Lecture 2: Fisher’s Variance Decomposition

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Lecture 8 Short-Term Selection Response
Advertisements

Chapter 6: Quantitative traits, breeding value and heritability Quantitative traits Phenotypic and genotypic values Breeding value Dominance deviation.
Quantitative genetics
Quantitative Genetics Up until now, we have dealt with characters (actually genotypes) controlled by a single locus, with only two alleles: Discrete Variation.
The Inheritance of Complex Traits
Quantitative Genetics Theoretical justification Estimation of heritability –Family studies –Response to selection –Inbred strain comparisons Quantitative.
Biometrical genetics Manuel Ferreira Shaun Purcell Pak Sham Boulder Introductory Course 2006.
Biometrical genetics Manuel Ferreira Shaun Purcell Pak Sham Boulder Introductory Course 2006.
Genetic Theory Manuel AR Ferreira Egmond, 2007 Massachusetts General Hospital Harvard Medical School Boston.
Lecture 4: Heritability. Heritability Narrow vs. board sense Narrow sense: h 2 = V A /V P Board sense: H 2 = V G /V P Slope of midparent-offspring regression.
Lecture 4: Basic Designs for Estimation of Genetic Parameters.
Lecture 5 Artificial Selection R = h 2 S. Applications of Artificial Selection Applications in agriculture and forestry Creation of model systems of human.
Quantitative Genetics
Extensions of the Breeder’s Equation: Permanent Versus Transient Response Response to selection on the variance.
Population Genetics: Populations change in genetic characteristics over time Ways to measure change: Allele frequency change (B and b) Genotype frequency.
Introduction to Basic and Quantitative Genetics. Darwin & Mendel Darwin (1859) Origin of Species –Instant Classic, major immediate impact –Problem: Model.
Reminder - Means, Variances and Covariances. Covariance Algebra.
Biometrical Genetics Pak Sham & Shaun Purcell Twin Workshop, March 2002.
Lecture 5 Short-Term Selection Response R = h 2 S.
NORMAL DISTRIBUTIONS OF PHENOTYPES Mice Fruit Flies In:Introduction to Quantitative Genetics Falconer & Mackay 1996.
Lecture 2: Basic Population and Quantitative Genetics.
PBG 650 Advanced Plant Breeding
Quantitative Trait Loci, QTL An introduction to quantitative genetics and common methods for mapping of loci underlying continuous traits:
PBG 650 Advanced Plant Breeding
Values & means (Falconer & Mackay: chapter 7) Sanja Franic VU University Amsterdam 2011.
Lecture 24: Quantitative Traits IV Date: 11/14/02  Sources of genetic variation additive dominance epistatic.
Lecture 21: Quantitative Traits I Date: 11/05/02  Review: covariance, regression, etc  Introduction to quantitative genetics.
NORMAL DISTRIBUTIONS OF PHENOTYPES Mice Fruit Flies In:Introduction to Quantitative Genetics Falconer & Mackay 1996.
24.1 Quantitative Characteristics Vary Continuously and Many Are Influenced by Alleles at Multiple Loci The Relationship Between Genotype and Phenotype.
IV. Variation in Quantitative Traits A. Quantitative Effects.
STT2073 Plant Breeding and Improvement. Quality vs Quantity Quality: Appearance of fruit/plant/seed – size, colour – flavour, taste, texture – shelflife.
I. Statistical Methods for Genome-Enabled Prediction of Complex Traits OUTLINE THE CHALLENGES OF PREDICTING COMPLEX TRAITS ORDINARY LEAST SQUARES (OLS)
NORMAL DISTRIBUTIONS OF PHENOTYPES
PBG 650 Advanced Plant Breeding
Genotypic value is not transferred from parent to
Genetics & Inheritance
NORMAL DISTRIBUTIONS OF PHENOTYPES
Genetics: Analysis and Principles
Introduction to Basic and Quantitative Genetics
Quantitative Variation
Statistical Tools in Quantitative Genetics
Spring 2009: Section 5 – Lecture 1
Genotypic value is not transferred from parent to
Genetics of qualitative and quantitative phenotypes
Linkage, Recombination, and Eukaryotic Gene Mapping
Correlation for a pair of relatives
Quantitative Genetics of Natural Variation: some questions
Lecture 4: Testing for Departures from Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium
Genetics – Patterns of Inheritance
Pak Sham & Shaun Purcell Twin Workshop, March 2002
CH22 Quantitative Genetics
Alternative hypotheses (i. e
Lecture 5 Artificial Selection
Pi = Gi + Ei Pi = pi - p Gi = gi - g Ei = ei - e _ _ _ Phenotype
Statistical Tools in Quantitative Genetics
The F2 Generation  1. F2 Population Mean and Variance (p = q = 0.5) 
Lecture 13: Inbreeding and Heterosis
Lecture 6: Inbreeding and Heterosis
Lecture 6: Inbreeding and Heterosis
Lecture 3: Resemblance Between Relatives
Lecture 14 Short-Termss Selection Response
Lecture 9: QTL Mapping II: Outbred Populations
Genotypic value is not transferred from parent to
Chapter 7 Beyond alleles: Quantitative Genetics
Genes and Heredity.
Cell Division To be able to understand mitosis and meiosis
The SWISS Family ?? ?? AA aa The genotype of an individual determines the phenotype. For the antennae and the nose, the alleles which code for the traits.
Genetics Review.
Inheritance & Variance Traits Vocabulary
Presentation transcript:

Lecture 2: Fisher’s Variance Decomposition

Contribution of a locus to a trait Basic model: P = G + E Phenotypic value -- we will occasionally also use z for this value Genotypic value Environmental value G = average phenotypic value for that genotype if we are able to replicate it over the universe of environmental values, G = E[P] Modifications: G - E covariance -- higher performing Animals may be disproportionately rewarded G x E interaction --- G values are different across environments. Basic model now becomes P = G + E + GE

