Describe two features of…

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Exam Technique and Course Overview AQA History B
Advertisements

Answering the Edexcel Impact of War Paper 7thth June 2011.
Section B 8 Mark questions Comparison of Key People who improved Public Health Comparison of how much progress was made in different time periods Comparison.
How to structure good history writing Always put an introduction which explains what you are going to talk about. Always put a conclusion which summarises.
How to answer the American West exam paper Edexcel.
EXAM SKILLS: PAPER ONE: QUESTIONS. CARTOON See cartoon questions in paper two section.
PAPER 1 1 hour 45 minutes 37.5%. Comprehension Value: 3 marks. Wording: ‘What does the Source tell us about…’ Mark Scheme: Penny points: 3 points given.
Section C 8 Mark questions Comparison of Key People who improved Surgery and Anatomy Comparison of how much progress was made in different time periods.
How useful are your notes on the Liberal landslide? Will your notes help you quickly and easily find three reasons to answer each question? Why did the.
Question 1 – you must answer all parts of this question. Study Source A. (a)What can you learn from Source A about Germany in the years immediately after.
Unit 1 Question Style: USA
Aim: To understand how to tackle the Paper 3 British History exam
Answering the Edexcel Impact of War Paper
GCSE History UNIT 1 – International Relations The Cold War
Answering exam questions GCSE Physical Education
1. To know how to answer a 16-mark essay question to a high standard.
Do you agree with the message in the source?
What is being assessed? Section B will contain three essay questions of which students are required to answer two. Each essay tests AO1 and is designed.
England – A New Century AS History Source Paper Revision Overview
Writing frames and Mark Schemes for
Structure of exam question
Study the sources below and then answer the question which follows:
English Reading Course Calendar and Personal Learning Checklist
Paper 3: Weimar and Nazi Germany
GCSE Paper This presentation goes through paper one detailing the different question types and what you are required to do with each one. Paper One will.
Paper 1: Health and Medicine, thematic study and environment.
English Language Assessment Objectives
Writing Frames Master.
NET History Exam Skills
Section A focuses on the historic environment – Western Front WW1.
Revision: Language Paper 1 Section A
English Language Top Tips May 2018.
Edexcel – GCSE History – Paper 1
GCSE EXAM QUESTION GUIDANCE
Unit 1 WW1, ToV, LofN & CoP Unit 1 WW1, ToV, LofN & CoP Unit 1
How similar were King Richard
NET History Exam Skills
AS LEVEL Paper One – Section A / B
Section 1: What is ‘developed’ explanation?
Three stages in historical thinking Evaluate
Exam Skills Question 1 – Multiple choice question Worth 1 mark
Paper 3 Option 31: Weimar and Nazi Germany
NET History Exam Skills
The Mid Tudors A2 Evaluation and enquiry questions
Exam Technique - 30 Mark Question
NEA What makes a good answer?
NET History Exam Skills
A LEVEL Paper Three– Section A
The Thematic Essay Questions set will require coverage of the whole period, which will be of at least 100 years. The whole period will not need to be covered.
NET History Exam Skills
List/ Name/ Identify You will give information as individual words, facts or points. Use the number of marks as a guide to the number of examples.
The Language of Exams Mrs Thompson.
Secure Knowledge (1-3) Describe investigation process
Evaluation Why is an evaluation vital?
American West and Anglo-Saxon & Norman England
AQA History Exam Paper 1: Understanding the Modern World
What is being assessed? Section B will contain three essay questions of which students are required to answer two. Each essay tests AO1 and is designed.
How to answer each question 1 hour 20 minutes
What is being assessed? Section B will contain three essay questions of which students are required to answer two. But for your mock you will get two.
Section 1: What is ‘developed’ explanation?
Paper 3 Weimar and Nazi Germany 1 hour 20 minutes
AQA – GCSE History – Paper 1 UNDERSTANDING THE MODERN WORLD
Medicine Through Time and The Western Front
America Inequality and Opportunity
Exam Preparation: Cold War - 1 hour and 15 minutes
America (paper 1). America (paper 1) GCSE HISTORY How to guide: Elizabeth (paper 2) Explain what was important about… (8 marks) Write an account.
Writing Frames Master.
Writing a Paper 1.
Megan Smoot 4th Quarter Project 5/1/19
GCSE History Exam Practice
Presentation transcript:

Describe two features of… (4 marks) (5 minutes) Feature 1 ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Feature 2 ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 4/4 Gives two features – both with extra information. 3/4 Gives two features – one with extra information. 2/4 Gives two features OR Gives one feature with extra information. 1/4 Gives one feature.

Explain why … P E L P E L P E L 8-12 7-9 4-6 1-3 (12 marks) (15 minutes) P E L P E L P E L 8-12 Answer fully explains 3+ reasons in paragraphs which are all linked to the question using a range of detailed own knowledge (only L4 with new points) 7-9 Answer explains 2-3 reasons in paragraphs with are mostly linked to the question using relevant own knowledge (max 8 if answer with no new points) 4-6 Some reasons explained with relevant own knowledge in paragraphs but not fully supported or always linked to the question throughout the answer (max 5 if answer with no new points) 1-3 Simple or general answer with some own knowledge

Explain one way in which X was similar/ different to Y … (4 marks) (5 minutes) P E L 4/4 Detailed knowledge is used to show understanding by comparing different periods 3/4 One difference explained by explaining the features of the period. 2/4 Some limited own knowledge of the period/s. 1/4 Simple comment giving one difference. ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

