muon Front-End for a Neutrino Factory S. J. Brooks, RAL, Chilton, Oxfordshire, U.K. Tracking Code Non-linearised.
October 4-5, Electron Lens Beam Physics Overview Yun Luo for RHIC e-lens team October 4-5, 2010 Electron Lens.
J. Turner 02/07/05 SLAC PEPII Accelerator Physics LER WIGGLER PLAN J. Turner, M. Donald, M. Sullivan, U. Wienands, J. Yocky Motivation and Concerns Details.
J-PARC Accelerators Masahito Tomizawa KEK Acc. Lab. Outline, Status, Schedule of J-PARC accelerator MR Beam Power Upgrade.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, A.Drozhdin, N.Kazarinov.
Design of an Isochronous FFAG Ring for Acceleration of Muons G.H. Rees RAL, UK.
1 FFAG Role as Muon Accelerators Shinji Machida ASTeC/STFC/RAL 15 November, /machida/doc/othertalks/machida_ pdf/machida/doc/othertalks/machida_ pdf.
November 14, 2004First ILC Workshop1 CESR-c Wiggler Dynamics D.Rubin -Objectives -Specifications -Modeling and simulation -Machine measurements/ analysis.
Part III Commissioning. Proof of Principle FFAG (POP) study The world first proton FFAG –Commissioned in March –From 50 keV to 500 keV in 1ms. –Proof.
Luminosity of the Super-Tau-Charm Factory with Crab Waist D. Shatilov BINP, Novosibirsk TAU’08 Workshop, Satellite Meeting “On the Need for a Super-Tau-Charm.
1 NICA Collider: status and further steps O.S. Kozlov LHEP, JINR, Dubna for the NICA team Machine Advisory Committee, JINR, Dubna, October 19-20, 2015.
E Levichev -- Dynamic Aperture of the SRFF Storage Ring Frontiers of Short Bunches in Storage Rings INFN-LNF, Frascati, 7-8 Nov 2005 DYNAMIC APERTURE OF.
Simulation on beam loss from radiative Bhabha process Y. Funakoshi KEK.
FMA workshop April 1st and 2nd, 2004 L. Nadolski1 Guiding Lines for Computing and Reading a Frequency Map New FMA Calculations for SOLEIL including Insertion.
The Introduction to CSNS Accelerators Oct. 5, 2010 Sheng Wang AP group, Accelerator Centre,IHEP, CAS.
Optimization of beam envelop at the injection point of PS Chenghui Yu Jan. 30, 2012.
Design study of CEPC Alternating Magnetic Field Booster Tianjian Bian Jie Gao Michael Koratzinos (CERN) Chuang Zhang Xiaohao Cui Sha bai Dou Wang Yiwei.
ADSR Inst.July 2009 From PAMELA to ADSR, T.Yokoi From PAMELA to ADSR Takeichiro Yokoi (JAI)
Muon Collider Physics Workshop FNAL November 10-12, 2009 Muon Collider Lattice Design FERMI NATIONAL ACCELERATOR LABORATORY US DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY f Y.
C. Biscari, D. Alesini, A. Ghigo, F. Marcellini, LNF-INFN, Frascati, Italy B. Jeanneret, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland CLIC DRIVE BEAM FREQUENCY MULTIPLICATION.
First evaluation of Dynamic Aperture at injection for FCC-hh
Oleksiy Dolinskyy 1st December, 2014
Design Study of CEPC Booster and Mainring Lattice
Sara Thorin, MAX IV Laboratory
A.Lachaize CNRS/IN2P3 IPN Orsay
Design study of CEPC Alternating Magnetic Field Booster
Benchmarking MAD, SAD and PLACET Characterization and performance of the CLIC Beam Delivery System with MAD, SAD and PLACET T. Asaka† and J. Resta López‡
NSLS-II Lattice Design Strategies Weiming Guo 07/10/08
Electron Cooling Simulation For JLEIC
Cui Xiaohao, Zhang Chuang,Bian Tianjian January 12,2016
Beam Collector Ring Dmitry Shwartz BINP, Novosibirsk 6th BINP-GSI-FAIR workshop
Energy calibration issues for FCC-ee I. Koop, BINP, Novosibirsk
CEPC injector high field S-band accelerating structure design and R&D
2nd Workshop on a Super B-Factory INFN-LNF, Frascati, Italy
Non linear optimization of the CLIC pre-damping rings
First Look at Nonlinear Dynamics in the Electron Collider Ring
Discussion on Emittance Evolution through FCC-e+e-
Multiturn extraction for PS2

