Dr. Darren J. Mollot Director, Office of Clean Energy System

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Transatlantic Dialogue on Climate Change Innovation Drivers by Kevin Fay Executive Director International Climate Change Partnership November 20, 2004.
Advertisements

Mark Ackiewicz Director, Division of CCS Research U.S. Department of Energy April 22, 2014 Workshop on Technology Pathways Forward for CCS on Natural Gas.
National Energy Technology Laboratory 1 Project Financing & Technology Deployment Division, Office of Major Demonstrations, Strategic Center for Coal 2.
E NERGY M ATERIALS I NDUSTRIAL R ESEARCH I NITIATIVE Bridging the Innovation Gap EMIRI in a nutshell – Meeting October 31st LEITAT Establishing Industrial.
Federal Cap-and-Trade Policy: Overview of Design Options Ray Hammarlund, KCC Energy Programs Division Director Presentation to Kansas Energy Council Greenhouse.
The EU Emissions Trading System (ETS) Rationale and Lessons learnt Artur Runge-Metzger Head of International Climate Negotiations, European Commission.
CO 2 Sequestration Options for California Larry Myer WESTCARB Technical Director California Energy Commission (916) ; ETAAC.
PRME Seminar “Responsible Management of GHG Emissions” Fri 14 October 2011 Gujji Muthuswamy Department of Management Faculty of Business and Economics.
-1- ICHS Round Table “Industrial Perspective” Les Shirvill Shell Global Solutions.
Robert C. Trautz Principal Technical Leader CREA Energy Innovation Summit Denver, Colorado October 27, 2014 Commercial CO 2 Storage: Around the Corner.
Sequestration Technology Manager Sean Plasynski – National Energy Technology Laboratory.
An Introduction to the Role of Carbon Capture and Storage in Ukraine Keith Whiriskey.
INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY AGENCE INTERNATIONALE DE L’ENERGIE 1 Dr. Robert K. Dixon Head, Energy Technology Policy Division International Energy Agency.
Institute for 21st Century Energy U.S. Chamber of Commerce Karen A. Harbert President and CEO Institute for 21st Century Energy U.S. Chamber of Commerce.
The Lodge at Ballantyne Charlotte, North Carolina February 7, 2007 Panel Discussion: The Role of Coal Generation in a World of Greenhouse Gas Regulation.
Dr. Fatih Birol Chief Economist Head, Economic Analysis Division International Energy Agency / OECD WORLD ENERGY INVESTMENT OUTLOOK.
Technology options under consideration for reducing GHG emissions SUSTAINABLE ENERGY ROUNDTABLE SERIES: Next Steps Post-Kyoto: U.S. Options January 13,
The Economic Impact of the Waxman Markey Bill (H.R. 2454) By: Dr. Margo Thorning, Ph.D. Senior Vice President and Chief Economist American Council for.
2008 Southern Section A&WMA Annual Meeting & Technical Conference Biloxi, Mississippi August 7, 2008 Danny Herrin, Manager Climate and Environmental Strategies.
KEC MGA Committee, 2/21/2008 Midwestern Governor’s Association (MGA) Energy Security and Climate Stewardship Platform and Midwestern GHG Accord.
Institute for 21st Century Energy U.S. Chamber of Commerce Karen A. Harbert President and CEO Institute for 21st Century Energy U.S. Chamber of Commerce.
Office of the Chief Economist Office of Energy Policy and New Uses National Agricultural Credit Committee Harry S. Baumes Associate Director Office of.
CCS and Climate. Do We Need CCS? Climate protection is impossible with current emission trends. Global coal investments will lock in high cumulative carbon.
Vice President of Market and Climate Policy Steve Corneli – NRG Energy, Inc.
Developing a Framework for Offset Use in RGGI Opportunities and Risks Dale Bryk, NRDC and Brian Jones, MJB&A – Northeast Regional GHG Coalition RGGI Stakeholder.
Carbon Dioxide Capture and Geological Storage: Contributing to Climate Change Solutions Luke Warren, IPIECA.
Future Power Generation in Georgia Georgia Climate Change Summit May 6, 2008 Danny Herrin, Manager Climate and Environmental Strategies Southern Company.