(Total for Question = 8 marks) Explain two consequences of… (Total for Question = 8 marks) 4/4 Detailed knowledge is used to support analysis of the period in relation to the question. 3/4 One consequence/result explained by explaining the features of the period. 2/4 Some limited own knowledge of the period. 1/4 Simple comment giving one consequence/results. Consequence 1 ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Consequence 2 ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ x2

Total for Question = 16 marks (8 marks for each explanation.) Explain two of the following… Total for Question = 16 marks (8 marks for each explanation.) P E L P E L 7-8 Explains reasons why each event was important using detailed knowledge with all points clearly linked to the question. 3-5 Gives/describes reasons why each event was important using own knowledge but not all points are linked to the question. 1-2 Simple or general answer with some knowledge of the events.

(16 + 4 SPAG marks) (30 minutes) ‘Statement.’ How far do you agree? (16 + 4 SPAG marks) (30 minutes) 13-16 Answer is well explained in paragraphs agreeing and disagreeing with the statement which are all linked to the question using a range of detailed own knowledge. Overall judgement is made and explained using criteria (most important cause , biggest change, greatest similarity or difference using links or comparison) (only L4 with new points) 9-12 Answer is explained in paragraphs agreeing and disagreeing with the statement with are mostly linked to the question using relevant own knowledge. Overall judgement is made and explained but without using criteria (with no new points max 11 marks) 5- 8 Some explanation which agrees/disagrees with the view in the question with relevant own knowledge in paragraphs but not fully supported or always linked to the question throughout the answer. Overall judgement is made but not supported or explained (with no new points max 7 marks) 1- 4 Simple or general answer with some own knowledge Has no or and unsupported judgement

SPAG 4 Spell and punctuate accurately throughout with a wide range of key terms. Use rules of grammar effectively to convey meaning. 2-3 Spell and punctuate accurately with a good range of key terms. Use rules of grammar which make the overall meaning clear. 1 Spell and punctuate accurately in places and uses some key terms. Use some rules of grammar and errors don’t affect meaning.

How useful are sources A and B for an investigation into… (8marks) (15 minutes) 6-8 Judgement on how useful the sources are using clear criteria (e.g. accuracy, completeness, objectivity) is explained and supported with inferences about the content, own knowledge to evaluate and the impact of the provenance (NOP) on the content is explained 3-5 Judgement on how useful the sources are using some criteria (e.g. accuracy, completeness or objectivity) is made with some analyses/explanation of the source content using some own knowledge to evaluate the source /provenance (NOP) 1-2 Simple statement on how useful the sources are using comments on the content/ or provenance (NOP) with little or no own knowledge

What is the main difference between the interpretations in the sources? (4 marks) 4 Difference in their views are explained using details from both sources 3 Identifies a key difference of view by explaining both of the sources’ views 1-2 Picks out, repeats or sums up what the sources say with to show simple differences OR Gives a key difference but not supported

Suggest one reason why interpretations 1 and 2 give different views about … (4 marks) 4 Explained reason is supported with source details and own knowledge 3 Explains why the source may have reached that view (could be weight to sources, focus, extract selection, emphasis, NOP) 2 Supports the reason with some own knowledge OR source detail 1 Gives a valid reason why the views are different

How far do you agree with interpretation 2 about …? (16 + 4 SPaG marks) 13-16 Answer explains evaluation which agrees AND disagrees with the view in the interpretation which is supported by precise and well-chosen quotes and inferences from BOTH sources to explain their differences and how they get their views across AND detailed own knowledge. All points link to the question and build up to an overall judgement which is supported and explained. 9- 12 Answer explains evaluation which agrees/disagrees with the view in the interpretation which is supported by quotes and inferences from BOTH sources which show their differences AND some own knowledge Points link to the question and build up to an overall judgement with some explanation /support. 5- 8 Evaluates the view through comments which agree/disagree with the view in the interpretation is supported with quotes/inferences from BOTH sources and some own knowledge. Gives an overall judgement but is not explained or supported 1- 4 Simple comment to agree/disagree with the view in the interpretation Picks out/quotes, repeats or sums up what ONE source says. Some relevant knowledge may be used to evaluate the view

How could you follow up Source A to find out more about… (8marks) (15 minutes) Detail in Source B that I would follow up ______________ Question I would ask: _____________ What type of source I could use: _______ How this might help answer my question: ________ 1 mark Picks out a detail from the source which could be followed up in an enquiry. Asks a question which could be used in an enquiry – must be related to the source detail. Identifies a type of source which could be used to find more information to answer the Q in a follow up enquiry. Explains how the follow up source would help answer the question in the follow up enquiry.

Give two things you can infer from Source A about… (4marks) Inference 1 ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Inference 2 ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 4 Makes 2 inferences from the source BOTH explained with detail from the source. 3 Makes 2 inferences from the source - 1 with detail from the source. 2 Makes 2 inferences from the source OR 1 inference explained with detail from the source. 1 Makes 1 inference from the source

Write a narrative account analysing… (8marks) 6-8 Clear narrative with detailed knowledge of events which are in the correct order leading to an outcome and explains the links between them. 3-5 Narrative with knowledge of events which are in the correct order up to the outcome and explains some links between them may be less clear or detailed in places. 1-2 Simple general narrative with only some knowledge of the event/s which may not all be in the correct order.