Solution Structure of ZASP PDZ Domain

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Structure of the Rho Family GTP-Binding Protein Cdc42 in Complex with the Multifunctional Regulator RhoGDI  Gregory R. Hoffman, Nicolas Nassar, Richard.
Advertisements

by Sunghyouk Park, Michael E. Johnson, and Leslie W.-M. Fung
Volume 9, Issue 10, Pages (October 2001)
Crystal Structure of the Tandem Phosphatase Domains of RPTP LAR
Volume 13, Issue 6, Pages (March 2004)
Anatomy of an Amyloidogenic Intermediate
Ross Alexander Robinson, Xin Lu, Edith Yvonne Jones, Christian Siebold 
Volume 35, Issue 2, Pages (July 2002)
Kristopher Josephson, Naomi J. Logsdon, Mark R. Walter  Immunity 
Volume 23, Issue 11, Pages (November 2015)
Volume 95, Issue 8, Pages (October 2008)
Solution Structure of a Cyanovirin-N:Manα1-2Manα Complex
Symmetry Recognizing Asymmetry
Solution Structure of the U11-48K CHHC Zinc-Finger Domain that Specifically Binds the 5′ Splice Site of U12-Type Introns  Henning Tidow, Antonina Andreeva,
Volume 3, Issue 9, Pages (September 1995)
Molecular Basis of Box C/D RNA-Protein Interactions
Volume 24, Issue 12, Pages (December 2016)
Volume 9, Issue 11, Pages (November 2001)
Volume 8, Issue 2, Pages (August 2001)
Volume 10, Issue 3, Pages (March 2002)
Volume 24, Issue 12, Pages (December 2016)
Structure and RNA Interactions of the N-Terminal RRM Domains of PTB
Volume 13, Issue 9, Pages (December 2015)
Diabetes Mutations Delineate an Atypical POU Domain in HNF-1α
Solution and Crystal Structures of a Sugar Binding Site Mutant of Cyanovirin-N: No Evidence of Domain Swapping  Elena Matei, William Furey, Angela M.
Volume 11, Issue 5, Pages (May 2003)
Ross Alexander Robinson, Xin Lu, Edith Yvonne Jones, Christian Siebold 
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages (May 2006)
Volume 4, Issue 5, Pages (November 1999)
Volume 21, Issue 10, Pages (October 2013)
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages 9-19 (October 2005)
A Conformational Switch in the CRIB-PDZ Module of Par-6
Volume 20, Issue 12, Pages (December 2012)
Structural Analysis of Ligand Stimulation of the Histidine Kinase NarX
Moosa Mohammadi, Joseph Schlessinger, Stevan R Hubbard  Cell 
Volume 8, Issue 7, Pages (July 2000)
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (April 2005)
The Crystal Structure of the Costimulatory OX40-OX40L Complex
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages (June 2013)
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages (February 2005)
Antonina Roll-Mecak, Chune Cao, Thomas E. Dever, Stephen K. Burley 
Unfolding Barriers in Bacteriorhodopsin Probed from the Cytoplasmic and the Extracellular Side by AFM  Max Kessler, Hermann E. Gaub  Structure  Volume.
Volume 12, Issue 7, Pages (July 2004)
Volume 17, Issue 7, Pages (July 2009)
Volume 19, Issue 1, Pages (January 2011)
Insights into Oncogenic Mutations of Plexin-B1 Based on the Solution Structure of the Rho GTPase Binding Domain  Yufeng Tong, Prasanta K. Hota, Mehdi.
Volume 101, Issue 4, Pages (May 2000)
Volume 13, Issue 7, Pages (July 2005)
Structural Basis for FGF Receptor Dimerization and Activation
Subdomain Interactions Foster the Design of Two Protein Pairs with ∼80% Sequence Identity but Different Folds  Lauren L. Porter, Yanan He, Yihong Chen,
Volume 11, Issue 8, Pages (August 2003)
Jeffrey J. Wilson, Rhett A. Kovall  Cell 
Solution Structure of a TBP–TAFII230 Complex
Structure of the Staphylococcus aureus AgrA LytTR Domain Bound to DNA Reveals a Beta Fold with an Unusual Mode of Binding  David J. Sidote, Christopher.
Volume 14, Issue 6, Pages (June 2006)
Volume 8, Issue 7, Pages (July 2000)
Hideki Kusunoki, Ruby I MacDonald, Alfonso Mondragón  Structure 
Solution Structure of the Proapoptotic Molecule BID
Volume 18, Issue 9, Pages (September 2010)
Structure and Interactions of PAS Kinase N-Terminal PAS Domain
Kristopher Josephson, Naomi J. Logsdon, Mark R. Walter  Immunity 
Structure of the Histone Acetyltransferase Hat1
Volume 7, Issue 12, Pages (January 1999)
Volume 20, Issue 7, Pages (July 2012)
A Plug Release Mechanism for Membrane Permeation by MLKL
Volume 14, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Tertiary structure of an immunoglobulin-like domain from the giant muscle protein titin: a new member of the I set  Mark Pfuhl, Annalisa Pastore  Structure 
Volume 13, Issue 6, Pages (March 2004)
Unfolding Barriers in Bacteriorhodopsin Probed from the Cytoplasmic and the Extracellular Side by AFM  Max Kessler, Hermann E. Gaub  Structure  Volume.
Volume 95, Issue 2, Pages (October 1998)
Presentation transcript:

Solution Structure of ZASP PDZ Domain Yunghan Au, R.Andrew Atkinson, Remo Guerrini, Geoff Kelly, Catherine Joseph, Steven R. Martin, Frederick W. Muskett, Alberto Pallavicini, Georgine Faulkner, Annalisa Pastore  Structure  Volume 12, Issue 4, Pages 611-622 (April 2004) DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2004.02.019

Figure 1 Diagram of the Sarcomere and Domain Architecture (A) Schematic representation of the sarcomere. The position of the Z disk and of the M line is indicated. A single molecule titin filament (indicated in green) connects the Z disk to the M line. In the Z disk, α-actinin-2 (in yellow) forms transversal connections between actin filaments (in red) and is thought to bind ZASP (in blue). (B) Domain architecture of the titin region localized in the Z disk, α-actinin-2, and ZASP (variant 3). Structure 2004 12, 611-622DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2004.02.019)

Figure 2 A 500 MHz 1H-15N HSQC Spectrum of ZASP-PDZ at pH 6.6 and 27°C Showing Backbone Resonance Assignments Side chain amide protons of asparagine and glutamine residues are indicated by solid horizontal lines. Structure 2004 12, 611-622DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2004.02.019)

Figure 3 Structure Bundles of ZASP-PDZ NMR bundles corresponding to the manually (top row) and automatically (bottom row) assigned structure families. From left to right are displayed the bundles without refinement (A and D), with RDC (B and E), and water refinement (C and F) respectively. No accepted structures contain distance violations >0.5 Å and/or no dihedral angle violations >5° from the experimental data. Structure 2004 12, 611-622DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2004.02.019)

Figure 4 Rmsd Comparison of Known PDZ Structures with 1PDR Pairwise comparison of the manually and automatically assigned bundles, 1kwa and 1qav structures with 1pdr, taken as a reference. The pairwise Z scores as obtained by WHATIF MOTIF option are plotted versus the sequence of 1pdr. The secondary structure elements of 1pdr are indicated underneath with yellow (β strands) and red (α helices) boxes. Structure 2004 12, 611-622DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2004.02.019)

Figure 5 Effects of the Titration between Combinations of ZASP-PDZ with α-Actinin-2 and Titin Constructs (A) Fluorescence titration of ZASP-PDZ against Act-EF34 (black diamonds), and the Act-EF34/tZr7 complex (white open circles). (B) Chemical shift variations of the spectrum of 15N-labeled Act-EF34 upon titration with unlabeled ZASP-PDZ plotted versus the Act-EF34 residue number. The data are reported for the titration of isolated Act-EF34 (white) and of Act-EF34 complexed tZr7 (black). (C) Chemical shift variations of the spectrum of 15N-labeled ZASP-PDZ upon titration with unlabeled Act-EF1234 (white) or Act-EF34 (black) plotted versus the ZASP-PDZ sequence. Structure 2004 12, 611-622DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2004.02.019)

Figure 6 Model of the ZASP-PDZ/Act-EF34/Titin-ZR7 Complex and ZASP-PDZ Mutants (A) Ribbon representation of the Act-EF34/tZr7/ZASP-PDZ ternary complex. The mutual orientation of Act-EF34 and ZASP-PDZ was chosen arbitrarily to avoid clashes between the two molecules. The observed chemical shift variations are reported on the structures: in purple are residues in intermediate exchange rate, in red and yellow are indicated chemical shift variations over 0.3 and 0.2 respectively (see Figure 5). Titin Zr7 is colored in green. (B) Hydrogen bond network between ZASP-PDZ and Act-EF34 in the complex. (C) Connolly surface representation (probe radius of 1.4 Å) of the trimeric complex, showing electrostatic complementarity. (D) Mapping of point mutations described in (Zhou et al., 2001) onto the structure of ZASP-PDZ. Structure 2004 12, 611-622DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2004.02.019)

Figure 7 Enigma Family PDZ Domain Homology Models (A) Sequence alignment of the PDZ domains of the enigma family. The numbering refers to ZASP. Stars, semicolons, and dots denote decreasing levels of conservation. Red stars are used for the residues most affected by binding (see Figure 5B). (B) Comparative models of other PDZ domains from the enigma family. Highlighted red, orange, and yellow residues correspond to identical positions and decreasing levels of similarity of the sequence in a pairwise comparison with ZASP-PDZ. White are nonconserved residues. The sequence conservation across the whole family is mapped on the structure marked “ALL.” A green arrow indicates the strand involved in α-actinin-2 binding. Structure 2004 12, 611-622DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2004.02.019)