INTERGOVERNMENTAL PANEL ON CLIMATE CHANGE (IPCC) The IPCC on Carbon dioxide Capture and Storage Heleen de Coninck (IPCC WG III on Mitigation) DEFRA/IRADe.
CLIMATE CHANGE POLICY United The United States of America Schwartz, Swallow, and Wu Global Energy Consulting, Inc.
ARKANSAS ENVIRONMENTAL FEDERATION GHG EMMISSIONS TRADING CONFERENCE LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS MARCH 2006 Interstate Oil and Gas Compact Commission.
The Economics of Climate Change Policy By: Dr. Margo Thorning, Ph.D. Senior Vice President and Chief Economist American Council for Capital Formation Washington,
Interaction of a GHG Emissions Cap With Energy Technologies and Markets USAEE Annual Conference – Washington DC October 11, 2011 Donald Hanson and David.
THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SHALE GAS PRODUCTION AND CARBON CAPTURE AND STORAGE UNDER CO2 TAXES: MARKAL MODELING Nadja Victor and Chris Nichols Pittsburgh,
The Economics of Climate Change Policy Prepared for: CEO Climate Change Task Force Meeting American Public Power Association Washington, D.C. December.
Greening Canada’s International Purchases Climate Law Symposium December 3, 2005 Warren Bell, IISD.
Carbon Sequestration A Strategic Element in Clean Coal Technology Presentation to: Mid-America Regulatory Conference (MARC) Columbus, Ohio, June 20, 2006.
Dutch presidency agenda on ensuring industrial competitiveness Erik Janssen, Ministry of Economic Affairs The Netherlands.
Office of Fossil Energy CCS Experience Samuel S. Tam China Chief Representative Office of Clean Coal & Carbon Management Roadmap for CCS Demonstration.
Coal in a Carbon-Constrained World Ernest J. Moniz, Cecil and Ida Green Professor of Physics and Engineering Systems Director, MIT Energy Initiative Baker.
© OECD/IEA Do we have the technology to secure energy supply and CO 2 neutrality? Insights from Energy Technology Perspectives 2010 Copenhagen,
Slide 1 American Recovery & Reinvestment Act (Recovery Act) Dan Beckley Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy U.S. Department of Energy Tennessee.
World Energy and Environmental Outlook to 2030
May 11, 2017 Policies and Financing: Current Opportunities to Accelerate Carbon Capture Deployment Fatima Maria Ahmad C2ES Solutions Fellow.
The Benefits of Energy Diversity
BIOENERGY IN ELECTRICITY GENERATION
LEVERAGING US EXPERIENCE: INDIA’s ENERGY PRODUCTIVITY ROAD MAP
Goals and Targets to Direct FY2010 Budget and Stimulus
Australian Energy Scenarios Predicting Uncertainty
National Energy Marketers Association U.S. International Energy Policy
U.S. Coal Industry Update
Trends and Perspectives of the Global Gas Industry
The Role of Efficient Electrification in the Future Energy System
Energy Technology Perspectives 2008
Energy Technology Policy Progress and Way Forward
Kuwait – Germany Prospects for Cooperation
Roadmap for moving to a competitive low carbon economy in 2050
Coal – security of coal supply considerations of EURACOAL
Regional Coordination Mechanism – 11th Session
The role of gas in developing Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS)
The Economics of Carbon Capture & Storage (CCS)
Closing the Biomass Power Cost-Price Gap
Restructuring Roundtable Peter D. Fuller February 29, 2008
New England Economic Partnership James Daly Vice President Energy Supply Energy Market Perspectives Reliable Energy, Competitive Prices and.
Anna Garcia Air Innovations Conference August 2004
The Shale Gas Revolution – changing global energy markets
Electricity Technology in a Carbon-Constrained Future
SUSTAINABLE ENERGY SUPPLY
THE ROLE OF CCUS IN NORTH AMERICA ENERGY SYSTEM DECARBONIZATION
Industrial Value Chain: A Bridge Towards a Carbon Neutral Europe
A Clean Planet for all A European strategic long term vision for a prosperous, modern, competitive and climate neutral economy.
Presentation transcript:

