Describe two features of… (4 marks) (5 minutes) Feature 1 ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Feature 2 ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 4/4 Gives two features – both with extra information. 3/4 Gives two features – one with extra information. 2/4 Gives two features OR Gives one feature with extra information. 1/4 Gives one feature.
Explain why … P E L P E L P E L 8-12 7-9 4-6 1-3 (12 marks) (15 minutes) P E L P E L P E L 8-12 Answer fully explains 3+ reasons in paragraphs which are all linked to the question using a range of detailed own knowledge (only L4 with new points) 7-9 Answer explains 2-3 reasons in paragraphs with are mostly linked to the question using relevant own knowledge (max 8 if answer with no new points) 4-6 Some reasons explained with relevant own knowledge in paragraphs but not fully supported or always linked to the question throughout the answer (max 5 if answer with no new points) 1-3 Simple or general answer with some own knowledge
Explain one way in which X was similar/ different to Y … (4 marks) (5 minutes) P E L 4/4 Detailed knowledge is used to show understanding by comparing different periods 3/4 One difference explained by explaining the features of the period. 2/4 Some limited own knowledge of the period/s. 1/4 Simple comment giving one difference. ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
(Total for Question = 8 marks) Explain two consequences of… (Total for Question = 8 marks) 4/4 Detailed knowledge is used to support analysis of the period in relation to the question. 3/4 One consequence/result explained by explaining the features of the period. 2/4 Some limited own knowledge of the period. 1/4 Simple comment giving one consequence/results. Consequence 1 ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Consequence 2 ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ x2
Total for Question = 16 marks (8 marks for each explanation.) Explain two of the following… Total for Question = 16 marks (8 marks for each explanation.) P E L P E L 7-8 Explains reasons why each event was important using detailed knowledge with all points clearly linked to the question. 3-5 Gives/describes reasons why each event was important using own knowledge but not all points are linked to the question. 1-2 Simple or general answer with some knowledge of the events.
(16 + 4 SPAG marks) (30 minutes) ‘Statement.’ How far do you agree? (16 + 4 SPAG marks) (30 minutes) 13-16 Answer is well explained in paragraphs agreeing and disagreeing with the statement which are all linked to the question using a range of detailed own knowledge. Overall judgement is made and explained using criteria (most important cause , biggest change, greatest similarity or difference using links or comparison) (only L4 with new points) 9-12 Answer is explained in paragraphs agreeing and disagreeing with the statement with are mostly linked to the question using relevant own knowledge. Overall judgement is made and explained but without using criteria (with no new points max 11 marks) 5- 8 Some explanation which agrees/disagrees with the view in the question with relevant own knowledge in paragraphs but not fully supported or always linked to the question throughout the answer. Overall judgement is made but not supported or explained (with no new points max 7 marks) 1- 4 Simple or general answer with some own knowledge Has no or and unsupported judgement
SPAG 4 Spell and punctuate accurately throughout with a wide range of key terms. Use rules of grammar effectively to convey meaning. 2-3 Spell and punctuate accurately with a good range of key terms. Use rules of grammar which make the overall meaning clear. 1 Spell and punctuate accurately in places and uses some key terms. Use some rules of grammar and errors don’t affect meaning.
How useful are sources A and B for an investigation into… (8marks) (15 minutes) 6-8 Judgement on how useful the sources are using clear criteria (e.g. accuracy, completeness, objectivity) is explained and supported with inferences about the content, own knowledge to evaluate and the impact of the provenance (NOP) on the content is explained 3-5 Judgement on how useful the sources are using some criteria (e.g. accuracy, completeness or objectivity) is made with some analyses/explanation of the source content using some own knowledge to evaluate the source /provenance (NOP) 1-2 Simple statement on how useful the sources are using comments on the content/ or provenance (NOP) with little or no own knowledge
What is the main difference between the interpretations in the sources? (4 marks) 4 Difference in their views are explained using details from both sources 3 Identifies a key difference of view by explaining both of the sources’ views 1-2 Picks out, repeats or sums up what the sources say with to show simple differences OR Gives a key difference but not supported
Suggest one reason why interpretations 1 and 2 give different views about … (4 marks) 4 Explained reason is supported with source details and own knowledge 3 Explains why the source may have reached that view (could be weight to sources, focus, extract selection, emphasis, NOP) 2 Supports the reason with some own knowledge OR source detail 1 Gives a valid reason why the views are different
How far do you agree with interpretation 2 about …? (16 + 4 SPaG marks) 13-16 Answer explains evaluation which agrees AND disagrees with the view in the interpretation which is supported by precise and well-chosen quotes and inferences from BOTH sources to explain their differences and how they get their views across AND detailed own knowledge. All points link to the question and build up to an overall judgement which is supported and explained. 9- 12 Answer explains evaluation which agrees/disagrees with the view in the interpretation which is supported by quotes and inferences from BOTH sources which show their differences AND some own knowledge Points link to the question and build up to an overall judgement with some explanation /support. 5- 8 Evaluates the view through comments which agree/disagree with the view in the interpretation is supported with quotes/inferences from BOTH sources and some own knowledge. Gives an overall judgement but is not explained or supported 1- 4 Simple comment to agree/disagree with the view in the interpretation Picks out/quotes, repeats or sums up what ONE source says. Some relevant knowledge may be used to evaluate the view
How could you follow up Source A to find out more about… (8marks) (15 minutes) Detail in Source B that I would follow up ______________ Question I would ask: _____________ What type of source I could use: _______ How this might help answer my question: ________ 1 mark Picks out a detail from the source which could be followed up in an enquiry. Asks a question which could be used in an enquiry – must be related to the source detail. Identifies a type of source which could be used to find more information to answer the Q in a follow up enquiry. Explains how the follow up source would help answer the question in the follow up enquiry.
Give two things you can infer from Source A about… (4marks) Inference 1 ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Inference 2 ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 4 Makes 2 inferences from the source BOTH explained with detail from the source. 3 Makes 2 inferences from the source - 1 with detail from the source. 2 Makes 2 inferences from the source OR 1 inference explained with detail from the source. 1 Makes 1 inference from the source
Write a narrative account analysing… (8marks) 6-8 Clear narrative with detailed knowledge of events which are in the correct order leading to an outcome and explains the links between them. 3-5 Narrative with knowledge of events which are in the correct order up to the outcome and explains some links between them may be less clear or detailed in places. 1-2 Simple general narrative with only some knowledge of the event/s which may not all be in the correct order.