CFN 602 Math Ambassadors Tuesday, October 29th 2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Professional Development on the Instructional Shift of Rigor Rigor: Illustrations of Conceptual Understanding, Fluency, and Application.
Advertisements

© 2012 Common Core, Inc. All rights reserved. commoncore.org NYS COMMON CORE MATHEMATICS CURRICULUM A Story of Units Taking a Look at Rigor.
Student Learning Targets in the CCSS Classroom: Mathematics.
© 2012 Common Core, Inc. All rights reserved. commoncore.org NYS COMMON CORE MATHEMATICS CURRICULUM Rigor Breakdown Part 2: Procedural Skill and Fluency.
Congruency to Math Standards How do we successfully monitor and support our teachers when we can’t be an expert in every content area?
© 2012 Common Core, Inc. All rights reserved. commoncore.org NYS COMMON CORE MATHEMATICS CURRICULUM A Story of Units Application and Concept Development.
Making Proficiency in Math Soar to Greater Heights November 2, 2006 Claudia Ahlstrom.
Depth of Knowledge in Math K-5 Math Back to School Conference
Writing Instructional Objectives
© 2012 Common Core, Inc. All rights reserved. commoncore.org NYS COMMON CORE MATHEMATICS CURRICULUM A Story of Units Module Focus Grade 2- Module 4.
© 2012 Common Core, Inc. All rights reserved. commoncore.org NYS COMMON CORE MATHEMATICS CURRICULUM A Story of Units Module Focus Kindergarten- Module.
New York State 2013 Grades 3-8 Common Core Mathematics Rubric and Scoring Turnkey Training Video 12: Guide Papers for 6 th Grade Three Point Question.
© 2012 Common Core, Inc. All rights reserved. commoncore.org NYS COMMON CORE MATHEMATICS CURRICULUM A Story of Units Application and Concept Development.
An Overview of the New HCPSS Teacher Evaluation Process School-based Professional Learning Module Spring 2013 This presentation contains copyrighted material.
An Overview of the New HCPSS Teacher Evaluation Process School-based Professional Learning Module Spring 2013 This presentation contains copyrighted material.
2 nd Mathematics Meeting Wednesday, November 16 Agenda.
Elementary Math: Principals Professional Development Fall 2011.
Materials Beliefs Cut-up beliefs Answer key Adjusting support tool Tasks activity Martha’s carpeting problem (on ppt) Fencing problem (labels) 3-5 tasks.
Protocols for Mathematics Performance Tasks PD Protocol: Preparing for the Performance Task Classroom Protocol: Scaffolding Performance Tasks PD Protocol:
GOMATH! Day 2 Network 609 Core Curriculum Planning June 2013 Presenter: Karen Cardinali.
Unpacking Standards and Using Student-Friendly Language Facilitated by: Catherine Garrison Professional Development Specialist.
Student Learning Objectives: Approval Criteria and Data Tracking September 17, 2013 This presentation contains copyrighted material used under the educational.
Twilight Training October 1, 2013 OUSD CCSS Transition Teams.
Dr. John D. Barge, State School Superintendent “Making Education Work for All Georgians” Assessment for Learning Series Module 2: Understanding.
Elementary Math: Grade 5 Professional Development Fall 2011.
NC FALCON: Module III Collecting & Documenting Evidence February 2011 East Elementary.
Mathematics Teachers Grade 8 October 10, 2013 Joy Donlin and Tony Lobascher.
© 2012 Common Core, Inc. All rights reserved. commoncore.org NYS COMMON CORE MATHEMATICS CURRICULUM A Story of Units Student Debrief in Practice.
 Sign In and find your assigned table  Enjoy breakfast items  You will NOT need a computer until much later  Be ready to share at 9 a.m. a check for.
Our Community 10 districts learning together to lead the way in CCSS-Mathematics Implementation 1.
New York State 2013 Grades 3-8 Common Core Mathematics Rubric and Scoring Turnkey Training Video 7: Guide Papers for 8 th Grade Two Point Question.
The ACE Strategy Week 2: Administer and Evaluate Pre-test Cluster Cycle 2 Goal: By the end of the cycle, 78% of students in grades 3-5 will increase their.
Dorthea Litson April 30, Purposes of Assessment Purposes of Assessment Making instructional decisions Monitoring student progress Evaluating programs.
Claim 1 Smarter Balanced Sample Items Grade 4 - Target I Solve problems involving measurement and conversion of measurements from a larger unit to a smaller.
13.1 WELCOME TO COMMON CORE HIGH SCHOOL MATHEMATICS LEADERSHIP SCHOOL YEAR SESSION APR 2015 MARGINS: GREAT FOR ERRORS, NOT SO GOOD FOR.
A comprehensive K--5 elementary curriculum Education Development Center, Inc. With support from NSF.
Objectivist Learning Environment. Learner Teacher LearningLearning ContextContext LearningLearning ActivityActivity Content Assessment Areas for Comparing/Contrasting.
Elementary Mathematics for Bethel School District April 2014.
Transitioning to the Common Core for Mathematics February 24 th, 2012.
EQuIP Student Work Protocol — Mathematics. Session Goals Develop reviewers’ ability to:  Use the EQuIP Student Work Protocol to examine student work.
Common Core State Standards Mathematics
Designing Scoring Rubrics
Welcome. BSI Parent Night October 13, 2016 Mrs
5th Grade Math Content Training Session 1
Evaluating Student-Teachers Using Student Outcomes
Core Math Instruction RtI Innovations in Education Conference, Milwaukee, WI October 12-13, 2017.
Lesson planning 101 – Assessment & Questions
Shift Happens Or does it? Leadership Summit Thursday, November 10
December 11, 2015 Varnville Elementary School, Varnville, SC
DAY 1.
Writing in Math: Digging Deeper into Short Constructed Responses
Huntsville City Schools
Please sit at the appropriate table with your IC/Principal.
Starting with the End in Sight…
Getting Down to the Basics with Length Measurement
Preparing Your Assessment Plan
Teacher Evaluation “SLO 101”
Mathematics and Special Education Leadership Protocols
Network Team Institute July 8-12, 2013
Gary Carlin, CFN 603 September, 2012
Setting Instructional Outcomes
Sachem Central School District Teacher Evaluation Training 2012
Connecticut Core Standards for English Language Arts & Literacy
Jeanie Behrend, FAST Coordinator Janine Quisenberry, FAST Assistant
Scoring Open-Ended Items
Developing Quality Assessments
Assessing Understanding
EDUC 2130 Quiz #10 W. Huitt.
Elementary Mathematics
Presentation transcript:

CFN 602 Math Ambassadors Tuesday, October 29th 2013

Agenda Opening Activity : “Rachel’s Coin Problem”    EngageNY Sample Module Questions: Anticipating Student Work    NYS Testing Program, Released Questions with Annotations, Gallery Activity Lunch Observing a Math classroom through the lens of Domains 2 and 3 of the FfT 3-2-1 Exit Ticket, Suggestions for Next Meeting Agenda

Reinforce the shift to content-rich, cognitively demanding instructional tasks accessible to all learners. Align classroom questioning techniques to Webb DOK levels and CCLS Math Practice Standards. Develop practices for anticipating and addressing student misunderstanding in math tasks. Establish protocols for looking at student work in teacher team settings in order to provide targeted feedback to students. Calibrate various types of summative assessments (curricular and state exam). Use Danielson’s FfT as a lens for self-evaluation and as a basis for professional dialogue between colleagues. Expected Outcomes

Opening Activity Reflection What elementary CONTENT standards might this task address? What middle school CONTENT standards might this task address?   Which mathematical practice standards would students utilize in this task? How might you incorporate this task into current/future units? Where in the curriculum might it fit well? Opening Activity Reflection

EngageNY Sample Module Questions: Anticipating Student Work Activity Time Introduction 5 min Work-it-out 10 min Identifying the Math of the Task Anticipate Possible Student Solutions 25 min Develop Instructional Questions Reflection EngageNY Sample Module Questions: Anticipating Student Work

EngageNY Sample Module Questions: Anticipating Student Work MIDDLE GRADES LEVEL (7th grade, Module 2, End of Module Assessment) The length of a rectangular envelope is times its width. A plastic band surrounds the front and back of the envelope to secure it as shown in the picture. The plastic band is inches long. Find the length and width of the envelope. EngageNY Sample Module Questions: Anticipating Student Work

EngageNY Sample Module Questions: Anticipating Student Work MIDDLE GRADES LEVEL (7th grade, Module 2, End of Module Assessment)   Level1 Level2 Level3 Level4 4 7.NS.A.3 7.EE.B.4a Student answered incorrectly and shows little or no understanding of how to find the missing dimensions of the envelope. Student used a valid process to arrive at either a correct length of inches or width of inches but did not provide both dimensions. OR Student related the length and width backwards, resulting in a length of inches and a width of inches. Student provided appropriate work and correct numerical values for the answer but without the units of measure. OR Student provided incorrect answer values based on a computational error, but used a valid method (i.e., ) and showed correct steps. Student correctly answered a length of inches and width of inches AND provided error-free work to support the answer. EngageNY Sample Module Questions: Anticipating Student Work

EngageNY Sample Module Questions: Anticipating Student Work ELEMENTARY GRADES LEVEL (4h grade, Module 3, Mid-Module Assessment)   Last year Mr. Petersen’s rectangular garden had a width of 5 meters and an area of 20 square meters and he was able to plant 4 rows of carrots with 13 plants in each row.   This year he wants to make the garden three times as long and two times as wide. In his new garden, he will plant twice as many rows with twice as many carrot plants in each. What is the area of his new garden and how many additional carrot plants will he plant this year? EngageNY Sample Module Questions: Anticipating Student Work

EngageNY Sample Module Questions: Anticipating Student Work ELEMENTARY GRADES LEVEL (4h grade, Module 3, Mid-Module Assessment)   A Progression Toward Mastery Assessment Task Item STEP 1 Little evidence of reasoning without a correct answer.   (1 Point) STEP 2 Evidence of some reasoning without a correct answer. (2 Points) STEP 3 Evidence of some reasoning with a correct answer or evidence of solid reasoning with an incorrect answer. (3 Points) STEP 4 Evidence of solid reasoning with a correct answer. (4 Points) 5   4.NBT.5 4.OA.1 4.OA.2 4.OA.3 4.MD.3 The student shows little to no reasoning and answers more than two parts incorrectly. The student correctly draws a representation of the new garden and attempts to find the area, but the solution may have some calculation errors. The student finds the area of the new garden but fails to appropriately determine the number of additional carrot plants that can be planted. This might be due to a calculation error or a misunderstanding of how to determine the number of additional plants as opposed to total new plants. The student correctly answers all parts of the question. EngageNY Sample Module Questions: Anticipating Student Work

Gallery Walk Choose a question and task review Share out with group NYS Testing Program, Released Questions with Annotations Activity Time Choose a question and task review 5 min Share out with group 10 min Commonalities and trends Gallery Walk 15 min Share Out Gallery Walk

Observing a Math classroom through the lens of Domains 2 and 3 of the FfT

Exit Ticket: 3-2-1 Protocol