Dr. Darren J. Mollot Director, Office of Clean Energy System Advanced coal technology showcase: A Pathway to Enhanced Coal Utilization in the U.S. June 20, 2012 Dr. Darren J. Mollot Director, Office of Clean Energy System

Meeting the President’s Energy Goals Photo courtesy of the White House, Pete Souza “This country needs an all-out, all-of-the-above strategy that develops every available source of American energy.  A strategy that’s cleaner, cheaper, and full of new jobs.” President Barack Obama State of the Union Address January 24, 2012

Responding to New Realities - CCUS CCS Drivers – 2009 Realities No carbon legislation Oil @ $100/bbl Low cost natural gas from shale CO2 capture costs must be driven to business case economics Pending carbon legislation Oil @ $50 - $60 per barrel High natural gas prices High cost of CO2 capture Then Now Pending carbon legislation Oil @ $50 - $60 per barrel High natural gas prices High cost of CO2 capture No carbon legislation Oil @ $100/bbl Low cost natural gas from shale CO2 capture costs must be driven to business case economics CCUS is a business-driven path to promote CO2 capture and storage Strong incentive to pursue carbon capture and storage

CCUS Meets National and International Climate Goals President Obama: By 2050, 83% reduction in GHG emissions from 2005 levels IEA:“application of CCS… represents potentially the most important new technology option for reducing direct emissions in industry.” Source: IEA. Energy Technology Perspectives 2010

No CCS? – Game over on Climate Change Supported by the Environmental Community …at present, no other technology comes close to matching the potential of CCS in the fight against global warming…If we don't implement carbon capture and storage," says John Thompson of the Clean Air Task Force, an environmental advocacy group, "it's probably game over on climate change.” Excerpted from “What’s Killing Carbon Capture?” by Ken Wells and Ben Elgin in Bloomberg Businessweek July 21, 2011

CCUS – EOR The “Un-Mined Gold” Story for Energy and Jobs Benefits of CO2-EOR Improves Balance of Trade $3.5 trillion over 60 years Promotes Energy Security Reduces imports by 2 MMbpd1 Increases Domestic Activity $60 Billion/year (wages, royalties, taxes, profits)1 Creates Jobs 622,000 new jobs1 Domestic Oil Supplies and CO2 Demand (Storage) Volumes enabled by CCUS Technology 1 Source : NETL Report, “Improving Domestic Energy Security and Lowering CO2 Emissions with “Next Generation” CO2 EOR,” June 2011

CO2 Production from Natural Sources Source: DiPietro, Balash, and Wallace. 2012

Major CO2-EOR U.S. Demonstrations Leveraging Existing Infrastructure and Creating New Markets Hydrogen Energy California IGCC with EOR $408 Million - DOE $4.0 Billion - Total Southern Company Services IGCC-Transport Gasifier (CO2 to pipeline) $270 Million - DOE $2.67 Billion - Total Summit Texas Clean Energy IGCC with EOR $450 Million - DOE $1.7 Billion - Total CCPI Round II CCPI Round III ICCS (Area I) NRG Energy Post Combustion with CO2 Capture and EOR $167 Million – DOE $339 Million - Total Leucadia CO2 Capture from Methanol with EOR $261 Million - DOE $436 Million - Total CO2 Pipelines Air Products CO2 Capture from Steam Methane Reformers with EOR $284 Million - DOE $431 Million - Total