12 GeV CEBAF.
CEPC Booster Design Dou Wang, Chenghui Yu, Tianjian Bian, Xiaohao Cui, Chuang Zhang, Yudong Liu, Na Wang, Daheng Ji, Jiyuan Zhai, Wen Kang, Cai Meng, Jie.
CEPC Booster Design Progress (Low field)
Mainring prograss 6 fold emit:2.3nm
The new 7BA design of BAPS
DA Study for the CEPC Partial Double Ring Scheme
CEPC Injector Damping Ring
Cui Xiaohao, Bian Tianjian, Zhang Chuang 2017/11/07
Design study of CEPC Alternating Magnetic Field Booster
Design study of CEPC Alternating Magnetic Field Booster
Design study of CEPC Alternating Magnetic Field Booster
Design study of CEPC Alternating Magnetic Field Booster
PEPX-type BAPS Lattice Design and Beam Dynamics Optimization
Mainring prograss 6 fold emit:2.3nm
Beam-Beam Effects in High-Energy Colliders:
CEPC injector beam dynamics
CEPC Injector Linac beam dynamics
CEPC injector beam dynamics
Mainring prograss 6 fold emit:2.3nm
Lattice design for CEPC PDR
Mainring prograss 6 fold emit:2.3nm
Injection design of CEPC
CEPC injector beam dynamics
Presentation transcript:

Mainring progress 6 fold emit:2.3nm Analytical results are agree with numeric results. 8 sextupole families and two tune shift variables, and we got the result showed in the plot. This is the best solution in that condition(8 sextupole families and two tune shift variables). 2rd chrom:270 3th chrom: 199. Pro.Cai say it is not bad, but expect more knobs to have better result. If we want better result, more sextupole families and more tune shift variables are expected.(but he formulae are so long that Mathematica in my labtop will breakdown, maybe the code need optimization)

X=72.8sigma Y=1237.2sigma@0%

X=48.6sigma Y=824.8sigma@0.5% X=24.3sigma Y=421.4sigma@1%

DA from my own code

Less than 6 min with 8 core@i7_6700Q

256 turns in 109 seconds

512 turns in 219 seconds

Phase space plot

Difficulties At begining, we want to use my own element simulator and link to Zlib to obtain the one-turn-map. Zlib is the most suitable to this situation, with high efficiency and convenient. The picture below shows the idea how to obtain one-turn-map using Zlib.(From Yan Yitong’s reprot)

Difficulties When we check the results from Zlib carefully, we find that Zlib always lose the first order in some Tps operation(such as ‘*’ and ‘/’). I read Yan’s papers and try to understand this result. Maybe it is because his tracking scheme. We know the core idea of Zlib, and I can also write a library like Zlib. But it is little far from accelerator physics. Now I am try to change his code. A little difficult, without handbook and comment. Solutions: change the simulator Use some symbol libraries. All of these will lose efficiency.

Requirement for Linac Parameter Symbol Unit Value E- beam energy Ee- GeV 6 E+ beam energy Ee+ Repetition rate frep Hz 50 E- bunch population Ne-   2×1010 E+ bunch population Ne+ Energy spread (E+/E-) σE <1×10-3 Emitance (E-) 0.3 mm mrad Emitance (E+)

Design Goal Consideration of injection Injected Beam p/2 Inject in X direction. Closed orbit kickers Injected Beam Circulating Beam p/2

Design Goal Consideration of injection Emit in mainring is 2E-9 m*rad, asuming beta_x=590 meter in the injection point. Asuming DA_x=20 sigma@dp=0.5% in the mainring. Asuming beta_x=590 meter in the injection point. The total space for injection: 8 sigma is retained for revolution beam to get enough quantum life time: 6 sigma is retained for injection beam to loss less particles: 3.2mm is lefted for septum and emit of booster@120Gev is 3.5E-9 m*rad.

Survival plot by P.Piminov (no quad SR): Dynamic aperture @ 175 GeV Survival plot by P.Piminov (no quad SR):

Survival plot by P.Piminov (no quad SR): Dynamic aperture @ 45 GeV Survival plot by P.Piminov (no quad SR):