Alternative parameterizations of Genotypic values Q1Q1 Q2Q1 Q2Q2 C C + a(1+k) C + 2a C C + a + d C + 2a C -a C + d C + a d measures dominance, with d = 0 if the heterozygote is exactly intermediate to the two homozygotes d = ak =G(Q1Q2 ) - [G(Q2Q2) + G(Q1Q1) ]/2 2a = G(Q2Q2) - G(Q1Q1) k = d/a is a scaled measure of the dominance

Example: Booroola (B) gene Genotype bb Bb BB Average Litter size 1.48 2.17 2.66 2a = G(BB) - G(bb) = 2.66 -1.46 --> a = 0.59 ak =d = G(Bb) - [ G(BB)+G(bb)]/2 = 0.10 k = d/a = 0.17

Fisher’s Decomposition of G One of Fisher’s key insights was that the genotypic value consists of a fraction that can be passed from parent to offspring and a fraction that cannot. G i j ° = ± b Dominance deviations --- the difference (for genotype AiAj) between the genotypic value predicted from the two single alleles and the actual genotypic value, G i j = π + Æ ± π G = X i j ¢ f r e q ( Q ) Mean value, with Average contribution to genotypic value for allele i Since parents pass along single alleles to their offspring, the ai (the average effect of allele i) represent these contributions b G i j = π + Æ The genotypic value predicted from the individual allelic effects is thus

G = π + Æ ± Fisher’s decomposition is a Regression G = π + 2 Æ ( ° ) N Residual error G i j = π + Æ ± Predicted value A notational change clearly shows this is a regression, Independent (predictor) variable N = # of Q2 alleles Regression slope Intercept G i j = π + 2 Æ 1 ( ° ) N ± Regression residual 2 Æ 1 + ( ° ) N = 8 > < : f o r ; e . g , Q

Allele Q1 common, a2 > a1 Slope = a2 - a1 Allele Q2 common, a1 > a2 Both Q1 and Q2 frequent, a1 = a2 = 0 1 2 N G G22 G11 G21

Æ = p a [ + k ( ° ) ] ± = G ° π Æ π = 2 p a ( 1 + k ) Genotype Q1Q1 Consider a diallelic locus, where p1 = freq(Q1) Genotype Q1Q1 Q2Q1 Q2Q2 Genotypic value a(1+k) 2a π G = 2 p a ( 1 + k ) Mean Allelic effects Æ 2 = p 1 a [ + k ( ° ) ] Dominance deviations ± i j = G ° π Æ

B V ( G ) = Æ + Average effects and Breeding Values i j B V = X ≥ Æ + The a values are the average effects of an allele Breeders focus on breeding value (BV) B V = n X k 1 ≥ Æ ( ) i + ¥ B V ( G i j ) = Æ + Why all the fuss over the BV? Consider the offspring of a QxQy sire mated to a random dam. What is the expected value of the offspring?

π ° = µ Æ + 2 ∂ B V ( S i r e ) G e n o t y p F r q u c V a l Q 1 / 4 x w 1 / 4 π + Æ ± z The expected value of an offspring is the expected value of µ For random w and z alleles, this has an expected value of zero ∂ µ ∂ For a random dam, these have expected value 0 π O = G + Æ x y 2 w z ± 4 π O ° G = µ Æ x + y 2 ∂ B V ( S i r e ) Hence,

B V ( S i r e ) = 2 π ° π ° = B V ( S i r e ) 2 + D a m G We can thus estimate the BV for a sire by twice the deviation of his offspring from the pop mean, B V ( S i r e ) = 2 π ° G More generally, the expected value of an offspring is the average breeding value of its parents, π ° G = B V ( S i r e ) 2 + D a m

æ = + Genetic Variances G = π + ( Æ ) ± 2 G A D æ ( G ) = X Æ + ± æ ( j = π g + ( Æ ) ± æ 2 ( G ) = π g + Æ i j ± As Cov(a,d) = 0 æ 2 ( G ) = n X k 1 Æ i + j ± Dominance Genetic Variance (or simply dominance variance) Additive Genetic Variance (or simply Additive Variance) æ 2 G = A + D

æ = ( p a k ) æ = p a [ + k ( ° ) ] æ = E [ Æ ] X p Q1Q1 Q1Q2 Q2Q2 0 a(1+k) 2a æ 2 A = E [ Æ ] m X i 1 p Since E[a] = 0, Var(a) = E[(a -ma)2] = E[a2] One locus, 2 alleles: Dominance effects additive variance æ 2 A = p 1 a [ + k ( ° ) ] When dominance present, asymmetric function of allele frequencies æ 2 D = E [ ± ] m X i 1 j p Equals zero if k = 0 One locus, 2 alleles: This is a symmetric function of allele frequencies æ 2 D = ( p 1 a k )

Additive variance, VA, with no dominance (k = 0) Allele frequency, p VA

Complete dominance (k = 1) VA VD Allele frequency, p

Overdominance (k = 2) VA VD Zero additive variance Allele frequency, p Allele frequency, p

Epistasis æ = + 2 G A D G = π + ( Æ ) ± A D DD Dominance value -- interaction between the two alleles at a locus Breeding value G i j k l = π + ( Æ ) ± A D DD Additive x Additive interactions -- interactions between a single allele at one locus with a single allele at another Additive x Dominant interactions -- interactions between an allele at one locus with the genotype at another, e.g. allele Ai and genotype Bkj Dominance x dominance interaction --- the interaction between the dominance deviation at one locus with the dominance deviation at another. These components are defined to be uncorrelated, (or orthogonal), so that æ 2 G = A + D