Existing Investment in CCUS Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnerships – Validation Tests 10 RCSP Formation Type Big Sky Saline MGSC Oil-bearing Coal seam MRCSP Saline Oil-bearing PCOR SECARB SWP WESTCARB 1 2 3 4 5 1 12 6 1 11 7 8 BSCSP WESTCARB SWP PCOR MGSC MRCSP SECARB 9 9 7 10 11 5 2 8 3 12 17 6 15 20 4 13 18 14 16 19 15 16 13 14 17 18 19 20

Conditions for Establishing a “Business Case” for CCUS Matrix of Market and Policy Scenarios Fossil Energy’s CCS Program can effectively proceed, bridging the mid-term, by Using CO2 commercially (CCUS) The commercial opportunity for anthropogenic CO2, used for EOR, is expanding rapidly, offering significant, parallel capacity for attaining the President’s Energy Security Goal CO2 EOR revenues in the range of $32-46/tonne will enable 2nd-Gen coal with CCUS to have COE parity with NGCC without CCUS. For all scenarios, 2nd-Gen coal with CCUS has a lower COE than NGCC with CCUS at any given CO2 EOR price. EOR Revenues Needed for Coal to Compete? Yes No 2nd-Gen CCUS needs 20% COE reduction and ~$40/tonne CO2 revenue No Regulation-Based Cost for Carbon Emissions? Transformational CCS needs 38% COE reduction and no CO2 revenue Yes COE reductions are required to compete with other baseload options in the future electricity market (e.g., NGCC and nuclear). Percent reductions are relative to today’s IGCC with CCS.

High Level Program Goals 2nd Gen and Transformational Technology Distilled to the highest level, the FE program for CCS has the following goals: 2nd Generation CCUS technology: <$40/tonne removed CO2 capture cost to satisfy strong EOR market opportunities, meet broad acceptance, and enable the United States to benefit from a significant increase in domestic oil production. 99% monitoring and mass balance closure: tracking CO2  to ensure leakage from large geologic storage sites does not offset future annual emissions if/when billions of tons of CO2 is stored. Best Practice Manuals: address key aspects of putting CCUS projects into commercial service on topics such as site selection and reservoir characterization, simulation and risk assessment, well bore completion and closure, monitoring verification and accounting, regulatory compliance, and public outreach and education.  Transformational CCS technology: <$10/tonne removed CO2 capture cost for commercial deployment to: open greater domestic EOR opportunities, expand beneficial utilization opportunities such as conversion of CO2 to higher value chemicals, and deliver advanced higher performance coal-fueled energy systems that reduce the cost of generating electricity by 38% relative to today’s IGCC with CCS, and compete with NGCC systems under EIA’s AEO 2011 Low Gas, Reference, and Macro-economic natural gas pricing scenarios (i.e., when the natural gas price is $6.70/MMBtu or higher).

High-Risk, High-Value RD&D The Role of Public Investment in CCUS Technology Accelerate the development of new energy technologies beyond the pace that would otherwise be dictated by normal market or regulatory forces. Expand the slate of beneficial energy options beyond those likely to be developed by the private sector on its own. Produce “transformational” breakthrough technologies that achieve environmental, efficiency, and cost goals well beyond those currently pursued by the private sector.

Moving Forward – Next Steps Supplement existing oil and gas next generation EOR projects Continue next generation EOR R&D and new geologic discovery Initiate CO2 EOR class-based demonstration Investigate CO2 conversion to other value-added products Accelerate path to 2nd generation CO2 capture technology CCUS commercialization post- 2020

Moving Forward – Next Steps Now – 2015 2015 – 2018 2018 – 2021 2021 – 2025 Construction and Start Up of CCPI and Recovery Act Projects Operation and Validation of Facilities Construction of 2nd Generation Demonstrations Commercialization 1st Generation CO2 Capture Technology 2nd Generation CO2 Capture Technology

Linking Business and Policy to Do the Best for America Environment The Economy The Environment AND The Economy Or The Power of AND – not Or